Abstracts
Abstract
Informed by eighteen months of ethnographic fieldwork in Montmartre, one of the last village-like neighbourhoods in Paris, in this paper, I analyze how people in this community talked through and acted out the COVID-19 pandemic. Using theoretical frameworks from linguistic, cognitive and medical anthropology, I examine “small stories” (Georgakopoulou 2007) about COVID-19, in particular, the analogical and conceptual aspects of this talk. How do people construct understandings of crisis as it evolves? What does this process look like when talk becomes action and reaction and what does it say about the future?
This paper explores how people employed analogy, cultural scripts and other linguistic wor(l)d-building tools in their talk about their experiences and comprehensions of COVID-19. Following the arguments of Ochs (2012), I propose that talking about COVID-19 is itself an experience of the virus, an experience that informs people’s understandings of their present circumstances and future possibilities.
Keywords:
- COVID-19,
- human futures,
- sense-making,
- linguistic anthropology,
- medical anthropology
Résumé
À partir de dix-huit mois de travail ethnographique sur le terrain à Montmartre, l’un des derniers quartiers de Paris ressemblant à un village, j’analyse dans cet article la manière dont les membres de cette communauté ont parlé de la pandémie de COVID-19 et l’ont mise en scène. En utilisant des cadres théoriques issus de l’anthropologie linguistique, cognitive et médicale, j’examine les « petites histoires » (Georgakopoulou 2007) sur la COVID-19, en particulier les aspects analogiques et conceptuels de ce discours. Comment les gens construisent-ils leur compréhension de la crise au fur et à mesure qu’elle évolue ? À quoi ressemble ce processus lorsque le discours se transforme en action et en réaction, et qu’est-ce que cela dit de l’avenir ?
Cet article explore la manière dont les gens ont utilisé l’analogie, les scripts culturels et d’autres outils linguistiques de construction du travail dans leur discours sur leurs expériences et leur compréhension de la COVID-19. Suivant les arguments d’Ochs (2012), je propose de parler de la COVID-19 comme d’un fait qui constitue en soi une expérience du virus, une expérience de la maladie.
Mots-clés :
- COVID-19,
- avenirs humains,
- création de sens,
- anthropologie linguistique,
- anthropologie médicale
Appendices
Bibliography
- Black, Steven P. 2021a. “Portable Values, Inequities, and Techno-Optimism in Global Health Storytelling.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 31 (1): 25–42. https://anthrosource.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jola.12297.
- Black, Steven P. 2021b. “Linguistic Anthropology and COVID-19.” Anthropology News website, 26 March. Accessed 6 August 2021. https://www.anthropology-news.org/articles/linguistic-anthropology-and-covid-19/.
- Blommaert, Jan. 2020. “The coronavirus crisis of 2020 and Globalization.” Diggit Magazine, 3 December. Accessed 6 August 2021. https://www.diggitmagazine.com/column/coronavirus-globalization.
- Briggs, Charles L. 2002. “Why Nation States and Journalists Can’t Teach People to Be Healthy.” Medical Anthropology Quarterly 17 (3): 287–321. https://doi.org/10.1525/maq.2003.17.3.287.
- Davies, Christie. 1982. “Sexual Taboos and Social Boundaries.” American Journal of Sociology 87 (5): 1032–1063. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2778417.
- Douglas, Mary. 2002 (1966). Purity and Danger. New York: Routledge Classics.
- Foucault, Michel. 1969. L’archéologie du savoir. Paris: Gallimard.
- Georgakopoulou, Alexandra. 2007. Small Stories, Interaction and Identities. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
- Good, Byron. 1994. Medicine, Rationality and Experience: An Anthropological Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Hariman, Robert. 2016. “Public Culture.” Communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Accessed 27 November 2022. https://oxfordre.com/communication/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228613-e-32.
- Hofstadter, Douglas and Emmanuel Sander. 2010. Surfaces and Essences: Analogy as the Fuel and Fire of Thinking. New York: Basic Books.
- Inhorn, Marcia C. and Peter J. Brown. 1990. “The Anthropology of Infectious Disease.” Annual Review of Anthropology 19: 89–117. https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.000513.
- Lambert, Anne and Joanie Cayouette-Remblière, eds. 2021. L’explosion des inégalités : Classes, genre et générations face à la crise sanitaire. Paris: Éditions de l’Aube.
- Lee, Gregory B. 2013. “Migration et diaspora chinoises : La Chine et les chinois dans l’imaginaire des français.” Huaqiao: Regards sur les présences chinoises à Valence, Centre du patrimoine arménien, Valence, March, Valence, France. Accessed 14 August 2021. https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-02070372/.
- Longhi, J. 2022. “The Parascientific Communication around Didier Raoult’s Expertise and the Debates in the Media and on Digital Social Networks during the COVID-19 Crisis in France.” Publications 10 (7): 1–16. https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/10/1/7.
- Masquelier, Bertrand. 1993. “Parler de la maladie. Querelles et langage chez les Ide du Cameroun.” Journal des Africanistes 63: 21–33. https://www.persee.fr/doc/jafr_0399-0346_1993_num_63_1_2370.
- Mattingly, Cheryl and Linda G. Garro, eds. 2001. Narrative and the Cultural Construction of Illness and Healing. Berkley: University of California Press.
- Ochs, Elinor. 2012. “Experiencing language.” Anthropological Theory 12 (2): 142–160. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1463499612454088.
- Roitman, Janet. 2021. “Crisis.” Political Concepts: A Critical Lexicon. Accessed 20 June 2022. https://www.politicalconcepts.org/roitman-crisis/#fn81.
- Singer, Merrill. 2014. Anthropology of Infectious Disease. Walnut Creek, California: Left Coast Press.
- Sontag, Susan. 2002 (1979 and 1989). Illness as Metaphor and AIDS and Its Metaphors. New York: Penguin Classics.
- Wang, Simeng. 2020. “Compte rendu : Mission d’information sur l’émergence et l’évolution des différentes formes de racisme et les réponses à y apporter.” Assemblée Nationale, 7 July, Compte Rendu 5. Accessed 14 August 2021. https://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/dyn/opendata/CRCANR5L15S2020PO768631N005.html.
- Wiercinski, Andrew. 2013. “Hermeneutic Notion of a Human Being as an Acting and Suffering Person: Thinking with Paul Ricoeur.” Ethics in Progress 4 (2): 18–33. https://doi.org/10.14746/eip.2013.2.2.