Résumés
Abstract
In George Eliot’s Romola, manuscripts represent the ability of objects to embody the past. Through various characters’ interactions with manuscripts, Eliot explores competing ways of using and valuing history, from Bardo’s obsessive collecting to Savonarola’s ideological co-optation. As the story progresses, however, manuscripts all but disappear and are replaced by printed texts. Through this depiction of technological change, Eliot advances her case for a particular kind of historical consciousness, one that engages critically—rather than fetishistically or opportunistically—with the past. Print, Eliot suggests, allows history to become widely accessible for public consumption, thereby weakening the aura of the past and allowing readers to simultaneously recognize its alterity and its intimate relationship to the present. Eliot suggests that the role of history is to guide and advance the interests of humanity in the present; as such, she uses Renaissance anxieties over the movement from manuscript to print to interrogate Victorian concerns surrounding the proliferation of inexpensive printed materials.
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- “Advertisement.” Athenaeum 1749 (4 May 1861): 579. British Periodicals. Web. 4 Feb. 2012.
- Bal, Mieke. “Telling Objects: A Narrative Perspective on Collecting.” The Cultures of Collecting. Ed. John Elsner and Roger Cardinal. London: Reaktion, 1994. 97-115. Print.
- Baudrillard, Jean. “The System of Collecting.” The Cultures of Collecting. Ed. John Elsner and Roger Cardinal. London: Reaktion, 1994. 7-24. Print.
- Benjamin, Walter. “The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction.” Illuminations. 1968. New York: Schocken, 2007. 217-252. Print.
- Benjamin, Walter. “Unpacking my Library: A Talk about Book Collecting.” Illuminations. 1968. New York: Schocken, 2007. 59-68. Print.
- Brown, Andrew. “The Texts of Romola.” From Author to Text: Re–reading George Eliot’s Romola. Ed. Caroline Levine and Mark W. Turner. Aldershot: Ashgate, 1998. 37-49. Print.
- Eliot, George. Romola. Oxford University Press, 1998. Print.
- Eliot, George. “Silly Novels by Lady Novelists.” Selected Critical Writings. Oxford University Press, 1993. 296-321. Print.
- Fraser, Hilary. The Victorians and Renaissance Italy. Oxford: Blackwell, 1992. Print.
- Hancock, Michael William. “Boffin’s Books and Darwin’s Finches: Victorian Cultures of Collecting.” Diss. U of Kansas, 2007. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses. Web. 3 Jan. 2012.
- Kurnick, David. “Abstraction and the Subject of Novel–Reading: Drifting Through Romola.” Novel 42.3 (Fall 2009): 490-496. Web. 4 Feb. 2012.
- Logan, Peter Melville. Victorian Fetishism: Intellectuals and Primitives. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2009. Print.
- MacCormack, Justin. “ART. II.—ROMOLA.” The Westminster Review 24.2 (Oct 1863): 344-352. British Periodicals. Web. 4 Jan. 2012.
- “Novelties in the British Museum.” Daily News 1532 (22 April 1851): 3. 19th Century British Library Newspapers. Web. 4 Feb. 2012.
- Price, Leah. “Reader’s Block: Trollope and the Book as Prop.” The Feeling of Reading: Affective Experience & Victorian Literature. Ed. Rachel Ablow. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 2010: 47-68. Print.
- Schaffer, Talia. “Craft, Authorial Anxiety and ‘The Cranford Papers.’” Victorian Periodicals Review 38.2 (2005): 221-239. JSTOR. Web. 4 Feb. 2012.
- Stewart, Susan. On Longing: Narratives of the Miniature, the Gigantic, the Souvenir, the Collection. 1984. Durham: Duke University Press, 1993. Print.
- Turner, Mark W. “George Eliot v. Frederic Leighton: Whose Text Is It Anyway?” From Author to Text: Re–reading George Eliot’s Romola. Ed. Caroline Levine and Mark W. Turner. Aldershot: Ashgate, 1998.17-35. Print.