![Logo de [VertigO] La revue électronique en sciences de l’environnement](/fr/revues/vertigo/logo.jpg){kind=logo}
Résumés
Abstract
In the post NAFTA era, Canada, Mexico, and the United States face a range of water resource management issues. These challenges include meeting increasing demands for water while also dealing with ecosystem management issues, attempting to balance the demands of riparian states in both upstream and downstream contexts, dealing with the extraction of groundwater and the potential overdraft of shared aquifers (especially in sole source aquifer areas), and coping with persistent water quality issues. In this paper, I provide an overview of the above issues and the North American context and review the experience of different regions in North America, specifically examining the U.S.-Canada and U.S.-Mexico border region and seeking insights from one region that may be useful in the other region. As such, this is an updated version of a paper that I presented at Laval University in 2005, drawing on more recent experience.
Keywords:
- Binational,
- water,
- resource management,
- United-States,
- Canada,
- Mexico,
- border,
- environment,
- governance
Résumé
Dans l’ère post-Nafta, le Canada, le Mexique et les États-Unis font face à un problème de gestion de l’eau. Ces défis, incluant la demande croissante de l’eau et les problèmes de gestion des écosystèmes, tentent : de balancer les demandes des États riverains en amont et en aval, de faire face à l’extraction des eaux souterraines et de la potentielle découverte d’aquifères partagés (surtout dans les endroits où il n’y a qu’une seule source aquifère) et finalement de faire face aux problèmes persistants de la qualité de l’eau. Nous couvrirons dans cet article une vue d’ensemble des problèmes mentionnés ci-haut, le contexte nord-américain et une révision de l’expérience des différentes régions nord-américaines principalement en examinant les frontières Américano-canadiennes et Américano-mexicaine en recherchant des visions qui peuvent être utile à l’autre. Il s'agit d'une version mise à jour d'un document que nous avons présenté à l'Université Laval en 2005, en s'appuyant sur une expérience plus récente.
Mots-clés :
- Gestion,
- eau,
- binationale,
- Etats-Unis,
- Canada,
- Mexique,
- gouvernance,
- environnement
Parties annexes
Bibliographie
- Brown, C. 2005. “Transboundary Water Resource Issues on the US-Mexico Border: Challenges and Opportunities in the 21st Century,” an article published in VertigO, La revue électronique en sciences de l'environnement, Hors-série 2, [En ligne] URL: http://vertigo.revues.org/1883, accessed 5 January 2009.
- Brown, C. and S. Mumme. 2000. “Applied and Theoretical Aspects of Binational Watershed Councils (Consejos de Cuencas) in the U.S.-Mexico Borderlands.” Natural Resources Journal issue on Water Conflicts and Water Conflict Resolution in the U.S.-Mexico Borderlands, Fall 2000.
- Brown, C. and S. Mumme. 2001. “Decentralizing Water Policy on the US-Mexico Border.” Chapter in Protecting A Sacred Gift: Changes in Water Management in Mexico, Monograph published by the Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies, University of California, San Diego.
- Brown, C. and E. Hermon. 2005. “Concept Paper for Collaborative Research on Transboundary Water Resources.” Unpublished concept paper outlining potential research ideas for comparative water resource management research in North America.
- Comisión Nacional del Agua (CNA). 1997. La Ley de Aguas Nacionales y su Reglamentos, Tercera Edición. Distrito Federal, Mexico: CNA.
- Commission on Environmental Cooperation (CEC). 2002. Summary of a workshop hosted by the CEC entitled, “Public Workshop on Freshwater issues in North America” on 3 October 2002 in Albuquerque, NM.
- Environment Canada. 2010a. Environment Canada website detailing the integrated watershed management approach of Environment Canada. [On line] URL: http://www.ec.gc.ca/eau-water/default.asp?lang=En&n=87922E3C-1, accessed 4 January 2010.
- Environment Canada. 2010b. Environment Canada website detailing the manner by which federal and provincial government in Canada share water resource management responsibility. [On line] URL: http://www.ec.gc.ca/eau-water/default.asp?lang=En&n=13D23813-1, accessed 4 January 2010.
- Environment Canada. 2010c. Environment Canada website detailing water resource management in Canada. [On line] URL: http://www.ec.gc.ca/eau-water/default.asp?lang=En&n=CD467AE6-1, accessed 4 January 2010.
- Good Neighbor Environmental Board (GNEB), 2010. Website for the Good Neighbor Environmental Board, maintained by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, [On line] URL: http://www.epa.gov/ocem/gneb-page.htm, site accessed 29 December 2010.
- International Joint Commission (IJC). 1909. Boundary Waters Treaty of 1909, [On line] URL: http://www.ijc.org/en/home/main_accueil.htm, accessed 30 December 2009.
- International Joint Commission (IJC). 1972. IJC Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement of 1972. [On line] URL: http://www.ijc.org/rel/agree/quality.html, accessed
- International Joint Commission (IJC), 2001. IJC Directive of 7 February 2001 calling for the establishment of the International Red River Board . [On line] URL: http://www.ijc.org/conseil_board/red_river/en/irrb_mandate_mandat.htm, accessed 29 December 2009.
- Merriam Webster, 2009. Online dictionary published by Merriam Webster, [On line] URL: http://www.merriam-webster.com/, accessed 30 December 2009.
- Norman, E.S. and J. O. Melious. 2004. “Transboundary Environmental Management: A Study of the Abbotsford-Sumas Aquifer in British Columbia and Western Washington.” Journal of Borderland Studies 19(2):101-120.
- Quebec Parliament, 2009. “Bill 27, An Act to Affirm the Collective Nature of Water Resources and Provide for Increased Water Resource Protection.” [On line] URL: http://www2.publicationsduquebec.gouv.qc.ca/dynamicSearch/telecharge.php?type=5&file=2009C21A.PDF, accessed 20 December 2009.
- Red River Basin Commission (RRBC), 2010. RRBC website detailing the history and development of the Red River Basin Commission. [On line] URL: http://www.redriverbasincommission.org/, accessed 6 January 2010.
- Southwest Consortium for Environmental Research and Policy (SCERP). 2009. Website detailing U.S.-Mexico border environmental research conducted by SCERP researchers, available at www.scerp.org, accessed 30 December 2009.
- United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1996. The Watershed Approach: An Overview. Washington, DC: USEPA, Office of Water.
- United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2009. USEPA website detailing the Clean Water Act and compliance measures, [On line] URL: http://www.epa.gov/compliance/monitoring/programs/cwa/index.html, accessed 29 December 2009.
- United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and Secretaría de Desarrollo Urbano y Ecologia (SEDUE). 1991. Integrated Environmental Plan for the Mexican-U.S. Border Area, First Stage, 1992-1994. Washington, DC: USEPA.
- United States Geological Survey (USGS). 2010. USGS website detailing the U.S.-Mexico Border Environmental Health Initiative research project, [On line] URL: http://borderhealth.cr.usgs.gov/projectindex.html, accessed 5 January 2010.
- United States of America and Government of Canada. 1998. Letters of reference from the governments of the U.S. and Canada calling for the establishment of international watershed boards on the U.S.-Canada border, [On line] URL: http://www.ijc.org/conseil_board/watershed/watershed_pub.php, accessed 30 December 2009.
- Woodard and Durall, 1996. United States-Mexico Border Area, as Delineated by a Shared Water Resources Perspective, U.S. Department of the Interior, Field Coordinating Committee, Fact Sheet 1.