Résumés
Abstract
The essay brings together Georg Simmel’s and John Dewey’s reflections on the issues of education against the background of their diagnosis of a crisis in modern culture. In speaking of a “tragedy of culture” (Simmel) or, respectively, of a “tragedy of the lost individual” (Dewey) both thinkers stress the challenge the individual faces in constituting itself as a unity within a highly differentiated culture. I will show that both Simmel’s as well as Dewey’s considerations refer to the urgency of understanding individuality not as something static and fixed but as a coherent manner of interacting with continuously transforming conditions. This is an insight which emerges from Simmel’s “philosophy of life” as well as from Dewey’s “philosophy of experience” and it urges modern education to focus on enabling the individual’s “self-control” and “self-direction” within its own life and experience process.
Veuillez télécharger l’article en PDF pour le lire.
Télécharger
Parties annexes
Biographical note
Heike Koenig studied philosophy, mathematics and pedagogics (B.A./M.Ed.) at the Bergische Universität Wuppertal. Since 2016, she has worked as a Research Assistant at the Chair for Philosophy of Culture and Aesthetics. Her research interests are: philosophy of culture, philosophical anthropology, philosophy of education and American pragmatism. She is currently working on her dissertation about prospects of a modern “philosophy of culture”, focusing particularly on Ernst Cassirer and John Dewey.
Bibliography
- Amat M. (2017). “Simmel’s Law of the Individual: A Relational Idea of Culture”, in: Simmel Studies, vol. 22(2), pp. 41-72.
- Amat M. (2018). Le relationnisme philosophique de Georg Simmel. Une idée de la culture, Paris: Honoré Champion Éditeur.
- Bittner S. (2001). Learning by Dewey? John Dewey und die Deutsche Pädagogik 1900-2000, Bad Heilbronn/Obb.: Klinkhardt.
- Danner S. (1991). Georg Simmels Beitrag zur Pädagogik, Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt.
- Danner S. (2007). “Pädagogische Mittel als Zweck – pädagogische Zwecke als Mittel? Antworten von Simmel, Dewey und Litt”, in: Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, vol. 53(6), pp. 825-842.
- Dewey J. (1930). Human Nature and Conduct. An Introduction to Social Psychology [1922]. New York: Modern Library.
- Dewey J. (1931). “Philosophy and Civilization”, in: Idem, Philosophy and Civilization, New York-London: G.P. Putnam’s Sons, pp. 3-12.
- Dewey J. (1974). On Education. Selected Writings, ed. by R.D. Archambault, Chicago-London: The University of Chicago Press.
- Dewey J. (1979). Experience and Education [1938], New York: Macmillan.
- Dewey J. (1984). “Individualism, Old and New” [1929/30], in: Idem, The Later Works, vol. 5, ed. by J.A. Boydston, Carbondale-Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press, pp. 41-123.
- Dewey J. (2008). Democracy and Education [1916], in: Idem, The Middle Works, vol. 9, ed. by J.A. Boydston, Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
- Fitzi G. (2002). Soziale Erfahrung und Lebensphilosophie. Georg Simmels Beziehung zu Henri Bergson, Konstanz: UVK.
- Geßner W. (2003). Der Schatz im Acker. Georg Simmels Philosophie der Kultur, Weilerswist: Velbrück Wissenschaft.
- Levine D. N. (1991). “Simmel as Educator: On Individuality and Modern Culture”, in: Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 8, pp. 99-117.
- Neubert S. (1998). Erkenntnis, Verhalten und Kommunikation: John Deweys Philosophie des ‘experience’ in interaktionistisch-konstruktivistischer Interpretation, Münster-NewYork-München-Berlin: Waxmann.
- Oelkers J./Horlacher R. (2002). “Einleitung”, in: John Dewey, Pädagogische Aufsätze und Abhandlungen (1900-1944), Zürich: Pestalozzianum.
- Podoksik E. (2010). “Georg Simmel: Three Forms of Individualism and Historical Understanding”, in: New German Critique, vol. 37, Number 1 (109), pp. 119-145.
- Pyyhtinen O. (2008). “Ambiguous Individuality: Georg Simmel on the ‘Who’ and the ‘What’ of the Individual”, in: Human Studies, vol. 31(3), pp. 279-298.
- Ricken N. (2014). “Individualität”, in: C. Wulf and J. Zirfas (Eds.), Handbuch Pädagogische Anthropologie, Wiesbaden: Springer VS, pp. 559-566.
- Schlitte A. (2017). “Bildung und Kultur bei Georg Simmel”, in: M. Spieker and K. Stojanov (Eds.), Bildungsphilosophie. Disziplin – Gegenstandsbereich – Politische Bedeutung, Baden-Baden: Nomos, pp. 213-227.
- Simmel G. (1971). Georg Simmel on Individuality and Social Forms. Selected Writings, ed. by D.N. Levine, Chicago-London: The University of Chicago Press.
- Simmel G. (1987). Das individuelle Gesetz. Philosophische Exkurse, ed. by M. Landmann, Frankfurt/M.: stw (reissue).
- Simmel G. (2004). The Philosophy of Money, 3rd enlarged edition, ed. by D. Frisby, transl. by T. Bottomore and D. Frisby, London-New York: Routledge.
- Simmel G. (2005). Rembrandt: An Essay in the Philosophy of Art, transl. and ed. by A. Scott and H. Staubmann, New York-London: Routledge and Taylor.
- Simmel G. (2006). Simmel on Culture. Selected Writings, ed. by D. Frisby and M. Featherstone, London-Thousand Oaks-New Delhi: SAGE.
- Simmel G. (2010). The View of Life. Four Metaphysical Essays with Journal Aphorisms, transl. by J. A. Y. Andrews and D. N. Levine, Chicago-London: The University of Chicago Press.
- Simmel G. (2012). “The Fragmentary Character of Life”, transl. by A. Harrington, in: Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 29(7/8), pp. 237-248.