Résumés
Abstract
The main purpose of this article is to re-examine the legacy of Marx and Simmel for the study of romantic love from a feminist perspective. I am interested in the relational legacy these two authors provide for the study of the affective sphere. Specifically, I am interested in highlighting how both offer analytical inputs to consider the relationships between love, power, and conflict. I attempt to answer the following questions: What do Marx and Simmel postulate when they talk about love? What is the complementary contribution of their proposals considering recent studies on love from a feminist perspective? While Marx allows us to incorporate the socio-structural and historical level – specifically the material dimension –, Simmel allows us to incorporate the social process and symbolic exchange – specifically the cultural dimension – to think about the affective dimension of social ties and love as social bond. I consider that from this analytical and political perspective, the Marxist-Simmelian legacy provides a thought-provoking program for the relational analysis of affects, emotions and love.
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Ahmed S. (2006). Queer Phenomenology: Orientations, Objects, Others. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
- Ahmed S. (2014). The Cultural Politics of Emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
- Bowring F. (2019). Erotic Love in Sociology, Philosophy and Literature From Romanticism to Rationality. London: Bloomsbury Publishing. Kindle Edition.
- Cantó-Milà N. (2012). “Gratitude – invisibly webbing society together”, in: Journal of Classical Sociology, 13(1), pp. 8-19.
- Cantó-Milà N. (2005). A Sociological Theory of Value. Georg Simmel’s Sociological Relationism. Bielefeld: Transcript.
- Christias P. (2019). “Eros as Educator in the Era of Advanced Monetary Economy: Simmel’s Social Metaphysics of the Erotic Being”, in: Simmel Studies, 23(1), pp. 183–201.
- Dépelteau F. (2018). “Relational Thinking in Sociology: Relevance, Concurrence and Dissonance”, in: Dépelteau, F. (Ed.), The Palgrave Handbook of Relational Sociology. Switzerland: Palgrave MacMillan, pp. 3-29
- Emirbayer M. (1997). “Manifesto for a Relational Sociology”, in: The American Journal of Sociology,103(2), pp. 281-317.
- Federici S. (1975). Wages against housework. London: Power of Women Collective.
- Federici S. (2018). El patriarcado del salario. Críticas feministas al marxismo. Madrid: Traficante de Sueños.
- Ferguson A. (2018). “Alienation in love. Is mutual love the solution?”, in: García Andrade, A., Gunnarsson, L., Jónasdóttir, A. (Ed.), Feminism and the Power of Love. Interdisciplinary Interventions. New York: Routledge, pp 36-54.
- Fraser N. (2016). “Contradictions of Capital and Care”, in: New Left Review. (100), pp. 99-117
- Frisby D. (1998). “Introduction to Georg Simmel’s On the Sociology of the Family”, in: Theory, Culture, and Society. 15(3-4), pp. 277-281.
- Gabriel M. (2011). Love and Capital. Karl and Jenny Marx and the Birth of a Revolution. New York: Little Brown.
- Gago V. (2020). La potencia feminista o el deseo de cambiarlo todo. México: Tinta Limón.
- García Andrade A., and O. Sabido Ramos (2016). “Los amantes y su mundo: una propuesta teórico-metodológica”, in: Pozas, M., Estrada, M. (Ed.), Disonancias y resonancias conceptuales. México: El Colegio de México, pp. 179-203
- García Andrade A., and O. Sabido Ramos (2018). “The invisible ties We share. A relational analysis of the contemporary loving couple”, ?”, in: García Andrade, A., Gunnarsson, L., Jónasdóttir, A. (Ed.), Feminism and the Power of Love. Interdisciplinary Interventions. New York: Routledge, pp 137-154.
- García Andrade A., Gunnarsson, L., Jónasdóttir, A. (Ed.), (2018). Feminism and the Power of Love. Interdisciplinary Interventions. New York: Routledge
- Giddens A. (1992). The Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love, and Eroticism in Modern Societies. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
- González F. (22 de Noviembre de 1980). Karl Marx sobre el divorcio. El País. https://elpais.com/diario/1980/11/23/sociedad/343782004_850215.html (accesed 19 July 2021)
- González N. (2012). “Estudio preliminar y notas”, in: Marx, K. Sobre el suicidio. Madrid: El Viejo Topo, pp. 7-50
- Haraway D. (1988). “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective”, in: Feminist Studies, 14(3), pp. 575-599
- Hartmann H. (1981). “The Unhappy Marriage of Marxism and Feminism: Towards a More Progressive Union”, in: Sargent, L. (Ed.), Women and Revolution. A discussion of the Unhappy Marriage of Marxism and Feminism. A Debate on Class and Patriarchy. London: Pluto Press, pp. 1-41
- Herrera C. (2020). “Amor romántico”, in: Cobo, R., Ranea, B. (Ed.), Breve diccionario de feminismo. Madrid: Catarata, pp. 7-50
- Illouz E. (1997). Consuming the Romantic Utopia. California: University of California Press.
- Illouz E. (2012). Why love hurts. A sociological explanation. Cambridge: Polity Press.
- Illouz E. (2019). The End of Love: A Sociology of Negative Relations. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Jimeno M. (2004). Crimen pasional. Contribución a una antropología de las emociones. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
- Jónasdóttir A. (1993). El poder del amor. ¿Le importa al sexo la democracia? Madrid: Ediciones Cátedra.
- Jónasdóttir A. (2008): “Feminist questions, Marx’s method and the theorisation of “love power””, in: Jónasdóttir, A. and K. Jones, (Ed.): The Political Interests of Gender Revisited. Redoing theory and research with a feminist face. Manchester, Manchester University Press, pp. 58-83
- Jónasdóttir A. (2011). “¿Qué clase de poder es el poder del amor?” in: Sociológica. 26(74), pp. 247-274.
- Jónasdóttir A. (2014). “Los estudios acerca del amor: un renovado interés para el conocimiento”, in: García Andrade, A. and Sabido Ramos, O. (Ed.), Cuerpo y afectividad en la sociedad contemporánea. Algunas rutas del amor y la experiencia sensible en las ciencias sociales. México: UAM-Azcapotzalco, pp. 39-80
- Jónasdóttir A. (2018). “The difference that love (power) makes”, in: García Andrade, A., Gunnarsson, L., Jónasdóttir, A. (Ed.), Feminism and the Power of Love. Interdisciplinary Interventions. New York: Routledge, pp. 15-35.
- Klesse C. (2014). “Poliamor. De la promesa de amar a muchos”, in: García Andrade, A. and Sabido Ramos, O. (Ed.), Cuerpo y afectividad en la sociedad contemporánea. Algunas rutas del amor y la experiencia sensible en las ciencias sociales. México: UAM-Azcapotzalco. pp. 131-161
- Lamas M. (2020). Dolor y política. Sentir, pensar y hablar desde el feminismo. México: Océano.
- Levine D. (1971). Introduction. Georg Simmel on Individuality of Social Forms. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. pp. IX-LXV
- Lichtblau K. (1989). “Eros and Culture: Gender Theory in Simmel, Tönnies and Weber”, in: Telos. A Quarterly Journal of Critical Thought, (82), pp. 89-110.
- Luhmann N. (1998). Love as Passion. The Codification of Intimacy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
- Marx K. [1867] (1954). Capital (Vol. I). London: Lawrence and Wishart.
- Marx K. [1932] (2014). Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844. USA: Wilder Publications.
- Marx K. [1842] (1982). “El proyecto de ley sobre el divorcio”, in: Escritos de juventud. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica, pp. 289-291
- Marx K [1857/1858] (1973). Grundrisse. Harmondsworth, Middlesex, England: Penguin Books.
- Marx K. [1844] (1978). “On the Jewish Question”, in: Tucker, C. (Ed.), The Marx-Engels Reader. New York: Norton, pp. 26-46
- Marx K. [1846] (2012). Sobre el suicidio. Madrid: El Viejo Topo.
- Marx K. [1841] (2017). “Sobre el amor”, in: Bértolo, C. (Ed.), Llamando a las puertas de la revolución. Antología. Barcelona: Penguin, pp. 143-144
- Marx K. and Engels, F. ([1846] (1998). The German Ideology: including Theses on Feuerbach and Introduction to the Critique of Political Economy. Amherst, New York: Prometheus Books.
- Marx K. and Engels, F. [1848] (2011). The Communist Manifesto. USA: Penguin.
- Oakes G. (1984). “The problem of women in Simmel’s theory of culture” in Simmel, G., On women, sexuality, and love. New Haven, CT. and London: Yale University Press, pp. 3-62
- Pedwell C. and A. Whitehead. (2012). Affecting feminism: Questions of feeling in feminist theory. Feminist Theory, 13(2), 115-129.
- Pyyhtinen O. (2010). Simmel and “The Social”. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Quintana V. (2020). Canción sin miedo. Recuperado de https://www.letras.mus.br/vivir-quintana/cancion-sin-miedo-part-el-palomar/ (accesed 19 July 2021)
- Rammstedt, A. (2015). “Tres mujeres en diálogo con Simmel”, in: Díaz, G. (Ed.), Un actitud del espíritu. Interpretaciones en torno a Georg Simmel. Medellín: Universidad de Antioquia, pp. 181-203.
- Rougemont D. (1983). Love in the Western World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Sabido Ramos O. (2015). “Fragmentos amorosos en el pensamiento de Georg Simmel”, in: Díaz, G, (Ed.), Un actitud del espíritu. Interpretaciones en torno a Georg Simmel. Medellín: Universidad de Antioquia, pp. 205-235
- Sabido Ramos O. (2018). “La sensorialidad capitalista en Karl Marx y Georg Simmel: Claves para el análisis sensible de la sociedad contemporánea”, in: Dissonância: Revista de Teoria Crítica. 2(2), pp. 224-261.
- Sabido Ramos O, and A. García Andrade. (2015). “El amor como vínculo social: con Elias y más allá de Elias”, in: Sociológica, 30(86), pp. 31-63.
- Sabido Ramos O, and A. García Andrade. (2017). “El cuerpo de los amantes. El amor como experiencia sensible en jóvenes universitarios”, in: Domínguez, A., Zirión, A. (Ed.), La dimensión sensorial de la cultura. Diez contribuciones al estudio de los sentidos en México. México: UAM-Iztapalapa, pp. 233-270.
- Sabido Ramos O, and A. García Andrade. (2018). “In the Name of Love: A Relational Approach to Young People’s Relationships in Urban Mexico”, in: Juvonen, T., and M. Kolehmainen (Ed.), Affective Inequalities in Intimate Relationships. Nueva York-London: Routledge, pp. 141-154.
- Seebach S. (2017). Love and society: Special social forms and the master emotion, New York and London: Routledge.
- Sempruch J. (2018). “Feminist visions and socio-political meanings of non-monogamous love”, in: García Andrade, A., Gunnarsson, L., Jónasdóttir, A. (Ed.), Feminism and the Power of Love. Interdisciplinary Interventions. New York: Routledge, pp. 117-136.
- Simmel G. [1916] (1971). “Eros, Platonic and Modern”, in: Levine, D. (Ed.), Georg Simmel on Individuality of Social Forms. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 235-248.
- Simmel G. [1913] (1984a). “On Love (A Fragment)”, in: Oakes, G. (Ed.), Georg Simmel: On Women, Sexuality, and Love. New Haven: Yale University Press, pp. 153–192.
- Simmel G. [1911] (1984b). “Flirtation”, in: Oakes, G. (Ed.), Georg Simmel: On Women, Sexuality, and Love. New Haven: Yale University Press, pp. 133–152.
- Simmel G. [1911] (1984c). “The Relative and the Absolute in the Problem of the Sexes in: Oakes, G. (Ed.), Georg Simmel: On Women, Sexuality, and Love. New Haven: Yale University Press, pp. 102–132.
- Simmel G. [1911] (1984d). “Female Culture”, in: Oakes, G. (Ed.), Georg Simmel: On Women, Sexuality, and Love. New Haven: Yale University Press, pp. 65–101.
- Simmel G. [1904] (1997a). “The Philosophy of Fashion”, in: Frisby, D. and M. Featherstone (Ed.), Simmel on Culture. London: SAGE, pp. 187-206
- Simmel G. [1891/1892] (1997b). “Some Remarks on Prostitution in the Present and in Future”, in: Frisby, D. and M. Featherstone (Ed.), Simmel on Culture. London: SAGE, pp. 262-270.
- Simmel G. [1895] (1998). “On the Sociology of the Family”, in: Theory, Culture, and Society, 15(3-4), pp. 283-293.
- Simmel G. [1900] (2004). The Philosophy of Money. New York and London: Routledge.
- Simmel G. [1901/1902] (2007) “Fragmentos de una filosofía del amor”, in: Simmel, G. Imágenes momentáneas sub specie aeternitatis. Barcelona: Gedisa, pp. 116-119
- Simmel G. [1908] (2009). Sociology: Inquiries Into the Construction of Social Forms. Boston: Leiden.
- Simmel G. [1918] (2010a). The View of Life. FourMetaphysical Essays with Journal Aphorisms. Chicago: The University Chicago Press.
- Simmel G. [1898] (2010b). “El papel del dinero en las relaciones de género”, in: Simmel, G. Cultura líquida y dinero. Fragmentos simmelianos de la modernidad. Barcelona: Anthropos y UAM, Cuajimalpa, pp. 62-78
- Simmel G. [1901] (2018). Sobre una psicología de la vergüenza. Digithum 21, 67-74.
- Swedberg R. and Reich, W. (2010). “Georg Simmel’s Aphorisms”, in: Theory, Culture, and Society, 27(1), pp. 24-51.
- Torres M. (2016). “El nuevo rostro de un viejo fenómeno: la trata de personas con fines de explotación sexual y los derechos humanos”, in: Sociológica, 31, 89, pp. 95-129.
- Turner B. (2008). The Body and Society: Explorations in Social Theory. London: SAGE.
- Vandenberghe F. (2018). “The Relation as Magical Operator: Overcoming the Divide. Between Relational and Processual Sociology”, in: Dépelteau, F. (Ed.), The Palgrave Handbook of Relational Sociology. Switzerland: Palgrave MacMillan, pp. 35-57.
- Vromen S. (1990). “Georg Simmel and the Cultural Dilemma of Women”, in: Kaern, M., B. Phillips, R. Cohen (Ed.), Georg Simmel and Contemporary Sociology. Boston: Kluwer Academic Puplishers, pp. 318-340
- Weeks K. (2011). The problem of work. Feminism, marxism, antiwork politics and postwork imaginaties. London: Duke Press.
10.7202/1062543ar