Résumés
Résumé
Cette étude effectue un portrait des pratiques liées à l’usage du Stanford Presenteeism Scale (SPS-6) en recherche, un instrument couramment utilisé dans les travaux sur le présentéisme. Deux cent trente-huit travailleurs divisés en trois groupes ont participé à l’étude : un complétant le questionnaire dans sa version originale et les autres répondants aux deux versions expérimentales (l’une dont les items sont de forme positive et l’autre dont les items sont de formes négatives). Les résultats montrent que les versions expérimentales présentent des structures unidimensionnelles et des patrons corrélationnels similaires à ceux de la version originale. Des guides à l’usage des différentes versions du SPS-6 sont discutés en conclusion.
Mots-clés :
- présentéisme,
- structure bidimensionnelle,
- formulation des items,
- patrons corrélationnels,
- fréquence du présentéisme,
- improductivité relative
Abstract
This study examines practices linked to the usages of the Stanford Presenteeism Scale (SPS-6), an instrument commonly used in presenteeism research. 238 workers divided into three groups participated to this study: one completing the questionnaire in its original version and the other responding to one of the two experimental versions (one whose items are positively worded and the other whose items are negatively worded). The results show that the experimental versions have a unidimensional structure and correlational patterns similar to those of the original version. Guides for the use of the different versions of the SPS-6 are discussed in conclusion.
Keywords:
- presenteeism,
- bifactorial structure,
- wording of items,
- correlational patterns,
- frequency of presenteeism,
- relative unproductivity
Parties annexes
Bibliographie
- Arumugam, V., MacDermid, J. C. et Grewal, R. (2013). Content analysis of work limitation, Stanford presenteeism scale, and work instability questionnaires using international classification of functioning, disability, and health and item perspective framework. Rehabilitation Research and Practice, 1-11.
- Aronsson, G., Gustafsson, K. et Dallner, M. (2000). Sick but yet at work. An empirical study of sickness presenteeism. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 54(7), 502-509.
- Aronsson, G. et Gustafsson, K. (2005). Sickness presenteeism: prevalence, attendance-pressure factors, and an outline of a model for research. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 47(9), 958-966.
- Ashby, K. et Mahdon, M. (2010). Why do employees come to work when ill? An investigation into sickness presence in the workplace. The Work Foundation, 1-69. Récupéré le 20 août 2014 de http://www.theworkfoundation.com/Assets/Docs/AXA%20event/FINAL%20Why%20do%20employees%20come%20to%20work%20when%20ill.pdf
- Beaton, D. E., Tang. K., Gignac, M. A. M., Lacaille, D., Badley, E. M., Anis, A. H. et Bombardier, C. (2010). Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of five at-work productivity measures in patients with rheumatoid arthritis or osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care & Research, 62(1), 28-37.
- Brborović, H., Brborović, O., Brumen, V., Pavleković, G. et Mustajbegović, J. (2014). Are nurse presenteeism and patient safety culture associated? A cross-sectional study. Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology, 65(2), 149-156.
- Cicolini, G., Della Pelle, C., Cerratti, F., Franza, M. et Flacco, M. E. (2016). Validation of the Italian version of the Stanford Presenteeism Scale in nurses. Journal of Nursing Management, 24(5), 598-604.
- Deery, S., Walsh, J. et Zatzick, C. D. (2014). A moderated mediation analysis of job demands, presenteeism, and absenteeism. Journal of Organizational and Occupational Psychology, 87(2), 352-369. doi: 10.1111/joop.12051
- Despiégel, N., Danchenko, N., Fançois, C., Lensberg, B. et Drummond, M. F. (2012). The use and performance of productivity scales to evaluate presenteeism in mood disorders. Value in Health, 15(8), 1148-1161.
- Esposito, E., Wang, J. L., Williams, J. V. A. et Patten, S. B. (2007). Mood and anxiety disorders, the association with presenteeism in employed members of a general population sample. Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences, 16(3), 231-237.
- Goetzel, R. Z., Long, S. R., Ozminkowski, R. J., Hawkins, K., Wang, S. et Lynch, W. (2004). Health, absence, disability, and presenteeism: cost estimates of certain physical and mental health conditions affecting U.S. employers. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 46(4), 398-412.
- Gosselin, E. et Lauzier, M. (2011). Le présentéisme : lorsque la présence n’est pas garante de la performance. Revue française de gestion, 37(211), 15-27.
- Greenberger, E., Chen, C., Dmitrieva, J. et Farruggia, S. P. (2003). Item-wording and the dimensionality of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: do they matter? Personality and Individual Differences, 35(6), 1241-1254. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00331-8
- Hemp, P. (2004). Presenteeism: at work but out of it. Harvard Business Review, October, 49-58.
- Hutting, N., Engels, J. A., Heerkens, Y. F., Staal, J. B. et Nijhuis-van der Sanden, M. W. G. (2014). Development and measurement properties of the Dutch version of the Stanford Presenteeism Scale (SPS-6). Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 24(2), 268-277.
- Johns, G. (2010). Presenteeism in the workplace: a review and research agenda. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(4), 519-542.
- Johns, G. (2011). Attendance dynamics at work: the antecedents and correlates of presenteeism, absenteeism, and productivity loss. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 16(4), 483-500.
- Jourdain, G. et Vézina, M. (2014). How psychological stress in the workplace influences presenteeism propensity: A test of the Demand–Control–Support model. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 23(4), 483-496. doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2012.754573
- Koopman, C., Pelletier, K. R., Murray, J. F., Sharda, C. E., Berger, M. L., Turpin, R. S.,… Bendel, T. (2002). Stanford presenteeism scale: health status and employee productivity. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 44(1), 14-20.
- Laranjeira, C. A. (2013). Validation of the Portugese version of the Stanford Presenteeism Scale in nurses. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 19(6), 644-650.
- Lauzier, M. et Haccoun, R. R. (2010). Validation canadienne-française de l’échelle des styles d’orientation des buts (ESOB). Canadian Journal of Behavioural Sciences, 42(2), 127-133. doi: 10.1037/a0016237
- Lauzier, M., Mélançon, S. et Côté, K. (2017). L’effet du stress perçu sur les comportements d’absentéisme et de présentéisme : Le rôle médiateur de l’état de santé. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Sciences, 49(4), 221-230. doi.org/10.1037/cbs0000081
- Lerner, D., Amick, B. C., Rogers, W. H., Malspeis, S., Bungay, K. et Cynn, D. (2001). The Work Limitation Questionnaire. Medical Care, 39(1), 72-85. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200101000-00009
- Martinez L. F. et Ferriera, A. I. (2012). Sick at work: presenteeism among Nurse in a Portuguese Public Hospital. Stress and Health, 28(4), 297-304. doi. 10.1002/smi.1432
- Mélançon, S., Lauzier, M., Gosselin, É. et Foucher, R. (2015). Le Standford Presenteeism Scale (SPS-6) : déconstruction d’un faux semblant. Dans P. Sarnin, D. R. Kouabenan, M.-É. Bobillier Chaumon, M. Dubois et J. Vacherand-Revel (Dir.). Santé et bien-être au travail (p. 53-63). Paris, France : L’Harmattan.
- Messick, S. (1966). The psychology of acquiescence: an interpretation of research evidence. ETS Research Bulletin Series, 66(1), 1-44. doi: 10.1002/j.2333-8504.1966.tb00357.x
- Miraglia, M. et Johns, G. (2016). Going to work ill: a meta-analysis of the correlates of presenteeism and a dual path model. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 21(3), 261-283. doi.10.1037/ocp0000015
- Oakman, J., Kinsman, N. et Briggs, A. M. (2017). Working with persistent pain: an exploration of strategies utilised to stay productive at work. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 27(4), 4-14. doi. 10.1007/s10926-016-9626-5
- Sanderson, K., Tilse, E., Nicholson, J., Oldenburg, B. et Graves, N. (2007). Which presenteeism measures are more sensitive to depression and anxiety? Journal of Affective Disorders, 101(1-3), 65-74.
- Tang, K., Beaton, D. E., Lacaille, D., Gignac, M. A. M. et Bombardier, C. (2013). Sensibility of five at-work productivity measures was endorsed by patients with osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 66(5), 546-556. doi:10.1016/j. jclinepi.2012.12.009
- Tang, K., Pitts, S., Solway, S. et Beaton, D. (2009). Comparison of the psychometric properties of four at-work disability measures in workers with shoulders or elbow disorders. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 19(2), 142-154.
- Tourangeau, R., Rips, L. J. et Rasinski, K. (2000). The Psychology of Survey Response. Cambridge, Royaume-Uni : Cambridge University Press.
- Turpin, R. S., Ozminkowski, R. J., Sharda, C. E., Collins, J. J., Berger, M. L., Billotti, G. M.,… Nicholson, S. (2004). Reliability and validity of the Stanford Presenteeism Scale. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 46(11), 1123-1133.
- Wynne-Jones, G., Buck, R., Phillips, C. J. et Main, C. J. (2011). Impacts on work performance; what matters 6 months on? Occupational Medicine, 61(3), 205-208.
- Wynne-Jones, G., Buck, R., Varnava, A., Philips, C. et Main, C. J. (2009). Impacts on work absence and performance: what really matters. Occupationnal Medicine, 59(8), 556-562.
- Yamashita, M. et Arakida, M. (2008). Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Stanford Presenteeism Scale in female employees at 2 japanese enterprises. Journal of Occupational Health, 50(1), 66-69.
- Yildiz, H., Yildiz, B., Zehir, C., Altindaǧ, E., Moloǧlu, V. et Kitapçi, H. (2017). Impact on presenteeism of the conscientiousness trait: a health sector case study. Social Behavior and Personality, 45(3), 399-411. doi.10.2224/sbp.5969
- Zhou, Q., Martinez, L. F., Ferreira, A. I., & Rodriguez, P. (2016). Supervisor support, role ambiguity and productivity associated with presenteeism : a longitudinal study. Journal of Business Research, 69(9), 3380-3387. doi.10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.02.006