Résumés
Abstract
True to her origins in a prominent Dissenting family, Anna Aikin Barbauld was cautious in her appraisal of existing (and often oppressive) authority structures. Her work is underscored by her understanding that established power structures are incomplete, sometimes incoherent, and usually dangerous to those that attempt to subvert them. Her poetry shows a sophisticated awareness of hierarchy as a frame of mind that needs to be disrupted and re-modeled, as a poor mental construct that pervades much of our thinking about social roles, gender, and—of course—religious practice. But rather than choosing the path of radicalism and radical idealism, Barbauld accepted the fact that realities do not always respond quickly to new critical understandings. Her poetry engages us in experiences that provoke questions and encourage further inquiry—that seek to establish what might be called a “Dissenting frame of mind.” By juxtaposing the languages of science and nurture, and by transforming ordinary experiences into extraordinary ones, Barbauld disrupts reader expectations and provokes re-evaluation of assumptions, prejudices, and “the normal.” The key to change, for Barbauld, is the ability to “think again.” And her poetry is crafted to help readers do just that.
Parties annexes
Works Cited
- Armstrong, Isabel. “‘The Gush of the Feminine’: How Can We Read Romantic Women’s Poetry.” Romantic Women Writers: Voices and Countervoices. Ed. Paula R. Feldman and Theresa M. Kelley. Hanover, NH : U P of New England, 1995.
- Barbauld, Anna Letitia. Selected Poetry and Prose. Ed. William McCarthy and Elizabeth Kraft. Ontario, CA: Broadview, 2002.
- Bateson, Gregory. Mind and Nature: A Necessary Unity. New York: E. P. Dutton, 1979. Den Otter, Alice G. “Pests, Parasites, and Positionality: Anna Letitia Barbauld and ‘The Caterpillar’.” Studies in Romanticism 43.2 (Summer 2004), 209-231.
- Keach, William. “Barbauld, Romanticism, and the Survival of Dissent.” Essays and Studies 51 (1998): 44-61.
- Mandell, Laura. Misogynous Economies. Lexington, KY: U Kentucky P, 1999.
- McCarthy, William. “Why Anna Letitia Barbauld Refused to Head a Women’s College: New Facts, New Story.” Nineteenth-Century Contexts 23.3 (2001): 349-380.
- McLachlan, H. M.A., D.D. Warrington Academy: Its History and Influence. Printed for the Chetham Society, 1943.
- Mercer, Matthew. “Dissenting Academies and the Education of the Laity, 1750-1850.” History of Education 30.1 (Jan 2001): 35-59.
- Parker, Irene. Dissenting Academies in England. New York: Octagon, 1969.
- Priestley, Joseph. Disquisitions Relating to Matter and Spirit. New York: Arno, 1975.
- Richardson, Alan. British Romanticism and the Science of the Mind. New York: Cambridge U P, 2002.
- ———. Literature, Education, and Romanticism: Reading as Social Practice 1780-1832. New York: Cambridge U P, 1994.
- Stephens, M. D. and G. W. Roderick. “Education and the Dissenting Academies.” History Today 27.1 (Jan 1977): 47-55.
- Vargo, Lisa. “The Case of Anna Laetitia Barbauld’s ‘To Mr C[olerid]ge’.” University of Saskatchewan. “The Anna Laetitia Barbauld Website: Background and Criticism.” http://www.usask.ca/english/barbauld/ <18 December 2004>.
- Watson, Mary Sidney. “When Flattery Kills: The Silencing of Anna Letitia Barbauld.” Women’s Studies 28.6 (Dec 1999): 617-644.
- Watts, Ruth. “Some Radical Educational Networks of the Late Eighteenth Century and Their Influence.” History of Education 27.1 (Mar 1998): 1-14.
- White, Daniel E. “The ‘Joineriana’: Anna Barbauld, the Aiken Family Circle, and the Dissenting Public Sphere.” Eighteenth-Century Studies 32.4 (1999): 511-33.
- Zunshine, Lisa. “Rhetoric, Cognition, and Ideology in A. L. Barbauld’s Hymns in Prose for Children (1781).” Poetics Today 23.1 (Spring 2002): 123-39.