Résumés
Abstract
This research marks a new attempt to examine the development of new industrial relations actors in contemporary China. It appears that the CMDA has the potential to convert members’ common pursuit into action, albeit with different strengths and patterns compared with its Western counterparts. However, the process of mobilizing doctors is likely to be challenged by China’s unitary industrial relations system. For Chinese doctors, the question is how to convert constant work-related discontent and conflict into an institutional response, and how much freedom the CMDA can be given. Follow-up observation is needed to assess the impact of the CMDA’s continuous expansion in the industrial relations system in China’s health services.
Findings suggest that currently the CMDA is neither an independent union organization, nor a new industrial relations actor within Chinese health services due to its structural weakness and political limitations. Unlike its Western counterparts, the CMDA does not have high levels of social and economic power to control licenses and access to the medical profession. However, the prospect remains that the CMDA may be more active within the industrial relations system if doctors’ social capital and group identity can be further strengthened.
This paper examines possibilities and difficulties for the Chinese Medical Doctor Association (CMDA) to become a new industrial relations actor in China’s health services. It attempts to provide evidence on whether the CMDA functions in similar ways as its Western counterparts in mobilizing members. Aiming at filling the research gap in Chinese professional organizations’ involvement in the industrial relations process, this paper discusses the CMDA’s potential and the challenges of becoming a union organization. Data were collected through 39 semi-structured interviews with supplementation of documentary evidence from the government, doctors’ professional societies, hospitals and trade unions.
Keywords:
- Chinese doctors,
- professional association,
- mobilization,
- industrial relations actor
Résumé
La présente recherche constitue une tentative pour étudier le développement de nouveaux acteurs en relations industrielles en Chine. Il semble que l’AMC ait le potentiel pour transformer les objectifs communs de ses membres en action, bien qu’avec des forces et des moyens différents de ceux de leurs collègues occidentaux. Le processus de mobilisation des médecins chinois risque toutefois d’être contesté par le système unitaire de relations industrielles chinois. Pour les médecins chinois, la question est comment transformer le mécontentement constant lié au travail et les conflits de travail en une réponse institutionnelle et quelle liberté peut être accordée à l’AMC. Il faudra suivre l’évolution de la situation pour voir quel impact aura le développement de l’association sur le système de relations industrielles des services de santé en Chine.
Les résultats de la recherche démontrent qu’actuellement l’AMC n’est ni une organisation syndicale indépendante ni un nouvel acteur du système de relations industrielles vu sa faiblesse structurelle et ses limites politiques. Contrairement à ses homologues occidentaux, l’AMC n’a pas assez de pouvoir social et économique pour contrôler les permis d’exercice et l’accès à la profession médicale. Il y a cependant espoir que l’AMC devienne plus active dans le système de relations industrielles si le capital social des médecins et leur identité de groupe étaient renforcés.
Cet article examine la possibilité que l’Association des médecins chinois (AMC) devienne un nouvel acteur du système de relations industrielles dans les services de santé en Chine. Il cherche à établir si l’AMC fonctionne de la même façon que ses homologues occidentaux dans la mobilisation des membres. Visant à combler un vide dans la recherche sur l’implication des organisations professionnelles chinoises dans le processus de relations industrielles, cet article étudie la possibilité pour l’AMC de devenir une organisation syndicale et les défis que cela représente. Les données, pour ce faire, furent colligées au moyen de 39 entrevues semi-structurées et par la consultation de la documentation pertinente provenant du gouvernement, des sociétés professionnelles médicales, d’hôpitaux et de syndicats.
Mots-clés :
- médecins chinois,
- association professionnelle,
- mobilisation,
- acteur du système de relations industrielles
Resumen
Esta investigación marca un nuevo intento de examinar el desarrollo de nuevos actores de las relaciones laborales en la China contemporánea. Surge a la vista que la AMC tiene el potencial para convertir la búsqueda común de sus miembros en acción, aunque con diferentes fuerzas y modelos comparado a sus homólogos del Oeste. Sin embargo, el proceso de movilización de los médicos deberá probablemente enfrentar el reto del sistema unitario de relaciones laborales en China. Para los médicos chinos, la cuestión es cómo convertir el constante descontento y conflicto vinculado al trabajo en una respuesta institucional, y cómo puede ser conferida una mayor libertad a la AMC. Es necesario seguir con la observación para evaluar el impacto de la continua expansión de la AMC sobre el sistema de relaciones laborales en los servicios de salud de China.
Los resultados sugieren que actualmente la AMC no es una organización sindical independiente ni un nuevo actor de las relaciones laborales en los servicios de salud en China, y esto, debido su debilidad estructural y sus limitaciones políticas. A diferencia de sus homólogos del Oeste, la AMC no tiene niveles altos de poder social y económico como para controlar las licencias y el acceso a la profesión médica. Sin embargo, la perspectiva sigue siendo que la AMC pueda ser más activa dentro del sistema de relaciones laborales si el capital social de los médicos y su identidad de grupo pudieran ser fortalecidas.
Este documento examina las posibilidades y dificultades para que la Asociación de Médicos de China (AMC) se convierta en un nuevo actor de las relaciones laborales de los Servicios de salud en China. Se intenta proporcionar evidencia a saber si la AMC funciona de manera similar que sus homólogos del Oeste en cuanto a la movilización de sus miembros. Con el objetivo de cubrir el vacío de investigaciones sobre la implicación de las organizaciones profesionales chinas en el proceso de relaciones laborales, este documento discute el potencial de la AMS y los retos para convertirse en una organización sindical. Los datos fueron colectados mediante 39 entrevistas semi-estructuradas con datos documentarios adicionales provenientes del gobierno, de las sociedades profesionales médicas, de los hospitales y los sindicatos.
Palabras clave:
- Médicos chinos,
- asociación profesional,
- movilización,
- actor de relaciones laborales
Parties annexes
References
- Abbott, B. 1998. “The Emergence of a New Industrial Relations Actor: The Role of the Citizens’ Advice Bureaux?” Industrial Relations Journal, 29 (4), 257-270.
- Anand, S., V. Fan, J. Zhang, L. Zhang, Y. Ke, Z. Dong and L. Chen. 2008. “China’s Human Resources for Health: Quantity, Quality, and Distribution.” Lancet, 375 (November), 1774-1781.
- Bain, G. S. and H. A. Clegg. 1974. “Strategy for Industrial Relations Research in Great Britain.” British Journal of Industrial Relations, 12 (1), 91-113.
- Bellemare, G. 2000. “End Users: Actors in the Industrial Relations System?” British Journal of Industrial Relations, 38 (3), 383-405.
- Black, B. 2005. “Comparative Industrial Relations Theory: The Role of National Culture.” The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16 (7), 1137-1158.
- Bloom, G., L. Han and X. Li. 2001. “How Health Workers Earn a Living in China?” Human Resources for Health Development Journal, 5, 25-38.
- Blumenthal, D. and W. Hsiao. 2005. “Privatization and Its Discontents: The Evolving Chinese Health Care System.” The New England Journal of Medicine, 353 (11), 1165-1170.
- Bryson, A. and R. Gomez. 2005. “Why Have Workers Stopped Joining Unions? The Rise in Never-Membership in Britain.” British Journal of Industrial Relations, 43 (1), 67-92.
- Burchill, F. and A. Casey. 1996. Human Resource Management, The NHS: A Case Study. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
- Chan, A. 2004. “Some Hopes for Optimism for Chinese Labour.” New Labour Forum, 13 (3), 67-75.
- Charlwood, A. 2002. “Why Do Non-union Employees Want to Unionize? Evidence from Britain.” British Journal of Industrial Relations, 40 (3), 463-491.
- Chinese Central Government. 2005. The Medical Practitioner Act. Beijing: China Law Press.
- Choi, Y. 2008. “Aligning Labour Disputes with Institutional, Cultural and Rational Approach: Evidence from East Asian-invested Enterprises in China.” The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19 (10), 1929-1961.
- Clarke, S. 2005. “Post-Socialist Trade Unions: China and Russia.” Industrial Relations Journal, 36 (1), 2-8.
- CMDA. 2005. “The CMDA Charter.” Selected Documents of Chinese Medical Doctors Association. Beijing: Ministry of Health.
- Cook, P. 1996. The Industrial Craftsworker: Skill, Managerial Strategies and Workplace Relationships. London: Mansell.
- Cooke, F. L. 2008. “The Changing Dynamics of Employment Relations in China: An Evaluation of the Rising Level of Labour Dispute.” Journal of Industrial Relations, 50 (1), 111-138.
- Cooke, F. L. 2009. “A Decade of Transformation of HRM in China: A Review of Literature and Suggestions for Future Studies.” Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 47 (1), 6-40.
- Cregan, C., T. Bartram and P. Stanton. 2009. “Union Organizing as a Mobilizing Strategy: The Impact of Social Identity and Transformational Leadership on the Collectivism of Union Members.” British Journal of Industrial Relations, 47 (4), 701-722.
- Crum, G. 1991. “Professionalism and Physician Reimbursement.” Paying the Doctor: Health Policy and Physician Reimbursement. J. Moreno, ed. New York: Auburn House.
- Dickinson, D. 2006. “Fighting for Life: South Africa HIV/AIDS Peer Educators as a New Industrial Relations Actor?” British Journal of Industrial Relations, 44 (4), 697-717.
- Ding, D., K. Goodall and M. Warner. 2002. “The Impact of Economic Reform on the Role of Trade Unions in Chinese Enterprises.” The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 13 (3), 431-449.
- Dunlop, J. T. 1958. Industrial Relations Systems. New York: Holt.
- Gao, H. and J. Yang. 2006. “The Implications of the American Medical Licensing Examination to the Examination System for Chinese Doctors’ License.” Chinese Medical Ethics, 108, 84-85.
- Gospel, H. and G. Palmer. 1993. British Industrial Relations. 2nd edition. London: Routledge.
- Greene, A. 2003. “Women and Industrial Relations.” Understanding Work and Employment: Industrial Relations in Transition. P. Ackers and A. Wilkinson, eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Gu, X. and X. Wang. 2005. “From Statism to Corporatism: Changes in the Relationship between the State and Professional Associations in the Transition to Market Economics in China.” Sociologic Review, 106, 351-369.
- Hall, M. 2009. “Behind the European Works Councils Directive: The European Commission’s Legislative Strategy.”British Journal of Industrials Relations, 30 (4), 547-566.
- Hassard, J., J. Morris, J. Sheehan and Y. Xiao. 2006. “Downsizing the Danwei: Chinese State-Enterprise Reform and the Surplus Labour Question.” The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17 (8), 1441-1455.
- Heckscher, C. and F. Carre. 2006. “Strength in Networks: Employment Rights Organizations and the Problem of Co-Ordination.” British Journal of Industrial Relations, 44 (4), 605-628.
- Heery, E. and C. Frege. 2006. “New Actors in Industrial Relations.” British Journal of Industrial Relations, 44, 601-604.
- Heery, E., G. Healy and P. Taylor. 2004. “Representation at Work.” The Future of Worker Representation. G. Healy, E. Heery, P. Taylor and W. Brown, eds. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Hu, Y., J. Shen and A. Jiang. 2010. “Nursing Shortage in China: State, Causes, and Strategy.” Nursing Outlook, 58 (3), 122-128.
- Irvine, G. 1997. “The Performance of Doctors: Professionalism and Self Regulation in a Changing World.” British Medical Journal, 314 (24), 1540-1542.
- Johnson, N. and P. Jarley. 2004. “Justice and Union Participation: An Extension and Test of Mobilization Theory.” British Journal of Industrial Relations, 42 (3), 543-562.
- Kelly, J. 1998. Rethinking Industrial Relations: Mobilization, Collectivism and Long Waves. London: Routledge.
- Kirton, G. and G. Healey. 2004. “Shaping Union and Gender Identities: A Case Study of Women-only Trade Union Courses.” British Journal of Industrial Relations, 42 (2), 303-323.
- Martin, R. 1999. “Mobilization Theory: A New Paradigm for Industrial Relations.” Human Relations, 52 (9), 1205-1216.
- Ministry of Health. 2009. China Health Statistic Yearbook 2009. Beijing: China Union Medical University Press.
- Munro, A. and H. Rainbird. 2004. “The Workplace Learning Agenda: New Opportunities for Trade Unions?” The Future of Worker Representation. G. Healy, E. Heery, P. Taylor and W. Brown, eds. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
- National Bureau of Statistics. 2009. China Statistical Yearbook 2009. Beijing: China Statistic Press.
- Perkin, H. 1989. The Rise of Professional Society: England since 1880. London: Routledge.
- Scott, W. R. 1982. “Managing Professional Work: Three Models of Control for Health Organizations.” Health Services Research, 17 (3), 213-240.
- Seeber, R. and D. Lipsky. 2006. “The Ascendancy of Employment Arbitrators in US Employment Relations: A New Actor in the American System?” British Journal of Industrial Relations, 44 (4), 719-756.
- Seifert, R. 1992. Industrial Relations in the NHS. London: Chapman and Hall.
- Shen, J. 2006. “An Analysis of Changing Industrial Relations in China.” International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations, 22 (3), 347-368.
- Shen, J. 2007. “The Labour Dispute Arbitration System in China.” Employee Relations, 29 (5), 520-539.
- Taylor, B., K. Chang and Q. Li. 2003. Industrial Relations in China. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
- Unger, J. 2008. “Introduction: Chinese Associations, Civil Society, and State Corporatism: Disputed Terrain.” Associations and the Chinese State: Contested Spaces. J. Unger, ed. Armonk, New York: M. E. Sharpe.
- Wang, S. 2010. “Doctors at Receiving End in Medical Reform.” China Daily, 25 March.
- White, G. 1996. “Chinese Trade Unions in the Transition from Socialism: Towards Corporatism or Civil Society?” British Journal of Industrial Relations, 34 (3), 433-457.
- Wynia, M., S. Latham, A. Kao, J. Berg and L. Emanuel. 1999. “Medical Professionalism in Society.” New England Journal of Medicine, 341, 1612-1616.
- Zou, M. and R. Lansbury. 2009. “Multinational Corporations and Employment Relations in the People’s Republic of China: The Case of Beijing Hyundai Motor Company.” The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20 (11), 2349-2369.