Résumés
Résumé
Le concept de gouvernance multiniveau peut aider àreconnaître et à comprendre de nouvelles tendances dansles relations intergouvernementales et l’élaboration depolitiques. Dans cet article, nous nous penchons sur les liens quiexistent entre la littérature sur l’administrationpublique, particulièrement celle portant sur la nouvelle gestionpublique, et la gouvernance multiniveau. Ces deux approches sontsusceptibles d’améliorer les approches traditionnellesutilisées pour comprendre le fonctionnement interne desrelations intergouvernementales dans les régimesfédéraux. Nous fournissons des exemples tirés detrois fédérations : l’Australie, le Canada etles États-Unis. Nous nous concentrons sur la façon dontla gouvernance multiniveau peut mettre en lumière leschangements dans les relations intergouvernementales (entre leséchelons supranational, fédéral,étatique/provincial et municipal) ainsi quel’élargissement horizontal de la gouvernance dans cesmêmes régimes à des organisations nongouvernementales et à d’autres acteurs.
Abstract
We argue that the concept of multi-level governance (MLG) can help touncover and understand changing trends in intergovernmental relationsand policy-making. We also consider the linkages between the publicadministration literature, particularly the new public management (NPM)approach, and the concept of multi-level governance. Both the MLG andNPM approaches can help to enhance traditional approaches tounderstanding internal intergovernmental relations in federal systems.We draw on empirical examples from three Western federal systems:Canada, the United States, and Australia. In particular, we focus onhow the concept of MLG can help to illuminate changing forms ofintergovernmental relations(supranational-federal-state/provincial-local) and as well as thehorizontal expansion of governance in these systems to non-governmentalorganizations and other actors.
Parties annexes
Bibliographie
- Bache, I. (2008). Europeanization and Multi-level Governance: Cohesion Policy in the European Union and Britain, Lanham, Rowman & Littlefield.
- Baracskay, D. (2011). « How Federal Health-Care Policies Interface with Urban and Rural Areas: A Comparison of Three Systems », Global Public Health: An International Journal for Research, Policy and Practice, vol. 7, n° 4, p. 317-336.
- Benson, D. et A. Jordan (2010). « The Scaling of Water Governance Tasks: A Comparative Federal Analysis of the European Union and Australia », Environmental Management, vol. 46, n° 1, p. 7-16.
- Betsill, M. et H. Bulkeley (2006). « Cities and the Multilevel Governance of Global Climate Change », Global Governance, vol. 12, n° 2, p. 141-159.
- Blanken, A. et G. Dewulf (2010). « PPPs in Health: Static or Dynamic ? », Australian Journal of Public Administration, vol. 69, n° 1, p. 35-47.
- Blum, J. (2008). « A Revisionist Model of Hospital Licensure », Regulation & Governance, vol. 2, n° 1, p. 48-64.
- Bradford, N. (2005). « Place-based Public Policy: Towards a New Urban and Community Agenda for Canada », Canadian Policy Research Networks Research Report, n°F/51.
- Brown, G. R. (1994). « Canadian Federal-provincial Overlap and Presumed Government Inefficiency », Publius, vol. 24, n° 1, p. 21-37.
- Bulkeley, H. (2006). « Urban Sustainability: Learning from Best Practice ? », Environment and Planning, vol. 38, n° 6, p. 1029-1044.
- Bulkeley, H. et S. Moser (dir.) (2007). « Responding to Climate Change: Governance and Social Action beyond Kyoto », Global Environmental Politics, vol. 7, n° 2, p. 1-144.
- Contandriopoulos, D. et autres (2004). « Governance Structures and Political Processes in a Public System: Lessons from Quebec », Public Administration, vol. 8, n° 3, p. 627-655.
- Costanza, R. et J. Greer (1995). « The Chesapeake Bay and its Watershed: A Model for Sustainable Ecosystem Management ? », dans L. Gunderson, C. Holling et S. Light (dir.), Barriers and Bridges to the Renewal of Ecosystems and Institutions, New York, Columbia University Press, p. 169-213.
- Dahlström, C., B. Peters et J. Pierre (2011). « Steering Strategies in Western Democracies », dans C. Dahlstom, B. Peters et J. Pierre (dir.), Steering from the Centre: Strengthening Political Control in Western Democracies, Toronto, University of Toronto Press, p. 263-276.
- Durant, R. (2004). « Reconnecting with Stakeholders », dans R. Durant, D. Fiorino et R. O’Leary (dir.), Environmental Governance Reconsidered: Challenges, Choices, and Opportunities, Cambridge, MIT Press, p. 177-182.
- Durant, R., D. Fiorino et R. O’Leary (2004). « Introduction », dans R. Durant, D. Fiorino et R. O’Leary (dir.), Environmental Governance Reconsidered: Challenges, Choices, and Opportunities, Cambridge, MIT Press, p. 1-28.
- Elson, S. (2005). The Evolution of Health System Governance in Canada and Ontario Including Cautionary Reflections on the Introduction of Local Health Integration Networks in Ontario, www.lhsc.on.ca/About_Us/ISAN/communication/articles/evolution.pdf (page consultée le 3 janvier 2010).
- Gore, C. et P. Robinson (2009). « Local Government Response to Climate Change: Our Last, Best Hope ? », dans H. Selin et S. VanDeveer (dir.), Changing Climates in North American Politics: Institutions, Policymaking, and Multilevel Governance, Cambridge, MIT Press, p. 137-158.
- Grodzins, M. (1960). The Report of the President’s Commission on National Goals, The American Assembly Goals for Americans, Englewood Cliffs, Prentice Hall, réimprimé dans Grodzins, M. (2007), « The Federal System », dans L. J. O’Toole (dir.), American Intergovernmental Relations: Foundations, Perspectives, and Issues Washington, DC, CQ Press, p. 54-63.
- Gruening, G. (2001). « Origin and Theoretical Basis of New Public Management », International Public Management Journal, vol. 4, n° 1, p. 1-25.
- Head, B. (2011). « Australian Experience: Civic Engagement as Symbol and Substance », Public Administration and Development, vol. 31, n° 2, p. 102-112.
- Heimer, C. et autres (2008). « Health Care and New Governance: The Quest for Effective Regulation », Regulation and Governance, vol. 2, n° 1, p. 1-8.
- Hoflund, A. et M. Farquhar (2008). « Challenges of Democratic Experimentalism: A Case Study of the National Quality Forum in Health Care », Regulation & Governance, vol. 2, n° 1, p. 121-135.
- Hollander, R. (2009). « Rethinking Overlap and Duplication: Federalism and Environmental Assessment in Australia », Publius: The Journal of Federalism, vol. 40, n° 1, p. 136-170.
- Hollander, R. et H. Patapan (2007). « Pragmatic Federalism: Australian Federalism from Hawke to Howard », Australian Journal of Public Administration, vol. 66, n° 3, p. 280-297.
- Homburg, V., C. Pollitt et S. van Thiel (2007). « Introduction », dans V. Homburg, C. Pollitt et S. van Thiel (dir.), New Public Management in Europe: Adaptation and Alternatives, Houndmills, Palgrave, p. 1-9.
- Hood, C. et G. Peters (2004). « The Middle Aging of New Public Management: Into the Age of Paradox ? », Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, vol. 14, n° 3, p. 267-282.
- Hooghe, L. et G. Marks (2003). « Unravelling the Central State, but How ? Types of Multi-level Governance », American Political Science Review, vol. 97, n° 2, p. 233-243.
- Howlett, M. (2000). « Beyond Legalism: Policy Ideas, Implementation Styles and Emulation-based Convergence in Canadian and U.S. Environmental Policy », Journal of Public Policy, vol. 20, n° 3, p. 305-329.
- Huang, K. et K. Provan (2006). « Resource Tangibility and Patterns of Interaction in a Publicly Funded Health and Human Services Network », Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, vol. 17, p. 435-454.
- Huque, A. et N. Watton (2010). « Federalism and the Implementation of Environmental Policy: Changing Trends in Canada and the United States », Public Organization Review, vol. 10, n° 1, p. 71-88.
- John, D. (2004). « Civic Environmentalism », dans R. Durant, D. Fiorino et R. O’Leary (dir.), Environmental Governance Reconsidered: Challenges, Choices, and Opportunities, Cambridge, MIT Press, p. 219-254.
- Jones, S. (2009). « The Future of Renewable Energy in Australia: A Test for Cooperative Federalism ? », Australian Journal of Public Administration, vol. 68, n° 1, p. 1-20.
- Jones, S. (2008). « Cooperative Federalism ?: The Case of the Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs », Australian Journal of Public Administration, vol. 67, n° 2, p. 161-172.
- Karkkainen, B. (2004). « Post-Sovereign Environmental Governance », Global Environmental Politics, vol. 4, n° 1, p. 72-96.
- Kettl, D. (2009). « The Key to Networked Government », dans S. Goldsmith et D. Kettl (dir.), Unlocking the Power of Networks: Keys to High-Performance Government, Washington, Brookings Institution Press, p. 1-14.
- Kettl, D. (2005). The Global Public Management Revolution, Washington, Brookings Institution Press.
- Kettl, D. (2000). « The Transformation of Governance: Globalization, Devolution, and the Role of Government », Public Administration Review, vol. 60, n° 6, p. 488-497.
- Krantzberg, G. et E. Houghton (1996). « The Remedial Action Plan that Led to the Cleanup and Delisting of Collingwood Harbour as an Area of Concern », Journal of Great Lakes Research, vol. 22, n° 2, p. 469-483.
- Leo, C. et J. Enns (2009). « Multi-Level Governance and Ideological Rigidity: The Failure of Deep Federalism », Canadian Journal of Political Science, vol. 42, n° 1, p. 93-116.
- Levy, R. (2010). « New Public Management: End of an Era ? », Public Policy and Administration, vol. 25, n° 2, p. 234-240.
- Lewis, C. et D. Marsh. (2012). « Network Governance and Public Participation in Policy-Making: Federal Community Cabinets in Australia », Australian Journal of Public Administration, vol. 71, n° 1, p. 6-19.
- Marks, G., L. Hooghe et K. Blank (1996). « European Integration from the 1980s: State-Centric v. Multi-level Governance », Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. 34, n° 3, p. 341-378.
- Newig, J. et O. Fritsch (2009). « Environmental Governance: Participatory, Multi-Level and Effective ? », Environmental Policy and Governance, vol. 19, n° 3, p. 197-214.
- Ongaro, E. et autres (2011). Policy, Performance and Management in Governance and Intergovernmental Relations: Transatlantic Perspectives, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.
- Ongaro, E. et autres (dir.) (2010). Governance and Intergovernmental Relations in the European Union and the United States: Theoretical Perspectives, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.
- Osborne, S. P. (2010). « Introduction », dans S. P. Osborne (dir.) The New Public Governance ? Emerging Perspectives on the Theory and Practice of Public Governance, Abingdon, Routledge, p. 1-16.
- Painter, M. (2001). « Multi-level Governance and the Emergence of Collaborative Federal Institutions in Australia », Policy & Politics, vol. 24, n° 2, p. 137-150.
- Papillon, M. (2008). « Canadian Federalism and the Emerging Mosaic of Aboriginal Multilevel Governance », dans H. Bakvis et G. Skogstad (dir.) Canadian Federalism: Performance, Effectiveness, and Legitimacy, Toronto, Oxford University Press, p. 291-313.
- Peters, B. (2008). Governance Through the Political System: Making and Implementing Policy, http://paperroom.ipsa.org/papers/paper_4037.pdf (page consultée le 30 juillet 2012).
- Peters, B. et J. Pierre (1998). « Governance without Government ? Rethinking Public Administration », Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, vol. 8, n° 2, p. 223-243.
- Piattoni, S. (2010). The Theory of Multi-level Governance: Conceptual, Empirical, and Normative Challenges, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
- Piattoni, S. (2009). « Multi-level Governance: A Historical and Conceptual Analysis », Journal of European Integration, vol. 31, n° 2, p. 163-180.
- Pollitt, C. et G. Bouckaert (2011). Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis: New Public Management, Governance, and the Neo-Weberian State, 3e éd., Oxford, Oxford University Press.
- Posner, P. (2009). « Networks in the Shadow of Government: The Chesapeake Bay Program », dans S. Goldsmith et D. Kettl (dir.) Unlocking the Power of Networks: Keys to High-performance Government, Washington, Brookings Institution Press, p. 62-94.
- Prager, K. (2010). « Local and Regional Partnerships in Natural Resource Management: The Challenge of Bridging Institutional Levels », Environmental Management, vol. 46, p. 711-724.
- Provan, K., K. Huang et H. Milward (2009). « The Evolution of Structural Embeddedness and Organizational Social Outcomes in a Centrally Governed Health and Human Services Network », Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, vol. 19, p. 873-893.
- Rabe, B. (2009a). « Governing the Climate from Sacramento », dans S. Goldsmith et D. Kettl (dir.), Unlocking the Power of Networks: Keys to High-performance Government, Washington, Brookings Institution Press, p. 34-61.
- Rabe, B. (2009b). « Second-Generation Climate Policies in the States Proliferation, Diffusion, and Regionalization », dans H. Selin et S. VanDeveer (dir.), Changing Climates in North American Politics: Institutions, Policymaking, and Multilevel Governance, Cambridge, MIT Press, p. 67-86.
- Rabe, B. (2007). « Beyond Kyoto: Climate Change Policy in Multilevel Governance Systems », Governance, vol. 20, n° 3, p. 423-444.
- Rhodes, R. (2000). « Governance and Public Administration », dans J. Pierre (dir.), Debating Governance: Authority, Steering, and Democracy, Oxford, Oxford University Press, p. 54-90.
- Sabel, C., A. Fung et B. Karkkainen (2000). « Beyond Backyard Environmentalism », dans J. Cohen et J. Rogers (dir.), Beyond Backyard Environmentalism, Cambridge, Beacon Press.
- Scheberle, D. (2004a) Federalism and Environmental Policy: Trust and the Politics of Implementation, Washington, Georgetown University Press.
- Scheberle, D. (2004b). « Devolution », dans R. Durant, D. Fiorino et R. O’Leary (dir.), Environmental Governance Reconsidered: Challenges, Choices, and Opportunities, Cambridge, MIT Press, p. 361-392.
- Schlager, E. (2004). « Common Pool Resource Theory », dans R. Durant, D. Fiorino et R. O’Leary (dir.), Environmental Governance Reconsidered: Challenges, Choices, and Opportunities, Cambridge, MIT Press, p. 145-176.
- Schön-Quinlivan, E. (2011). Reforming the European Commission, New York, Palgrave Macmillan.
- Selin, H. et S. VanDeveer (dir.) (2009a). Changing Climates in North American Politics: Institutions, Policymaking, and Multilevel Governance, Cambridge, MIT Press.
- Selin, H. et S. VanDeveer (2009b). « Changing Climates and Institution Building across the Continent », dans H. Selin et S. VanDeveer (dir.), Changing Climates in North American Politics: Institutions, Policymaking, and Multilevel Governance, Cambridge, MIT Press, p. 3-22.
- Selin, H. et S. VanDeveer (2009c). « North American Climate Governance Policymaking and Institutions in the Multilevel Greenhouse », dans H. Selin et S. VanDeveer (dir.), Changing Climates in North American Politics: Institutions, Policymaking, and Multilevel Governance, Cambridge, MIT Press, p. 305-326.
- Smith, R. et J. Lavoie (2008). « First Nations Health Networks: A Collaborative System Approach to Health Transfer », Healthcare Policy, vol. 4, n° 2, p. 101-112.
- Stein, M. et L. Turkewitsch (2011a). « The Relevance of the Concept of Multi-level Governance for a Comparative Analysis of Canadian and American Intergovernmental Relations », dans H. Enderlein, S. Wälti et M. Zürn (dir.), Handbook on Multi-level Governance, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, p. 184-202.
- Stein, M. et L. Turkewitsch (2011b). « An Assessment of Multi-level Governance as an Analytical Concept Applied to Federations and Decentralized Unitary Systems: Germany versus the United Kingdom », Communication présentée au symposium European Consortium for Political Research (ECPR) 6th General Conference, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, 25-27 août.
- Stein, M. et L. Turkewitsch (2010a). « The European Model of Governance Beyond Europe: The Applicability of the Concept of Multi-Level Governance to the Comparative Study of Intergovernmental Relations in Parliamentary and Presidential Federations », Communication présentée au symposium IPSA International Conference “Is There a European Model of Governance ? A Comparative Perspective”, Luxembourg, 18-20 mars.
- Stein, M. et L. Turkewitsch (2010b). « Multilevel Governance and Federalism: Closely Linked or Incompatible Concepts ? », Participation, vol. 34, n° 2, p. 3-5.
- Stein, M. et L. Turkewitsch (2009). « Similarities and Differences in Patterns of Intergovernmental Relations in Parliamentary and Presidential Federations: A Comparative Analysis », Communication présentée au symposium International Political Science Association (IPSA) 21st World Congress of Political Science, Santiago, 14 juillet.
- Stein, M. et L. Turkewitsch (2008a). « The Concept of Multi-level Governance in Studies of Federalism », Communication présentée au symposium International Political Science Association (IPSA) International Conference, Université Concordia, Montréal, 2 mai.
- Stein, M. et L. Turkewitsch (2008b). « The Concepts of Federalism and Multi-level Governance Evaluated: A Comparative Analysis of Canadian and American Intergovernmental Relations », Communication présentée au symposium The International Political Science Association’s Research Committee 28 - Comparative Federalism and Federation Annual Conference, Berlin, Hertie School of Governance, 3-4 octobre.
- Trubek, L. (2006). « New Governance and Soft Law in Health Care Reform », Indiana Health Law Review, vol. 3, p. 139-169.
- Trubek, L. et D. Trubek (2005). « Hard and Soft Law in the Construction of Social Europe: the Role of the Open Method of Co-ordination », European Law Journal, vol. 11, n° 3, p. 343-364.
- Valiante, M. (2002). « Legal Foundations of Canadian Environmental Policy: Underlining our Values in a Shifting Landscape », dans D. VanNijnatten et R. Boardman (dir.), Canadian Environmental Policy: Context and Cases, Toronto, Oxford University Press, p. 5-24.
- Van Kersbergen, K. et F. Van Waarden (2004). « “Governance” as a Bridge between Disciplines: Cross-Disciplinary Inspiration Regarding Shifts in Governance and Problems of Governability, Accountability and Legitimacy », European Journal of Political Research, vol. 43, n° 2, p. 143-171.
- Vining, A. et D. Weimer (2005). « Economic Perspectives on Public Organizations », dans E. Ferlie, L. Lynn et C. Pollitt (dir.), The Oxford Handbook of Public Management, Oxford, Oxford University Press, p. 209-233.
- Young, R. et C. Leuprecht (2004). « Introduction: New Work, Background Themes, and Future Research about Municipal-Federal-Provincial Relations in Canada », dans R. Young et C. Leuprecht (dir.), Canada: The State of the Federation 2004: Municipal-Federal-Provincial Relations in Canada, Montréal et Kingston, McGill-Queen’s University Press, p. 3-24.
- Zurba, M. et autres (2012). « Building Co-Management as a Process: Problem Solving Through Partnerships in Aboriginal Country, Australia », Environmental Management, vol. 49, n° 6, p. 1130-1142.