Comprendre les conflits liés à la réglementation du travail sur plateforme numérique : une revue critique de la littérature sur le rôle des institutions, des réseaux et des cadres cognitifs dans l’élaboration des politiques

Martin-Caballero, Angel

doi:https://doi.org/10.7202/1111507ar

Feuilleter les articles de ce numéro

Understanding Conflict over Regulation of Platform Work: a Critical Literature Review on the Role of Institutions, Networks and Frames in Policy-Making

Risk Cycles, Capitalism and the Future of Work

Plan de l’article

Retour au début
Résumé
Bibliographie

Boîte à outils

Sauvegarder Supprimer
PDFTélécharger
Citer cet article
Partager

Résumés

Précis

La croissance du travail sur plateforme numérique a perturbé et réorganisé la réglementation sur l’emploi. La littérature a abordé ce sujet sous différents angles, mais souvent de manière fragmentée et sans expliquer clairement pourquoi et comment les conflits sur le plan réglementaire à propos du travail sur plateforme numérique surviennent. En utilisant le cadre de Beckert (2010) pour étudier la manière dont les domaines changent, l’auteur a effectué une revue critique de la littérature sur : 1) les rôles des institutions, des réseaux et des cadres dans la réglementation du travail sur plateforme numérique; 2) le pouvoir de réglementation que ces structures confèrent aux acteurs et aux organisations; et 3) les interrelations possibles entre ces structures. Les résultats démontrent l’existence d’une littérature abondante sur la portée de la réglementation institutionnelle et le pouvoir réglementaire des réseaux, mais beaucoup moins sur le rôle plus large de l’État dans ce domaine et les cadres qui guident les préférences des acteurs en matière de réglementation. Les axes de la recherche à réaliser dans le futur sont abordés.

Résumé

Dans cet article, une analyse critique de la littérature identifie les acteurs et organisations étatiques et non étatiques qui influencent et créent le conflit réglementaire sur le travail sur plateforme numérique ainsi que les ressources qui leur permettent d’intervenir.

C’est en analysant les différentes formes d’intégration qui interagissent et façonnent le processus réglementaire que ces questions sont abordées. En s’inspirant du cadre proposé par Beckert (2010) pour expliquer les changements dans les domaines du marché du travail, cette revue de la littérature identifie trois dimensions de la recherche qui soulignent les rôles respectifs des institutions, des réseaux sociaux et des cadres cognitifs. Elle examine également dans quelle mesure la littérature abordant le travail sur plateforme numérique a développé une perspective intégrée sur la réglementation et comment le domaine des relations industrielles peut bénéficier de l’incorporation de différentes dimensions de la recherche.

La recherche documentaire a été effectuée à l’aide des principales bases de données disponibles et a été regroupée selon les trois dimensions principales du cadre. L’article comprend également des rapports politiques influents et la littérature grise du domaine d’étude. Au total, 149 documents ont fait l’objet d’un examen approfondi.

La littérature s’est principalement concentrée sur la portée et l’applicabilité des cadres réglementaires existants en matière de travail et sur le rôle de plus en plus important des litiges stratégiques. Le pouvoir réglementaire des entreprises de plateformes et les nouvelles formes de gouvernance ont également fait l’objet d’un remarquable volet de recherche. Beaucoup moins de recherches critiques ont été effectuées sur le rôle de l’État dans l’expansion de l’économie à la demande et sur la manière dont les différents acteurs légitiment le processus de réglementation.

Cet article applique un cadre tridimensionnel à la littérature pour faciliter le dialogue sur trois structures sociales qui influencent la réglementation du travail sur plateforme numérique; l’objectif étant d’expliquer l’émergence du conflit réglementaire dans ce domaine. Ce cadre englobe à la fois les formes officielles et informelles de réglementation, ce qui le rend utile pour la littérature sur les relations industrielles.

Mots-clés :

travail sur plateforme numérique,
réglementation,
conflit réglementaire,
revue critique de la littérature

Parties annexes

Bibliographie

Adams, A., Freedman, J., & Prassl, J. (2018). Rethinking legal taxonomies for the gig economy. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 34(3), 475–494. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/gry006
10.1093/oxrep/gry006 Google Scholar
Adams, Z. (2023). Legal Mobilisations, Trade Unions and Radical Social Change: A Case Study of the IWGB. Industrial Law Journal, dwac031. https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwac031
10.1093/indlaw/dwac031 Google Scholar
Adler, L. (2021). Framing disruption: How a regulatory capture frame legitimized the deregulation of Boston’s ride-for-hire industry. Socio-Economic Review, 19(4), 1421–1450. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwab020
10.1093/ser/mwab020 Google Scholar
Aloisi, A. (2022). Platform work in Europe: Lessons learned, legal developments and challenges ahead. European Labour Law Journal, 13(1), 4-29. https://doi.org/10.1177/20319525211062557
10.1177/20319525211062557 Google Scholar
Aloisi, A. (2016). Commoditized Workers: The Rising of On-Demand Work, A Case Study Research on a Set of Online Platforms and Apps. Comparative Labour Law and Policy Journal, 37(3), 653–690.
10.2139/ssrn.2637485 Google Scholar
Aloisi, A., & De Stefano, V. (2020). Regulation and the future of work: The employment relationship as an innovation facilitator. International Labour Review, 159(1), 47–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/ilr.12160
10.1111/ilr.12160 Google Scholar
Aslam, Y., & Woodcock, J. (2020). A History of Uber Organizing in the UK. South Atlantic Quarterly, 119(2), 412–421. https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-8177983
10.1215/00382876-8177983 Google Scholar
Atkinson, J., & Dhorajiwala, H. (2021). The Future of Employment: Purposive Interpretation and the Role of Contract after Uber. The Modern Law Review, 1468-2230.12693. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12693
10.1111/1468-2230.12693 Google Scholar
Azzellini, D., Greer, I., & Umney, C. (2021). Why isn’t there an Uber for live music? The digitalisation of intermediaries and the limits of the platform economy. New Technology, Work and Employment, 37(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12213
10.1111/ntwe.12213 Google Scholar
Azzellini, D., Greer, I., & Umney, C. (2022). Why platform capitalism is not the future of work. Work in the Global Economy, 2(2), 272–289. https://doi.org/10.1332/273241721X16666858545489
10.1332/273241721X16666858545489 Google Scholar
Beckert, J. (2010). How Do Fields Change? The Interrelations of Institutions, Networks, and Cognition in the Dynamics of Markets. Organization Studies, 31(5), 605–627. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840610372184
10.1177/0170840610372184 Google Scholar
Behrendt, C., & Nguyen, Q. A. (2018). Innovative Approaches for Ensuring Universal Social Protection for the Future of Work. ILO Future of Work Series; Research Paper 1.
Google Scholar
Berg, J., Rani, U., Furrer, M., Ellie, H., & Silberman, M. S. (2018). Digital Labour Platforms and the Future of Work: Towards Decent Work in the Online World. Geneva: ILO.
Google Scholar
Bessa, I., Joyce, S., Neumann, D., Stuart, M., Trappmann, V., & Umney, C. (2022). A global analysis of worker protest in digital labour platforms. International Labour Organization.
10.54394/CTNG4947 Google Scholar
Buendia Esteban, R. M. (2023). Examining recent initiatives to ensure labour rights for platform workers in the European Union to tackle the problem of domination. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 102425892211495. https://doi.org/10.1177/10242589221149506
10.1177/10242589221149506 Google Scholar
Cherry, M. A. (2020). A Global System of Work, A Global System of Regulation?: Crowdwork and Conflicts of Law. Tulane Law Review, 94(2), 184–245.
Google Scholar
Cherry, M. A. (2016). Beyond Misclassification: The Digital Transformation of Work. Comparative Labour Law and Policy Journal.
Google Scholar
Cherry, M. A., & Aloisi, A. (2017). ‘Dependent Contractors’ in the Gig Economy: A Comparative Approach. American University Law Review, 66(3), 635–689.
Google Scholar
Cohen, J. E. (2019). Between truth and power: The legal constructions of informational capitalism. Oxford University Press.
10.1093/oso/9780190246693.001.0001 Google Scholar
Colvin, A. J. S. (2019). The Metastasization of Mandatory Arbitration. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 94(1), 3–24.
Google Scholar
Countouris, N. (2019). Defining and regulating work relations for the future of work. ILO.
Google Scholar
Cusumano, M. A., Gawer, A., & Yoffie, D. (2021). Can Self-Regulation Save Digital Platforms? Industrial and Corporate Change. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3900137
10.2139/ssrn.3900137 Google Scholar
Davidov, G. (2017). The Status of Uber Drivers: A Purposive Approach. Spanish Labour Law and Employment Relations Journal, 6(1–2), 6. https://doi.org/10.20318/sllerj.2017.3921
10.20318/sllerj.2017.3921 Google Scholar
Davies, H., Godley, S., Lawrence, F., Lewis, P., & O’Carroll, L. (2022, July 11). Uber broke laws, duped police and secretly lobbied governments, leak reveals. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/news/2022/jul/10/uber-files-leak-reveals-global-lobbying-campaign
Google Scholar
De Stefano, V. (2016). The Rise of the ‘Just-in-Time Workforce’: On-Demand Work, Crowd Work and Labour Protection in the ‘Gig-Economy’. ILO Conditions of Work and Employment Series No. 71.
10.2139/ssrn.2682602 Google Scholar
De Stefano, V. (2019). ‘Negotiating the Algorithm?’ : Automation, Artificial Intelligence and Labour Protection. Comparative Labour Law and Policy Journal, 41(1), 15–46.
Google Scholar
De Stefano, V., & Wouters, M. (2019). Should Digital Labour Platforms Be Treated as Private Employment Agencies? European Trade Union Institute (ETUI); Foresight Brief.
Google Scholar
De Stefano, V., Durri, I., Stylogiannis, C., & Wouters, M. (2021). Platform work and the employment relationship. ILO Working Paper 27. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_protect/---protrav/---travail/documents/publication/wcms_777866.pdf
Google Scholar
Dubal, V. B., Collier, R. B., & Carter, C. L. (2018). Disrupting Regulation, Regulating Disruption: The Politics of Uber in the United States. Perspectives on Politics, 16(4), 919–937. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592718001093
10.1017/S1537592718001093 Google Scholar
Dukes, R. (2019). The Economic Sociology of Labour Law. Journal of Law and Society, 46(3), 396–422. https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.12168
10.1111/jols.12168 Google Scholar
ETUI. (2020). Rethinking labour law in the digitalisation era. Conference report.
Google Scholar
Fligstein, N. (2001). Social Skill and the Theory of Fields. Sociological Theory, 19(2), 105–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/0735-2751.00132
10.1111/0735-2751.00132 Google Scholar
Fligstein, N., & McAdam, D. (2011). Toward a General Theory of Strategic Action Fields. Sociological Theory, 29(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2010.01385.x
10.1111/j.1467-9558.2010.01385.x Google Scholar
Gall, G. (2020). Emerging forms of worker collectivism among the precariat: When will capital’s ‘gig’ be up? Capital & Class, 44(4), 485–492. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309816820906344
10.1177/0309816820906344 Google Scholar
Garben, S. (2019). The regulatory challenge of occupational safety and health in the online platform economy. International Social Security Review, 72(3), 95–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/issr.12215
10.1111/issr.12215 Google Scholar
Gawer, A. (2014). Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework. Research Policy, 43(7), 1239–1249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.03.006
10.1016/j.respol.2014.03.006 Google Scholar
Gig Economy Project. (2023, February 2). Defeat for the platform lobby: European Parliament backs stronger Platform Work Directive. Brave New Europe. https://braveneweurope.com/gig-economy-project-defeat-for-the-platform-lobby-european-parliament-backs-stronger-platform-work-directive
Google Scholar
Gillespie, T. (2018). Regulation of and by Platforms. In J. Burgess, A. Marwick, & T. Poell, The SAGE Handbook of Social Media (pp. 254–278). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473984066.n15
10.4135/9781473984066.n15 Google Scholar
Graham, M. (2020). Regulate, replicate, and resist – the conjunctural geographies of platform urbanism. Urban Geography, 41(3), 453–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2020.1717028
10.1080/02723638.2020.1717028 Google Scholar
Grimshaw, D. (2020). International organisations and the future of work: How new technologies and inequality shaped the narratives in 2019. Journal of Industrial Relations, 62(3), 477–507. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022185620913129
10.1177/0022185620913129 Google Scholar
Hassel, A., & Sieker, F. (2022). The platform effect: How Amazon changed work in logistics in Germany, the United States and the United Kingdom. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 095968012210824. https://doi.org/10.1177/09596801221082456
10.1177/09596801221082456 Google Scholar
Heeks, R. (2017). Decent Work and the Digital Gig Economy: A Developing Country Perspective on Employment Impacts and Standards in Online Outsourcing, Crowdwork, Etc. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3431033
10.2139/ssrn.3431033 Google Scholar
Helfen, M. (2015). Institutionalizing Precariousness? The Politics of Boundary Work in Legalizing Agency Work in Germany, 1949–2004. Organization Studies, 36(10), 1387–1422. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840615585338
10.1177/0170840615585338 Google Scholar
Howcroft, D., & Bergvall-Kåreborn, B. (2019). A Typology of Crowdwork Platforms. Work, Employment and Society, 33(1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017018760136
10.1177/0950017018760136 Google Scholar
Hughes, R. C. (2021). Regulatory Entrepreneurship, Fair Competition, and Obeying the Law. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04932-y
10.1007/s10551-021-04932-y Google Scholar
ILO. (2021). World Employment and Social Outlook 2021 the role of digital labour platforms in transforming the world of work. International Labor Office.
Google Scholar
Ilsøe, A. (2017). The digitalisation of service work – social partner responses in Denmark, Sweden and Germany. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 23(3), 333–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/1024258917702274
10.1177/1024258917702274 Google Scholar
Inversi, C., Dundon, T., & Buckley, L.-A. (2022). Work in the Gig-Economy: The Role of the State and Non-State Actors Ceding and Seizing Regulatory Space. Work, Employment and Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/09500170221080387
10.1177/09500170221080387 Google Scholar
Inversi, C., Buckley, L. A., & Dundon, T. (2017). An analytical framework for employment regulation: Investigating the regulatory space. Employee Relations, 39(3), 291–307. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-01-2016-0021
10.1108/ER-01-2016-0021 Google Scholar
Jaehrling, K., & Kalina, T. (2020). ‘Grey zones’ within dependent employment: Formal and informal forms of on-call work in Germany. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 26(4), 447–463. https://doi.org/10.1177/1024258920937960
10.1177/1024258920937960 Google Scholar
Johnston, H., & Land-Kazlauskas, C. (2019). Organizing On-Demand: Representation, Voice, and Collective Bargaining in the Gig Economy. ILO Conditions of Work and Employment Series No. 94.
Google Scholar
Joyce, S., Stuart, M., & Forde, C. (2022). Theorising labour unrest and trade unionism in the platform economy. New Technology, Work and Employment, ntwe.12252. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12252
10.1111/ntwe.12252 Google Scholar
Kapczynski, A. (2020). The Law of Informational Capitalism. Yale Law Journal, 129(5), 1460–1515.
Google Scholar
Kenney, M., & Zysman, J. (2018). Entrepreneurial Finance in the Era of Intelligent Tools and Digital Platforms: Implications and Consequences for Work. In Work and Welfare in the Digital Age: Facing the 4th Industrial Revolution (pp. 47–62).
Google Scholar
Kirchner, S., & Schüßler, E. (2020). Regulating the Sharing Economy: A Field Perspective. In I. Maurer, J. Mair, & A. Oberg (Eds.), Research in the Sociology of Organizations (pp. 215–236). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X20200000066010
10.1108/S0733-558X20200000066010 Google Scholar
Kocher, E. (2022). Digital work platforms at the interface of labour law: Regulating market organisers. Hart.
10.5040/9781509949885 Google Scholar
Koutsimpogiorgos, N., Slageren, J., Herrmann, A. M., & Frenken, K. (2020). Conceptualizing the Gig Economy and Its Regulatory Problems. Policy & Internet, 12(4), 525–545. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.237
10.1002/poi3.237 Google Scholar
Lianos, I., Countouris, N., & De Stefano, V. (2019). Re-thinking the competition law/labour law interaction: Promoting a fairer labour market. European Labour Law Journal, 10(3), 291–333. https://doi.org/10.1177/2031952519872322
10.1177/2031952519872322 Google Scholar
Lobel, O. (2016). The Law of the Platform. Minnesota Law Review, 101(1), 87–166.
Google Scholar
Marchington, M. (Ed.). (2005). Fragmenting work: Blurring organizational boundaries and disordering hierarchies. Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Marenco, M., & Seidl, T. (2021). The discursive construction of digitalization: A comparative analysis of national discourses on the digital future of work. European Political Science Review, 13(3), 391–409. https://doi.org/10.1017/S175577392100014X
10.1017/S175577392100014X Google Scholar
Martínez Lucio, M., & MacKenzie, R. (2004). ‘Unstable boundaries?’ Evaluating the ‘new regulation’ within employment relations. Economy and Society, 33(1), 77–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/0308514042000176748
10.1080/0308514042000176748 Google Scholar
Martínez Lucio, M., Mustchin, S., Marino, S., Howcroft, D., & Smith, H. (2021). New technology, trade unions and the future: Not quite the end of organised labour. Revista Española de Sociología, 30(3), a68. https://doi.org/10.22325/fes/res.2021.68
10.22325/fes/res.2021.68 Google Scholar
Moyer-Lee, J., & Countouris, N. (2021). Taken for a ride: Litigating the digital platform model. ILAW Network. https://www.ilawnetwork.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Issue-Brief-TAKEN-FOR-A-RIDE-English.pdf
Google Scholar
Murray, G., Lévesque, C., Morgan, G., & Roby, N. (2020). Disruption and re-regulation in work and employment: From organisational to institutional experimentation. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 26(2), 135–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/1024258920919346
10.1177/1024258920919346 Google Scholar
Parker, G., Van Alstyne, M., & Choudary, S. P. (2016). Platform revolution: How networked markets are transforming the economy - and how to make them work for you. W. W. Norton & Company.
Google Scholar
Pelzer, P., Frenken, K., & Boon, W. (2019). Institutional entrepreneurship in the platform economy: How Uber tried (and failed) to change the Dutch taxi law. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 33, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.02.003
10.1016/j.eist.2019.02.003 Google Scholar
Pesole, A., Brancati, M. C. U., Fernandez Macias, Biagi, F., & Gonzalez Vazquez. (2018). Platform workers in Europe: Evidence from the COLLEEM survey. Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2760/742789
Google Scholar
Pollman, E., & Barry, J. M. (2016). Regulatory Entrepreneurship. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2741987
Google Scholar
Posner, E. A. (2021). How antitrust failed workers. Oxford University Press.
10.1093/oso/9780197507629.001.0001 Google Scholar
Prassl, J., & Risak, M. (2016). Uber, Taskrabbit, and Co.: Platforms as Employers – Rethinking the Legal Analysis of Crowdwork. Comparative Labour Law and Policy Journal, 37(3), 619–651.
Google Scholar
Purcell, C., & Brook, P. (2022). At Least I’m My Own Boss! Explaining Consent, Coercion and Resistance in Platform Work. Work, Employment and Society, 36(3), 391–406. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017020952661
10.1177/0950017020952661 Google Scholar
Racabi, G. (2021). Effects of City–State Relations on Labor Relations: The Case of Uber. ILR Review, 74(5), 1155–1178. https://doi.org/10.1177/00197939211036445
10.1177/00197939211036445 Google Scholar
Rahman, K. S. (2016). The Shape of Things to Come: The On-Demand Economy and the Normative Stakes of Regulating 21st-Century Capitalism. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 7(4), 652–663.
10.1017/S1867299X00010096 Google Scholar
Rahman, K. S., & Thelen, K. (2019). The Rise of the Platform Business Model and the Transformation of Twenty-First-Century Capitalism. Politics & Society, 47(2), 177–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329219838932
10.1177/0032329219838932 Google Scholar
Rolf, S., O’Reilly, J., & Meryon, M. (2022). Towards privatized social and employment protections in the platform economy? Evidence from the UK courier sector. Research Policy, 51(5), 104492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2022.104492
10.1016/j.respol.2022.104492 Google Scholar
Saunders, M. N. K., & Rojon, C. (2011). On the attributes of a critical literature review. Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 4(2), 156–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/17521882.2011.596485
10.1080/17521882.2011.596485 Google Scholar
Schüßler, E., Attwood-Charles, W., Kirchner, S., & Schor, J. B. (2021). Between mutuality, autonomy and domination: Rethinking digital platforms as contested relational structures. Socio-Economic Review, 19(4), 1217–1243. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwab038
10.1093/ser/mwab038 Google Scholar
Srnicek, N. (2017). The challenges of platform capitalism: Understanding the logic of a new business model. Juncture, 23(4), 254–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/newe.12023
10.1111/newe.12023 Google Scholar
Stanford, J. (2017). The resurgence of gig work: Historical and theoretical perspectives. The Economic and Labour Relations Review, 28(3), 382–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/1035304617724303
10.1177/1035304617724303 Google Scholar
Stewart, A., & Stanford, J. (2017). Regulating work in the gig economy: What are the options? The Economic and Labour Relations Review, 28(3), 420–437. https://doi.org/10.1177/1035304617722461
10.1177/1035304617722461 Google Scholar
Thelen, K. (2018). Regulating Uber: The Politics of the Platform Economy in Europe and the United States. Perspectives on Politics, 16(4), 938–953. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592718001081
10.1017/S1537592718001081 Google Scholar
Todolí-Signes, A. (2017a). The ‘gig economy’: Employee, self-employed or the need for a special employment regulation? Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 23(2), 193–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/1024258917701381
10.1177/1024258917701381 Google Scholar
Todolí-Signes, A. (2017b). The End of the Subordinate Worker? The On-Demand Economy, the Gig Economy, and the Need for Protection for Crowdworkers. International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations, 33(Issue 2), 241–268. https://doi.org/10.54648/IJCL2017011
10.54648/IJCL2017011 Google Scholar
Torraco, R. J. (2005). Writing Integrative Literature Reviews: Guidelines and Examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4(3), 356–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484305278283
10.1177/1534484305278283 Google Scholar
Tubaro, P. (2021). Disembedded or Deeply Embedded? A Multi-Level Network Analysis of Online Labour Platforms. Sociology, 55(5), 927–944. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038520986082
10.1177/0038038520986082 Google Scholar
Tucker, E. (2020). Towards a political economy of platform-mediated work. Studies in Political Economy, 101(3), 185–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/07078552.2020.1848499
10.1080/07078552.2020.1848499 Google Scholar
Tzur, A. (2019). Uber Über regulation? Regulatory change following the emergence of new technologies in the taxi market. Regulation & Governance, 13(3), 340–361. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12170
10.1111/rego.12170 Google Scholar
van Dijck, J. (2021). Seeing the forest for the trees: Visualizing platformization and its governance. New Media & Society, 23(9), 2801–2819. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820940293
10.1177/1461444820940293 Google Scholar
van Doorn, N., Ferrari, F., & Graham, M. (2022). Migration and Migrant Labour in the Gig Economy: An Intervention. Work, Employment and Society, 095001702210965. https://doi.org/10.1177/09500170221096581
10.1177/09500170221096581 Google Scholar
van Doorn, N., Mos, E., & Bosma, J. (2021). Actually Existing Platformization. South Atlantic Quarterly, 120(4), 715–731. https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-9443280
10.1215/00382876-9443280 Google Scholar
Vieira, T. (2021). The Unbearable Precarity of Pursuing Freedom: A Critical Overview of the Spanish ‘sí soy autónomo’ Movement. Sociological Research Online, 136078042110400. https://doi.org/10.1177/13607804211040090
10.1177/13607804211040090 Google Scholar
Wang, T., & Cooke, F. L. (2021). Internet Platform Employment in China: Legal Challenges and Implications for Gig Workers through the Lens of Court Decisions. Relations Industrielles / Industrial Relations, 76(3), 541–564. https://doi.org/10.7202/1083612ar
10.7202/1083612ar Google Scholar
Weber, C. E., Okraku, M., Mair, J., & Maurer, I. (2021). Steering the transition from informal to formal service provision: Labor platforms in emerging-market countries. Socio-Economic Review, 19(4), 1315–1344. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwab008
10.1093/ser/mwab008 Google Scholar
Wood, A. J., Graham, M., Lehdonvirta, V., & Hjorth, I. (2019). Networked but Commodified: The (Dis)Embeddedness of Digital Labour in the Gig Economy. Sociology, 53(5), 931–950. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038519828906
10.1177/0038038519828906 Google Scholar
Wood, A. J., Martindale, N., & Lehdonvirta, V. (2021). Dynamics of contention in the gig economy: Rage against the platform, customer or state? New Technology, Work and Employment, ntwe.12216. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12216
10.31235/osf.io/8nm37 Google Scholar
Woodcock, J., & Graham, M. (2020). The gig economy: A critical introduction. Polity.
10.16997/book51.a Google Scholar
Zhang, C. (2019). China’s new regulatory regime tailored for the sharing economy: The case of Uber under Chinese local government regulation in comparison to the EU, US, and the UK. Computer Law & Security Review, 35(4), 462–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2019.03.004
10.1016/j.clsr.2019.03.004 Google Scholar
Zou, M. (2017). The Regulatory Challenges of Uberization in China: Classifying Ride-hailing Drivers. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2866874
10.2139/ssrn.2866874 Google Scholar

Résumés

Précis

Parties annexes

Bibliographie

Outils de citation

Citer cet article

Exporter la notice de cet article