Résumés
Abstract
“She did make defect perfection” (Antony and Cleopatra 2.2.242): by this formula, Enobarbus sums up the essence of Cleopatra’s inimitable charm. Shakespeare’s Cleopatra is a study of women and women: in other words, Shakespeare’s Cleopatra is less fiction than an investigation of the other sex. “Was will das Weib?” asked Freud (if we are to believe Marie Bonaparte’s testimony), thus admitting that the great question psychoanalysis has been unable to answer is the enigma of feminine desire. Shakespeare’s Cleopatra represents this enigma, which takes the form of a perfection resulting from a series of paradoxes: beauty and maturity, cunning and folly, fidelity and betrayal, jealousy and indifference, majesty and debauchery, expense and economy, audacity and fragility, truth and lies. Cleopatra’s perfection is the sum of all possible paradoxes. What is the point of this dizzying interplay of paradoxes? What is the resulting perfection?
Keywords:
- Antony and Cleopatra,
- Querelle des Femmes,
- Shakespeare,
- Lacan,
- Freud,
- Phallus,
- Feminine jouissance,
- Pucelle venimeuse
Résumé
« She did make defect perfection » (Antoine et Cléopâtre 2.2.242) : par cette formule, Énobarbe synthétise l’essence de l’inimitable charme de Cléopâtre. La Cléopâtre shakespearienne est une véritable étude de femme et de la femme : autrement dit, la Cléopâtre de Shakespeare relève moins de la fiction que de l’enquête sur l’autre sexe. « Was will das Weib? » se demandait Freud (si l’on en croit le témoignage de Marie Bonaparte), en admettant ainsi que la grande question auquelle la psychanalyse n’a pas su répondre est l’énigme du désir féminin. La Cléopâtre de Shakespeare représente cette énigme qui prend la forme d’une perfection résultante d’une série de paradoxes : beauté et âge mûr, ruse et déraison, fidélité et trahison, jalousie et indifférence, majesté et débauche, dépense et économie, audace et fragilité, vérité et mensonge. La perfection de Cléopâtre est la somme de tous les paradoxes possibles. À quoi vise cet étourdissant jeu de paradoxes ? Qu’est-ce que la perfection qui en résulte ?
Mots-clés :
- Antoine et Cléopâtre,
- Querelle des Femmes,
- Shakespeare,
- Lacan,
- Freud,
- Phallus,
- Jouissance féminine,
- Pucelle venimeuse
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Abraham, Lyndall. “Alchemical Reference in Antony and Cleopatra.” Sydney Studies in English 8 (1982): 100–104.
- Abraham, Lyndall. “ ‘The Lovers and the Tomb’: Alchemical Emblems in Shakespeare, Donne, and Marvell.” Emblematica 5 (Winter 1991): 301–20.
- Aldelman, Janet. Suffocating Mothers: Fantasies on Maternal Origins in Shakespeare’s Plays, Hamlet to The Tempest. New York: Routledge, 1992. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203420652.
- Bataille, Georges. L’érotisme. Paris: Éditions de Minuit, 1957.
- Beltrametti, Anna. “Immagini della donna, maschere del logos.” In I Greci: Storia, cultura, arte, società, edited by S. Settis, 897–935. Vol. 2, bk. 2. Turin: Einaudi, 1997.
- Berthelot, Marcellin, and Charles-Émile Ruelle. Collections des Anciens Alchimistes Grecs. Vol. 2. Paris: Georges Steinheil, 1888.
- Bevington, David, ed. Antony and Cleopatra. By William Shakespeare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
- Burton, Robert. L’anatomia della malinconia. Edited by Luca Manini and Amneris Roselli. Milan: Bompiani, 2020.
- Caraffi, Patrizia. “Velenose bellezze: Isotta e Mirabella.” In Il corpo impuro e le sue rappresentazioni nelle letterature medievali, edited by F. Mosetti Casaretto, 247–60. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso, 2012.
- Cixous, Hélène, and Catherine Clément. La jeune née. Paris: Union Générale d’Éditions, 1975.
- D’Ancona, Alessandro. “Il tesoro di Brunetto Latini versificato.” Atti della Reale Accademia dei Lincei: Classe di scienze morali, storiche, e filologiche 4, no. 1 (1887): 111–274.
- Donà, Carlo. La fata serpente: Indagine di un mito erotico e regale. Rome: WriteUp, 2020.
- Eliot, T. S. “The Metaphysical Poets (1921).” In Selected Essays, 281–91. London: Faber and Faber, 1999. First published in 1932 by Harcourt, Brace and Company.
- Evangelista, Stefano. “Swinburne’s Galleries.” The Yearbook of English Studies 40, no. 1/2 (2010): 160–79. https://doi.org/10.1353/yes.2010.0007.
- Fusini, Nadia. Maestre d’amore: Giulietta, Desdemona, Ofelia e le altre. Turin: Einaudi, 2020.
- Giallongo, Angela. La donna serpente: Storia di un enigma dall’antichità al XXI secolo. Bari: Dedalo, 2012.
- Henn, T. R. “The Images of Antony and Cleopatra.” In The Living Image: Shakespearean Essays, 117–38. London: Routledge, 2005.
- Hertz, Wilhelm.“Die Sage vom Giftmädchen.” Abhandlungen der bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften 166 (1893): 89–166.
- Jones, Ernest. The Life and Work of Sigmund Freud. Vol. 2. New York: Basic Books, 1961.
- Kuriyama, Constance Brown. “The Mother of the World: A Psychoanalytic Interpretation of Shakespeare’s Antony and Cleopatra.” English Literary Renaissance 7, no. 3 (Autumn 1977): 324–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6757.1977.tb01374.x.
- Lacan, Jacques. Le Séminaire XX: Encore (1972–1973). Paris: Seuil, 1975.
- Lacan, Jacques. “Radiophonie.” In Autres écrits, 403–47. Paris: Seuil, 2001. First published in 1970.
- Lewis, Rhodri. “Romans, Egyptians, and Crocodiles.” Shakespeare Quarterly 68, no. 4 (Winter 2017): 320–50. https://doi.org/10.1353/shq.2017.0039.
- Østermark-Iohansen, Lene. “Swinburne’s Serpentine Delights: The Aesthetic Critic and the Old Master Drawings in Florence.” Nineteenth-Century Contexts 24, no. 1 (2002): 49–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/08905490290031794.
- Park, Jennifer. “Discandying Cleopatra: Preserving Cleopatra’s Infinite Variety in Shakespeare’s Antony and Cleopatra.” Studies in Philology 113, no. 3 (Summer 2016): 595–633. https://doi.org/10.1353/sip.2016.0023.
- Praz, Mario. Mnemosyne: Parallelo tra letteratura e arti visive. Milan: Mondadori, 1971.
- Sacerdoti, Gilberto. Nuovo cielo, nuova terra: La rivelazione copernicana di Antonio e Cleopatra di Shakespeare. Bologna: Il Mulino, 1990.
- Schilling, Robert. La religion romaine de Vénus depuis les temps d’Auguste. Paris: De Boccard, 1954.
- Secretum secretorum: Nine English Versions. Edited by Mahmoud Manzalaoui. Vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977.
- Shakespeare, William. Antony and Cleopatra. Edited by John Wilders. Arden Shakespeare, 3rd ser. London: Bloomsbury, 1995.
- Starobinski, Jean. L’encre de la mélancolie. Paris: Seuil, 2012.
- Stella, Massimo. Il romanzo della Regina: Shakespeare e la scrittura della sovranità. Rome: Bulzoni, 2014.
- Stella, Massimo. “The Meta-Physical Wound: Shakespeare’s Roman Plays.” In The Wounded Body: Memory, Language and the Self from Petrarch to Shakespeare, edited by Fabrizio Bondi, Massimo Stella, and Andrea Torre, 227–58. New York: Palgrave, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91904-7_11.
- Stella, Massimo. “Tradimento gitano: L’anticlassico di un dramma romano,” In Ti do la mia parola: Sette saggi sul tradimento, edited by Serena Pezzini and Alessandro Benassi, 81–114. Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura, 2017.
- Swinburne, Algernon. “Notes on Designs of the Old Masters at Florence.” In Major Poems and Selected Prose, edited by Jerome McGann and Charles L. Sligh. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2004.