Résumés
Abstract
Two models of compassion coexisted in early modern English thinking: one characterized fellow-feeling as a form of contagion that physically compelled the sharing of passions through the humoral body; the other saw compassion as a moral exercise that required deliberate encouragement and active practice. This paper argues that Shakespeare’s The Rape of Lucrece demonstrates the dynamic interaction of these two models, situating Lucrece’s post-rape failures of productive compassionate interaction as the consequence of the changes produced in her body by the force of Tarquin’s passion, imparted to her through the event of the rape. By tracing Shakespeare’s poetic anatomy of the compassionate body through the rhetoric of opposition in the poem, this analysis elucidates how the construction of gender in humoral theory shapes the narration of the rape and exhibits the enduring influence of the humoral body on the period’s understanding of social life.
Keywords:
- William Shakespeare,
- The Rape of Lucrece,
- Compassion,
- Sympathy,
- Galenic Humoralism,
- History of Emotion
Résumé
Deux modèles de compassion coexistaient dans la pensée anglaise de la première modernité : l’un caractérisait le sentiment de camaraderie comme une forme de contagion imposant physiquement le partage des passions à travers le corps humoral ; l’autre considérait la compassion comme un exercice moral nécessitant un encouragement délibéré et une pratique active. Cet article soutient que Le viol de Lucrèce de Shakespeare illustre l’interaction dynamique de ces deux modèles, en positionnant les tentatives malheureuses de Lucrèce d’établir, après le viol, des interactions basées sur la compassion comme la conséquence des changements produits dans son corps par la force de la passion de Tarquin, transmise à travers l’acte du viol. En retraçant l’anatomie poétique du corps compatissant de Shakespeare à travers la rhétorique de l’opposition dans le poème, cette analyse cherche à comprendre comment la construction du genre dans la théorie humorale façonne le récit du viol et montre l’influence durable du corps humoral sur la compréhension de la société à l’époque.
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Arkin, Samuel. “ ‘That map which deep impression bears’: Lucrece and the Anatomy of Shakespeare’s Sympathy.” Shakespeare Quarterly 64, no. 3 (Fall 2013): 349–71. https://doi.org/10.1353/shq.2013.0036.
- Belling, Catherine. “Infectious Rape, Therapeutic Revenge: Bloodletting and the Health of Rome’s Body.” In Disease, Diagnosis, and Cure on the Early Modern Stage, edited by Stephanie Moss and Kaara L. Peterson, 113–32. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2004. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315257662.
- Berlant, Lauren. Introduction to Compassion: The Culture and Politics of an Emotion, edited by Lauren Berlant, 1–14. New York: Routledge, 2004. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203871096.
- Carrera, Elena, ed. Emotions and Health, 1200–1700. Leiden: Brill, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004252936.
- Colombetti, Giovanna, and Steve Torrance. “Emotion and Ethics: An Inter-(en)active Approach.” Phenomenology and Cognitive Science 8 (2009): 505–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-009-9137-3.
- Cousins, A. D. “Subjectivity, Exemplarity, and the Establishing of Characterization in Lucrece.” Studies in English Literature 38, no. 1 (Winter 1998): 45–60. https://doi.org/10.2307/451080.
- Crawford, John W. “Revisiting Shakespeare’s Lucrece: A Social Reason for Her Suicide.” CEA Critic 59, no. 3 (Spring–Summer 1997): 65–69. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44377195.
- Crewe, Jonathan. Trials of Authorship: Anterior Forms and Poetic Reconstruction from Wyatt to Shakespeare. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990.
- Crooke, Helkiah. Mikrokosmographia: A Description of the Body of Man. London, 1631.
- Culpeper, Nicholas. Galen’s Art of Physick. London, 1662.
- Davies, John. Microcosmos: The Discovery of the Little World, with the Government Thereof. Oxford, 1603.
- Dubrow, Heather. Captive Victors: Shakespeare’s Narrative Poems and Sonnets. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1987. https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501745720.
- Fineman, Joel. “Shakespeare’s Will: The Temporality of Rape.” Representations 20 (Autumn 1987): 25–76. https://doi.org/10.2307/2928501.
- Fitz-Geffry, Charles. Compassion towards Captives, Chiefly towards Our Brethren and Country-Men Who Are in Miserable Bondage in Barbarie. Oxford, 1637.
- Griswold, Jeffrey B. “Human Insufficiency and the Politics of Accommodation in King Lear.” Renaissance Drama 47, no. 1 (Spring 2019): 73–94. https://doi.org/10.1086/702989.
- Hein, Grit, and Tania Singer. “I Feel How You Feel but Not Always: The Empathic Brain and Its Modulation.” Current Opinion in Neurobiology 18, no. 2 (April 2008): 153–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2008.07.012.
- Helms, Nicholas R. “ ‘Upon Such Sacrifices’: An Ethic of Spectator Risk.” Journal of Dramatic Theory and Criticism 27, no. 1 (Fall 2012): 91–107. https://doi.org/10.1353/dtc.2012.0031.
- Holmes, Brooke. “Reflection: Galen’s Sympathy.” In Sympathy: A History, edited by Eric Schliesser, 61–69. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199928873.003.0004.
- Hulse, S. Clark. “ ‘A Piece of Skilful Painting’ in Shakespeare’s Lucrece.” Shakespeare Survey 31 (1978): 13–22.
- Ibbett, Katherine. Compassion’s Edge: Fellow-Feeling and Its Limits in Early Modern France. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2018.
- James, Heather. “Dido’s Ear: Tragedy and the Politics of Response.” Shakespeare Quarterly 52, no. 3 (Fall 2001): 360–82. https://doi.org/10.1353/shq.2001.0044.
- Jensen, Katharine Ann, and Miriam L. Wallace, eds. “Special Topic: Emotions.” Special issue, Publications of the Modern Language Association 130, no. 5 (October 2015).
- Kaegi, Ann. “Passionate Uprisings in Shakespeare’s Lucrece.” Shakespeare 14, no. 3 (September 2018): 205–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450918.2018.1504814.
- Keleher, Sarah S. “ ‘This bastard graff shall never come to growth’: Conception and Consent in Shakespeare’s Lucrece.” Shakespeare Quarterly 72, no. 1–2 (Spring–Summer 2022): 79–103. https://doi.org/10.1093/sq/quac014.
- Langley, Eric. Shakespeare’s Contagious Sympathies: Ill Communications. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198821847.001.0001.
- Lehtonen, Kelly. “The Intelligence of Negative Passion and the Collapse of Stoicism in King Lear.” Studies in English Literature 59, no. 2 (Spring 2019): 259–80. https://doi.org/10.1353/sel.2019.0011.
- Long, Zackariah. “Historicizing Rape Trauma: Identification with the Aggressor in Early Modern Humoralism and The Rape of Lucrece (1594).” In Early Modern Trauma: Europe and the Atlantic World, edited by Erin Peters and Cynthia Richards, 55–79. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2021. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1tbhrhx.7.
- Maus, Katharine Eisaman. “Taking Tropes Seriously: Language and Violence in Shakespeare’s Rape of Lucrece.” Shakespeare Quarterly 37, no. 1 (Spring 1986): 66–82. https://doi.org/10.2307/2870192.
- Maxwell, Lynn M. “Writing Women, Writing Wax: Metaphors of Impression—Possibilities of Agency in Shakespeare’s Rape of Lucrece and Twelfth Night.” Criticism 58, no. 3 (Summer 2016): 433–58. https://doi.org/10.13110/criticism.58.3.0433.
- Meek, Richard, ed. “Shakespeare and the Culture of Emotion.” Special issue, Shakespeare 8, no. 3 (2012).
- Meek, Richard. Sympathy in Early Modern Literature and Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1017/ 9781009280259.
- Miller, Christopher W. T. “Confusion of Tears: The Deadened Oedipal Couple and Predatory Identifications in The Rape of Lucrece.” American Imago 75, no. 4 (Winter 2018): 489–515. https://doi.org/10.1353/aim.2018.0028.
- Oxford English Dictionary (OED) Online. September 2023. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://www.oed.com.
- Paster, Gail Kern. “The Unbearable Coldness of Female Being: Women’s Imperfection and the Humoral Economy.” English Literary Renaissance 28, no. 3 (September 1998): 416–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6757.1998.tb00760.x.
- Paster, Gail Kern, Katherine Rowe, and Mary Floyd-Wilson. Introduction to Reading the Early Modern Passions: Essays in the Cultural History of Emotion, edited by Gail Kern Paster, Katherine Rowe, and Mary Floyd-Wilson, 1–20. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2004.
- Philiatreus. The Generall Practise of Medecine. Edinburgh, 1634.
- The Problemes of Aristotle, with Other Philosophers and Physitians. London, 1607.
- Rosenwein, Barbara H. “Problems and Methods in the History of Emotions.” Passions in Context: Journal of the History and Philosophy of the Emotions 1, no. 1 (2010): 1–32.
- Rublack, Ulinka. “Fluxes: The Early Modern Body and the Emotions.” Translated by Pamela Selwyn. History Workshop Journal 53, no. 1 (Spring 2022): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1093/hwj/53.1.1.
- Shakespeare, William. The Rape of Lucrece. In Early Plays and Poems, edited by Stephen Greenblatt et al., 695–744. Vol. 1 of The Norton Shakespeare. 3rd ed. New York: W. W. Norton, 2016.
- Shakespeare, William. The Rape of Lucrece. In The Riverside Shakespeare, edited by G. Blakemore Evans et al., 1814–38. 2nd ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1997.
- Smith, Shawn. “Pity and Piety in Titus Andronicus.” Studies in Philology 119, no. 1 (Winter 2022): 104–39. https://doi.org/10.1353/sip.2022.0004.
- Solomon, Robert C. “The Philosophy of Emotions.” In The Handbook of Emotions, edited by Michael Lewis, Jeannette M. Haviland-Jones, and Lisa Feldman Barrett, 3–16. 3rd ed. New York: Guilford Press, 2008.
- Steenbergh, Kristine. “Mollified Hearts and Enlarged Bowels: Practising Compassion in Reformation England.” In Compassion in Early Modern Literature: Feeling and Practice, edited by Kristine Steenbergh and Katherine Ibett, 121–38. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108862172.010.
- Steenbergh, Kristine, and Katherine Ibbett. Introduction to Compassion in Early Modern Literature: Feeling and Practice, edited by Katherine Steenbergh and Katherine Ibett, 1–21. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108862172.001.
- Strier, Richard. “Against the Rule of Reason: Praise of Passion from Petrarch to Luther to Shakespeare to Herbert.” In Reading the Early Modern Passions: Essays in the Cultural History of Emotion, edited by Gail Kern Paster, Katherine Rowe, and Mary Floyd-Wilson, 23–42. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2004.
- Tilmouth, Christopher. “Shakespeare’s Open Consciences.” Renaissance Studies 23, no. 4 (September 2009): 501–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-4658.2009.00607.x.
- Tsentourou, Naya. “Untimely Breathings in The Rape of Lucrece.” Shakespeare 18, no. 4 (2021): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450918.2021.1957995.
- Wilson, R. Rawdon. “Shakespearean Narrative: The Rape of Lucrece Reconsidered.” Studies in English Literature 28, no. 1 (Winter 1988): 39–59. https://doi.org/10.2307/450714.
- Wright, Thomas. The Passions of the Minde in Generall. London, 1604.
- Zirker, Angelika. “Performative Iconicity: Chiasmus and Parallelism in William Shakespeare’s The Rape of Lucrece.” In Dimensions of Iconicity, edited by Angelika Zirker, Matthias Bauer, Olga Fischer, and Christian Ljungberg, 287–300. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing, 2017.