Résumés
Résumé
Dans le cadre de notre recherche sur les problèmes d’abandon en formation à distance (FAD), nous avons introduit un environnement de réseautage social éducatif (ELGG) dans trois établissements postsecondaires canadiens, selon une méthodologie de type « design-based experiment ». Quarante pour cent des étudiants se connectent à l’environnement, le quart d’entre eux devenant des utilisateurs fréquents. Les principaux obstacles à l’utilisation sont le manque de participation des autres étudiants (problème de « démarrage à froid »), les problèmes techniques (problèmes de connexion, problèmes utilisateurs) et les problèmes liés au temps. Les suggestions des étudiants interrogés visent à simplifier les moyens de se connecter, et à faciliter et valoriser la participation.
Mots-clés :
- réseaux sociaux numériques,
- formation à distance,
- médias sociaux,
- interactions,
- badaudage,
- obstacles à la participation
Abstract
In view of the high attrition rates in distance education identified in our previous studies, we focus on peer interactions through the use of an educational social networking environment (ELGG) in three Canadian postsecondary institutions, using a design-based experiment methodology. Traces show that only about 40% of the students visit the environment at least once, and that only one fourth of them become frequent users. The main obstacles to participation mentioned by the 38 interviewees are the lack of participation by other students, the classical “cold-start” problem in social media, technical problems (connection problems and user problems), and concerns about time and flexibility. Students’ suggestions aimed to facilitate participation or connections among students while increasing the associated value and rewards.
Keywords:
- social networking sites,
- distance education,
- social media,
- interactions,
- lurking,
- obstacles to participation
Parties annexes
Bibliographie
- Abrahamson, C. E. (1998). Issues in interactive communication in distance education. College Student Journal, 32(1), 33-42. Récupéré de http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu
- Allen, I. E. et Seaman, J. (2010). Learning on demand : Online education in the United States, 2009. Récupéré du site de Babson Survey Research Group : http://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com ; http://onlinelearningconsortium.org/survey_report/2009-learning-demand-online-education-united-states/
- Anderson, T. (2005). Distance learning – Social software’s killer ap?. Dans Proceedings of the Open et Distance Learning Association of Australia. Récupéré de l’archive Au Space : http://auspace.athabascau.ca:8080/
- Anderson, T., Annand, D. et Wark, N. (2005). The search for learning community in learner paced distance education : Or “Having your cake and eating it, too!”. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 21(2), 222-241. Récupéré de http://ajet.org.au
- Anderson, T. et Dron, J. (2011). Three generations of distance education pedagogy. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3), 80-97. Récupéré de http://www.irrodl.org
- Arnold, N. et Paulus, T. (2010). Using a social networking site for experiential learning: Appropriating, lurking, modeling and community building. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 188-196. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.04.002
- Audet, L. (2010). Wikis, blogues et Web 2.0 : Opportunités et impacts pour la formation à distance. Récupéré des archives du Réseau d’enseignement francophone à distance du Canada : http://archives.refad.ca
- Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A. C., Tamim, R. M., Surkes, M. A. et Bethel, E. C. (2009). A meta-analysis of three types of interaction treatments in distance education. Review of Educational Research, 79(3), 1243-1289. doi:10.3102/0034654309333844
- Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Lou, Y., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Wozney, L., . . . Huang, B. (2004). How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 379-439. doi:10.3102/00346543074003379
- Bernatchez, P.-A. (2001). Attitude proactive, participation et collaboration à des activités d’encadrement médiatisées par ordinateur (Thèse de doctorat, Université de Montréal). Récupéré de l’archive TEL : http://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/
- Boyd, S. (2003, 1er mai). Are you ready for social software? Darwin Magazine.
- Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments : Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141-178. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0202_2
- Carr, S. (2000). As distance education comes of age, the challenge is keeping the students. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 46(23), 39-41. Récupéré du site de Crafton Hills College : http://www.craftonhills.edu
- Collins, A., Joseph, D. et Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design research : Theoretical and methodological issues. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 15-42. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1301_2
- Cormode, G. et Krishnamurthy, B. (2008). Key differences between Web 1.0 and Web 2.0. First Monday, 13(6). doi:10.5210/fm.v13i6.2125
- Dalsgaard, C. et Paulsen, M. F. (2009). Transparency in cooperative online education. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(3). Récupéré de http://www.irrodl.org
- Daniel, J. (2005, août). Towards education for all : The critical role of open and distance learning in national development. Communication présentée à la Namibian Conference on Open Learning, Windhoeck, Namibie. Récupéré de l’archive Oasis : http://oasis.col.org
- Daniel, J., Mackintosh, W. et Diehl, W. (2007). The mega-university response to the moral challenge of our age. Dans M. G. Moore (dir.), Handbook of Distance Education (2e éd., p. 609-620). Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Dron, J. et Anderson, T. (2007). Collectives, networks and groups in social software for e-learning. Dans T. Bastiaens et S. Carliner (dir.), Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2007 (p. 2460-2467). Chesapeake, VA : AACE.
- Dron, J., et Anderson, T. (à paraître). How the crowd can teach/how to teach the crowd. Edmonton : Athabasca University Press.
- Elliot, N., Friedman, R. S. et Briller, V. (2005). Irony and asynchronicity : Interpreting withdrawal rates in e-learning courses. Dans P. Kommers et G. Richards (dir.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2005 (p. 459-465). Chesapeake, VA : AACE.
- Facebook. (2012). Key Facts. Facebook Newsroom. Récupéré de http://newsroom.fb.com
- Garrett, N., Thoms, B., Soffer, M. et Ryan, T. (2007). Extending the Elgg Social Networking System to Enhance the Campus Conversation. Récupéré du site personnel de Brian Thoms : http://brianthoms.com
- Greenhow, C., Robelia, B. et Hughes, J. E. (2009). Learning, teaching, and scholarship in a digital age – Web 2.0 and classroom research: What path should we take now? Educational researcher, 38(4), 246-259. doi:10.3102/0013189x09336671
- Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T. et Smith, K. A. (1998). Cooperative learning returns to college : What evidence is there that it works? Change, 30(4), 26-35. doi:10.1080/00091389809602629 Récupéré de San José State University : http://www.sjsu.edu
- Jones, N. et Thomas, P. (2007). Inter-organizational collaboration and partnerships in health and social care : The role of social software. Public Policy and Administration, 22(3), 289-302. Récupéré de http://wiki.dbast.com/images/6/64/Inter-organizational_Collaboration_and_Partnerships_in_Health_and_Social_Care.pdf
- Joo, Y. J., Lim, K. Y. et Kim, E. K. (2011). Online university students’ satisfaction and persistence : Examining perceived level of presence, usefulness and ease of use as predictors in a structural model. Computers and Education, 57(2), 1654-1664. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.02.008
- Joseph, D. (2004). The practice of design-based research : Uncovering the interplay between design, research, and the real-world context. Educational Psychologist, 39(4), 235-242. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3904_5
- Kelly, A. E. (2004). Design research in education : Yes, but is it Methodological? Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 115-128. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1301_6
- Kennedy, C. A. (2000). What Influences Student Learning in an Online Course? Récupéré de http://files.eric.ed.gov
- Leblanc, D. (2011). Les indicateurs 2009-2010 du Cégep@distance. Population étudiante, cheminement et rendement scolaires. Récupéré de http://cegepadistance.ca
- Lee, Y. et Choi, J. (2010). A review of online course dropout research : implications for practice and future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(5), 593-618. doi:10.1007/s11423-010-9177-y
- Lee, M. J. W. et McLoughlin, C. (2010). Beyond distance and time constraints : Applying social networking tools and Web 2.0 approaches in distance education. Dans G. Veletsianos, Emerging technologies in distance education (p. 61-87). Récupéré de http://www.aupress.ca
- Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M. et Jones, K. (2009). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning : A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. Récupéré de http://files.eric.ed.gov
- Miles, M. B. et Huberman, A. M. (2003). Analyse des données qualitatives (2e éd., traduit par M. H. Rispal). Paris : De Boeck. (Ouvrage original publié en 1994 sous le titre Qualitative data analysis : an expanded sourcebook, 2e éd., Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.)
- Misko, J. (2000). The effects of different modes of delivery : Student outcomes and evaluations. Leabrook : National Centre for Vocational Education Research.
- Moore, M. G. et Kearsley, G. (2011). Distance education : A systems view of online learning. Belmont, CA : Wadsworth Publishing Company.
- Nielsen, J. (2006). Participation Inequality : Encouraging More Users to Contribute. Nielsen Norman Group. Récupéré d’Internet Archive Wayback Machine : http://web.archive.org
- Office québécois de la langue française. (2013). folksonomy / folksonomie. Dans Vocabulaire d’Internet – Banque de terminologie du Québec. Récupéré de http://www.oqlf.gouv.qc.ca
- Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2e éd.). Newbury Park, CA : Sage.
- Paulsen, M. F. (1993). The hexagon of cooperative freedom : A distance education theory attuned to computer conferencing. DEOS, 3(2). Récupéré de http://www.prof2000.pt
- Phipps, R. et Merisotis, J. (1999). What’s the difference? A review of contemporary research on the effectiveness of distance learning in higher education. Récupéré de http://files.eric.ed.gov
- Poellhuber, B. (2005). L’univers mouvant des FOAD : quels intérêts et quels enjeux? [vidéo]. Communication présentée à l’Université Laval, Québec, Canada.
- Poellhuber, B., Karsenti, T., Raynaud, J., Dumouchel, G., Roy, N., Fournier Saint-Laurent, S. et Géraudie, N. (2012). Les habitudes technologiques au cégep : résultats d’une enquête effectuée auprès de 30 724 étudiants. Montréal : Centre de recherche interuniversitaire sur la formation et la profession enseignante (CRIFPE).
- Poellhuber, B., Roy, N. et Anderson, T. (2011). Distance students’ readiness for social media and collaboration. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(6), 102-125. Récupéré de http://www.irrodl.org
- Poellhuber, B., Roy, N. et Duclos, A.-M. (2013). A mixed methods analysis of closed-gate academic social network usages based on the TAM model. Dans Actes du colloque de l’AERA, San Francisco, avril 2013. Récupéré de http://www.academia.ed
- Racette, N. (2012). Augmenter la motivation dans un cours à distance – Expérimentation d’un modèle. Sarrebruck : Éditions universitaires européennes.
- Richardson, W. (2006). Blogs, Wikis, Podcasts and Other Powerful Web Tools for Classrooms. Thousand Oaks, CA : Corwin Press.
- Russell, T. L. (1999). The No Significant Difference Phenomenon. IDECC.
- Saint-Arnaud, Y. (2008). Les petits groupes – Participation et communication (3e éd.). Boucherville : Gaëtan Morin.
- Schein, A. I., Popescul, A., Ungar, L. H. et Pennock, D. M. (2002). Methods and metrics for cold-start recommendations. Dans PA, ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information retrieval (p. 253-260). doi:10.1145/564376.564421
- Shaunessy, M. F. (2007, 25 avril). An interview with Morten Flate Paulsen : Focusing on his theory of cooperative freedom in online education. EdNews.
- Simpson, O. (2013). Supporting students in online, open and distance learning. New York, NY : Routledge.
- Veletsianos, G. et Navarrete, C. (2012). Online social networks as formal learning environments : Learner experiences and activities. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(1), 144-166. Récupéré de http://www.irrodl.org
- Wenger, E., McDermott, R. et Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice : A guide to managing knowledge. Cambridge, MA : Harvard Business School Press.
- Wenger, E., Trayner, B. et de Laat, M. (2011). Promoting and assessing value creation in communities and networks : a conceptual framework (Rapport 18). Récupéré de http://www.knowledge-architecture.com
- Wikimedia. (2013). Distribution of article edits over registered editors. Dans Wikipedia Statistics English. Récupéré de http://stats.wikimedia.org