Résumés
Abstract
Rescue operas developed along two somewhat different lines: “tyrant” operas and “humanitarian” operas within the general category of “opera semiseria,” or “opéra comique.” The first type corresponds to the conservative British “loyalty gothic,” with its focus on the trials and tribulations of the aristocracy, while the second type draws upon the Sentimental “virtue in distress” or “woman in jeopardy” genre, with its focus on middle class characters or women as the captured or besieged. The first category emphasized political injustice or abstract questions of law and embodied the threat of tyranny in an evil man who imprisons unjustly a noble character. Etienne Méhul’s Euphrosine and H.-M. Berton’s Les rigueurs du cloître (both 1790) are typical examples of the genre. “Humanitarian” operas, on the other hand, do not depict a tyrant, but instead portray an individual—usually a woman or a worthy bourgeois—who sacrifices everything in order to correct an injustice or to obtain some person’s freedom. Dalayrac’s Raoul, Sire de Créqui (1789) or Bouilly’s and Cherubini’s Les deux journées (1800) are examples, along with Sedaine’s pre-1789 works. But why, we might ask, were gothic dramas quickly transformed into gothic operas or what are known now as “rescue operas”? This essay examines the social and political ideologies that are explicit in the major gothic operatic adaptations of the most popular gothic novels of Britain, while at the same time examining British opera’s very close connections with French models as well as French adaptations of British cultural works.
Parties annexes
Works Cited
- Anderson, Benedict. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. Rev. ed. London: Verso, 1991.
- Backsheider, Paula. Spectacular Politics: Theatrical Power and Mass Culture in Early Modern England. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1993.
- Balthazar, Scott. “Ferdinando Paër”; “Leonora”; “I Fuorusciti di Firenze”; and “Rescue Opera.” In The New Grove Dictionary of Opera [NGD]. Ed. Stanley Sadie. London: Macmillan, 1992. 816-18; 1150; 316; 1293-94.
- Bernard-Griffiths, Simone and Jean Sgard, eds. Mélodrames et romans noirs 1750-1890. Toulouse: P U du Mirail, 2000.
- Blanchot, Maurice. L’entretien infini. Paris: L’Athenaeum-Gallimard, 1981.
- Brooks, Peter. The Melodramatic Imagination. New Haven: Yale UP, 1976.
- Charlton, David. “On Redefinitions of Rescue Opera.” In Music and the French Revolution. Ed. M. Boyd. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1992. 169-188.
- --------. French Opera 1730-1830: Meaning and Media. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2000.
- Chéruzel, Maurice. “David Garrick 1717-1779 Compagnon et ami de Noverre.” In Jean-George Noverre: Levain de la danse moderne. Cahors: France Quercy, 1994. 67-72.
- Cox, Jeffrey. “Romantic Drama and the French Revolution.” In Revolution and English Romanticism. Ed. Keith Hanley and Raman Selden. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1990. 241-60.
- Didier, Béatrice. “Beaumarchais aux origines du mélodrame.” In Mélodrames et romans noirs 1750-1890. Eds. Simone Bernard-Griffiths and Jean Sgard. Toulouse: P U du Mirail, 2000. 115-126.
- Dunkley, John. “The Representation of the Female in the Dramas of Sedaine.” In Michel-Jean Sedaine (1719-1797): Theatre, Opera, Art. Eds. David Charlton and Mark Ledbury. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate, 2000. 52-67.
- Foster, Susan Leigh. Choreography and Narrative: Ballet’s Staging of Story and Desire. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1996.
- Gaspard, Claire. “Coelina, de Ducray-Duminil à Pixerécourt: à l’aube de la ‘littérature industrielle’.” In Mélodrames et romans noirs 1750-1890. Eds. Simone Bernard-Griffiths and Jean Sgard. Toulouse: P U du Mirail, 2000. 125-144.
- Hale, Terry. The Dedalus Book of French Horror: The Nineteenth Century. Cambridge: Dedalus, 1998.
- Kennedy, Emmet, et al. Theatre, Opera, and Audiences in Revolutionary Paris: Analysis and Repertory. Contributions in Drama and Theatre Studies 62. London: Greenwood Press: 1996.
- Lebrun, Annie. Les châteaux de la subversion. Paris: J. J. Pauvert-Garnier Frères, 1982.
- Ledbury, Mark. Sedaine, Greuze and the Boundaries of Genre. Studies on Voltaire and the Eighteenth Century 380. Voltaire Foundation, Oxford: 2000.
- ---. “Sedaine and the Question of Genre.” In Michel-Jean Sedaine (1719-1797): Theatre, Opera, Art. Eds. David Charlton and Mark Ledbury. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate, 2000. 13-38.
- Marcoux, J. Paul. “Guilbert de Pixérécourt: the people’s conscience.” In Themes in Drama 14: Melodrama. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1992. 47-59.
- Mellor, Anne K. “English Women Writers and the French Revolution.” In Rebel Daughters: Women and the French Revolution. Eds. Melzer, Sara E. and Leslie W. Rabine. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1992. 255-272.
- Melzer, Sara E. and Leslie W. Rabine. Eds. Rebel Daughters: Women and the French Revolution. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1992.
- Miles, Robert. Gothic Writing 1750-1820: A Genealogy. London: Routledge, 1993.
- Noiray, Michel. “L’opéra de la Révolution (1790-1794): Un ‘Tapage de Chien’?” In La Carmagnole des Muses: L’Homme de lettres et l’artiste dans la Révolution. Ed. Jean-Claude Bonnet. Paris: Armand Colin, 1988.
- Rahill, Frank. The World of Melodrama. University Park: Penn State P, 1967.
- Root-Bernstein, Michele. Boulevard Theater and Revolution in Eighteenth-Century Paris. Ann Arbor, MI, 1984.
- Rosenblum, R. Transformations in Late Eighteenth-Century Art. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1967.
- Schmidgall, Gary. Literature as Opera. New York: Oxford UP, 1977.
- Schor, Naomi. “Triste Amérique: Atala and the Postrevolutionary Construction of Woman.” In Rebel Daughters: Women and the French Revolution. Eds. Melzer, Sara E. and Leslie W. Rabine. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1992. 139-156.
- Taylor, George. The French Revolution and the London Stage, 1789-1805. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2000.
- Watt, James. Contesting the Gothic: Fiction, Genre and Cultural Conflict, 1764-1832. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1999.
- White, Hayden. Metahistory. Baltimore: Johns UP, 1973.