Résumés
Résumé
Dans nos universités, la perspective de l’embauche d’un nombre important de professeurs débutants offre l’occasion idéale de revoir les structures existantes de formation et de soutien à ces novices peu préparés aux exigences de leur métaprofession. Or, depuis trois décennies, des formations ont été mises en place et leur analyse montre qu’aux années où régnait le modèle additif ont succédé les années du modèle transformatif, conçu dans une perspective de formation continue et collaborative, élargi à la dimension professionnelle. Une exploration non exhaustive du site internet de 48 universités et de leurs centres de formation permet d’offrir un aperçu de la formation des professeurs d’université de plusieurs pays.
Mots clés:
- formation continue,
- novices,
- soutien,
- universités,
- métaprofession
Summary
In our universities, the prospect of hiring a significant number of new professors offers an ideal opportunity to revisit the existing training and support structures for these novices, little prepared to face the demands of their metaprofession. Training programs have been in place for three decades and analysis shows that the transformative model, developed from a perspective of continuing and collaborative education and expanded to the professional dimension, has replaced the previous additive model. A preliminary exploration of Internet sites of 48 universities and their training centres provides an overview of the training of university professors in a number of countries.
Key words:
- continuing education,
- novices,
- support,
- universities,
- metaprofession
Resumen
En nuestras universidades, la perspectiva de contratar a un número importante de profesores principiantes ofrece una oportunidad ideal de volver a considerar las estructuras existentes de formación y de apoyo a estos nuevos profesores, poco preparados a las exigencias de su metaprofesión. Ahora bien, desde hace tres décadas, algunas formaciones fueron implementadas y su análisis muestra que a la época del modelo aditivo, sucedió la época del modelo transformativo, elaborado en una perspectiva de formación continua y de colaboración, extendido a la dimensión profesional. Una exploración no exhaustiva del sitio Internet de 48 universidades y de sus centros de formación proporciona un vistazo de la formación de los profesores de universidad en varios países.
Palabras claves:
- formación continua,
- profesores principiantes,
- apoyo,
- universidades,
- metaprofesión
Parties annexes
Références
- Angelo, A. (1994). From faculty development to academic development. AAHE Bulletin, 46(10), 3-7.
- Arreola, R., Theall, M. et Aleamoni, L. M. (2003). Beyond scholarship : recognizing the multiple roles of the professoriate. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, Illinois.
- Bertrand, D. (2004). Diversité, continuité et transformation du travail professoral dans les universités québécoises (1991, 2003). Sainte-Foy, Québec : Conseil supérieur de l’éducation.
- Bond, C., Boud, D., Lublin, J. et Webb, G. (1997). The accreditation of university teachers : a HERDSA discussion document. Jamison Centre, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory : Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia (HERDSA).
- Boyer, E. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered : priorities of the professoriate. Princeton, New Jersey : Carnegie foundation for the advancement of teaching.
- Cannon, R. et Hore, T. (1997). The long-term effects of « one-shot » professional development courses : an Indonesian case study. The international journal for academic development, 2(1), 35-42.
- Conseil supérieur de l’éducation (2004). L’état de la situation et les prévisions de renouvellement du corps professoral dans les universités québécoises. Études et recherche. Sainte-Foy, Québec : Conseil supérieur de l’éducation.
- Conseil supérieur de l’éducation (2003). Rapport annuel sur l’état et les besoins de l’éducation 2002-2003. Sainte-Foy, Québec : Conseil supérieur de l’éducation.
- Cranton, P. (1996). Professional development as transformative learning. New perspectives for teachers of adults. San Francisco, California : Jossey-Bass.
- Dreyfus, A. (1996). La formation pédagogique des enseignants universitaires : idéal et réalité. Dans J. Donnay et M. Romainville (Dir.) : Enseigner à l’université : un métier qui s’apprend ? Bruxelles, Belgique : De Boeck.
- Eble, K. et McKeachie, W. (1985). Improving undergraduate education through faculty development. San Francisco, California : Jossey-Bass.
- Feldman, K. A. (1987). Research productivity and scholarly accomplishment of college teachers as related to their instructional effectiveness : a review and exploration. Research in higher education, 26(3), 227-298.
- Ferman, T. (2002). Academic professional development practice : what lecturers find valuable. The international journal for academic development, 7(2), 146-158.
- Ferman, T. et Page, M. (2000). Beyond product : materials development as a vehicle for professional growth. Distance education, 21(2), 323-343.
- Foley, B. J., Redman, R. W., Horn, E. V., Davis, G. T., Neal, E. M. et Van Riper, M. L. (2003). Determining nursing faculty development needs. Nursing outlook, 51(5), 227-232.
- Frantz, A. C., Beebe, S. A., Horvath, V. S., Canales, J. et Swee, D. E. (2005). The roles of teaching and learning centers. Dans S. Chadwick-Blossey et D. R. Robertson (Dir.) : To improve the academy. Resources for faculty, instructional and organizational development, 23. Bolton, Massachusetts : Anker Pub.
- Frey, B. A. et Overfield, K. (2002). Action research and professional development faculty. The Canadian journal for the study of adult education, 16(1), 20-33.
- Godin, B. (2004). L’internationalisation des universités québécoises. Texte présenté à la Commission de l’enseignement et de la recherche universitaire du Conseil supérieur de l’éducation (CSÉ), Montréal, Québec.
- Gow, L. et Kember, D. (1993). Conceptions of teaching and their relationship to student learning. British journal of educational psychology, 63, 20-33.
- Hébert, P. (2004). L’Université à venir. Le renouvellement du corps professoral. Document de réflexion. Montréal, Québec : Fédération québécoise des professeures et professeurs d’université.
- Jenkins, A. (1996). Discipline-based educational development. International journal of academic development, 1(1), 50-62.
- Kane, R., Sandretto, S. et Heath, C. (2002). Telling half the story : a critical review of research on the teaching beliefs and practices of university academics. Review of educational research, 72(2), 177-228.
- Kember, D. et McKay, J. (1996). Action research into the quality of student learning : a paradigm for faculty development. Journal of higher education, 67(5), 528-554.
- Kember, D. et Mezger, R. (1990). The instructional designer as a staff developer : a course team approach consistent with the concern-based adoption model. Distance education,11(1), 51-70.
- Kember, G. et Gow, L. (1994). Orientations to teaching and their effect on the quality of student learning. Journal of higher education, 65(1), 58-74.
- Kreber, C. (2001). The scholarship of teaching and its implementation in faculty development and graduate education. New directions for teaching and learning, 86, 222-234.
- Kreber, C. (2003). The scholarship of teaching : a comparison of conceptions held by experts and regular academic staffs. Higher education, 46(1), 93-121.
- Kreber, C. et Cranton, P. (2000). Exploring the scholarship of teaching. The journal of higher education, 71(4), 476-495.
- Martin, E., Prosser, M., Trigwell, K., Ramsden, P. et Benjamin, J. (2000). What university teachers teach and how they teach it. Instructional science, 28(5), 387-412.
- Martin, E. et Ramsden, P. (1992). An expanding awareness : how lecturers change their understanding of teaching. Dans M. S. Parer (Dir.) : Research and development in higher education, 15. Sydney, Australia : Higher education research and development society of Australasia.
- McAlpine, L. et Grandell, T. (2003). Teaching improvement grants : their potential to promote a scholarly approach to teaching. Journal of further and higher education, 27(2), 187-194.
- McCaughey, R. A. (1993). But can they teach ? In praise of college professors who publish. Teachers college record, 95(2), 242-257.
- Nicol, D. J. (2000). Preparation and support of part-time teachers in higher education, Teacher development, 4(1), 115-129.
- Prosser, M. et Trigwell, K. (1999). Understanding learning and teaching. The experience in higher education. Buckingham, United Kingdom : The Society for research into Higher Education.
- Quinlan, K. M. (2002). Scholarly dimensions of academics’ beliefs about engineering education. Teachers and teaching : theory and practice, 8(1), 42-64.
- Samuelowicz, K. et Bain, J. D. (2001). Revisiting academics’ beliefs about teaching and learning. Higher education, 41(3), 299-325.
- Schön, D. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner : toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco, California : Jossey-Bass.
- Sorcinelli, M. D. (2002). Ten principles of good practice in creating and sustaining teaching and learning centers. Dans K. H. Gillespie, L. R. Hilsen et E. C. Wadsworth (Dir.) : A guide to faculty development : practical advice, examples and resources. Bolton, Massachusetts : Anker.
- Tang, T. L.-P. et Chamberlain, M. (1997). Attitudes toward research and teaching. Journal of higher education, 68(2), 213-227.
- Van Broekhuizen, L. D. et Dougherty, B. (1999). Teacher diversity : implications for professional development. Working paper. Honolulu, Hawaii : Pacific ressources for education and learning.
- Webb, G. et Murphy, D. (2000). Organisational approaches to staff development to support teaching and learning. Teacher development, 4(1), 15-29.
- Wilkerson, L. et Irby, D. (1998). Strategies for improving teaching practices : a comprehensive approach to faculty development. Academic medecine, 73(4), 387-394.