Résumés
Abstract
Despite many different research efforts over the past thirty years, one can still attend a conference and learn that Simmel was a radical nationalist who sang in this chorus throughout the First World War. The main references in this respect are the memories of the younger intellectuals of the time like Lukács and Bloch. There is no attempt at assessment – neither of Simmel’s writings nor of his letters. In contrast, the present paper deals with the issue of Simmel’s attitude to the war by focusing on its different periods and by reconstructing the twists and turns that changed it. After an analysis of the reasons that led Lukács and Bloch to claim Simmel’s treason, it describes the unique aspect of Simmel’s early position about the war. In this context, especially the issue of “clearing up” the foreign countries and Simmel’s exchange with Albion Small deserve particular attention. The effects of Simmel’s change of opinion since the spring of 1915 are then reconstructed with reference to his later war writings, especially the anthology on The War and Decisions of the Spirit (1917) as well as his late reflection on the theory of modernity in the essay on “The Conflict of Modern Culture” (1918).
Veuillez télécharger l’article en PDF pour le lire.
Télécharger
Parties annexes
Biographical note
Gregor Fitzi is co-director of the Centre for Citizenship, Social Pluralism and Religious Diversity at University of Potsdam, Germany. After his PhD in Sociology at the University of Bielefeld, he was assistant professor at the Institute of Sociology, University of Heidelberg, Germany. Among his recent publications are: The Challenge of Modernity. Simmel’s Sociological Theory, (Routledge 2018). (With Jürgen Mackert and Bryan Turner) Populism and the Crisis of Democracy, 3 vol. (Routledge 2018).
Bibliography
- Benda J. (1927). La trahison des clercs. Paris: Grasset.
- Bergson H. (1972). Mélanges. Paris: PUF.
- Bruhns H. (2017). Max Weber und der Erste Weltkrieg. Tübingen: Mohr-Siebeck.
- Coser L. A. (1965). “The stranger in the academy”, in: Georg Simmel: Makers of Modern Social Science. Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, pp. 29‒39.
- Durkheim É. (1887). “La Science positive de la morale en Allemagne”, in: Revue philosophique, 24, pp. 33‒58, pp. 113‒42, pp. 275‒84.
- Durkheim É. (1915). Germany above All. The German Mental Attitude and the War. Paris: Colin.
- Fitzi G. (2002). Soziale Erfahrung und Lebensphilosophie. Georg Simmels Beziehung zu Henri Bergson. Constance: UVK.
- Fitzi G. (2015). Grenzen des Konsenses. Rekonstruktion einer Theorie transnormativer Vergesellschaftung. Weilerswist: Verlbrück.
- Fitzi G. (2017). “Emotionalisation, Propaganda and Latent Europe: French and German Sociologists Debating the War”, in: M. Demoor, S. Posman, and C. Van Dijck, First World War. How the Conflict Impacted on Ideas, Methods and Fields of Inquiry. Brighton: Sussex Academic Press, pp. 113‒129.
- Hauptmann G. (1914), “Gegen Unwahrheit”, in: Berliner Tagblatt, Nr. 431, 26, August 1914.
- Karsanti B. (2015), ‘Commentaire à vive voix’, in: É. Durkheim, L’Allemagne au-dessus de tout. Paris: Editions EHESS, pp. 13‒53.
- Kriegs-Rundschau. Zeitgenössische Zusammenstellung der für den Weltkrieg wichtigen Ereignisse, Urkunden, Kundgebungen, Schlacht- und Zeitberichte. Ed.by the Tägliche Rundschau. Vol. 1: Von den Ursachen des Krieges bis etwa zum Schluß des Jahres 1914, Berlin 1915.
- Landmann M. (1976). “Ernst Bloch über Simmel”, in: Ästhetik und Soziologie um die Jahrhundertwende: Georg Simmel. Ed. by H. Böhringer, und K. Gründer. Frankfurt a.M: Klostermann, pp. 269‒271.
- Lukács G. (1973). “Die deutschen Intellektuellen und der Krieg”, in: Text und Kritik, 39/40, pp. 65-69.
- Plessner H. (1935). Das Schicksal deutschen Geistes im Ausgang seiner bürgerlichen Epoche. Zürich und Leipzig: Max Niehans Verlag; Then in: Id. (1959). Die verspätete Nation. Über die politische Verführbarkeit bürgerlichen Geistes. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer. Now in: Id. (1982). Gesammelte Schriften, ed. by G. Dux, O. Marquard and E. Ströker, vol. 6, Die verspätete Nation. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, pp. 7–223.
- Popp M., Rammstedt O. (1995). “Aufklärung und Propaganda: zum Konflikt zwischen Georg Simmel und Friedrich Gundolf”, in: Simmel Newsletter, 5(2), pp. 139-155.
- Reithel T. (1996). Das “Wunder” der inneren Einheit: Studien zur deutschen und französischen Öffentlichkeit bei Beginn des Ersten Weltkrieges. Bonn: Bouvier.
- Scheler M. (1914). “Der Genius des Krieges”, in: Die neue Rundschau, 25. Jg. der Freien Bühne, 10. Vol., October 1914, pp. 1327–1352.
- Simmel G. (1989-2015). Georg Simmel Gesamtausgabe (here cited as GSG). Ed. by Otthein Rammstedt et al. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, 24 volumes.
- Simmel H. (2008[1941/42]). “Lebenserinnerungen”, in: Simmel Studies, 18/1, pp. 9‒136.
- Small A. (1915). “Germany and the American opinion. Professor Albion Small to Professor Georg Simmel”, in: The Sociological Review VIII, pp. 106–111.
- Ungern-Sternberg J. v. (2014). Der Aufruf an Die Kulturwelt!: Das Manifest der 93 und die Anfänge der Kriegspropaganda im Ersten Weltkrieg. 2., Erweiterte Auflage Mit Einem Beitrag Von Trude Maurer. Bern: Peter Lang.
- Watier P. (1991). “The war writings of G. Simmel”, in: Theory, Culture and Society, 1991/8, n.3, London: Sage, pp. 219‒233.