Résumés
Abstract
Could “centralized” bodies of collective representation constitute a power resource for employees in contemporary fragmented work organizations? Referring to the particular features of the institutional framework in France, this article links the theory of power resources to the concept of institutional toying to show that the power resources of managers allow them to make use of institutional shortcomings that limit the scope of these bodies as power resources for employees. The article draws on the REPONSE 2017 (DARES) survey, which sought to quantify “fragmented” organizations and their collective representation bodies. Six case studies of fragmented companies are also used to illustrate the diversity of institutional toying strategies employed by managers.
Summary
The traditional representation of a company has been undermined by processes of productive disintegration (outsourcing and geographical dispersion) and economic and financial concentration (subsidiaries). This movement has been accompanied by new collective rights in the form of bodies at the “centralized” level, which are intended to take into account the entire workforce. Referring to the particular features of the institutional framework in France, this article links the theory of power resources to the concept of institutional toying to show that the power resources of managers enable them to make use of institutional shortcomings that limit the scope of these bodies as power resources for employees. It draws on the REPONSE 2017 (DARES) survey to quantify “fragmented” companies and the collective representation bodies that operate within them. Six case studies of fragmented companies are used to illustrate the diversity of institutional toying strategies employed by managers in setting up centralized bodies. We begin by highlighting the prevalence of three forms of fragmentation (outsourcing, group, multi-site) and the limited role played within them by centralized bodies. The institutional limits of centralized bodies are then analyzed based on the power resources available to management and the diversity of strategies implemented to configure these bodies. Next, the fragmentation of companies is analyzed as an instrument for weakening employees’ power resources, as it reduces their interest and ability to participate in social dialogue, and divides and creates competition within a fragmented workforce. Finally, associational resources to overcome the divisions created by fragmentation and institutional resources to rebalance the ability to set the framework for employee consultation are discussed as solutions to restrict management leeway.
Key words:
- Outsourcing,
- subcontracting,
- subsidiaries,
- collective representation,
- centralized bodies,
- power resources,
- management strategy
Parties annexes
References
- Amossé, Thomas and Thomas Coutrot. (2008). “2. Genèse et réalité d’une enquête.” In: Thomas Amossé Ed., Les relations sociales en entreprise: Un portrait à partir des enquêtes “Relations professionnelles et négociations d’entreprise” (pp. 38-68). Paris: La Découverte. https://doi.org/10.3917/dec.bloch.2008.01.0038
- Anner, Mark, Fischer-Daly, Matthew, and Michael Maffie. (2021). “Fissured employment and network bargaining: Emerging employment relations dynamics in a contingent world of work.” ILR Review, 74(3), 689–714.
- Appay, Béatrice. (2005). La dictature du succès, le paradoxe de l’autonomie contrôlé, L’Harmattan.
- Appelbaum, Eileen. (2017). “Domestic outsourcing, rent seeking, and increasing inequality,” Review of Radical Political Economics, 49(4), 513–528.
- Beaujolin-Bellet, Rachel, and Géraldine Schmidt. (2012). Les restructurations d’entreprises. La Découverte, Coll. Repères.
- Benassi, Chiara, and Andreas Kornelakis. (2021). “How do employers choose between types of contingent work? Costs, control, and institutional toying.” ILR Review, 74(3), 715–738.
- Bernhardt, Annette, Rosemary L. Batt, Susan N. Houseman, and Eileen Appelbaum. (2016). "Domestic Outsourcing in the United States: A Research Agenda to Assess Trends and Effects on Job Quality." Upjohn Institute Working Paper 16-253. Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research. https://doi.org/10.17848/wp16-253
- Delahaie, Noélie, and Coralie Perez. (2021). “Workforce adjustment strategies and concession bargaining in times of crisis: A qualitative approach based on French case studies.” Industrial Relations Journal, 52(5), 406–422.
- Delahaie, Noélie, and Anne Fretel. (2022). “La dynamique des relations professionnelles en France sous l’influence des réformes institutionnelles? Apports de l’enquête REPONSE et de ses post-enquêtes.” La Revue de l’IRES, 2022/2-3 (N° 107-108), 3-12. DOI: 10.3917/rdli.107.0003.
- Denis, Jean-Michel. (2018). “Asseoir la représentation sur la communauté de travail. À la recherche de la communauté perdue dans la branche de la propreté.” Sociologie du travail [online], Vol. 60 - n° 1 |January-March 2018, published online February 23, 2018, accessed October 2, 2023. URL: http://journals.openedition.org/sdt/1748 ; DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/sdt.1748
- Devetter, François-Xavier, and Julie Valentin. (2021). Deux millions de travailleurs et des poussières, Les petits Matins, Paris.
- Doellgast, Virginia. (2010). “Collective voice under decentralized bargaining: a comparative study of work reorganization in US and German call centres.” British Journal of Industrial Relations, 48(2), 375–399.
- Doellgast, Virginia, Matthew Bidwell and Alexander J.S. Colvin. (2021). “New directions in employment relations theory: understanding fragmentation, identity, and legitimacy.” ILR Review, 74(3), 555–579.
- Farvaque, Nicolas (coord.). (2019). “Appropriation et mise en oeuvre des Ordonnances du 22 septembre 2017 réformant le droit du travail.” Rapport d’études DARES, N° 1, 110 pages.
- Freyssinet, Jacques. (2005). “Quels acteurs et quels niveaux pertinents de représentation dans un système productif en restructuration?” La Revue de l’IRES, 47(1), 319-336.
- Geymond, Maé. (2022). “Fusions-acquisitions, restructurations et externalisations: quand les mouvements stratégiques récurrents percutent les relations sociales.” Socio-économie du travail,2021(10), 95-127.
- Giraud, Baptiste and Rémi Ponge. (2016). “Des négociations entravées.” La nouvelle revue du travail [online], 8 | 2016, published online June 1, 2016, accessed October 2, 2023. URL: http://journals.openedition.org/nrt/2591; DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/nrt.2591
- Giraudet, Carole. (2018). “Nécrologie juridique du comité d’entreprise: transformation et succession d’une institution juridique.” La Revue de l’IRES, 94-95(1), 29-56.
- Grumbach, Tiennot. (2012). “La généralisation de l’ouverture de l’appel pour contentieux de l’UES: un effet collatéral de loi du 20 août 2008.” Revue du droit du travail, p. 168.
- Jalette, Patrice and Ruth Barton. (2021). “Stratégies des multinationales pour reconfigurer le périmètre de l’entreprise et l’aire de la négociation collective en Tasmanie.” Négociations, De Boeck Supérieur, 1(35), 89-105.
- Korpi, Walter. (1985). “Power Resources Approach vs. Action and Conflict: On Causal and Intentional Explanations in the Study of Power.” Sociological Theory,3(2): 31–45.
- Marchington, Mick, Damian Grimshaw, Jill Rubery and Hugh Willmott (Eds.). (2005). Fragmenting work: Blurring organizational boundaries and disordering hierarchies. Oxford University Press.
- Nizzoli, Cristina. (2015). C’est du propre! Syndicalisme et travailleurs du « bas de l’échelle » (Marseille et Bologne), Presses universitaires de France, Paris.
- Perraudin, Corinne, Héloïse Petit, Nadine Thevenot, Bruno Tinel and Julie Valentin. (2014). “Inter‐firm Dependency and Employment Inequalities: Theoretical Hypotheses and Empirical Tests on French Subcontracting Relationships.” Review of Radical Political Economics, 42(2), 199‐220.
- Perraudin, Corinne, and Nadine Thevenot. (2022). “Exposition aux risques professionnels et prévention dans le travail en sous-traitance.” Socio-économie du travail, 2021(10), 193-230.
- Peskine, Elsa. (2021). “Établissement, entreprise ou groupe – La négociation d’entreprise en quête de ses espaces.” Négociations, n° 335, 2021/1, 39-51.
- Refslund, Bjarke, and Jens Arnholtz. (2022). “Power resource theory revisited: The perils and promises for understanding contemporary labour politics.” Economic and Industrial Democracy, 43(4), 1958–1979.
- Thébaut-Mony, Annie. (2008). Travailler peut nuire gravement à votre santé, La Découverte/Poche.
- Thevenot, Nadine (coord.), Geymond, Maé, Perez, Coralie, Perraudin, Corinne, Valentin, Julie and François-Xavier Devetter. (2021). “Entreprise ‘éclatée’ et périmètre de la représentation collective.” Rapport d’études DARES, n° 9.
- Thevenot, Nadine, Geymond, Maé, Perez, Coralie, Perraudin, Corinne, Valentin, Julie and François-Xavier Devetter. (2022). “Face à l’éclatement des entreprises, une représentation collective mise en défaut: une analyse à partir de l’enquête REPONSE 2017.” La Revue de l’IRES, vol. 107-108, no. 2-3, 13-40.
- Visser, Jelle. (2016). “What happened to collective bargaining during the great recession?”, IZA Journal of Labor Policy, 5(1), 1–35.
- Warin, Philippe. (2016). Le non-recours aux politiques sociales. Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.
- Weil, David. (2014). The Fissured Workplace. Harvard University Press.
- Wright, Erik Olin. (2000). “Working-class power, capitalist-class interests and class compromise.” American Journal of Sociology, 105(4), 957–1002.