Résumés
Résumé
Dans cette recherche, nous étudions l’influence de la structuration du dispositif d’apprentissage coopératif sur les biais perceptifs et comportementaux favorables aux garçons en basket-ball. Cent élèves (50 filles et 50 garçons) de 9-10 ans issus de quatre classes ont pratiqué le basket-ball pendant huit séances. Deux classes ont pratiqué dans un dispositif de coopération simple, alors que les deux autres ont été soumises à un dispositif structuré. Les biais perceptifs et comportementaux des élèves ont été mesurés à la première et à la dernière séance. Les résultats montrent que le dispositif structuré atténue les biais, contrairement au dispositif de coopération simple.
Mots-clés :
- genre,
- stéréotypes de sexe,
- apprentissage coopératif,
- dispositifs coopératifs,
- éducation physique
Abstract
The present study examines the effect of the cooperative learning structuring on perceptive and behavioural biases in favour of boys in basketball. One hundred students from four fifth grade classes practised basketball during eight lessons. Two classes practised in a cooperative learning structure based on the interdependence of results whereas the two others participated in a cooperative learning structure based on results and means interdependence. Perceptive and behavioural biases were measured at the first and last lesson. The results show that the type of cooperative structure influence the relationships between girls and boys.
Keywords:
- gender,
- sex stereotype,
- cooperative learning,
- cooperative structures,
- physical education
Resumen
Esta investigación analiza la influencia de la de la estructuración del dispositivo de aprendizaje cooperativo sobre los sesgos perceptuales y comportamentales favorables a los niños en baloncesto. Para la investigación, 100 alumnos (50 niñas y 50 niños) de 9-10 años de cuatro clases jugaron al baloncesto durante ocho sesiones de clase. Dos de las clases jugaron en un dispositivo de cooperación simple, mientras que las otras dos participaron en un dispositivo estructurado. Los sesgos perceptuales y comportamentales de los alumnos se midieron en la primera sesión y en la última. Los resultados muestran que el dispositivo estructurado mitiga los sesgos, contrariamente al dispositivo de cooperación simple.
Palabras clave:
- género,
- estereotipos de sexo,
- aprendizaje cooperativo,
- dispositivos cooperativos,
- educación física
Parties annexes
Bibliographie
- Allport, J.-W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, Massachusetts : Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
- André, A. (2012). Coopération intergroupe et sexisme en milieu scolaire. Actes du VIe Congrès international de la MESCE. Hamameth, Tunisie : Mediterranean society of comparative education.
- André, A. et Deneuve, P. (2012). Influence de la compétition et de la coopération sur les relations intergroupes en éducation physique et sportive. La recherche en éducation, 7, 3-16.
- André, A., Louvet, B. and Deneuve, P. (2013). Cooperative learning, risk-taking and inclusion of pupils with learning disabilities in physical education. British educational research journal, 39(1), 677-693.
- Auriac-Peyronnet, E. (2003). La mise en regard de deux dispositifs coopératifs. Dans E. Auriac Peyronnet (dir.), Je parle, tu parles, nous apprenons. Coopération et argumentation au service des apprentissages. Bruxelles, Belgique : De Boeck et Larcier.
- Azzarito, L. (2009) The panopticon of physical education : pretty, active and ideally white. Physical education and sport pedagogy, 14, 19–39.
- Azzarito, L. and Solmon, M. A. (2009). An investigation of students’ embodied discourses in physical education : a gender project. Journal of teaching in physical education, 28, 173-191.
- Barrett, T. M. (2000). Effects of two cooperative learning strategies on academic learning time, student performance, and social behavior of sixth-grade physical education students (unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Nebraska, Lincoln.
- Bonnot, V. and Croizet, J.-C. (2007). Stereotype internalization and women’s math performance : The role of interference in working memory. Journal of experimental social psychology, 43(6), 857-866.
- Bourhis, R.-Y., Gagnon, A. et Moise, L.-C. (1999). Discriminations et relations intergroupes. Dans R. Bourhis et J.-P. Leyens (dir.), Stéréotypes, discriminations et relations intergroupes. Sprimont, Belgique : Mardaga.
- Buchs, C., Butera, F. and Mugny, G. (2004). Ressource interdependence, student interactions and performance in cooperative learning. Educational psychology, 24(3), 291-314.
- Chalabaev, A., Sarrazin, P. and Fontayne, P. (2009). Stereotype endorsement and perceived ability as mediators of the girls’ gender orientation-soccer. Psychology of sport and exercise, 10(2), 297-309.
- Chalabaev, A., Sarrazin, P., Trouilloud, D. and Ocjussim, L. (2009). Can sex-undifferentiated teacher expectations mask an influence of sex stereotypes ? Alternative forms of sex bias in teacher expectations. Journal of applied social psychology, 39, 2469-2498.
- Cogérino, G. (2005). Filles et garçons en EPS. Paris, France : Éditions Revue EPS.
- Cohen, E. G. (2002). La construction sociale de l’équité dans les classes. Dans F. Ouellet (dir.), Les défis du pluralisme en éducation. Laval, Québec : Les Presses de l’Université Laval. (traduction par F. Ouellet).
- Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. Cambridge, Massachusetts : Polity Press.
- Constantinou, P., Manson, M. and Silverman, S. (2009). Female students’ perceptions about gender-role stereotypes and their influence on attitude toward physical education. Physicaleducator, 66, 85-96.
- Davidson, N. (1990). Cooperative learning in mathematics : a handbook for teachers. New York, New York : Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
- Dyson, B. (2001). Cooperative learning in an elementary physical education program. Journal of teaching in physical education, 20(3), 264-281.
- Dyson, B. (2002). The implementation of cooperative learning in an elementary physical education program. Journal of teaching in physical education, 22(1), 69-85.
- Dyson, B. and Grineski, S. (2001). Using cooperative learning structures in physical education. The journal of physical education, recreation and dance, 72, 28-31.
- Dyson, B., Linehan, N. and Hastie, P. A. (2010). The ecology of cooperative learning in elementary physical education classes. Journal of teaching in physical education, 29(2), 113-130.
- Flintoff, A. and Scranton, S. (2006). Girls and physical education. In D. Kirk, D. Macdonald and M. O’Sullivan (eds), The handbook of physical education. London, United Kingdom : SAGE publications.
- Fontayne, P., Sarrazin, P. et Famose, J.-P. (2001). Les pratiques sportives des adolescents : une différenciation selon le genre. STAPS, Revue internationale des sciences et du sport. 55, 23-37.
- Garcia, M.-C. (2007). Représentations genrées et sexuation des pratiques circassiennes en milieu scolaire. Sociétés et représentations, 24, 129-143.
- Gard, M. (2006). More art than science ? Boys, masculinities and physical education. In D. Kirk, D. Macdonald and M. O’Sullivan (eds), The handbook of physical education (p. 784-795). London, United Kingdom : SAGE publications.
- Gibbons, S. L., Humbert, M. L. and Temple, V. (2010). Making physical education meaningful for girls : translating theory into practice. PHEnex journal, 2(1), 1-20.
- Guérandel, C. et Beyria, F. (2011). Les interactions filles/garçons en cours d’EPS. L’exemple d’un collège de ZEP. Revue française de pédagogie, 170, 17-30.
- Guimond, S. and Palmer, D. (1993). Developmental changes in ingroup favouritism among bilingual and unilingual Francophone and Anglophone students. Journal of language and social psychology, 12(3) 318-351.
- Hill, J. (2013). Rejecting the weak Asian body : boys visualising strong masculinities. In L. Azzarito and D. Kirk (eds), Physical culture, pedagogies and visual methods. Abingdon, United Kingdom : Routledge.
- Hills, L. A. and Croston, A. (2012). It should be better all together : exploring strategies for “undoing” gender in coeducational physical education. Sport, education, and society, 17, 591-605.
- Holt, C. and Ellis, J. (1998). Assessing the current validity of the Bem sex-role inventory. Sex roles, 39(11), 929-941.
- Johnson, D.-W. and Johnson, R. (1989). Cooperation and competition : theory in the research. Edina, Minnesota : Interaction Book Company.
- Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T. and Holubec, E. (1998). Cooperation in the classroom (revised). Minneapolis, Minnesota : Interaction Book Company.
- Johnson, R., Johnson, D. W., Scott, L., and Ramolae, B. (1985). Effects of single-sex and mixed-sex cooperative interaction on science achievement and attitudes and cross handicap and cross sex relationship. Journal of research in science teaching, 22, 207-220.
- Kirk, D. (2003). Student learning and the social construction of gender. In S. J. Silverman and C. Ennis (eds). Student learning in physical education. Champaign, Illinois : Human kinetics.
- Klomsten, A. T., Marsh, H. W. and Skaalvik, E. M. (2005). Adolescents’ perceptions of masculine and feminine values in sport and physical education : a study of gender differences. Sex roles, 52, 625-636.
- Klomsten, A. T., Skaalvik E. M. and Espnes, G. A. (2004). Physical self-concept and sports : do gender differences still exist ? Sex roles, 50, 119-127.
- Koivula, N. (2001). Perceived characteristics of sports categorized as gender-neutral, feminine and masculine. Journal of sport behavior, 12(1), 377-394.
- Lafont, L. and Winnykamen, F. (1999). Co-operation and competition in children and adolescents. In Y. Vanden Auweele, F. Bakker, M. Durand and R. Seiler (eds), Textbook on psychology forphysical educators. Champaign, Illinois : Human kinetics.
- Lafont, L., Proeres, M. and Vallet, C. (2007). Cooperative group learning in a team game : role of verbal exchanges among peers. Social psychology of education, 10(1), 93–113.
- Larsson, H., Fagrell, B. and Redelius, K. (2009). Queering physical education : Between benevolence towards girls and a tribute to masculinity. Physical education and sport pedagogy, 14, 1-17.
- Lentillon, V. (2009). La mixité en Éducation physique et sportive : points de vue d’élèves du second degré. Ejrieps, 16, 38-54.
- Liotard P. et Terret T. (2005), Sport et genre, volume 2 :Excellence féminine et masculinitéhégémonique, Paris, France : L’Harmattan.
- Lips, H.-M. (2008). Sex and gender : an introduction (6th edition). Boston, Massachusetts : McGraw-Hill.
- Lyu, M. and Gill, D. L. (2011). Perceived physical competence, enjoyment, and effort in same-sex and coeducational physical education classes. Educational psychology :an international journal of experimental educational psychology, 31, 247-260.
- Mackie, D. M. and Smith, E. R. (1998). Intergroup relations : insights from a theoretically integrative approach. Psychological review, 105(3), 499-529.
- Mascret, N. (2011). Badminton player-coach, interactions between failing students. Physical education and sport pedagogy, 16(1), 1-13.
- Ministère de l’Éducation nationale (2006). Le Socle commun des connaissances et des compétences. Décret du 11 juillet 2006. Paris, France : ministère de l’Éducation nationale.
- Penney, D. and Evans, J. (2002). Talking gender. In D. Penney (ed.), Gender and physical education. London, United Kingdom : Routledge.
- Pettigrew, T. (1998) Intergroup contact theory. Annual review of psychology, 49, 65-85.
- Putnam, J.-W. (1998). Cooperative learning and strategies for inclusion : celebrating diversity in the classroom. Baltimore, Maryland : Brookes.
- Sadchev, I. and Bourhis, R.-Y. (1991). Power and status differentials in minority and majority group relations. European journal of social psychology, 21(1), 1-24.
- Slavin, R.-E. (1991). Synthesis of research on cooperative Learning. Educational leadership, 4(1), 71-82.
- Slavin, R.E. (1995). Cooperative learning : theory, research, and practice. Boston, Massachusetts : Allyn and Bacon.
- Sulz, L. D., Humbert, M. L., Gyurcski, N. C., Chad, K. E. and Gibbons, S. L. (2010). A student’s choice : enrollment in elective physical education. PHEnex journal, 2(2), 1-17.
- Terret, T. (2005). Sport et genre, volume 1 : La conquête d’une citadelle masculine, Paris, France : L’Harmattan.
- Van Amsterdam, N., Knoppers, A., Claringbould, I. and Jongmans, M. (2012). It’s just the way it is... or not ? How physical education teachers categorise and normalise differences. Gender and education, 24(7), 783-798.
- Vigneron, C. (2006). Les inégalités de réussite en EPS entre filles et garçons : déterminisme biologique ou fabrication scolaire. Revue française de pédagogie, 154, 111-124.
- Walker, I. and Crogan, M. (1998). Academic performance, prejudice and the jigsaw classroom : new pieces to the puzzle. Journal of community and applied social psychology, 8(6), 381-393.
- Webb, N. M. and Palincsar, A. S. (1996). Group processes in the classroom. In D. C. Berliner and R. C. Calfee (eds), Handbook of educational psychology. New York, New York : Macmillan.