Résumés
Résumé
Dans de nombreux pays occidentaux, l’innovation dans le secteur public grimpe au sommet des préoccupations de la recherche et des réformes. L’innovation est de plus en plus vue comme l’une des principales manières d’améliorer l’efficacité et le rendement de la prestation des services publics, mais la nécessité de l’innovation sur le plan des politiques a été largement ignorée. Elle représente pourtant un aspect crucial de l’innovation dans le secteur public. De nouvelles avenues au sein de la théorie de l’innovation et de la théorie de la gouvernance soulignent le rôle important de la collaboration dans la promotion de l’innovation, tant dans le secteur public que privé. Cependant, les efforts consentis afin d’augmenter la capacité du secteur public à mettre en oeuvre des projets de collaboration innovante en matière de politiques nécessitent le développement d’un nouveau rôle pour les politiciens, comme l’illustrent deux études de cas danois portant sur de tels projets et présentées dans cet article.
Abstract
Public innovation is moving to the top of the research and reform agendas in many Western countries. Innovation is increasingly viewed as an important means to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of public service delivery, but the need for policy innovation has been largely overlooked despite the fact that policy innovation is a key aspect of public innovation. New strands of innovation theory and governance theory highlight the important role of collaboration for promoting public as well as private sector innovation. However, efforts to enhance the public sector’s capacity for collaborative policy innovation calls for the development of a new role for politicians, as is illustrated by two Danish case studies of collaborative policy innovation projects.
Parties annexes
Bibliographie
- Agger, A. et E. Sørensen (à paraître). « Enhancing Collaborative Policy Innovation: A Case Study from a Danish Municipality », dans C. Ansell et J. Torfing (dir.), Public Innovation and Collaboration Through Design, Londres, Routledge.
- Almond, G. et S. Verba (1961). The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations, Washington D.C., Georgetown University Press.
- Ansell, C. et A. Gash (2012). « Stewards, Mediators, and Catalysts: Towards a Model of Collaborative Leadership », The Innovation Journal, vol. 17, no 1, art. 7.
- Bland, T. et autres (2010). « Enhancing Public Sector Innovation: Examining the Network-Innovation Relationship », Public Sector Innovation Journal, vol. 15, no 3, p. 1-25.
- Bommert, B. (2010). « Collaborative Innovation in the Public Sector », International Public Management Review, vol. 11, no1, p. 15-33.
- Borins, S. (2001). « Encouraging Innovation in the Public Sector », Journal of Intellectual Capital, vol. 2, no 3, p. 310-319.
- Considine, M., J. Lewis et D. Alexander (2009). Networks, Innovation and Public Policy, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan.
- Damanpour, F. (1991). « Organizational Innovation: A Meta-analysis of Effects of Determinants and Moderators », Academy of Management Journal, vol. 34, no 3, p. 555-590.
- Dente, B., L. Bobbio et A. Spada (2005). « Government or Governance of Urban Innovation? », DISP The Planning Review, vol. 41, no 162, p. 41-52.
- Downs, A. (1967). Inside bureaucracy, Boston, Little, Brown.
- Edquist, C. et L. Hommen (1999). « Systems of Innovation: Theory and Policy for the Demand Side », Technology in Society, vol. 21, no 1, p. 63-79.
- Eggers, B. et S. Singh (2009). The Public Innovators Playbook, Washington D.C., Harvard Kennedy School of Government.
- Freeman, C. (1991). « Networks of Innovators: A Synthesis of Research Issues », Research Policy, vol. 20, no 5, p. 499-514.
- Gloor, P. A. (2005). Swarm Creativity: Competitive Advantage through Collaborative Innovation Networks, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
- Halvorsen, T. et autres (2005). « On the Differences Between Public and Private Sector Innovation », Publin Report, no D9.
- Hartley, J. (2005). « Innovation in Governance and Public Service: Past and Present », Public Money & Management, vol. 25, no 1, p. 27-34.
- Hood, C. (1991). « A Public Administration for all Seasons? », Public Administration, vol. 69, no 1, p. 1-19.
- Howarth, D. et J. Torfing (2005) (dir.). Discourse Theory in European Politics, Londres, Palgrave.
- John, P. et G. Stoker (2008). « Design Experiments: Engaging Policy Makers in the Search for Evidence About What Works », Political Studies, vol. 57, no 2, p. 356-373.
- Kelman, S. (2005). Unleashing Change: A Study of Organizational Renewal in Government, Washington D.C., Brookings Institution.
- Kingdon, J. W. (1984). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies, Boston, Little, Brown.
- Lijphart, A. (1999). Patterns of Democracy, New Haven, Yale University Press.
- Lijphart, A. (1977). Democracy in Plural Societies: A Comparative Exploration, New Haven, Yale University Press.
- Lundvall, B. Å. (1985). Product Innovation and User-producer Interaction, Aalborg, Aalborg University Press.
- Mintrom, M. et S. Vergari (1998). « Policy Networks and Innovation Diffusion », Journal of Politics, vol. 60, no 1, p. 126-148.
- Mulgan, G. et D. Albury (2003). « Innovation in the Public Sector », Working Paper, Strategy Unit, UK Cabinet Office, www.sba.oakland.edu/faculty/mathieson/mis524/resources/readings/innovation/ innovation_in_the_public_sector.pdf (page consultée le 20 août 2013).
- Nambisan, S. (2008). Transforming Government through Collaborative Innovation, Washington D.C., Harvard Kennedy School of Government.
- Newman, J., J. Raine et C. Skelcher (2001). « Transforming Local Government: Innovation and Modernization », Public Money & Management, vol. 21, no 2, p. 61-68.
- Niskanen, W. A. (1987). « Bureaucracy », dans C. K. Rowley (dir.), Democracy and Public Choice, Oxford, Basil Blackwell, p. 135-140.
- Niskanen, W. A. (1975). « Bureaucrats and Politicians », Journal of Law and Economics, vol. 18, no 3, p. 617-43.
- Osborne, S. (2010). The New Public Governance?, New York, Routledge.
- Osborne, D. et T. Gaebler (1993). Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector, Reading, Addison-Wesley.
- O’Toole, L. J. (1997). « Implementing Public Innovations in Network Settings », Administration and Society, vol. 29, no 2, p. 115-138.
- Pierson, P. (2000). « Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics », American Political Science Review, vol. 94, no 2, p. 251-267.
- Polsby, N. W. (1984). Political Innovation in America: The Politics of Policy Initiation, New Haven, Yale University Press.
- Pressman, J. et A. Wildavsky (1973). Implementation, San Francisco, University of California Press.
- Roberts, N. C. et R. T. Bradley (1991). « Stakeholder Collaboration and Innovation », Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, vol. 27, no 2, p. 209-227.
- Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of Innovation, New York, Free Press.
- Rowley, C. K. (dir.) (1987). Democracy and Public Choice, Oxford, Basil Blackwell.
- Sartori, G. (1987). The Theory of Democracy Revisited, Chatham, Chatham House Publishers.
- Schumpeter, J. (1946). Economic Theory and Entrepreneurial History, Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
- Shein, E. (1992). Organizational Culture and Leadership: A Dynamic View, San Francisco, Jossey-Bass.
- Sørensen, E. (2012). « Governance and innovation in the public sector », dans David Levi-Faur (dir.) ,The Oxford Handbook of Governance, New York, Oxford University Press, p. 215-227.
- Sørensen, E. (2007). « Democratic Theory as a Frame for Decision Making: The Challenges by Discourse Theory and Governance Theory », dans G. Morcol (dir.), Handbook of Decision Making, New York, Marcel Dekker, p. 151-167.
- Sørensen, E. (2006). « Metagovernance the Changing Role of Politicians in Processes of Democratic Governance », The American Review of Public Administration, vol. 36, no 1, p. 98-114.
- Sørensen, E. et S. B. Waldorff (à paraître). ‘Enhancing Politicians’ Capacity for Political Leadership through Collaborative Policy Innovation, Paper presented at the IRSPM-conference in Prague, avril 2013.
- Sørensen, E. et J. Torfing (2011). « Enhancing Innovation in the Public Sector », Administration and Society, vol. 43, no 8, p. 842-868.
- Teece, D. J. (1992). « Competition, Cooperation, and Innovation », Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, vol. 18, no 1, p. 1-25.
- Tucker, R.C. (1995). Politics as leadership, Columbia, University of Missouri.
- Torfing, J. et autres (2012). Interactive Governance: Advancing the Paradigm, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
- Warren, M. E. (2009). « Governance-Driven Democratization », Critical Policy Analysis, vol. 3, no 1, p. 3-13.
- Weber, M. ([1920] 1971). Makt og Byråkrati, Oslo, Gyldendal Norsk Forlag.
- Wejnert, B. (2002). « Integrating Models of Diffusion of Innovations: A Conceptual Framework », Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 28, p. 297-326.
- Willner, A. R. (1985). The Spellbinders. Charismatic Political Leadership, Yale, Yale University Press.