Résumés
Abstract
A significant step in trying to understand the different philosophical and political orientations of Simmel and Benjamin consists in analysing the very concept of “critique” and “criticism” that is implicit in their thought and its relationship with the concept of experience. Even if Simmel and Benjamin share a common neo-Kantian background and they were both influenced by German romantic culture, the development of their thought follows very different paths. While Simmel moves from a reflection on the principle of “form”, which belongs to Kant, to the principle of “life” that is typical of Goethe, Benjamin – coming from a similar neo-Kantian background – moves toward a very eclectic form of “redemptive criticism” (rettende Kritik). A fruitful comparison therefore should consider that Simmel and Benjamin are unified by a common reference to the concept of experience and the theory of knowledge (Erkenntnistheorie) in relationship with the philosophy of history, or, to express it in Benjamin’s words, with the concept of history. This conceptual basis allows us to better perceive their fundamentally different philosophical and sociological approaches to modernity and their different judgement on the destiny of individuality in the modern context.
Veuillez télécharger l’article en PDF pour le lire.
Télécharger
Parties annexes
Biographical note
Vincenzo Mele is Associate Professor of General Sociology at the University of Pisa, Department of Political Science. He is author of Metropolis: Georg Simmel, Walter Benjamin and Modernity (2011), Aesthetics and Social Theory: Simmel, Benjamin, Adorno, Bourdieu (2013), Globalizing Cultures: Theories, Actions, Paradigms (co-edited with M. Vujnovic, 2015). His main research interests are in history and sociological theory, critical theory, sociological aesthetics, sociology of the imaginary. He was member of the scientific committee of the AIS (Italian Sociological Association) - Section Sociological Theories (2016-2019). He is editor of the journal Simmel Studies.
Bibliography
- Arendt, H. (1968). Men in Dark Times. Harcourt Brace & Company.
- Barbisan, L. (2016). Walter liest Georg Simmel. Über Walter Benjamin und Georg Simmel von Marian Mičko. Simmel Studies, 20(1–2), 180–189.
- Benjamin, W. (1979). One-Way Street and Other Writings. Lowe & Brydone.
- Benjamin, W. (1994). The Correspondence of Walter Benjamin. 1910 - 1940 (T. W. Adorno & G. Scholem (eds.)). The University of Chicago Press.
- Benjamin, W. (1996). Selected Writings. Volume 1: 1913-1926 (M. Bullock & M. W. Jennings (eds.)). The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
- Benjamin, W. (1999). The Arcades Project. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
- Benjamin, W. (2003). Selected Writings, Volume 4, 1938-1940 (M. W. Jennings & H. Eiland (eds.)). Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
- Caygill, H. (1998). Walter Benjamin. The Colour of Experience. Routledge.
- Dodd, N. (2008). Goethe in Palermo: Urphänomen and Analogical Reasoning in Simmel and Benjamin. Journal of Classical Sociology, 8.
- Dodd, N., & Wajcman, J. (2016). Simmel and Benjamin: early theorists of the acceleration society. In N. Dodd & J. Wajcman (Eds.), The sociology of speed: digital, organizational, and social temporalities (pp. 13–24). Oxford University Press.
- Eiland, H., & Jennings, M. W. (2014). Walter Benjamin. A Critical Life. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
- Fitzi, G. (2018). Nationalism and Europeanism: Simmel’s Dilemma. Simmel Studies, 22(2), 125–148.
- Frisby, D. (1981). Sociological Impressionism. A Reassessment of Georg Simmel’s Social Theory. Heinemann.
- Frisby, D. (1984). Georg Simmels Theorie der Moderne. In Hrsg. von Heinz-Jürgen Dahmen und Otthein Rammstedt (Ed.), Georg Simmel und die Moderne. Neue Interpretationen und Materialien. (pp. 9–79). Suhrkamp.
- Frisby, D. (1985). Georg simmel: First sociologist of modernity. Theory, Culture & Society, 2(3), 49–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276485002003006
- Frisby, D. (1986). Fragments of Modernity. Theories of Modernity in the work of Simmel, Kracauer and Benjamin. Routledge.
- Frisby, D. (2013). Sociological Impressionism (Routledge Revivals). In Sociological Impressionism (Routledge Revivals). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203760932
- Gassen, K., & Landmann, M. (Eds.). (n.d.). Buch des Dankes an Georg Simmel. Duncker & Humblot.
- Hobsbawm, E. (1994). The Age of Extremes: The Short Twentieth Century, 1914–1991. Vintage.
- Köhnke, K. C. (1981). Über den Ursprung des Wortes Erkenntnis- theorie – und dessen vermeintliche Synonyme. Archiv Für Begriffsgeschichte, XXV, 185–210.
- Köhnke, K. C. (1986). Entstehung und Aufstieg des Neukantianismus: Die deutsche Universitätsphilosophie zwischen Idealismus und Positivismus. Suhrkamp.
- Köhnke, K. C. (1996). Der junge Simmel in Theoriebeziehungen und sozialen Bewegungen. Suhrkamp.
- Kusch, M. (2019). Georg Simmel and Pragmatism. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, XI(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4000/ejpap.1490
- Landmann, M. (1958). Bausteine zur Biographie. In K. Gassen & M. Landmann (Eds.), Buch des Dankes an Georg Simmel (pp. 11–33). Duncker & Humblot.
- Lash, S. (2005). Lebenssoziologie: Georg Simmel in the Information Age. Theory, Culture & Society, 22(3), 1–24.
- Levine, D. N. (2012). Soziologie and Lebenschauung: Two Approaches to Synthesizing “Kant” and “Goethe” in Simmel’s Work. Theory, Culture & Society, 29(7/8), 26–52.
- Lijester, T. (2012). Walter Benjamin’s Concept of Critique. In K. de Boer & R. Soderegger (Eds.), Conceptions of Critique in Modern and Contemporary Philosophy (pp. 156–174). Palgrave Macmillian. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230357006_10
- Martinez, A. T. (n.d.). Walter Benjamin. A sociologist in the path of Simmel. Humboldt Journal of Social Relations, 12(1), 114–131.
- Meyer, I. (2005). Benjamin, Adorno und im Hintergrund der Dritte. Transformationen des Simmelschen Fragmentierungsgedankens: Mode, Allegorie und der ‚Essay als Form’. Simmel Studies, 15(1), 63–113.
- Mičko, M. (2010). Walter Benjamin und Georg Simmel. Harrassowitz.
- Podoksik, E. (2016). Neo-kantianism and Georg Simmel’s interpretation of Kant. Modern Intellectual History, 13(3), 597–622.
- Scholem, G., & Benjamin, W. (1982). The Story of a Friendship. Faber.
- Simmel, G. (1910). Philosophie der Abenteuers. Der Tag. Moderne Illustrierte Zeitung, 2 8 z(Juni 7-8), 1–3.
- Simmel, G. (1913). Goethe. Klinkhardt & Biermann.
- Simmel, G. (1989a). Aufsätze 1887 bis 1890. Über sociale Differenzierung. Die Probleme der Geschichtsphilosophie (H.-J. Dahme (Ed.); GSG 2). Suhrkamp.
- Simmel, G. (1989b). Philosophie des Geldes (D. K. K. C. Frisby (Ed.); GSG 6). Suhrkamp.
- Simmel, G. (1992a). Soziologie. Untersuchungen über die Formen der Vergesellschaftung (O. Rammstedt (Ed.); GSG 11). Suhrkamp.
- Simmel, G. (1992b). Soziologische Ästhetik. In D. Dahme, H. J.; Frisby (Ed.), GSG 5 (pp. 197–214). Suhrkamp.
- Simmel, G. (1995). Über Geschichte der Philosophie. Aus einer einleitenden Vorlesung. In R. Kramme, A. Rammstedt, & O. Rammstedt (Eds.), GSG 7. Aufsätze und Abhandlungen 1901-1908. Band I (pp. 283–287). Suhrkamp.
- Simmel, G. (1996). Hauptprobleme der Philosophie. Philosophische Kultur. In R. Kramme & O. Rammstedt (Eds.), GSG 14. Hauptprobleme der Philosophie. Philosophische Kultur. Suhrkamp.
- Simmel, G. (1997). Kant: sechzehn Vorlesungen gehalten an der Berliner Universität (G. Oakes & K. Röttgers (Eds.); GSG 9).
- Symons, S. (2017). More than life. Georg Simmel and Walter Benjamin on Art. Northwestern University Press.
- Vozza, M. (1988). Il sapere della superficie. Da Nietzsche a Simmel. Liguori Editore.
- Yakovenko, S. (2018, October). Review of Symons, Stéphane. More Than Life: Georg Simmel and Walter Benjamin on Art. H-SHERA, H-Net Reviews. https://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=52112
10.7202/1040123ar