Résumés
Résumé
Objectif Les troubles de la personnalité et la violence conjugale (VC) sont deux problématiques reconnues comme des enjeux majeurs en santé publique associées à de graves répercussions individuelles et sociétales. Plusieurs études ont documenté les liens entre le trouble de personnalité limite (TPL) et la VC, mais nous en connaissons très peu quant aux traits pathologiques spécifiques contribuant à la VC. L’étude vise à documenter le phénomène de VC commise et subie chez des personnes souffrant de TPL et à dresser des profils à partir des facettes de la personnalité du Modèle alternatif pour les troubles de la personnalité du DSM-5.
Méthode Cent huit participants/participantes avec un TPL (83,3 % femmes ; Mâge = 32,39, É.-T. = 9) référées à un programme d’hôpital de jour à la suite d’un épisode de crise ont rempli une batterie de questionnaires comprenant les versions françaises du Revised Conflict Tactics Scales, évaluant la VC psychologique et physique, commise et subie, et du Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 — FacetedBrief Form, évaluant 25 facettes pathologiques de la personnalité.
Résultats Parmi les participants/participantes, 78,7 % rapportent avoir déjà commis de la VC psychologique, alors que 68,5 % en auraient été victimes, ce qui est plus que les estimations publiées par l’Organisation mondiale de la santé (27 %). De plus, 31,5 % auraient commis de la VC physique, alors que 22,2 % en auraient été victimes. La VC semble bidirectionnelle puisque 85,9 % des personnes ayant commis de la VC psychologique rapportent aussi en subir et 52,9 % des personnes ayant commis de la VC physique rapportent en être également victimes. Des comparaisons de groupes non paramétriques indiquent que les facettes Hostilité, Méfiance, Duplicité, Prise de risques et Irresponsabilité distinguent les personnes violentes physiquement et psychologiquement des personnes non violentes. Des résultats élevés aux facettes Hostilité, Dureté/Insensibilité, Manipulation et Prise de risque caractérisent les participants/participantes victimes de VC psychologique, alors qu’une élévation aux facettes Hostilité, Retrait, Évitement de l’intimité et Prise de risque et un résultat faible à la facette Tendance à la soumission distinguent les participants/participantes victimes de VC physique des non-victimes. Des analyses de régression mettent en évidence que la facette Hostilité explique à elle seule une variance significative des résultats de VC commise, alors que la facette Irresponsabilité contribuerait de façon substantielle à la variance des résultats de VC subie.
Conclusion Les résultats font état de la prévalence élevée de VC chez des personnes aux prises avec un TPL ainsi que de son caractère bidirectionnel. Au-delà du diagnostic de TPL, certaines facettes spécifiques de la personnalité (dont l’Hostilité et l’Irresponsabilité) permettent de cibler les personnes plus à risque de commettre de la VC psychologique et physique et d’en subir.
Mots-clés :
- trouble de personnalité limite,
- violence conjugale,
- violence physique,
- violence psychologique,
- modèle alternatif pour les troubles de la personnalité
Abstract
Objective Personality disorders and intimate partner violence (IPV) are two problems recognized as major public health issues associated with serious individual and societal repercussions. Several studies have documented the links between borderline personality disorder (BPD) and IPV; however, we know very little about the specific pathological traits contributing to IPV. The study aims to document the phenomenon of IPV committed and suffered in persons with BPD and to draw profiles from the personality facets of the DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD).
Method One hundred and eight BPD participants (83.3% female; Mage = 32.39, SD = 9.00) referred to a day hospital program following a crisis episode completed a battery of questionnaires including the French versions of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales, evaluating physical and psychological IPV committed and suffered, and the Personality Inventory for the DSM-5- Faceted Brief Form, evaluating 25 pathological facets of personality.
Results Among the participants, 78.7% report having committed psychological IPV, while 68.5% have been victims, which is more than the estimates published by the World Health Organization (27%). In addition, 31.5% would have committed physical IPV, while 22.2% would have been victims. IPV appears to be bidirectional since 85.9% of participants who are perpetrators of psychological IPV also report suffering from it and 52.9% of participants who are perpetrators of physical IPV report being also victims. Nonparametric group comparisons indicate that Hostility, Suspiciousness, Duplicity, Risk-Taking, and Irresponsibility facets distinguish physically and psychologically violent participants from nonviolent participants. High results on Hostility, Callousness, Manipulation, and Risk-taking facets characterize participants who are victims of psychological IPV, while an elevation in Hostility, Withdrawal, Avoidance of intimacy, and Risk-taking facets and a low result on the Submission facet distinguish participants who are victims of physical IPV from non-victims. Regression analyzes show that the Hostility facet alone explains a significant variance in the results of IPV perpetrated, while the Irresponsibility facet contributes substantially to the variance of the results of IPV experienced.
Conclusion Results show the high prevalence of IPV in a sample of persons with BPD, as well as its bidirectional nature. Beyond the diagnosis of BPD, certain specific facets of the personality (including Hostility and Irresponsability) make it possible to target persons at greater risk of committing and suffering from psychological and physical IPV.
Keywords:
- borderline personality disorder,
- intimate partner violence,
- physical violence,
- psychological violence,
- DSM-5 alternative model of personality disorders
Parties annexes
Bibliographie
- Adams, A. E., Sullivan, C. M., Bybee, D. et Greeson, M. R. (2008). Development of the Scale of Economic Abuse. Violence Against Women, 14, 563-588. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1077801208315529
- American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5e éd.). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596
- Asen, E. et Fonagy, P. (2017). Mentalizing family violence part 1 : Conceptual framework. Family Process, 56(1), 6-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12261
- Bateman, A. et Fonagy, P. (2004). Mentalization-based treatment of BPD. Journal of Personality Disorders, 18(1), 36-51. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.18.1.36.32772
- Benazon, N. R. et Coyne, J. C. (2000). Living with a depressed spouse. Journal of Family Psychology, 14, 71-79. https://doi.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0893-3200.14.1.71
- Black, M. C. (2011). Intimate partner violence and adverse health consequences : Implications for clinicians. American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine, 5(5), 428-439. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1559827611410265
- Bouchard, S., Sabourin, S., Lussier, Y. et Villeneuve, É. (2009). Relationship quality and stability in couples when one partner suffers from borderline personality disorder. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 35, 446-455. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2009.00151.x
- Breiding, M. J., Basile, K. C., Smith, S. G., Black, M. C. et Mahendra, R. (2015). Intimate partner violence surveillance : Uniform definitions and recommended data elements (version 2.0). Atlanta, GA : Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control.
- Capaldi, D. M., Shortt, J. W. et Crosby, L. (2003). Physical and Psychological Aggression in at-risk young couples : Stability and change in young adulthood. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1353/mpq.2003.0001
- Christensen, A. (1987). Detection of conflict pattern in couples. Dans K. Hahlweg et M. J. Goldstein (dir.), Understanding major mental disorder : The contribution of family interaction research (p. 250-265). Family Process Press.
- Collison, K. L. et Lynam, D. R. (2021). Personality disorders as predictors of intimate partner violence : A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 88, 102047.
- Cotter, A. (2021). Intimate partner violence in Canada, 2018 : An overview. Juristat, 41 (1), 85-002-X. Récupéré le 7 avril 2022 à https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/85-002-x/2021001/article/00003-eng.pdfà
- Dowgwillo, E. A., Ménard, K. S., Krueger, R. F. et Pincus, A. L. (2016). DSM-5 pathological personality traits and intimate partner violence among male and female college students. Violence and Victims, 31(3), 416-437. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-14-00109
- Fruzzetti, A. E. et Fruzzetti, A. R. (2003). Borderline personality disorder. Dans D. K. Snyder et M. A. Whisman (dir.), Treating difficult couples : Helping clients with coexisting mental and relationship disorders (p. 235-260). Guilford Press.
- Fruzzetti, A. E., Stantisteban, D. A. et Hoffman, P. D. (2007). Dialectical behavior therapy with families. Dans L. A. Dimeff et K. Koerner (dir.), Dialectical behavior therapy in clinical practice : Applications across disorders and settings (p. 222-244). Guilford Press.
- Garcia-Moreno, C., Jansen, H. A. F. M., Ellsberg, M., Heise, L., Watts, C. H. (2006) et WHO Multi-country Study on Women’s Health and Domestic Violence against Women Study Team. (2006). Prevalence of intimate partner violence : findings from the WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence, The Lancet, 368(9543), 1260-1269. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69523-8.
- Harland, K. K., Peek-Asa, C. et Saftlas, A. F. (2018). Intimate Partner Violence and Controlling Behaviors Experienced by Emergency Department Patients : Differences by Sexual Orientation and Gender Identification. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(11-12) :NP6125-NP6143.
- Hill, J., Stepp, S. D., Wan, M. W., Hope, H., Morse, J. Q., Steele, M., Steele, H. et Pilkonis, P. A. (2011). Attachment, borderline personality, and romantic relationship dysfunction. Journal of Personality Disorder, 25(6), 789-805. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2011.25.6.789
- Hines, D. A. et Saudino, K. J. (2003). Gender differences in psychological, physical, and sexual aggression among college students using the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales. Violence and Victims, 18, 197-217. https://doi.org/10.1891/vivi.2003.18.2.197
- Holtzworth-Munroe, A., Meehan, J. C., Herron, K., Rehman, U. et Stuart, G. L. (2000). Testing the Holtzworth-Munroe and Stuart (1994) batterer typology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 1000-1019. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-006x.68.6.1000
- Holtzworth-Munroe, A. et Stuart, G. L. (1994). Typologies of male batterers : Three subtypes and the differences among them. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 476-497. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.116.3.476
- Jennings, M. (2017). The association between DSM-5 personality pathology traits and violence. SMU Journal of Undergraduate Research, 3(6). https://doi.org/10.25172/jour.3.1.6
- Krueger, R. F., Derringer, J., Markon, K. E., Watson, D. et Skodol, A. E. (2012). Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM-5. Psychological Medicine, 42(9), 1879-1890. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291711002674
- Landucci, J. et Foley, G. N. (2014). Couples therapy : Treating selected personality-disordered couples within a dynamic therapy framework. Innovations in Clinical Neuroscience, 11(3-4), 29-36. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1353/mpq.2003.0001
- Leclerc, P., Savard, C., Sellbom, M., Côté, A., Nolin, M.-C., Payant M., Roy, D. et Gamache, D. (2023). Investigating the Validity and Measurement Invariance of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Faceted Brief Form among French-speaking Clinical and Nonclinical Samples. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment. Prépublication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-022-10000-0
- Linehan, M. M., Armstrong, H. E. et Suarez, A. (1991). Cognitive-behavioral treatment of chronically parasuicidal borderline patients. Archive of General Psychiatry, 48(12), 1060-1064. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1991.01810360024003
- Links, P. S. et Stockwell, M. (2001). Is couple therapy indicated for borderline personality disorder ? American Journal of Psychotherapy, 55(4), 491-506.
- Lussier, Y. (1997). Traduction française de l’échelle révisée des stratégies de résolution de conflits. Document inédit, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières.
- Ménard, K. S. et Pincus, A. L. (2014). Child maltreatment, personality pathology, and stalking victimization among male and female college students. Violence and Victims,29(2), 300-316. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.vv-d-12-00098r1
- Miano, P., Bellomare, M. et Genova, V. G. (2021). Personality correlates of gaslighting behaviours in young adults. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 27(3), 285-298. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2020.1850893
- Moskowitz, A. (2004). Dissociation and violence : A review of the literature. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 5(1), 21-46. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838003259321
- Munro, O. E. et Sellbom, M. (2021). Evaluating borderline personality disorder traits in the context of an intimate partner violence intervention programme. Psychology, Crime et Law. Prépublication. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2021.1929976
- Munro, O. E. et Sellbom, M. (2020). Elucidating the relationship between borderline personality disorder and intimate partner violence. Personality and Mental Health, 14(3), 284-303. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmh.1480
- Navarro-Gómez, S., Frías, A. et Palma, C. (2017). Romantic Relationships of People with Borderline Personality : A Narrative Review. Psychopathology, 50(3), 175-187. https://doi.org/10.1159/000474950
- Organisation mondiale de la santé (2017). Violence Against Women. Repéré le 18 mars 2022 de https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/violence-against-women
- Pereira, M. E., Azeredo, A., Moreira, D., Brandão, I. et Almeida, F. (2020). Personality characteristics of victims of intimate partner violence : A systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 52 :101423. https://doi,org/10.1016/j.avb.2020.101423
- Pico-Alfonso, M., Echeburua, E. et Martinez, M. (2008). Personality disorder symptoms in women as a result of chronic intimate male partner violence. Journal of Family Violence, 23(7), 577-588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-008-9180-9.
- Roskam, I., Galdiolo, S., Hansenne, M., Massoudi, K., Rossier, J., Gicquel, L. et Rolland, J.-P. (2015). The psychometric properties of the French version of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5. PLoS ONE, 10, Article e0133413. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133413
- Smith, S. G., Zhang, X., Basile, K. C., Merrick, M. T., Wang, J., Kresnow, M. et Chen, J. (2018). The National Intimate Partner and sexual violence survey (NISVS) : 2015 data Brief—Updated release. Atlanta, GA : National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
- Spencer, C., Mallory, A. B., Cafferky, B. M., Kimmes, J. G., Beck, A. R. et Stith, S. M. (2019). Mental health factors and intimate partner violence perpetration and victimization : A meta-analysis. Psychology of Violence, 9(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000156
- Statistique Canada. (2019). Just Facts : Intimate Partner Violence. Department of Justice Canada.
- Stern, R. (2007). The gaslight effect : How to spot and survive the hidden manipulations other people use to control your life. Morgan road books.
- Stover, C. S., Meadows, A. L. et Kaufman, J. (2009). Interventions for intimate partner violence : Review and implications for evidence-based practice. Professional Psychology : Research and Practice, 40(3), 223-233. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012718
- Straus, M. A. et Douglas, E. M. (2004). A short form of the revised conflict tactics scales, and typologies for severity and mutuality. Violence and Victims, 19(5), 507-520. https://doi.org/10.1891/vivi.19.5.507.63686
- Straus, M. A., Hamby, S. L., Boney-McCoy, S. et Sugarman, D. B. (1996). The revised conflict tactics scales (CTS2). Development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues 17, 283-316. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F019251396017003001
- West, M. et George, C. (1999). Abuse and violence in intimate adult relationships : New perspectives from attachment theory. Attachment & Human Development,1(2), 137-156. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616739900134201
- Yeomans, F.E., Clarkin, J. F. et Kernberg, O. F. (2015). Transference-focused psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder : A clinical guide. American Psychiatric Publishing.
- Zanarini, M. C., Frankenburg, F. R., Reich, D. B., Marino, M. F., Haynes, M. C. et Gunderson, J. G. (1999). Violence in the lives of adult borderline patients. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 187(2), 65-71. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005053-199902000-00001
- Zhang, T., Hoddenbagh, J., McDonald, S. et Scrim, K. (2013). Une estimation de l’incidence économique de la violence conjugale au Canada en 2009. Récupéré le 7 avril 2022 à https://www.justice.gc.ca/fra/pr-rp/jp-cj/vf-fv/rr12_7/index.html