Résumés
Résumé
Le texte s’intéresse à la formation technopédagogique des futurs enseignants, et plus précisément, aux pratiques à déployer en formation initiale pour accroître leur compétence professionnelle à intégrer les TIC. Les pratiques proposées prennent appui sur la théorie du sentiment d’autoefficacité d’Albert Bandura, ce sentiment pouvant influencer leur compétence à intégrer les TIC. Appuyé par des travaux empiriques, le texte aborde les sources susceptibles d’influencer l’autoefficacité à intégrer les TIC dans un cadre pédagogique et identifie des pistes d’action à envisager. Enfin, la réflexion amène à repenser les interventions des formateurs tant en formation initiale qu’en formation continue et à remettre en question, sur le plan empirique, les dispositifs de formation.
Mots-clés :
- Compétence professionnelle,
- intégration des TIC,
- formation initiale,
- autoefficacité,
- sources d’influence
Abstract
The text focuses on the technopedagogical training of pre-service teachers and the preferred practices in pre-service training to enhance their professional competence to integrate ICT. The practices are based on the self-efficacy theory of Albert Bandura; the self-efficacy which may influence the use of ICT in class. Supported by empirical works, the text addresses the sources of self-efficacy which influence ICT integration in educational settings and identifies actions to consider. Finally, the text reconsiders trainers’ interventions both in pre and in-service training, and questions empirically training devices.
Keywords:
- Professional competence,
- ICT integration,
- pre-service teaching,
- self-efficacy,
- sources of self-efficacy
Veuillez télécharger l’article en PDF pour le lire.
Télécharger
Parties annexes
Bibliographie
- Albion, P. R. (1999). Self-efficacy beliefs as an indicator of teachers’ preparedness for teaching with technology. Dans J. Price, J. Willis, D. Willis, M. Jost et S. Boger-Mehall (dir.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 1999 (p. 1602-1608). Récupéré du site University of Southern Queensland ePrint : http://eprints.usq.edu.au
- Al-Awidi, H. M. et Alghazo, I. M. (2012). The effect of student teaching experience on preservice elementary teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs for technology integration in the UAE. Educational Techology Research and Development, 60(5), 923-941. doi: 10.1007/s11423-012-9239-4
- Anderson, S. L. et Betz, N. E. (2001). Sources of self-efficacy expectations : Their measurement and relation to career development. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58(1), 98-117. doi:10.1006/jvbe.2000.1753
- Angeli, C. et Valanides, N. (2005). Preservice elementary teachers as information and communication technology designers : an instructional systems design model based on an expanded view of pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(4), 292-302. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00135.x
- Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy : Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191 Récupéré du site de l’Université du Kentucky : http://www.uky.edu
- Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy : The exercise of control. New York, NY : Freeman.
- Bandura, A. (2007). Auto-efficacité : le sentiment d’efficacité personnelle (J. Lecomte, trad.). Bruxelles : De Boeck. (Ouvrage original publié en 1997 sous le titre Self-efficacy, New York, NY : Freeman).
- Bong, M. et Skaalvik, E. M. (2003). Academic self-concept and self-efficacy : How different are they really? Educational Psychology Review, 15(1), 1-40.
- Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L. et Tsai, C.-C. (2010). Facilitating preservice teachers’ development of technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge (TPACK). Education Technology & Society, 13(4), 63-73. Récupéré de http://ifets.info/
- Choi, N. (2003). Further examination of the self-efficacy scale. Psychological Reports, 92(2), 473-480. doi:10.2466/pr0.2003.92.2.473
- Coen, P.-F. (2012). Formation aux TICE des formateurs d’enseignants : un tissage entre formation et autoformation. Revue internationale des technologies en pédagogie universitaire, 9(1-2), 136-147. doi:10.7202/1012907ar
- Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs : The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25-39. doi:10.1007/bf02504683
- Ertmer, P. A et Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change : How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255-284. doi:10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551
- Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. et York, C. S. (2006). Exemplary technology-using teachers : Perceptions of factors influencing success. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 23(2), 55-61.
- Gloudemans, H., Schalk, R., Reynaert, W. et Braeken, J. (2013). The development and validation of a five-factor model of sources of self-efficacy in clinical nursing education. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, 3(3), 80-87. doi:10.5430/jnep.v3n3p80
- Guzman, A. et Nussbaum, M. (2009). Teaching competencies for technology integration in the classroom. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(5), 453-469. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00322.x Récupéré du site Centro de estudios de políticas Y prácticas en educación : http://www.ceppe.cl
- Hammond, M., Reynolds, L. et Ingram, J. (2011). How and why do student teachers use ICT? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(3), 191-203. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00389.x Récupéré de l’archive WRAP de l’Université de Warwick : http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk
- Hodges, C. B. et Murphy, P. F. (2009). Sources of self-efficacy beliefs of students in a technology-intensive asynchronous college algebra course. The Internet and Higher Education, 12(2), 93-97. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.06.005
- Hsu, Y.-S., Wu, H.-K. et Hwang, F.-K. (2007). Factors influencing junior high school teachers’ computer-based instructional practices regarding their instructional evolution stages. Educational Technology & Society, 10(4), 118-130.
- Inan, F. A. et Lowther, D. L. (2010). Factors affecting technology integration in K-12 classrooms : a path model. Education, Technology, Research and Development, 58(2), 137-154. doi:10.1007/s11423-009-9132-y
- Jang, S.-J. et Chen, K.-C. (2010). From PCK to TPACK : Developing a transformative model for pre-service science teachers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(6), 553-564. doi:10.1007/s10956-010-9222-y Récupéré du site des galeries de l’Université de Lakehead : http://galleries.lakeheadu.ca
- Karsenti, T. et Collin, S. (2013). TIC et éducation : avantages, défis et perspectives futures. Éducation et francophonie, 41(1), 1-6. doi:10.7202/1015056ar
- Karsenti, T., Raby, C., Villeneuve, S. et Gauthier, C. (2007). La formation des maîtres et la manifestation de la compétence professionnelle à intégrer les technologies de l’information et des communications (TIC) aux fins de préparation et de pilotage d’activités d’enseignement-apprentissage, de gestion de l’enseignement et de développement professionnel. Récupéré de http://depot.erudit.org
- Koehler, M., Mishra, P., Yahya, K. et Yadav, A. (2004). Successfull teaching with technology : The complex interplay of content, pedagogy, and technology. Dans R. Ferdig, C. Crawford, R. Carlsen, N. Davis, J. Price, R. Weber et D. Willis (dir.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2004 (p. 2347-2354). Récupéré du site personnel de Matthew J. Koehler : http://mkoehler.educ.msu.edu
- Koh, J. H. L. et Divaharan, S. (2011). Developing pre-service teachers’ technology integration expertise through the TPACK-developing instruction model. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 44(1), 35-58. doi:10.2190/ec.44.1.c
- Lefebvre, S. et Fournier, H. (2014). Utilisations personnelles, professionnelles et pédagogiques des TIC par de futurs enseignants et des enseignants. Revue internationale des technologies en pédagogie universitaire, 11(2). Récupéré de http://www.ritpu.org
- Lefebvre, S. et Loiselle, J. (2010). Développer la compétence professionnelle à exploiter les technologies de l’information et de la communication (TIC) en classe : portrait d’un dispositif de formation. Dans L. Bélair, C. Lebel, N. Sorin et A. Roy (dir.), Évaluation et régulation des compétences professionnelles : entre référentiels et pratiques (p. 39-52). Ottawa : Presses de l’Université d’Ottawa.
- Luszczynska, A., Scholz, U. et Schwarzer, R. (2005). The general self-efficacy scale : Multicultural validation studies. The Journal of Psychology, 139(5), 439-457. doi:10.1037/e355242004-001
- Magliaro, J. et Ezeife, A. N. (2007). Preservice teachers‘ preparedness to integrate computer technology into the curriculum. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 33(3). Récupéré de http://cjlt.csj.ualberta.ca
- Melançon, J., Lefebvre, S. et Thibodeau, S. (2013). Sources d’influence de l’autoefficacité relative à un enseignement intégrant les TIC chez des enseignants du primaire. Éducation et francophonie, 41(1), 70-93. doi:10.7202/1015060ar
- Ministère de l’Éducation du Québec (MEQ). (2001). La formation à l’enseignement. Les orientations, les compétences professionnelles. Récupéré de http://www.education.gouv.qc.ca
- Mueller, J., Wood, E., Willoughby, T., Ross, C. et Specht, J. (2008). Identifying discriminating variables between teachers who fully integrate computers and teachers with limited integration. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1523-1537. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.02.003
- Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2007). Expert technology-using teachers : Visions, strategies, and development (thèse de doctorat non publiée). Université Purdue, West Lafayette.
- Palmer, D. H. (2006). Sources of self-efficacy in a science methods course for primary teacher education students. Research in Science Education, 36(4), 337-353. doi:10.1007/s11165-005-9007-0
- Pamuk, S. (2012). Understanding preservice teachers’ technology use through TPAC framework. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(5), 425-439. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00447.x
- Pamuk, S. et Peker, D. (2009). Turkish pre-service science and mathematics teachers’ computer related self-efficacies, attitudes, and the relationship between these variables. Computers & Education, 53(2), 454-461. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.03.004
- Paraskeva, F., Bouta, H. et Papagianni, A. (2008). Individual characteristics and computer self-efficacy in secondary education teachers to integrate technology in educational practice. Computers & Education, 50(3), 1084-1091. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2006.10.006
- Raby, C. (2004). Analyse du cheminement qui a mené des enseignants du primaire à développer une utilisation exemplaire des technologies de l’information et de la communication (TIC) en classe (thèse de doctorat, Université du Québec à Montréal). Récupéré de l’archive HAL : http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr
- Redmann, D. H. et Kotrlik, J. W. (2009). Family and consumer sciences teachers’ adoption of technology for use in secondary classrooms. Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences Education, 27(1), 29-45. Récupéré sur le site de la National Association of Teacher Educators for Family and Consumer Sciences : http://www.natefacs.org
- Robertson, M. et Al-Zahrani, A. (2012). Self-efficacy and ICT integration into initial teacher education in Saudi Arabia : Matching policy with practice. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(7), 1136-1151. Récupéré de http://ajet.org.au
- Sang, G., Valcke, M., van Braak, J. et Tondeur, J. (2010). Student teachers’ thinking processes and ICT integration : Predictors of prospective teaching behaviors with educational technology. Computers & Education, 54(1), 103-112. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.07.010
- Shiue, Y.-M. (2007). Investigating the sources of teachers’ instructional technology use through the decomposed theory of planned behavior. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 36(4), 425-453. doi:10.2190/a407-22rr-50x6-2830
- Smarkola, C. (2008). Efficacy of a planned behavior model : Beliefs that contribute to computer usage intentions of student teachers and experienced teachers. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(3), 1196-1215. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2007.04.005
- Somekh, B. (2008). Factors affecting teachers’ pedagogical adoption of ICT. Dans J. Voogt et G. Knezek (dir.), International Handbook of Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education (p. 449-460). New York, NY : Springer. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-73315-9_27
- Somyürek, S., Atasoy, B. et Özdemir, S. (2009). Board’s IQ : What makes a board smart? Computers & Education, 53(2), 368-374. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.02.012
- Teo, T., Lee, C. B., Chai, C. S. et Wong, S. L. (2009). Assessing the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers in Singapore and Malaysia : A multigroup invariance analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Computers & Education, 53(3), 1000-1009. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.05.017
- Tezci, E. (2011). Factors that influence pre-service teachers’ ICT usage in education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 34(4), 483-499. doi:10.1080/02619768.2011.587116
- Thibodeau, S., Dussault, M., Frenette, É. et Royer, N. (2011). Solitude professionnelle d’enseignants du secondaire : relations avec le leadership du directeur d’école et leurs croyances d’efficacité sociale. Revue canadienne de l’éducation, 34(4), 177-199. Récupéré de http://journals.sfu.ca/cje
- Usher, E. L. et Pajares, F. (2006). Sources of academic and self-regulatory efficacy beliefs of entering middle school students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31(2), 125-141. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2005.03.002 Récupéré du site du College of Education : http://sites.education.uky.edu
- Usher, E. L. et Pajares, F. (2009). Sources of self-efficacy in mathematics : A validation study. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34(1), 89-101. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.09.002 Récupéré du site du College of Education : http://sites.education.uky.edu
- Valtonen, T., Pontinen, S., Kukkonen, J., Dillon, P., Vaisanen, P. et Hacklin, S. (2011). Confronting the technological pedagogical knowledge of Finnish net generation student teachers. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 20(1), 3-18. doi:10.1080/1475939x.2010.534867
- van Braak, J., Tondeur, J. et Valcke, M. (2004). Explaining different types of computer use among primary school teachers. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 19(4), 407-422. doi:10.1007/bf03173218
- van Dinther, M., Dochy, F. et Segers, M. (2011). Factors affecting students’ self-efficacy in higher education. Educational Research Review, 6(2), 95-108. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2010.10.003
- Wang, L. et Ertmer, P. A. (2003, avril). Impact of vicarious learning experiences and goal setting on preservice teachers’ self-efficacy for technology integration : A pilot study. Communication présentée à la réunion annuelle de l’American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL. Récupéré de http://eric.ed.gov
- Wang, S.-K., Hsu, H.-Y., Campbell, T., Coster, D. C. et Longhurst, M. (2014). An investigation of middle school science teachers and students use of technology inside and outside of classrooms : considering whether digital natives are more technology savvy than their teachers. Education and Technological Research Development, 62(6), 637-662. doi:10.1007/s11423-014-9355-4
- Yeh, Y.-F., Lin, T.-C., Hsu, Y.-S., Wu, H.-K. et Hwang, F.-K. (2015). Science teachers’ proficiency levels and patterns of TPACK in a practical context. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(1), 78-90. doi:10.1007/s10956-014-9523-7