Résumés
Résumé
Cette étude aborde les effets de l’implication des tuteurs et de la connectivité à Internet sur l’acceptation, par les étudiants, des plateformes d’enseignement à distance, dans un contexte de crise sanitaire. Un questionnaire en ligne, basé sur le modèle TAM (Technology acceptance model) étendu, a concerné 225 étudiants de l’ENSETP de Dakar. Les 11 hypothèses formulées ont été testées à travers un modèle structurel mettant en oeuvre les moindres carrés partiels (PLS-SEM; Partial least square structural equation modelling). En plus de consolider le modèle TAM de base, les résultats montrent un effet positif significatif de l’implication du tuteur et de la connectivité sur l’intention d’usage des plateformes.
Mots-clés :
- Modèle d’acceptation des technologies – TAM,
- acceptation,
- PLS-SEM,
- plateforme FAD,
- connectivité,
- implication du tuteur
Abstract
This research aims to study the effects of instructors’ involvement and those of Internet connectivity on e-learning platforms acceptance by students, in a COVID‑19 health crisis. An online survey based on an extended TAM model involved 225 students of the Dakar School of Technical and Vocational Teachers Training (ENSETP). The 11 hypotheses formulated were tested through a partial least squares structural model (PLS-SEM). In addition to consolidating the basic TAM model, the results show significant positive effects of instructor involvement and connectivity on intention to use e‑learning platforms.
Keywords:
- Technology acceptance model (TAM),
- acceptance,
- PLS-SEM,
- e-learning platform,
- connectivity,
- instructor involvement
Parties annexes
Références
- Abdous, M. et Yen, C.-J. (2010). A predictive study of learner satisfaction and outcomes in face-to-face, satellite broadcast, and live video-streaming learning environments. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 248‑257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.04.005
- Alexandre, B., Reynaud, E., Osiurak, F. et Navarro, J. (2018). Acceptance and acceptability criteria: A literature review. Cognition, Technology & Work, 20(2), 165‑177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-018-0459-1
- Al-Fraihat, D., Joy, M., Masa’deh, R. et Sinclair, J. (2020). Evaluating e-learning systems success: An empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 67‑86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.004
- Bailey, J. E., et Pearson, S. W. (1983). Development of a tool for measuring and analyzing computer user satisfaction. Management Science, 29(5), 530‑545. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.29.5.530
- Cho, M.-H. et Cho, Y. (2014). Instructor scaffolding for interaction and students’ academic engagement in online learning: Mediating role of perceived online class goal structures. The Internet and Higher Education, 21, 25‑30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.10.008
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2e éd.). Erlbaum.
- Collin, S. et Karsenti, T. (2013). Usages des technologies en éducation : analyse des enjeux socioculturels. Éducation et francophonie, 41(1), 192‑210. https://doi.org/10.7202/1015065ar
- Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319‑340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
- Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P. et Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982‑1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
- Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P. et Warshaw, P. R. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(14), 1111‑1132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00945.x
- Depover, C. et Orivel, F. (2012). Les pays en voie de développement à l’ère de l’e-learning. UNESCO. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/...
- Farahat, T. (2012). Applying the technology acceptance model to online learning in the Egyptian universities. Procedia ‑ Social and Behavioral Sciences, 64, 95‑104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.012
- Fernandes, V. (2012). En quoi l’approche PLS est-elle une méthode à (re)-découvrir pour les chercheurs en management? M@n@gement, 15(1), 102‑123. http://cairn.info/journal-management...
- Granić, A. et Marangunić, N. (2019). Technology acceptance model in educational context: A systematic literature review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2572‑2593. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12864
- Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M. et Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2e éd.). Sage.
- Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M. et Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139‑152. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069‑6679190202
- Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M. et Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115‑135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
- Ibrahim, R., Leng, N. S., Yusoff, R. C. M., Samy, G. N., Masrom, S. et Rizman, Z. I. (2018). E‑learning acceptance based on technology acceptance model (TAM). Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences, 9(4S), 871‑889. https://doi.org/10.4314/jfas.v9i4S.50
- Jaillet, A. (2005). Peut-on repérer les effets de l’apprentissage collaboratif à distance? Distances et savoirs, 3(1), 49‑66. https://doi.org/10.3166/ds.3.49-66
- Lee, B.-C., Yoon, J.-O. et Lee, I. (2009). Learners’ acceptance of e-learning in South Korea: Theories and results. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1320‑1329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.06.014
- Lee, Y.-H., Hsiao, C. et Purnomo, S. H. (2014). An empirical examination of individual and system characteristics on enhancing e-learning acceptance. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(5), 561‑579. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.381
- Ma, J., Han, X., Yang, J. et Cheng, J. (2015). Examining the necessary condition for engagement in an online learning environment based on learning analytics approach: The role of the instructor. The Internet and Higher Education, 24, 26‑34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.09.005
- Pham, L., Limbu, Y. B., Bui, T. K., Nguyen, H. T. et Pham, H. T. (2019). Does e-learning service quality influence e‑learning student satisfaction and loyalty? Evidence from Vietnam. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), article 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0136-3
- Pham, Q. T. et Tran, T. P. (2020). The acceptance of e-learning systems and the learning outcome of students at universities in Vietnam. Knowledge Management & E-Learning: An International Journal, 12(1), 63‑84. https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2020.12.004
- Robinson, H. A., Kilgore, W. et Warren, S. J. (2017). Care, communication, support: Core for designing meaningful online collaborative learning. Online Learning, 21(4), 29‑51. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i4.1240
- SmartPLS GmbH. (s.d.). SmartPLS [logiciel]. http://smartpls.com
- Tenenhaus, M., Vinzi, V. E., Chatelin, Y.-M. et Lauro, C. (2005). PLS path modeling. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 48(1), 159‑205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2004.03.005
- Teo, T., Zhou, M., Fan, A. C. W. et Huang, F. (2019). Factors that influence university students’ intention to use Moodle: A study in Macau. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(3), 749‑766. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09650-x
- Valencia-Arias, A., Chalela-Naffah, S. et Bermúdez-Hernández, J. (2019). A proposed model of e‑learning tools acceptance among university students in developing countries. Education and Information Technologies, 24(2), 1057‑1071. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639‑018‑9815‑2
- van der Heijden. (2004). User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Quarterly, 28(4), 695‑704. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148660
- Volery, T. et Lord, D. (2000). Critical success factors in online education. International Journal of Educational Management, 14(5), 216‑223. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540010344731
- Yeou, M. (2016). An investigation of students’ acceptance of Moodle in a blended learning setting using Technology Acceptance Model. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 44(3), 300‑318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239515618464
- Zanjani, N., Edwards, S. L., Nykvist, S. et Geva, S. (2016). LMS acceptance: The instructor role. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 25(4), 519‑526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299‑016‑0277‑2