Résumés
Résumé
Cette étude analyse le taux de pénétration des nouvelles formes d’organisation du travail (NFOT) ainsi que leurs déterminants. Pour ce faire, les perspectives contingente et institutionnelle ont été mises à profit afin de caractériser les facteurs explicatifs des NFOT dans 252 entreprises québécoises. Les résultats de cette étude sont concluants : la perspective contingente explique mieux la présence des NFOT lorsque le taux de pénétration de ces pratiques est élevé, alors que la perspective institutionnelle s’avère dominante lorsque ce taux est faible. Concrètement, les résultats suggèrent que la stratégie d’affaires, la gestion participative, le type de culture et la qualité totale, caractérisant la perspective contingente, sont les facteurs déterminants d’une pénétration élevée des NFOT, alors que le secteur d’activités, la concurrence à l’international et la structure de gouvernance, caractérisant la perspective institutionnelle, expliquent mieux la présence des NFOT lorsque celles-ci sont implantées superficiellement.
Summary
This study deals with new forms of work organization (NFWO). Whereas, in the past, this subject has been approached by many authors from the perspective of the impact of innovative practices on business performance (Arthur, 1994; Handel and Gittleman, 2004; Handel and Levine, 2004), this study rather sets out to study the diffusion and the determinants linked to work organization. Consequently, we can ask the following question: what differentiates firms having implemented new forms of work organization (NFWO)? To answer this question, two perspectives will be used: the institutional perspective and the contingent perspective.
On the one hand, according to the institutional perspective, businesses could be tempted to imitate competitors and/or to follow the enthusiasm which increasingly, many industries show for NFWO (Dirsmith, Fogarty and Gupta, 2000). They might equally be compelled to adopt NFWO due to surrounding coercive forces. According to this approach, the choice would thus be rather the result of sectoral imitation (DiMaggio and Powell, 1983) limited or encouraged by the different groups of actors in the business.
On the other hand, according to the contingency theory, businesses should be bound to their internal structure as well as to their policies and human resource management practices on their business strategies and their internal strategies. The choice to adopt or to implement NFOW would stem, from this perspective, from a rational and strategic choice (Dunphy and Bryant, 1996). Thus, businesses opting for participative management and having initiated a quality management approach would be more inclined to adopt new forms of work organization oriented towards autonomy and, conversely, those having adopted autocratic management and mass production without concern for quality would be less attracted by these practices (Dean and Bowen, 1994; Handel and Levine, 2004).
The results of this study show that 27% of establishments surveyed chose to implement NFOW substantially, which is comparable to the results obtained by Osterman (1994a, 2000). Also, although we did not test for the presence of complete practice systems, it appears that few businesses chose to thoroughly implement several practices linked to work organization. To this end, we observe that autonomous work teams are less implemented than are the other selected practices. Our results suggest that the contingent perspective and mainly internal strategies better account for the presence of NFOW than does the institutional perspective. Concretely, we found that the presence of a leadership strategy by costs, of participative management, of a quality management approach, and a market culture based on performance are all linked to the presence of NFOW when the degree of penetration for these practices is considered. However, on the institutional perspective side, the sector to which the business belongs, the competitive pressure to which businesses are exposed, the governing mechanism and their level of growth are linked to the presence of NFOW only when these are superficially implemented.
In conclusion, certain businesses implement NFOW in a way so as to be coherent with their strategies and values, while others seem rather to follow the style of the day, without achieving true change as concerns their work organization method.
Resumen
Este estudio analiza la tasa de penetración de las nuevas formas de organización del trabajo (NFOT) así que sus determinantes. Para ello hemos utilizado las perspectivas contingente e institucional para caracterizar los factores explicativos de las NFOT en 252 empresas quebequenses. Los resultados de este estudio son concluyentes: la perspectiva contingente explica mejor la presencia de NFOT cuando la tasa de penetración de dichas prácticas es elevada, mientras que la perspectiva institucional se revela dominante cuando esa tasa es baja. Concretamente, los resultados sugieren que la estrategia empresarial, la gestión participativa, el tipo de cultura y la calidad total, que caracterizan la perspectiva contingente, son los factores determinantes de una penetración elevada de NFOT, mientras que el sector de actividad, la concurrencia en el campo internacional y la estructura de gobernanza, que caracterizan la perspectiva institucional, explican mejor la presencia de NFOT cuando estas son implantas superficialmente.
Parties annexes
Bibliographie
- Antony, R.N. et V. Govindarajan. 2001. Management Control Systems. 10e édition. New-York : McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
- Appelbaum, E., T. Bailey, P. Berg et A. Kalleberg. 2000. Manufacturing Advantage : Why High-Performance Systems Pay Off. Ithaca, NY : ILR Press.
- Arthur, J.B. 1992. « The Link between Business Strategy and Industrial Relations Systems in American Steel Minimills ». Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 45 (3), 488–506.
- Arthur, J.B. 1994. « Effects of Human Resource Systems on Manufacturing Performance and Turnover ». Academy of Management Journal, 37, 670–687.
- Balkin, D.B. et G.D. Markman. 1998. « The Determinants of Team Rewards in Entrepreneurial Firms ». Note de recherche, 26.
- Barney, J.B. 1991. « Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage ». Journal of Management, 17, 99–120.
- Batt, R. et E. Appelbaum. 1995. « Workers Participation in Diverse Settings : Does the Form Affect the Outcome, and if so, Who Benefits? ». British Journal of Industrial Relations, 33 (3), 353–379.
- Bergeron, F., S. Rivard et L. Raymond. 1998. « Determinants of Business Process Reengineering Success in Small and Large Enterprises : An Empirical Study in the Canadian Context ». Journal of Small Business Management, janvier, 72–85.
- Bethel, J. et J. Liebeskind. 1993. « The Effects of Ownership Structure on Corporate Restructuring ». Strategic Management Journal, 14, 15–31.
- Boxall, P. et J. Purcell. 2003. Strategy and Human Resource Management. New York : Palgrave Macmillan.
- Campion, M.A., G.J. Medsker et A.C. Higgs. 1993. « Relations between Work Group Characteristics and Effectiveness : Implications for Designing Effective Work Groups ». Personnel Psychology, 46, 823–850.
- Caudron, S. 1993. « Are Self-directed Teams Right for Your Company? ». Personnel Journal, décembre, 76–84.
- Cotton, J. 1993. Employee Involvement. Newburry Park, CA : Sage.
- Crozier, M. et E. Friedberg. 1977. L’acteur et le système. Paris : Seuil.
- David, A. 2002. « Direction, conception et recherche en sciences de gestion ». Revue française de gestion, 3–4 (139), 173–185.
- Dean, J.W. et S.A. Snell. 1991. « Integrated Manufacturing and Job Design : Moderating Effects of Organizational Inertia ». Academy of Management Journal, 34 (4), 776–801.
- Dean, J.W. et D.E. Bowen. 1994. « Management Theory and Total Quality : Improving Research and Practice through Theory Development ». Academy of Management Review, 19 (3), 392–418.
- Delery, J.E. et D.H. Doty. 1996. « Modes of Theorizing in Strategic Human Resource Management : Tests of Universalistic, Contingency, and Configurational Performance Predictions ». Academy ofManagement Journal, 39 (4), 802–835.
- DiMaggio, P. et W. Powell. 1983. « The Iron Cage Revisited : Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields ». American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.
- Dirsmith, M.W., T.J. Fogarty et P. Gupta. 2000. « Institutional Pressures and Symbolic Displays in a GAO Context ». Organization Studies, 21 (3), 515–537.
- Drummond, H. et E. Chell. 1992. « Should Organizations Pay for Quality? ». Personnel Review, 21 (4), 3–11.
- Dunphy, D. et B. Bryant. 1996. « Teams : Panaceas or Prescriptions for Improved Performance ». Human Relations, 49 (5), 677–699.
- Edwards, P. et M. Wright. 2001. « High-involvement Work Systems and Performance Outcomes : The Strength of Variable, Contingent and Context-bound Relationships ». International Journal of Human Resource Management, 12 (4), 568–585.
- EPOC Research Group. 1997. New Forms of Work Organizations : Results of a Survey of Direct Employee Participation in Europe. Dublin : European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions.
- Etzioni, A. 1961. Comparative Analysis of Complex Organization. New York : Free Press.
- French, W.L. et C.H. Bell. 1973. Organization Development. Englewood Cliff, NJ : Prentice Hall.
- Frost, A.C. 2000. « Explaining Variation in Workplace Restructuring : The Role of Local Union Capabilities ». Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 53 (4), 559–578.
- Gittleman, M., M. Horrigan et M. Joyce. 1998. « Flexible Workplace Practices : Evidence from a Nationally Representative Survey ». Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 52 (1), 99–115.
- Grant, M. et B. Lévesque. 1997. « Aperçu des principales transformations des rapports du travail dans les entreprises : le cas québécois ». Nouvelles formes d’organisation du travail : études de cas et analyses comparatives. M. Grant, P.R. Bélanger et B. Lévesque, dir. Montréal : L’Harmattan, 221–277.
- Handel, M.J. et M. Gittleman. 2004. « Is There a Wage Payoff to Innovative Work Practices? ». Industrial Relations, 43 (1), 67–97.
- Handel, M.J. et D.I. Levine. 2004. « Editor’s Introduction : The Effects of New Work Practices on Workers ». Industrial Relations, 43 (1), 1–43.
- Hannan, M.T. et H. Freeman. 1977. « Structural Inertia and Organizational Change ». AmericanJournal of Sociology, 82, 929–964.
- Huselid, M.A. et B.L. Rau. 1996. « The Determinants of High Performance Work Systems : Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Analysis ». Manuscrit.
- Ichniowski, C. et K. Shaw. 1995. « Old Dogs and New Tricks : Determinants of Adoption of Productivity-Enhancing Work Practices ». Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Microeconomics, 1–65.
- Ichniowski, C., T.A. Kochan, D. Levine, C. Olson et G. Strauss. 1996. « What Works at Work : Overview and Assessment ». Industrial Relations, 35 (3), 299–333.
- Jensen, M.C. et W. Meckling. 1976. « Theory of the Firm : Managerial Behavior Agency Costs and Ownership Structure ». Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–360.
- Klein, A.S., R.J. Masi et C.K. Weidner II. 1995. « Organization Culture, Distribution and Amount of Control, and Perceptions of Quality ». Group and Organization Management, 20 (2), 122–148.
- Lapointe, P.-A. 2001. « Partenariat, avec ou sans démocratie ». Relations industrielles/Industrial Relations, 56 (2), 244–276.
- Meyer, J.W. et B. Rowan. 1977. « Institutionalized Organizations : Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony ». American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–363.
- Millward, N., A. Bryson et J. Forth. 2000. All Change at Work : British Employment Relations 1980–1998 as Portrayed by the Workplace Industrial Relations Survey Series. London : Routledge.
- Mintzberg, H. 1994. « Pièges et illusions de la planification stratégique ». Gestion, 19 (1), 66–74.
- Osterman, P. 1994a. « How Common is Workplace Transformation and Who Adopts It ». Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 47 (2), 173–188.
- Osterman, P. 1994b. « Supervision, Discretion, and Work Organization ». The American Economic Review, 84 (2), 380–384.
- Osterman, P. 2000. « Work Reorganization in an Era of Restructing : Trends in Diffusion and Effects on Employee Welfare ». Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 53 (2), 179–197.
- Pil, K.F. et P. MacDuffie. 1996. « The Adoption of High-Involvement Work Practices ». Industrial Relations, 35 (3), 423–455.
- Porter, M.E. 1985. Competitive Advantage. New York : Free Press.
- Ramsay, H., D. Scholarios et B. Harley. 2000. « Employees and High-Performance Work Systems : Testing inside the Black Box ». British Journal of Industrial Relations, 38 (4), 501–531.
- Scott, W.R. 1987. « The Adolescence of Institutional Theory ». Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, 493–511.
- Seaman, R. 1995. « How Self-Directed Work Teams Support Strategic Alignment ». Compensation and Benefits Review, 23–32.
- Tessier, R. et Y. Tellier. 1990. Changement planifié et développement des organisations. Montréal : Éditions de l’I.F.G.
- Trist, E.L. et K.W. Bamforth. 1951. « Quelques conséquences sociales et psychologiques de la méthode des longs fronts de taille dans l’extraction du charbon ». s.l. : s.n., 207–256.
- Wageman, R. 1995. « Interdependence and Group Effectiveness ». Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 145–180.
- Wells, D. 2001. « Labour Market, Flexible Specialization and the New Microcorporatism : The Case of Canada’s Major Appliance Industry ». Relations Industrielles/Industrial Relations, 56 (2), 279–304.
- Wolfe, R.A. 1995. « Human Resource Management Innovations : Determinants of Their Adoption and Implementation ». Human Resource Management, 34 (2), 313–327.
- Youndt, M.A., S.A. Snell, J.W. Dean et D.P. Lepak. 1996. « Human Resource Management, Manufacturing Strategy, and Firm Performance ». Academy of Management Journal, 39 (4), 836–866.