Résumés
Abstract
The essay develops a case study about a young boy playing with a toy train to address neoliberalism’s problematic discourse that depicts learning as instrumental, as something that can be caused by teaching. This paper’s perspective is enactive, taking the view that central to understanding learning is not the mind or brain working in isolation but involves the interrelationships between mind/brain, body, and world. The analysis revolves around the standing gap between teaching and learning, where navigating the gap involves a dynamic called ‘the moment of study.’ Three of Tyson Lewis’s ideas about study—body gesture, time, and play—are used to explain the moment of study. The paper argues that a learner traverses the gap between teaching and learning through a body gesture of hesitation, during which there is a temporal turning away from the familiar and towards new possibilities. Traversing the gap occurs through the risk of improvisational play, propelling a forward movement in the face of not knowing how to go on. This depiction of such traversing, shown to be central to the activity of learning, undermines the causal account of learning associated with neoliberalism.
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Barrett, L. (2011). Beyond the brain: How body and environment shape animal and human minds. Princeton University Press.
- Beer, R. D. (2014). Dynamical systems and embedded cognition. In K. Frankish & W. M. Ramsey (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of artificial intelligence. Cambridge University Press.
- Biesta, G. J. J. (2006). Beyond learning: Democratic education for a human future. Paradigm Publishers.
- Biesta, G. J. J. (2014). The Beautiful risk of education. Paradigm Publishers.
- Brown, W. (2015). Undoing the demos: Neoliberalism’s stealth revolution. Zone Books.
- Depraz, N., Varela, F. J., & Vermersch, P. (2000). The gesture of awareness: An account of its structural dynamics. In M. Velmans (Ed.), Investigating phenomenal consciousness (pp. 121–136). Benjamin Publishers.
- Dings, R. (2018). Understanding phenomenological differences in how affordances solicit action. An exploration. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 17(4), 681–699.
- Gadamer, H.-G. (2004). Truth and Method. (J. Weinsheimer & D. G. Marshall, Trans.) (2nd, revised). Continuum.
- Gallagher, S. (2010). Phenomenology and non-reductionist cognitive science. In S. Gallagher & D. Schmicking (Eds.), Handbook of phenomenology and cognitive science (pp. 21–34). Springer Netherlands. Retrieved from http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/978-90-481-2646-0_2
- Gallagher, S. (2014). Phenomenology and embodied cognition. In L. Shapiro (Ed.), The routledge handbook of embodied cognition (pp. 9–18). Routledge.
- Gallagher, S., & Lindgren, R. (2015). Enactive Metaphors: Learning Through Full-Body Engagement. Educational Psychology Review, 27(3), 391–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9327-1
- Gallagher, S. (2018). Educating the right stuff: Lessons in enactivist learning. Educational Theory, 68(6), 625–641. https://doi.org/10.1111/edth.12337
- Gallagher, S., & Zahavi, D. (2014). Primal impression and enactive perception. In V. Arstila & D. Lloyd (Eds.), Subjective time: The philosophy, psychology, and neuroscience of temporality (pp. 83–99). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Gallagher, S. (2018). Educating the right stuff: Lessons in enactivist learning. Educational Theory, 68(6), 625–641. https://doi.org/10.1111/edth.12337
- Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting and knowing: Toward an ecological psychology. London: Routledge.
- Gibson, J. J. (1986). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Grant, C. A. (2012). Cultivating flourishing lives: A robust social justice vision of education. American Educational Research Journal, 49(5), 910–934. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831212447977
- Gereluk, D. (2018). Flourishing and wellbeing in the academy: A capabilities approach. Philosophical Inquiry in Education, 25(2), 171–187.
- Harney, S., & Moten, F. (2013). The undercommons: Fugitive planning and black study. Minor Compositions.
- Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford University Press.
- Husserl, E. (1982). Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy (F. Kersten, Trans.). Martinus Nijhoff.
- Husserl, E. (1991). On the phenomenology of the consciousness of internal time (1893–1917) (J. B. Brough, Trans.). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
- Hutto, D. D. (2013). Radically enacted cognition in our grasp. In Z. Radman (Ed.), The hand, an organ of the mind: What the manual tells the mental. MIT Press.
- Jenkinson, J. (2017). Enactive subjectivity as flesh. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 16(5), 931–951. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-016-9488-5
- Joldersma, C. W. (2005). Habermas, generalization, and state interests in scientific educational research. In C. Higgins (Ed.), Philosophy of education society yearbook 2004. Philosophy of Education Society & University of Illinois Press.
- Joldersma, C. W. (2013). Neuroscience, education, and a radical embodiment model of mind and cognition. In C. Mayo (Ed.), Philosophy of education 2013. Philosophy of Education Society & University of Illinois Press.
- Joldersma, C. W. (2016a). Beyond a representational model of mind in educational neuroscience: Bodily subjectivity and enacted cognition. In C. W. Joldersma (Ed.), Neuroscience and Education: A Philosophical Appraisal. Routledge.
- Joldersma, C. W. (2016b). Neoliberalism and the neuronal self: A critical perspective on neuroscience’s application to education. In C. W. Joldersma (Ed.), Neuroscience and education: A philosophical appraisal. Routledge.
- Lewis, T. E. (2013). On study: Giorgio Agamben and educational potentiality. Routledge.
- Lewis, T. E. (2014a). Education as free use: Giorgio Agamben on studious play, toys, and the inoperative schoolhouse. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 33(2), 201–214.
- Lewis, T. E. (2014b). It’s a profane life: Giorgio Agamben on the freedom of im-potentiality in education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 46(4), 334–347.
- Lewis, T. E. (2014c). Studied perception and a phenomenology of bodily gesturality. In C. Mayo (Ed.), Philosophy of education yearbook 2013 (pp. 341–349). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign/Philosophy of Education Society.
- Lewis, T. E. (2014d). The fundamental ontology of study. Educational Theory, 64(2), 163–178.
- Lewis, T. E. (2015, May). Author Interview: Tyson E. Lewis [Philosophy of Education Society of Great Britain]. Retrieved from http://www.philosophy-of-education.org/publications/author-interview-tyson-lewis.html
- Lewis, T. E. (2016). Study time: Heidegger and the temporality of education. Journal of Philosophy of Education. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-9752.12208/full
- Lewis, T. E. (2017). Study: An example of potentialism. In C. W. Ruitenberg (Ed.), Reconceptualizing study in educational discourse and practice (pp. 8–22). Routledge.
- Lewis, T. E. (2018). Inoperative learning: A radical rewriting of educational potentialities. Routledge.
- Lewis, T. E. (2019). Study: A disinterested passion. In D. R. Ford (Ed.), Keywords in radical philosophy and education (pp. 398–407). Brill.
- McClintock, R. (1971). Toward a place for study in a world of instruction. Teachers College Record, 73(2), 161–205.
- Moretto, G., & di Pellegrino, G. (2008). Grasping numbers. Experimental Brain Research, 188(4), 505–515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-008-1386-9
- Napier, J. (1993). Hands. (R. H. Tuttle, Ed.) (revised edition). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Neufeld, L. (2003). Making Toys That Teach: With Step-by-Step Instructions and Plans. Taunton Press.
- Olssen, M. (2008). Understanding the mechanisms of neoliberal control: Lifelong learning, flexibility and knowledge capitalism. In A. Fejes & K. Nicoll (Eds.), Foucault and lifelong learning: governing the subject (pp. 35–47). Taylor & Francis.
- Pellis, S. M., Pellis, V. C., & Bell, H. C. (2010). The function of play in the development of the social brain. American Journal of Play, 2(3), 278–296.
- Peters, G. (2009). The philosophy of improvisation. University of Chicago Press.
- Peters, M. A. (2012). Neoliberalism, education and the crisis of western capitalism. Policy Futures in Education, 10(2), 134–141. https://doi.org/10.2304/pfie.2012.10.2.134
- Pinar, W. F. (2011). What Is curriculum theory? (2 edition). Routledge.
- Rietveld, E. (2013). Affordances and unreflective freedom. In R. T. Jensen & D. Moran (Eds.), The phenomenology of embodied subjectivity (pp. 21–42). Springer International Publishing.
- Ruitenberg, C. W. (2017a). Introduction: retrieving and recognizing study. In C. W. Ruitenberg (Ed.), Reconceptualizing study in educational discourse and practice (pp. 8–22). Routledge.
- Ruitenberg, C. W. (Ed.). (2017b). Reconceptualizing study in educational discourse and practice. Routledge.
- Simons, M., & Masschelein, J. (2008). The governmentalization of learning and the assemblage of a learning apparatus. Educational Theory, 58(4), 391–415.
- Thompson, E. (2017, January 24). The embodied mind in hindsight. Retrieved January 24, 2017, from http://philosophyofbrains.com/2017/01/23/the-embodied-mind-in-hindsight.aspx
- Vassallo, S. (2013). Critical pedagogy and neoliberalism: Concerns with teaching self-regulated learning. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 32(6), 563–580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-012-9337-0
- Zahavi, D. (2003a). Husserl’s phenomenology. Stanford University Press.
- Zahavi, D. (2003b). Inner time-consciousness and pre-reflective self-awareness. In D. Welton (Ed.), The new Husserl: A critical reader (pp. 157–180). Indiana University Press.
- Zahavi, D. (2019). Getting it quite wrong: Van Manen and Smith on phenomenology. Qualitative Health Research, 29(6), 900–907. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732318817547
- Zahavi, D., & Gallagher, S. (2008). Reply: A phenomenology with legs and brains. Abstracta, 4(3), 86–107.
10.7202/1070740ar