The articles in this special issue of Romanticism on the Net are derived from papers delivered at the ‘Romantic Spectacle’ conference, held at Roehampton University London in association with the University of Bristol in July 2006. The focus upon ‘Romantic Spectacle’ aims to promote and stimulate new modes of thinking about the aesthetic and ideological impact of visual cultural production in the Romantic period. The word ‘spectacle’ is intentionally tendentious: unlike a more neutral word such as ‘image’, the idea of ‘spectacle’ implies the emergence of conspicuous new types of visual effects in British culture of the late eighteenth century. It is clear from the variety of topics covered by the articles in this volume that this new cultural practice had numerous causes and manifestations. A crucial development was the cultural authority of theories of sensibility and the sublime, both of which placed an intensified emphasis on the visual representation of suffering. The idea that sensational violent imagery could have a redemptive moral effect on the suitably refined reader or spectator had a profound impact on eighteenth-century literary and artistic culture. In response to the cataclysmic events which became the historical bedrock of Romanticism – revolution, global warfare, imperial expansion, the slave trade – an expanding Romantic print culture invested heavily in set-piece dramas of hyperbolic distress. The Gothic imagination is the best-known and most enduring legacy of this cultural shift, but one aim of ‘Romantic spectacle’ is to recover a much wider field of cultural production and consumption. The quest for sublime and awe-inspiring visual effects was not restricted to depicting (in verbal or visual form) scenes of violent or hyperbolic suffering. Burke’s influential writings on the sublime identified a range of proto-Romantic spectacles which would guarantee the (assumed masculine) frisson of elevated terror and awe: colossal natural scenery (mountains, caves), notions of infinity or vastness, and ‘obscure’ or hyperbolic images of power. The notion of spectacle as a cultural tool of dictatorship was a particularly influential feature of the Burkean sublime: as Burke notes, ‘Those despotic governments, which are founded on the passions of men, and principally upon the passion of fear, keep their chief as much as may be from the public eye’ (231). Thomas Paine was in little doubt about the degrading effects of displays of terror such as public executions: ‘The effect of those cruel spectacles exhibited to the populace, is to destroy tenderness, or excite revenge; and by the base and false idea of governing men by terror, instead of reason, they become precedents’ (57-8). Following Burke’s approval of ‘judicious obscurity’ rather than Paine’s critique of repressive spectacle, revisionist historians have argued that popular spectacles of political, religious and military power played a crucial role in shaping British national identity in the late eighteenth century. But the political use of spectacle was not the sole prerogative of the state. From the 1760s onwards (the era of ‘Wilkes and Liberty’) popular politics became increasingly theatricalized and popular culture became increasingly politicized. Though the unreformed electoral system, as seen in Hogarth’s prints, could often resemble a carnival or urban riot, the disciplined mass political rally became the radical ‘answer’ to the loyalist military parade or royal procession. To mention Hogarth also reminds us that the spectacular vignettes of caricature prints became hugely popular modes of imagining and disseminating political ideas and social themes. Though they are poles apart in many ways, Gillray and Blake were both concerned to visualize sublime power and hyperbolic experience. However their work must also be placed in a much broader and diverse economy of visual spectacle and display which embraced both …
Parties annexes
Works Cited
- Altick, Richard D. The Shows of London Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1978
- Barker-Benfield, James G. Sensibility. In Iain McCalman and Jon Mee, eds. An Oxford Companion to the Romantic Age: British Culture 1776-1832 Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999
- Brewer, John, Neil McKendrick and J. H. Plumb. The Birth of Consumer Society: The Commercialization of Eighteenth-Century England London: Europa Publications, 1982
- Brewer, John and Anne Bermingham. The Consumption of Culture, 1600-1800: image, object, text London: Routledge, 1995
- Burke, Edmund. A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful (1757). In The Writings and Speeches of Edmund Burke. Volume 1. The Early Writings ed. T O McLoughlin and James T Boulton. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987
- Burwick, Frederick. "Romantic Drama from Optics to Illusion." Literature and Science: Theory & Practice. Ed. Stuart Peterfreund. Boston: Northeastern University Press, 1990.
- Castle, Terry. The Female Thermometer: 18th Century Culture and the Invention of the Uncanny. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.
- Castle, Terry. The Female Thermometer: Eighteenth Century Culture and the Invention of the Uncanny New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995
- Chandler, James K., and Kevin Gilmartin ‘Introduction: engaging the eidometropolis.’ In James K.Chandler and Kevin Gilmartin Eds. Romantic Metropolis: The Urban Scene of British Culture, 1780-1840 Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005
- Colley, Linda. Britons: Forging the Nation, 1707-1837 New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press, 1992
- Coyne, Richard. Technoromanticism: Digital Narrative, Holism, and the Romance of the Real Cambridge, Massachusetts and London: The MIT Press, 1999
- Darley, Andrew. Visual Digital Culture: Surface play and spectacle in the new digital media London and New York: Routledge, 2000
- De Bolla, Peter. The Education of the Eye: Painting, Landscape, and Architecture in Eighteenth-Century Britain Stanford, California: Stanford University Press, 2003
- During, Simon. Modern Enchantments: The Cultural Power of Secular Magic Cambridge, Massachusetts and London: Harvard University Press, 2002
- Epstein, James. Radical Expression: political language, ritual, and symbol in England, 1790-1850 New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994
- Gatrell, Vic. City of Laughter: Sex and Satire in Eighteenth-Century London London: Atlantic Books, 2006
- Haywood, Ian. Bloody Romanticism: Spectacular Violence and the Politics of Representation 1776-1832 Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2006
- McCalman, Iain. ‘The Art of De Loutherbourg’s Eidophusikon’ in Ann Bermingham, ed. Sensation and Sensibility: Viewing Gainsborough’s ‘Cottage Door’ New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2005, 180-97.
- Miles, Robert. Gothic Technologies: Visuality in the Romantic Era Praxis series, Romantic Circles
- Paine, Thomas. The Rights of Man London: Penguin, 1984
- Russell, Gillian. Theatres of War: Performance, Politics and Society 1793-1815 Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995
- Shaw, Philip. Waterloo and the Romantic Imagination Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2002
- Stafford, Barbara Maria and Frances Terpak. Devices of Wonder: From the World in a Box to Images on a Screen Los Angeles: Getty Research Institute, 2001.
- Stafford, Barbara Maria. Artful Science: Enlightenment Entertainment and the Eclipse of Visual Education. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1994.
- Wood, Gillan D’Arcy. The Shock of the Real:Romanticism and Visual Culture, 1760-1860 Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2001
- Wood, Marcus. Blind Memory: Visual Representations of Slavery in England and America 1780-1865 Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2000
- William Wordsworth, The Prelude 1799, 1805, 1850.Ed Jonathan Wordsworth, M. H. Abrams and Stephen Gill. London: W. W. Norton, 1979.