Résumés
Résumé
Dans cette contribution au débat lancé par les éditeurs de ce numéro spécial, j’aimerais clarifier les limites de l’approche du processus politique et en discuter les conséquences. De mon point de vue, qui est celui d’un représentant de cette approche, ses limites sont souvent exagérées et ne concernent en tout cas pas la question du changement systémique. En tant que représentant de cette approche, j’aimerais proposer quelques modifications aux concepts incriminés à juste titre par les éditeurs, afin de les rendre plus aptes à tenir compte des tendances fondamentales dans le domaine de la contestation politique dans la société contemporaine. Pour conclure, j’aimerais souligner que cette approche n’a pas que des limites, mais qu’elle permet d’ouvrir des portes, de jeter des ponts et de créer des synergies.
Abstract
In this contribution to the debate launched by the editors of this special issue, we wish to clarify the limits to the political process approach and discuss inherent consequences. As an adherent to this approach I frequently see its limits exaggerated while the question of systematic change is neglected. In representing the political process approach, I propose certain changes to the concepts justly queried by the editors to better align them with the basic trends affecting political protest in contemporary society. In conclusion, I would like to emphasize that this approach does not only have limits, but also serves to open doors, build bridges and create synergies.
Resumen
En este aporte al debate lanzado por los editores de este número especial, quisiera clarificar los límites del enfoque del proceso político y discutir sobre sus consecuencias. Desde mi punto de vista, que es el de un representante de dicho enfoque, considero que sus límites han sido a menudo exagerados y no se refieren en todo caso a la cuestión del cambio sistémico. Como representante de este enfoque, quisiera proponer algunas modificaciones a los conceptos puestos en duda con mucha pertinencia por los editores, con la finalidad de volverlos más aptos a tomar en cuenta las tendencias fundamentales en el ámbito del conflicto político en la sociedad contemporánea. Para concluir, quisiera destacar que este enfoque no solo presenta límites, sino que permite abrir puertas, tender puentes y crear sinergias.
Parties annexes
Bibliographie
- Armstrong, E. A. et M. Bernstein (2008), Culture, Power, and Institutions : A Multi-Institutional Politics Approach to Social Movements, Sociological Theory, 26, 1, p. 74-99.
- Bartolini, S. et P. Mair (1990), Identity, Competition, and Electoral Availability. The stabilisation of European Electorates 1885-1985, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
- Baumgartner, F. R. et B. D. Jones (2002), « Positive and negative feedback in politics », in F. R. Baumgartner et B. D. Jones (dir.), Policy Dynamics, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, p. 3-28.
- Beck, U. (2002), Macht und Gegenmacht im globalen Zeitalter. Neue werltpolitische Ökonomie, Francfort, Suhrkamp.
- Brand, K.W. (1985), « Vergleichendes Resümee », in K.W. Brand (dir.), Neue soziale Bewegungen in Westeuropa und den USA. Ein internationaler Vergleich, Francfort, Campus, p. 306-334.
- Brand, K.W. (1982), Neue soziale Bewegunegn. Entstehung, Funktion und Perspektive neuer Protestpotentiale. Eine Zwischenbilanz, Opladen, Westdeutscher Verlag.
- Burstein, P. (1998), Discrimination, Jobs, and Politics. The Struggle for Equal Employment Opportunity in the United States since the New Deal. With a New Introduction, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.
- Canovan, M. (1999), « Trust the People ! Populism and the Two Faces of Democracy », Political Studies, 47, p. 2-16.
- Cohen, J. L. (1985), « Strategy or Identity ? New Theoretical Paradigms and Contemporary Social Movements », Social Research, 52, p. 663-716.
- Duyvendak, J.W. et M. G. Giugni (1995), « Social Movement Types and Policy Domains », in H. Kriesi, R. Koopmans, J.W. Duyvendak, et M.G. Giugni (dir.), New Social Movements in Western Europe. A Comparative Analysis, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, p. 82-110.
- Ferree, M. M., W.A. Gamson, J. Gerhards et D. Rucht (2002), Shaping Abortion Discourse. Democracy and the Public Sphere in Germany and the United States, Cambridge University Press.
- Franklin, M. N., T. T. Mackie, H. Valenet al. (dir.) (1992), Electoral Change. Responses to Evolving Social and Attitudinal Structures in Western Countries, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
- Fuchs, D. (1991), « The Normalization of the Unconventional, New Forms of Political Action and New Social Movements », in G. Meyer et F. Ryszka (dir.), Political Participation and Democracy in Poland and West Germany, Warsow, Wydaeca, p. 148-169.
- Gamson, W. A. et D. S. Meyer (1996), « Framing political opportunity », in Doug McAdam, J. D. McCarthy, M. N. Zald (dir.), Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements. Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings, Cambridge University Press, p. 275-290.
- Gamson, W. A., D. Croteau, W. Hoynes, et T. Sasson (1992), « Media Images and the Social Construction of Reality ». Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 18, p. 373-393.
- Hamdan, F. (2000), « Aufdecken und Konfrontieren. NGO-Kommunikation am Beispiel Greenpeace », Forschungsjournal NSB, 13, 3, p. 69-74.
- Hirschman, A.O. (1982), Shifting Involvements : Private Interests and Public Action, Princeton, Princeton University Press.
- Jones, B. D. (1994), Reconceiving Decision-making in Democratic Politics : Attention, Choice, and Public Policy, Chicago University Press.
- Kernell, S. (1988), Going Public. New Strategies of Presidential Leadership, Washington, CQ Press.
- Klandermans, B. et S. Tarrow (1988), « Mobilization into Social Movements : Synthesizing European and American Approaches », in B. Klandermans, S. Tarrow et H. Kriesi, International Social Movement Research, vol. 1, Greenwich, Conn., JAI Press, p. 1-38.
- Kolb, F. (2007), Protest and Opportunities. The Political Outcomes of Social Movements, Francfort, Campus.
- Koopmans, R. (1996), « New Social Movements and Changes in Political Participation in Western Europe », West European Politics, 19, p. 1, 28-50.
- Koopmans, R. (1995), Democracy from Below. New Social Movements and the Political System in West Germany, Boulder, Westview Press.
- Kriesi, H. (2004), « Political Context and Opportunity », in D. H. Snow, S. A. Soule et H. Kriesi (dir.), The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, Oxford, Blackwell Publishing, p. 67-90.
- Kriesi, H. (1998), « The transformation of cleavage politics - The 1997 SteinRokkan lecture », European Journal of Political Research, 33, 2, p. 165-185.
- Kriesi, H. (1996), « The organizational structure of new social movements in a political context », in D. McAdam, J. D. McCarthy, et M. N. Zald. Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, p. 152-184.
- Kriesi, H. (1989), « New Social Movements and the New Class in the Netherlands », American Journal of Sociology, 94, p. 1078-1116.
- Kriesi, H. (1987), « Neue soziale Bewegungen : Auf der Suche nach ihrem gemeinsamen Nenner », Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 3, p. 315-334.
- Kriesi, H., E. Grande, R. Lachat, M. Dolezal, S. Bornschier, T. Frey (2008), West European Politics in the Age of Globalization, Cambridge University Press.
- Kriesi, H., E. Grande, R. Lachat, M. Dolezal, S. Bornschier, T. Frey (2006),
- « Globalization and the transformation of the national political space : six European countries compared », European Journal of Political Research, 45, 6, p. 921-957.
- Kriesi, H., R. Koopmans, J. W. Duyvendak, et M.G. Giugni (1995), New Social Movements in Western Europe. A Comparative Analysis, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press.
- Lipset, S. M. et S. Rokkan (1967), « Cleavage Structures, Party Systems, and Voter Alignments : An Introduction », in S. M. Lipset et S. Rokkan. (dir.), Party Systems and Voter Alignments : Cross-National Perspectives, New York, The Free Press, p. 1-67.
- Manin, B. (1995), Principes du gouvernement représentatif, Paris, Flammarion.
- Mazzoleni, G. et W. Schulz (1999), « Mediatization of Politics : A Challenge for Democracy ? », Political Communication, 16, p. 247-261.
- McAdam, D., S. Tarrow et C. Tilly (2001), Dynamics of Contention, Cambridge University Press.
- McCarthy, J. D. et M. N. Zald (1977), « Resource Mobilization and Social Movements : A Partial Theory », American Journal of Sociology, 82, p. 6, 1212-41.
- Melucci, A. (1988), « Getting involved : Identity and mobilization in social movements », in B. Klandermans, S. Tarrow et H. Kriesi (dir.), International Social Movement Research, vol. 1, Greenwich, Conn., JAI Press, p. 329-348.
- Melucci, A. (1980), « The new social movements : a theoretical approach », Social Science Information, 19, p. 199-226.
- Mény, Y. et Y. Surel (2002), « The constitutive ambiguity of populism », in Y. Mény et Y. Surel (dir.), Democracies and the populist challenge. Basingstoke, Palgrave, p. 1-21.
- Meyer, D. S. and S. Tarrow (1998), “A Movement Society : Contentious Politics for a New Century”, in D. S. Meyer et S. Tarrow (dir.), The Social Movement Society. Contentious Politics for a New Century, Boulder, Rowman & Littlefield, p. 1-28.
- Micheletti, M. (2003), Political Virtue and Shopping. Individuals, Consumerism, and Collective Action, NewYork, Palgrave.
- Micheletti, M., A. Follesdal, et D. Stolle (2003), Politics, Products, and Markets. Exploring Political Consumerism Past and Present, New Brunswick, NJ, Transaction Publishers.
- Offe, C. (1985), « The New Social Movements : Challenging the Boundaries of Institutional Politics », Social Research, 52, S. p. 251-272.
- Piven, F. F. et R. A. Cloward (1977), Poor People’s Movements. Why They Succeed, How They Fail, New York, Vintage Books.
- Pizzorno, A. (1978), « Political Exchange and Collective Identity », in C. Crouch et A. Pizzorno (dir.), Industrial Conflict, in the Resurgence of Class Conflict in Western Europe since 1968, Londres, Macmillan, p. 277-298.
- Raschke, J. (1985), Soziale Bewegungen. Ein historisch-systematischer Grundriss, Francfort, Campus.
- Rucht, D. (1988), « Themes, Logics, and Arenas of Social Movements : A Structural Approach », in B. Klandermans, S. Tarrow et H. Kriesi (dir.), International Social Movement Research, vol. 1, Greenwich, Conn., JAI Press, p. 305-328.
- Sartori, G. (1990 [1968]), « The Sociology of Parties : A Critical Review », in P. Mair (dir.), West European Party Systems, Oxford, Oxford University Press, p. 150-182.
- Schattschneider, E. E. (1988 [1960]), The Semi-sovereign People. A Realist’s View of Democracy in America, Londres, Wadsworth.
- Stimson, J. A., M. B. Mackkuen, R. S. Erikson (1995), « Dynamic representation », American Political Science Review, vol. 89, 3, p. 543-565.
- Stolle, D. et M. Micheletti (2005), « Warum werden Käufer zu “politischen Verbrauchern ?” », Forschungsjournal Neue Soziale Bewegungen, vol 18, no 4, p. 41-52.
- Taggart, P. (2002), « Populism and the pathology of representative politics », in Y. Mény et Y. Surel (dir.), Democracies and the Populist Challenge, Basingstoke, Palgrave, p. 61-80.
- Teorell, J., M. Torcal, et J. R. Montéro (2007), « Political Participation : Mapping the Terrain », in J.W. Van Deth, J. R. Montéro et A. Westholm (dir.), Citizenship and Involvement in European Democracies. A Comparative Analysis, Londres, Routledge, p. 334-357.
- Tilly, C. (2008), Contentious Performances, Cambridge University Press.
- Tilly, C. (1995), Popular Contention in Great Britain, 1758.1834, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press.
- Tilly, C. (1978), From Mobilization to Revolution, Reading, Mass., Addison-Wesley.
- Touraine, A. (1978), La voix et le regard, Paris, Éditions du Seuil.
- Vogel, D. (2005), The Market for Virtue. The Potential and Limits of Corporate Social Responsibility, Washington, D.C., Brookings Institution Press.
- Wolfsfeld, G. (1997), Media and Political Conflict. News from the Middle East, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.