Résumés
Résumé
Initiée en1997, la réforme ontarienne de la protection de l’enfance a modifié la pratique sociale dans les Sociétés d’aide à l’enfance (SAE). Entre autres, deux outils standardisés de prise de décision ont été introduits: le modèle d’évaluation des risques (ORAM) et le modèle de mesure du bien-être des enfants placés (Looking after children). Le concept de diffusion de l’innovation sera ici utilisé pour jeter un éclairage sur les enjeux inhérents à l’introduction de nouveautés. Ceux liés à la pratique actuelle en SAE seront aussi cernés afin de dresser un bilan critique des conditions de pratique que les intervenantes sociales y affrontent.
Parties annexes
Bibliographie
- AITKEN, G. (2002). «Extending options in permenancy planning», dans Sparrow Lake Alliance, Permanency Planning in the Child Welfare, Children in Limbo Task Force.
- ARONSON, J. et S. SAMMON (2000). «Practice amid social service cuts and restructuring: Working with the contradictions of “small victories ”», Canadian Social Work Review, vol. 17, no 2, 167-187.
- ASHFORTH, B. E. et F. A. MAEL (1998). «The power of resistance: Sustaining valued identities», dans R. M. Kramer et M. A. Neale, éd., Power and Influence in Organizations, California, SAGE Publications, 89-119.
- BAIRD, C., D. WAGNER, T. HEALY et K. JOHNSON (1999). «Risk assessment in child protective services: Consensus and actuarial model reliability», Child Welfare, vol. LXXVIII, no 6, 723-748.
- BEAUMONT, B (1999). «Risk assessment and prediction research», dans P. Parsloe , éd., Risk assessment in social care and social work, London, Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
- BURKE, P (1999). «Social services staff: Risks they face and their dangerousness to others», dans P. Parsloe , éd., Risk assessment in social care and social work, London, Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
- CALLAHAN, M. (2001). «Débat. L’évaluation du risque dans les services de protection de l’enfance. Non: Ces outils […] ne réduisent pas le risque pour les enfants», Revue canadienne de service social, vol. 18, no 1, 171-177.
- CAMILLERI, P. (1999). «Social work and its search for meaning: Theories, narratives and practices», dans B. Pease et J. Fook , éd., Transforming Social Work Practice. Postmodern Clinical Perspectives, New York et Londres, Routledge, 25-39.
- CARTER, J. (2000). Implementing change in child protection agencies: The case of the Ontario risk assessment model at Children’s aid society «X», thèse de maîtrise en service social, Montréal, Université McGill.
- CASH, S. J. (2001). «Risk assessment in child welfare: The art and science», Children and Youth Services Review, vol. 23, no 11, 811-830.
- CICCHINELLI, L. F. (1995). «Risk assessment: Expectations and realities», The APSAC Advisor, vol. 8, no 4, 3-8.
- CLOUTIER, R., G. CARRIER, K. VIEL, G. PAQUET, D. LESSARD, A. NAHID, A.-M. BARRETTE et M. LASNIER (2001). Projet d’intégration clinique. Intégration d’outils informatisés à l’intervention, Beauport, Centre Jeunesse de Québec, Institut universitaire.
- COHEN, B. J. (1999). «Fostering innovation in a large human services bureaucracy», Administration in Social Work, vol. 23, no 2, 47-59.
- COHEN, B. J. et M. J. AUSTIN (1994). «Organizational learning and change in a public child welfare agency», Administration in Social Work, vol. 18, no 1, 1-19.
- CORBY, B. (1996). « Risk assessment in child protection work», dans H. Kemshall et J. Pritchard , éd., Good practice in risk assessment and risk management, London, Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
- DAVIDSON, K.W. (1990). «Doubt as a source of innovation in developing effective services to families», Families in Society. The Journal of Contemporary Human Services, vol. 71, no 5, 296-302.
- DAVIES, L., M. McKINNON, P. RAINS et L. MASTRONARDI (1999). «Rethinking child protection practice: Through the lens of a voluntary service agency», Canadian Social Work Review, vol. 16, no 1, 103-116.
- DAWSON, R. (2001). «Débat: L’évaluation du risque dans les services de protection de l’enfance, Oui: l’évaluation du risque fait partie intégrante de la pratique», Revue canadienne de service social, vol. 18, no 1, 165-169.
- DePANFILIS, D. et S. J. ZURAVIN (1999). «Epidemiology of child maltreatment recurrences», Social Service Review, vol. 73, no 2, 218-239.
- DePANFILIS, D. (1996). «Implementing child mistreatment risk assessment systems: Lessons from theory», Administration in Social Work, vol. 20, no 2, 41-59.
- FLYNN, R., H. GHAZAL, S. MOSHENKO et L. WESTLAKE (2001). «Main features and advantages of a new, ‘Canadianized’ version of the assessment and action record from Looking After Children», OACAS Journal, vol. 45, no 2, 1-5.
- FREITAG, M. et Y. Bonny (coll.) (2002). L’oubli de la société. Pour une théorie critique de la postmodernité, France, Les Presses de l’Université Laval.
- GAMBRILL, E. et A. SHLONSKY (2001). «The need for comprehensive risk management systems in child welfare», Children and Youth Services Review, vol. 23, no 1, 79-107.
- GARRETT, P. M. (1999). «Mapping child-care social work in the final years of the twentieth century: A critical response to the ‘Looking after children’ system», British Journal of Social Work, vol. 29, 27-47.
- GOLD, N., R. BENBENISHTY et R. OSMO (2001). «A comparative study of risk assessments and recommended interventions in Canada and Israel», Child Abuse & Neglect, vol. 25, 607-622.
- GOLD, N (1999). «The nature and function of assessment», dans F. TURNER (dir.), Social work practice: A Canadian perspective, Scarborough, Prentice Hall Allyn and Bacon Canada.
- GOVE, T. J. (1995). «Children are people too: The challenge for change in child welfare», Journal of the Ontario Association of Children‘s Aid Societies, vol. 31, no 3, 18-21.
- GUMMER, B. (1995). «Reinventing, restructuring, and the big bang theory of organizational change», Administration in Social Work, vol. 19, no 3, 83-97.
- HARVEY, B. (2002). «Foster home numbers dwindle as need rises», Ottawa Citizen, 16 déc., A1-A2.
- HARVEY, C. (1998). «Defining excellence in human service organizations», Administration in Social Work, vol. 22, no 1, 33-45.
- HATTON, M.-J. et al. (1998). Protecting vulnerable children: Report of the panel of experts on child protection. Toronto, Ministère des services sociaux et communautaires.
- HERIE, M. et G. W. MARTIN (2002). «Knowledge diffusion in social work: A new approach to bridging the gap», Social Work, vol. 47, no 1, 85-95.
- HIGGINS, C. et L. DUXBURY (2002). Enquête nationale sur le conflit entre le travail et la vie personnelle (2001): Rapport 1, Santé Canada.
- HURWITZ, H., et D. CRESSWELL (2001). «Workload measurement project report», OACAS Journal, vol. 45, no 1, 8-38.
- JACKSON, S (1998). «Looking after children: A new approach or just an exercise in formfilling? A response to Knight and Caveney», British Journal of Social Work, vol. 28, 45-56.
- JEX, S. M. (1998). Stress and Job Performance. Theory, Research and Implications for Managerial Practice, California, SAGE Publications.
- JOHNSON, M. A., C. HENDRICKS BROWN et S. J. WELLS (2002). «Using classification and regression trees (CART) to support worker decision making», Social Work Research, vol. 26, no 1, mars, 19-29.
- KNIGHT, T et S. CAVENEY (1998). «Assessment and action records: Will they promote good parenting?», British Journal of Social Work, vol. 28, 29-43.
- LBEC – Ligue pour le bien-être de l’enfance du Canada (2002). «S’occuper des enfants: mise à jour canadienne», Journal de LBEC, vol. 1, no 1, 1-6.
- Loi sur les services à l‘enfance et à la famille (LSEF), 1990 [2000]. chap. C.11.
- LYONS, P., H. J. DOUECK et J. S. WODARSKI (1996). «Risk assessment for child protective services: A review of the empirical literature on instrument performance», Social Work Research, vol. 20, no 3, 143-155.
- MacMILLAN, H., P. D. STEINHAUER et D. CHAPPEL (2002). «Use of risk assessment tools», dans Permanency planning in the child welfare system, Sparrow Lake Alliance.
- MARKUS, E. J. (1990). «Computerization: A precondition for, or a product of, responsible social work practice», International Journal of Sociological and Social Policy, vol. 10, no 4-6, 30-53.
- MSSC, Ministry of Community and Social Services (1999). Handout: CFCA Amendments, Government of Ontario.
- MARTINEZ-BRAWLEY, E. E. et P. M.-B. ZORITA (1998). «At the edge of the frame: Beyond science and art in social work», British Journal of Social Work, vol. 28, 197-212.
- NORGAARRD, V. et S. BALLA (2002). «Looking after children Canadian-style», OACAS Journal, vol. 46, no 1, 3-4.
- OACAS (2001). (Page consultée le 1er décembre 2003). «Ontario child welfare statistics», [En ligne]. Adresse URL: http://www.oacas.org/resources/casstats.htm
- ORAM (2000). Risk assessment model for child protection in Ontario, Ontario Association of Children’s Aid Societies.
- OSMO, R. et A. ROSEN (2002). «Social workers’ strategies for treatment hypothesis testing», Social Work Research, vol. 26, no 1, mars, 9-18.
- PAQUET, G., G. CARRIER, R. CLOUTIER, F. GAGNON, D. LACERTE, A. NAHID et G. ALAIN (2001). Consultation sur l’implantation du Projet Intégration Jeunesse (PIJ) dans les quatre premiers centres jeunesse en déploiement, Beauport, Centre Jeunesse de Québec, Institut universitaire.
- PEARLMUTTER, S. (1998). «Self-efficacy and organizational change leadership», Administration in Social Work, vol. 22, no 3, 23-38.
- PINE, B. A.; R. WARSH et A. N. MALUCCIO (1998). «Participatory management in a public child welfare agency: A key to effective change», Administration in Social Work, vol. 22, no 1, 19-32.
- PROCTOR, K. (2002). «Decision making in social work practice», Social Work Research, vol. 26, no 1, mars, 3-6.
- REGEHR, C., M. M. BERNSTEIN, et K. KANANI (2002). «Liability for child welfare social workers: Weighing the risks», OACAS Journal, vol. 46, no 1, 32-39.
- REGEHR, C., B. LESLIE, P. HOWE et S. CHAU (2000). (Page consultée le 1er décembre 2003). «Stressors in child welfare practice», Bell Canada Child Welfare Research Unit, [En ligne]. Adresse URL: www.cecw-cepb.ca/Pubs/PubsOther.html
- REID, W. J. (2002). «Knowledge for direct social work practice: An analysis of trends», Social Service Review, vol. 76, no 1, mars, 6-33.
- RICE, R. M. (1973). «Organizing to innovate in social work», Social Casework, vol. 54, no 1, 20-26.
- RITTNER, B. (2002). «The use of risk assessment instruments in child protective services case planning and closures», Children and Youth Services Review, vol. 24, no 3, 189-207.
- ROGERS, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations, New York, The Free Press.
- SAE (2000-2001). «Rapport annuel 2000-2001», Ottawa, La société de l’aide à l’enfance d’Ottawa.
- SARGENT, K (1999). «Assessing risks for children», dans P. Parsloe , éd., Risk assessment in social care and social work, London, Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
- SCHAFFNER-GOLDBERG, G. (1995). «Theory and practice in program development: A study of the planning and implementation of fourteen social programs», Social Service Review, vol. 69, no 4, 614-655.
- SHELDON, B. (2001). «The validity of evidence-based practice in social work: A reply to Stephen Webb», British Journal of Social Work, vol. 31, 801-809.
- SHIN, J. et G. E. McCLOMB (1998). «Top executive leadership and organizational innovation: An empirical investigation of nonprofit human service organizations (HSOs)», Administration in Social Work, vol. 22, no 3, 1-21.
- STATISTIQUE CANADA (1996). Growing up in Canada: National Longitudinal Survey of Children and Youth, Ottawa, Développement des ressources humaines du Canada.
- SWIFT, K. (1995). «Manufacturing ‘Bad Mothers’: A critical perspective on child neglect», Toronto, University of Toronto Press.
- The ARA Consulting Group Inc. (1998). Child welfare accountability review: Final report, document présenté au ministère des Services sociaux et communautaires.
- TITTERTON, M. (1999). «Training professionals in risk assessment and risk management: What does the research tell us?», dans P. Parrsloe , éd., Risk Assessment in Social Care and Social Work, London, Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
- TROCMÉ, N. et al. (2000). Étude canadienne sur l’incidence des signalements de cas de violence et de négligence envers les enfants. Rapport final, Santé Canada.
- TROCMÉ, N., B. MERTINS-KIRKWOOD, R. MacFADDEN, R. ALAGGIA et D. GOODMAN (1999). Ontario risk assessment model phase 1: Implementation and training, Centre for Applied Social Research, Bell Canada Child Welfare Research Unit – Ministry of Community and Social Services.
- USHER, C. L., D. A. GIBBS, et J. B. WILDFIRE (1995). «A framework for planning, implementing, and evaluating child welfare reforms», Child Welfare, vol. LXXIV, no 4, 859-876.
- WEBB, S. A. (2001). «Some considerations on the validity of evidence-based practice in social work», British Journal of Social Work, vol. 31, 57-79.
- WILKES, J, R. (2002). «Introduction», dans Sparrow Lake Alliance, Permanency Planning in the Child Welfare, Children in Limbo Task Force.
- WIMPFHEIMER, S. (1993). «Introduction to the series on liability», Administration in Social Work, vol. 17, no 4, 1-9.