Résumés
Résumé
Cette contribution s’inscrit dans une continuation de recherches sur les effets pédagogiques des technologies de l’information et de la communication (TIC). Une recension par procédure méta-analytique est entreprise afin d’examiner la relation entre l’utilisation des télévoteurs en grands groupes et le rendement des étudiants. Après avoir recensé les écrits empiriques traitant le résultat scolaire comme variable dépendante de l’utilisation des télévoteurs, nous n’avons retenu que les études exploitant un devis méthodologique expérimental ou quasi expérimental. La méta-analyse, incluant 17 groupes de données provenant de huit articles scientifiques retenus, indique qu’il existe une relation positive entre l’utilisation des télévoteurs et le résultat scolaire (g = 0,463).
Mots-clés :
- Télévoteurs,
- méta-analyse,
- résultat scolaire
Abstract
This is a contribution to the body of research relating to the pedagogical effects of information and communication technologies (ICT). The result of a meta-analytic literature review of the relationship between the use of clickers in a large classroom and student academic performance is reported in this article. Upon a review of empirical studies considering academic result as being dependent on clicker use, we considered only those studies based on experimental and quasi-experimental methodologies. The meta-analysis, including 17 sets of data from the eight scientific articles retained, showed a positive relationship between clicker use and student results (g = 0.463).
Keywords:
- Clickers,
- meta-analysis,
- academic results
Parties annexes
Bibliographie
- Addison, S., Wright, A. et Milner, R. (2009). Using clickers to improve student engagement and performance in an introductory biochemistry class. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 37(2), 84-91.
- Beatty, I. (2004). Transforming student learning with classroom communication systems. Educase Centre for Applied Research: Research Bulletin, 3, 1-13.
- Beatty, I. et Gerace, W. (2009). Technology-enhanced formative assessment: A research based pedagogy for teaching science with classroom response technology. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18, 146-162.
- Bland, C. J., Meurer, L. G. et Maldonado, G. (1995). A systematic approach to conducting a non-statistical meta-analysis of research literature. Academic Medicine, 70, 642-653.
- Borenstein, M., Hedges, L, Higgins, J. et Rothstein, H. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester, R.-U. : Wiley.
- Brewer, C. A. (2004). Near real-time assessment of student learning and understanding in biology courses. BioScience, 54(11), 1034-1039.
- Caldwell, J. E. (2007). Clickers in the large classroom: Current research and best practice tips. CBE - Life Sciences Education, 6(1), 9-20.
- *Crossgrove, K. et Curran, K. (2008). Using clickers in nonmajors- and majors-level biology courses: Student opinion, learning, and long-term retention of course material. Life Sciences Education, 7, 146-154.
- DeCoster, J. (2004). Meta-analysis. Dans K. Kempf-Leonard (dir.), The encyclopedia of social measurement. San Diego, CA : Academic Press.
- Draper, S. W. et Brown, M. I. (2004). Increasing interactivity in lectures using an electronic voting system. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20, 81-94. Récupéré le 21 mars 2010 du site personnel de l’auteur : http://www.psy.gla.ac.uk/~steve/ilig/papers/draperbrown.pdf
- Duncan, D. (2006). Clickers: A new teaching aid with exceptional promise. Astronomy Education Review, 5(1), 70-88. Récupéré le 21 mars 2010 du site Teaching with Technology Initiative de l’Université d’Alberta, section Classroom Technologies : http://www.ualberta.ca/~tti/files/duncan.pdf
- Durlak, J. (1995). Understanding meta-analysis. Dans G. Grimm et P. R. Yarnold (dir.), Reading and understanding multivariate statistics (p. 319-353). Washington, DC : American Psychological Association (APA).
- *Gauci, S. A., Dantas, A. M. et Kemm, R. E. (2009). Promoting student-centered active learning in lectures with a personal response system. Advances in Physiology Education, 33, 60-71.
- Hunter, J. E. et Schmidt, F. L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.
- Judson, E. et Sawada, D. (2002). Learning from past and present: Electronic response systems in college lecture halls. Journal of Computer, Mathematics and Science Teaching, 21, 167-181.
- Knight, J. K. et Wood, W. B. (2005). Teaching more by lecturing less. Cellular Biology Education. 4, 298-310.
- Kulik, J. A., Kulik, C.-L. et Cohen, P. A. (1979). Research on audio-tutorial instruction: A ta-analysis of comparative studies. Research in Higher Education, 11, 321-341.
- MacGeorge, E. L., Homman, S. R., Dunning, J. B., Elmore, D., Bodie, G. D., Evans, E. et al. (2008). Student evaluation of audience response technology in large lecture classes. Education Technology and Research Development, 56, 125-145.
- Martyn, M. (2007). Clickers in the classroom: An active learning approach. Educause Quarterly, 2, 71-74. Récupéré du site de la revue : http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/EQM0729.pdf
- *Mayer, R. E., Stull, A., Deleeuw, K., Almeroth, K., Bimber, B., Chun et al. (2009). Clickers in college classrooms: Fostering learning with questioning methods in large lecture classes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34, 51-57. Récupéré le 21 mars 2010 du site du Networking and Multimedia Systems Laboratory, section Publications : http://imj.ucsb.edu/papers/174.pdf
- Morgan, R. (2008). Exploring the pedagogical effectiveness of clickers. Insight: A Journal of Scholarly Teaching, 3, 31-36. Récupéré du site de la revue : http://www.insightjournal.net/Volume3/ExploringPedagogicalEffectivenessClickers.pdf
- *Morling, B., McAuliffe, M., Cohen, L. et DiLorenzo, T. M. (2008). Efficacy of personal response systems (“clickers”) in large introductory psychology classes. Teaching of Psychology, 35(1), 45-50.
- Poulis, J., Massen, C., Robens, E. et Gilbert, M. (1998). Physics lecturing with audience paced feedback. American Journal of Physics, 66(5), 50-54.
- Roschelle, J., Penuel, W. R. et Abrahamson, L. (2004). The networked classroom. Education Leadership, 61, 50-54.
- Rosenberg, M. S. (2005). The file-drawer problem revisited: A general weighted method for calculating fail-safe numbers in meta-analysis. Evolution, 59(2), 464-468.
- Salmon, T. P. et Stahl, J. N. (2005). Wireless audience response system: Does it make a difference? Journal of Extension, 43(3). Récupéré du site de la revue : http://www.joe.org/joe/2005june/rb10.php
- *Schackow, T. E., Chavez, M., Loya, L. et Friedman, M. (2004). Audience response system: Effect on learning in family medicine residents. Family Medicine, 36(7), 496-504.
- *Shapiro, A. (2009). An empirical study of personal response technology for improving attendance and learning in a large class. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning,9(1), 13-26. Récupéré du site de la revue : https://www.iupui.edu/~josotl/archive/vol_9/no_1/v9n1shapiro.pdf
- *Stowell, J. R. et Nelson, J. M. (2007). Benefits of electronic audience response systems on student participation, learning, and emotion. Teaching of Psychology, 34(4), 253-258.
- Trees, A. R. et Jackson, M. H. (2007). The learning environment in clicker classrooms: Student processes of learning and involvement in large university-level courses using student response systems. Learning, Media and Technology, 32, 21-40.
- Wood, W. B. (2004). Clickers: A teaching gimmick that works. Developmental Cell, 7(6), 796-798.
- *Yourstone, S. A., Kraye, H. S. et Albaum, G. (2008). Classroom questioning with immediate electronic response: Do clickers improve learning? Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 6(1), 75-88.
* Indique les articles compris dans la présente méta-analyse.