Résumés
Résumé
De nombreuses sources indiquent que l’emploi prend aujourd’hui une place croissante dans la négociation collective au sein de l’Union européenne. Il faut alors s’interroger sur le rôle que joue la négociation collective dans la régulation du marché du travail, ou plus précisément dans la création et la préservation de l’emploi, en termes de postes de travail, ainsi que dans la régulation des entrées et sorties du marché du travail. L’article traite cette question en examinant la nature des processus de négociation impliqués. Il tente de montrer en quoi les compromis portant sur l’emploi sont spécifiques, impliquent des relations particulières entre interlocuteurs sociaux et État, et constituent autant de tentatives de réguler conjointement les transformations actuelles du marché du travail.
Summary
A large set of recent studies tends to show that employment is currently gaining increased importance in the content of collective bargaining in the European Union member states. The notion of bargaining on employment refers to negotiation processes that may take place among unions and employers’ organizations and, sometimes, the state, and that aim to increase employment levels and to reduce unemployment. In other words, this type of bargaining consists in defining joint rules organizing, or at least attempting to organize, employment volumes and flux, with the objective of preserving or creating jobs, on the one hand, and of assisting the unemployed to find a job, on the other. It is sometimes contrasted with bargaining focused on more traditional issues such as wages or working conditions, because it has a specific objective, trying not only to regulate employment relations, but more generally to regulate employment as such, defined in terms of number of jobs.
In the European Union, and more precisely in the EU-15, this takes place in a context where employment rates steadily remain below those of Japan and the United States, the two countries with which comparisons are traditionally made in the official figures published by the European Commission. Similarly, even if some countries have now virtually achieved full employment, such as Austria and the Netherlands, for instance, average unemployment rates in the European Union remain around 8%, higher than in either Japan or in the USA.
It is important to keep this context in mind when one considers the fact that social partners in the European Union participate in various bargaining processes aimed at building joint solutions for a more efficient labour market. This takes place at several levels: first, at the European level, social partners are invited to participate in the “European employment strategy” that annually defines guidelines for all member states and that stresses the contribution of unions and employers’ organizations in the preparation and implementation of those guidelines at national level; second, within the member states, it also includes tripartite agreements and “social pacts” that reflect the revival of neo-corporatism in European countries since the early 1990s and that include not only wage moderation clauses but also joint projects for employment; third, employment is also taken into consideration at lower levels of bargaining, e.g. at the level of branches, regions and companies.
The article examines collective bargaining on employment issues with a focus on the nature of the processes involved and shows that they represent a specific type of bargaining, both in terms of the rules produced and in terms of the relationships between the actors involved.
The first part briefly summarizes some important data on the context of employment in Europe and key points of the European employment strategy. It also discusses the notion of bargaining on employment and refers to the concept of regulation to analyse this type of bargaining. The second part examines the characteristics of bargaining on employment, successively looking at the subjects negotiated, the uncertainty that accompanies this type of bargaining, the relationship between the state and social partners and, finally, the nature of emerging compromises.
In terms of content, bargaining on employment touches a very wide range of issues, extending from measures oriented towards the protection of existing jobs to programmes to support the unemployed, through changes in work organization intended to preserve or to create jobs. In fact, if there is in Europe a broad consensus on the fact that employment is a priority for all, and here more particularly for states, unions and employers’ organizations, the specific content of bargaining behind the general objective is much less consensual. It is, moreover, highly uncertain as arrangements concluded aim to stimulate employment but very rarely include a clear and quantified commitment to a specific number of jobs.
In terms of processes, bargaining on employment, to the extent that it contributes to the regulation of the labour market, implies intertwined roles between governments and social partners. More generally, neo-corporatist processes have attracted renewed interest in European countries since the 1990s, and the search for joint solutions to regulate the labour market has contributed to these developments. Tripartite programmes for employment along with social pacts reflect the search, on the part of social actors, for transformed trade-offs organizing the labour market, in which the notion of “employability” holds a growing place.
In conclusion, collective bargaining on employment tends to reflect an apparent paradox: it opens greater space for flexibility, for company-based solutions, for a notion of “employability”, but through the means of joint regulation from the state and social partners. As such, it raises original issues on the role of collective bargaining in the definition of the rules organizing current labour markets in Europe, in other words on the role of collective bargaining as a regulator of the labour market, beyond the regulation of employment relationships.
Resumen
Numerosas fuentes indican que el empleo toma, en nuestros días, un lugar creciente en la negociación colectiva en el seno de la Unión Europea. Es necesario entonces interrogarse sobre el rol que juega la negociación colectiva en la regulación del mercado de trabajo o más precisamente en la creación y preservación del empleo, en términos de puestos de trabajo, así como en la regulación de las entradas y salidas del mercado de trabajo. El artículo trata esta cuestión examinando la naturaleza de los procesos de negociación implicados. Se intenta mostrar como los compromisos relativos al empleo son específicos, implican relaciones particulares entre los interlocutores sociales y el Estado y constituyen otras tantas tentativas de regular conjuntamente las transformaciones actuales del mercado de trabajo.
Parties annexes
Bibliographie
- Bélanger, Jacques et Christian Thuderoz. 1998. « La recodification de la relation d’emploi ». Revue française de sociologie, vol. 39, no 3, 469–494.
- Bourque, Reynald et Christian Thuderoz. 2002. Sociologie de la négociation. Paris : La Découverte, Coll. Repères.
- Boyer, Robert et Jean-Pierre Durand. 1993. L’Après-fordisme. Paris : Syros.
- CEC. 1993. White Paper on Growth, Competition, and Employment : The Challenges and Ways forward into the 21st Century. Brussels : European Commission, COM(93)700 final, http://europa.eu.int/en/record/white/c93700/contents.html.
- CEC. 2003. Employment in Europe 2003. Recent Trends and Prospects. Brussels : European Commission, D.-G. for Employment and Social Affairs, September 2003, http://europa.eu.int/comm/employment_social/employment_analysis/employ_2003_en.htm.
- CEC. 2004. Communication from the Commission to the Council. Draft Joint Employment Report 2003/2004, COM(2004) 24 final, Brussels : European Commission, http://europa.eu.int/comm/lisbon_strategy/pdf/COM2004_024_en.pdf.
- Conseil européen. 2003. « Décision du Conseil du 22 juillet 2003 relative aux lignes directrices pour l’emploi des États membres (2003/578/CE) ». Journal Officiel de l’Union européenne, 5.8.2003, http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/pri/fr/oj/dat/2003/l_197/ l_19720030805fr00130021.pdf.
- Crouch, Colin. 2000. « National Wage Determination and European Monetary Union ». After the Euro. Shaping Institutions for Governance in the Wake of European Monetary Union. C. Crouch, dir. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 203–226.
- Dølvik, Jon Erik. 2001. « The Impact of Post-Industrialisation on Employment and Labour Relations: A Comparative Review ». At Your Service ? Comparative Perspectives on Employment and Labour Relations in the European Private Sector Services. J.E. Dølvik, dir. Bruxelles : PIU-Peter Lang, 485–527.
- Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 1999. Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
- Freyssinet, Jacques et Hartmut Seifert. 1999. Negotiating Employment and Competitiveness: A Comparative Overview on Collective Agreements Dealing with the Relationship between Employment and Competitiveness, Interim Report. Dublin : European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions.
- Grote, Jürgen R. et Philippe C. Schmitter. 1997. « The Corporatist Sisyphus : Past, Present and Future ». EUI Working PaperSPS, No. 97/4. Florence : European University Institute.
- Jobert, Annette. 2000. Les espaces de la négociation collective, branches et territoires. Toulouse : Octares.
- Lallement, Michel. 1996. Sociologie des relations professionnelles. Paris : La Découverte, Coll. Repères.
- Lallement, Michel. 1999. Les gouvernances de l’emploi. Paris : Desclée de Brouwer.
- Maruani, Margaret. 1990. « La Sociologie du travail en quête d’emploi ». L’Emploi, l’entreprise et la société. F. Michon et D. Segrestin, dir. Paris : Economica, 41–48.
- Mériaux, Olivier. 1998. « Logiques d’échange politique et régulation du système français de formation professionnelle continue ». Les régulations de l’emploi : les stratégies des acteurs. B. Lamotte, coord. Paris : L’Harmattan, 111–122.
- Pochet, Philippe. 1998. « Les pactes sociaux en Europe dans les années 1990 ». Sociologie du travail, no 2/98, 173–190.
- Reynaud, Jean-Daniel. 1989. Les règles du jeu : l’action collective et la régulation sociale. Paris : Armand Colin.
- Rhodes, Martin. 2001. « The Political Economy of Social Pacts : ‘Competitive Corporatism’ and European Welfare Reform ». The New Politics of the Welfare State. P. Pierson, dir. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 165–194.
- Saglio, Jean. 1994. « Entre le prisonnier et le comptable : réflexions sur les modèles de l’échange ». Variations autour de la régulation sociale. Collectif. Paris : Presses de l’École nationale supérieure, 141–147.
- SamekLodovici, Manuela. 2000. « The Dynamics of Labour Market Reform in European Countries ». Why Deregulate Labour Markets ? G. Esping-Andersen et M. Regini, dir. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 30–65.
- Sisson, Keith, Jacques Freyssinet, Hubert Krieger, Kevin O’Kelly, Claus Schnabel et Hartmut Seifert. 1999. Pacts for Employment and Competitiveness: Concepts and Issues. Dublin : European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions.
- Smets, Jan. 2003. Mobilisation générale pour l’emploi : rattraper notre retard sur l’Europe en matière d’emploi. Bruxelles : Banque nationale de Belgique, http://meta.fgov.be/pdf/pd/frdf29a.pdf.
- Spineux, Armand, Evelyne Leonard, Xavier Leloup, Pierre Walthery et Philippe Barre, dir. 2001. Employment : The Focus of Collective Bargaining in Europe. Louvain-la-Neuve : Presses universitaires de Louvain.
- Spineux, Armand, Evelyne Leonard et Pierre Walthery, dir. 2002. Collective Bargaining and Employment in Europe. Louvain-la-Neuve : Presses universitaires de Louvain.
- Supiot, Alain, dir. 1999. Au-delà de l’emploi : transformations du travail et devenir du droit du travail en Europe. Paris : Flammarion.
- Traxler, Franz. 1995. « Farewell to Labour Market Associations? Organized versus Disorganized Decentralization as a Map for Industrial Relations ». Organized Industrial Relations in Europe : What Future? C. Crouch et F. Traxler, dir. Aldershot : Avebury, 23–44.
- Traxler, Franz. 2003. « Bargaining, State Regulation and the Trajectories of Industrial Relations ». European Journal of Industrial Relations, vol. 9, no 2, 141–161.
- Tromp, Coyan et Leni Beukema. 2001. « The Dutch “Poldermodel” : A Flexible Success-Story ». At your Service ? Comparative Perspectives on Employment and Labour Relations in the European Private Sector Services. J.E. Dølvik, dir. Bruxelles : PIU-Peter Lang, 145–187.
- van der Meer, Marc, Hester Benedictus et Jelle Visser. 2002. « The Netherlands ». Collective Bargaining and Employment in Europe. A. Spineux, E. Leonard et P. Walthery, dir. Louvain-la-Neuve : Presses universitaires de Louvain, 283–319.
- Visser, Jelle et Anton Hemerijck. 1997. A Dutch Miracle : Job Growth, Welfare Reform and Corporatism in the Netherlands. Amsterdam : Amsterdam University Press.
- Walton, Richard E. et Robert B. McKersie. 1965. A Behavioral Theory of Labor Negotiations: An Analysis of a Social Interaction System. New York : McGraw-Hill.
- Zagelmeyer, Stefan. 2000. Innovative Agreements on Employment and Competitiveness in the European Union and Norway. Dublin : European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions.