Résumés
Abstract
The global climate change controversy is arguably the most important problem currently facing humankind. It involves seemingly insurmountable, conflicting issues of economics, science, politics, and philosophy. This essay suggests that, on the pathway to modernity, a kind of “wrong turn” was taken in these disciplines, involving problematic presumptions about phenomenology, logic, and metaphysics. A possible correction for current disfunctions, notably in the relation of economics to the physical sciences and political action, may found in the semiotic and pragmatist perspectives of the scientist/logician/philosopher Charles Sanders Peirce (1839-1914).
Keywords:
- Climate Change,
- Economics,
- Logic,
- Pragmatism,
- Science,
- Semiotics
Résumé
La controverse sur le changement climatique mondial est sans doute le problème le plus important auquel l’humanité est actuellement confrontée. Cela implique des problèmes apparemment insurmontables et contradictoires d’économie, de science, de politique et de philosophie. Cet essai suggère que, sur le chemin de la modernité, une sorte de « fausse direction » a été prise dans ces disciplines, impliquant des présomptions problématiques sur la phénoménologie, la logique et la métaphysique. Une correction possible des dysfonctionnements actuels, notamment dans le rapport de l’économie aux sciences physiques et à l’action politique, peut se trouver dans les perspectives sémiotiques et pragmatistes du scientifique/logicien/philosophe Charles Sanders Peirce (1839-1914).
Mots-clés :
- Changement climatique,
- économie,
- logique,
- pragmatisme,
- science,
- sémiotique
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- BAKER, V.R. (2000) “Let Earth Speak!” In The Earth Around Us : Maintaining a Livable Planet. J.S. Sneiderman (Ed.) New York, NY : Freeman : 358-367.
- BAKER, V.R. (2017) “Debates—Hypothesis Testing in Hydrology : Pursuing Certainty Versus Pursuing Uberty”. In Water Resources Research (53) : 1770-1778.
- BRENT, J. (1998) Charles Sanders Peirce : A Life. Bloomington, IN : Indiana University Press.
- BRISSET, N. (2020) Economics and Performativity. Exploring Limits, Theories and Causes. London : Routledge.
- CALLON, M. (2007) “What Does It Mean to Say That Economics is Performative?” In Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics. D. MacKenzie, F. Muniesa, and L. Siu (Eds.). Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press : 344–357.
- DASGUPTA, P (2007) Economics : A Very Short Introduction. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
- DE WAAL, C. (2001) On Peirce. Belmont, CA : Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
- DE WAAL, C. (2013) Peirce : A Guide to the Perplexed. London : Bloomsbury.
- FORSTER, P. (2011) Peirce and the Threat of Nominalism. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
- HAACK, S. (2007) Defending Science—Within Reason : Between Scientism and Cynicism. Buffalo, NY : Prometheus Books.
- HAACK, S. (2014) “Do Not Block the Way of Inquiry”. In Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society (50)3 : 319-339.
- HERRMANN-PILLATH, C. (2020) “The Art of Co-Creation: An Intervention in the Philosophy of Ecological Economics”. In Ecological Economics (169) Article 106526 : 1-5
- LAZARUS, R. (2009). “Super Wicked Problems and Climate Change : Restraining the Present to Liberate the Future”. In Cornell Law Review (94)5 : 1153–1233.
- ORESKES, N., and CONWAY, E.M. (2014) The Collapse of Western Civilization. A View from the Future. New York, NY : Columbia University Press.
- PEIRCE, C. S. (1868) “Questions Concerning Certain Faculties Claimed for Man”. In Journal of Speculative Philosophy (2) : 103-114.
- PEIRCE, C. S. (1878) “How to Make Our Ideas Clear”. In Popular Science Monthly (13) : 286–302.
- PEIRCE, C. S. (1902) “Sign”. In Dictionary of Philosophy and Psychology, vol. 2. J.M. Baldwin (Ed.). New York, NY : Macmillan : 527.
- PEIRCE, C. S. (1905) “The Consequences of Pragmaticism”. In The Monist (15) : 481-499.
- PEIRCE, C. S. (1998) The Essential Peirce : Selected Philosophical Writings, Volume 2 (1893-1913). Bloomington, IN : Indiana University Press.
- SAMUELSON, P.A. (1977) “When It is Ethically Optimal to Allocate Money Income in Stipulated Fractional Shares”. In Natural Resources, Uncertainty, and General Equilibrium Systems : Essays in Memory of Rafael Lusky, A.S. Blinder, and P. Friedman (Eds.). New York, NY : Academic Press : 175-195.
- TALEB, N. (2007) The Black Swan : The Impact of the Highly Improbable. New York, NY : Random House.