Réflexion éthique sur la question du soutien nutritionnel en fin de vie

Vaillancourt, Hugues; Bouthillier, Marie-Ève

doi:https://doi.org/10.7202/1066311ar

1. Bourgeault G. Éthiques : dit et non-dit, contredit, interdit. Presses de l’Université du Québec. 2004. 148 p.

2. Jaeger S M. Teaching health care ethics: the importance of moral sensitivity for moral reasoning. Nursing Philosophy. 2001; 2(2), 131–142.

10.1046/j.1466-769X.2001.00045.x Google Scholar

3. Lechasseur K, Caux C, Dollé S, et Legault A. Ethical competence: An integrative review. Nursing ethics. 2018; 25(6), 694–706.

Google Scholar

4. Milliken A. Nurse ethical sensitivity: An integrative review. Nursing ethics. 2018; 25(3), 278–303.

10.1177/0969733016646155 Google Scholar

5. Schwartz D B. Enteral nutrition and dementia integrating ethics. Nutrition in Clinical Practice. 2018; 33(3), 377–387.

Google Scholar

6. Legault G A. Professionnalisme et délibération éthique : manuel d’aide à la décision responsable, Sainte-Foy, Presses de l’Université́ du Québec. 2003. 312 p.

Google Scholar

7. Geppert C M, Andrews M R, et Druyan M E. Ethical issues in artificial nutrition and hydration: a review. Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. 2010; 34(1), 79-88.

Google Scholar

8. Ko D N et Blinderman C D. Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment (including artificial nutrition and hydration), Oxford Textbook of Palliative Medicine (5 ed.), Edited by Nathan Cherny, Marie Fallon, Stein Kaasa, Russell K. Portenoy, & David C. Currow. Oxford University Press. 2015. 1504 p.

10.1093/med/9780199656097.003.0108 Google Scholar

9. Beauchamp T L et Childress J F. Principles of biomedical ethics. Oxford University Press, USA. 2001. 480 p.

Google Scholar

10. Payot A et Janvier A. Qu’est-ce que l’éthique clinique? Dans : Payot, A. & Janvier, A. Éthique clinique, un guide pour aborder la pratique, Éditions CHU Ste-Justine. 2015. 350 p.

Google Scholar

11. Singer P A, Robertson G, et Roy D J. Bioethics for clinicians: 6. Advance care planning. CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal. 1996; 155(12), 1689.

Google Scholar

12. Gouvernement du Québec. Directives médicales anticipées [Internet]. 8 mars 2019 [page consultée le 4 août 2019]. En ligne : https://www.quebec.ca/sante/systeme-et-services-de-sante/soins-de-fin-de-vie/directives-medicales-anticipees/.

Google Scholar

13. Institut national d’excellence en santé et en services sociaux (INESSS). Les niveaux de soins : normes et standards de qualité. Guide rédigé par Michel Rossignol et Lucy Boothroyd. Québec, QC : INESSS. 2016. 101 p.

Google Scholar

14. Dening K H, Jones L, et Sampson E L. Advance care planning for people with dementia: a review. International Psychogeriatrics. 2011; 23(10), 1535–1551.

Google Scholar

15. LégisQuébec. Code civil du Québec, Article 15 [Internet]. 1er juin 2019 [page consultée le 4 août 2019]. En ligne : http://legisquebec.gouv.qc.ca/fr/showdoc/cs/CCQ-1991.

Google Scholar

16. Quill T E, Arnold R, et Back A L. Discussing treatment preferences with patients who want “everything.” Annals of Internal Medicine. 2009; 151(5), 345–349.

Google Scholar

17. Murphy B F. What has happened to clinical leadership in futile care discussions? Medical Journal of Australia. 2008; 188(7), 418.

10.5694/j.1326-5377.2008.tb01690.x Google Scholar

18. LégisQuébec. Code de déontologie des médecins, Code des professions, Articles 46 à 50 [Internet]. 1er avril 2019 [page consultée le 4 août 2019]. En ligne : http://legisquebec.gouv.qc.ca/fr/ShowDoc/cr/M-9,%20r.%2017/.

Google Scholar

19. LégisQuébec. Code de déontologie des diététistes, Code des professions, Article 13 [Internet]. 1er avril 2019 [page consultée le 4 août 2019]. En ligne : http://legisquebec.gouv.qc.ca/fr/ShowDoc/cr/C-26,%20r.%2097/.

Google Scholar

20. Collège des Médecins du Québec (CMQ). Pour des soins appropriés au début, tout au long et en fin de vie. Rapport du groupe de travail en éthique clinique [Internet]. 2008 [page consultée le 4 août 2019]. En ligne : http://www.cmq.org/page/fr/Soins-medicaux-fin-de-vie.aspx.

Google Scholar

21. Cai S, Gozalo P L, Mitchell S L, Kuo S, Bynum J P, Mor V, et Teno J M. Do patients with advanced cognitive impairment admitted to hospitals with higher rates of feeding tube insertion have improved survival? Journal of pain and symptom management. 2013; 45(3), 524–533.

Google Scholar

22. Easson A M, Hinshaw D B, et Johnson D L. The role of tube feeding and total parenteral nutrition in advanced illness. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2002; 194(2), 225–228.

Google Scholar

23. Sampson E L, Candy B, et Jones L. Enteral tube feeding for older people with advanced dementia. Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2009.

10.1002/14651858.CD007209.pub2 Google Scholar

24. Ying I. Artificial nutrition and hydration in advanced dementia. Canadian Family Physician. 2015; 61(3), 245–248.

Google Scholar

25. Ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux (MSSS). Orientations ministérielles relatives à l’utilisation exceptionnelle des mesures de contrôle nommées dans l’article 118.1 de la Loi sur les services de santé et les services sociaux, MSSS. 2002.

Google Scholar

26. Gillick M R. Rethinking the role of tube feeding in patients with advanced dementia. New England Journal of Medicine-Unbound Volume. 2000; 342(3), 206–210.

10.1056/NEJM200001203420312 Google Scholar

27. Niederman M S et Berger J T. The delivery of futile care is harmful to other patients. Critical care medicine. 2010; 38(10), S518-S522.

10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181f1cba5 Google Scholar

28. Druml C, Ballmer P E, Druml W, Oehmichen F, Shenkin A, Singer P, Soeters P, Woemann A, et Bischoff S C. ESPEN guideline on ethical aspects of artificial nutrition and hydration. Clinical Nutrition. 2016; 35(3), 545–556.

Google Scholar

29. American Geriatrics Society Ethics Committee and Clinical Practice and Models of Care Committee. American Geriatrics Society feeding tubes in advanced dementia position statement. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2014; 62(8), 1590–1593.

Google Scholar

30. Volkert D, Chourdakis M, Faxen-Irving G, Frühwald T, Landi F, Suominen M H, Vandewoude M, et Schneider S M. ESPEN guidelines on nutrition in dementia. Clinical nutrition. 2015; 34(6), 1052–1073.

Google Scholar

31. Gillick M R et Volandes A E. The standard of caring: Why do we still use feeding tubes in patients with advanced dementia? Journal of the American Medical Directors Association. 2008; 9(5), 364–367.

10.1016/j.jamda.2008.03.011 Google Scholar

32. Hofmann B. On the value-ladenness of technology in medicine. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 4(3). 2001; 335–345.

10.1023/A:1012069919089 Google Scholar

33. Monturo C et Hook K. From means to ends: Artificial nutrition and hydration. Nursing Clinics. 2009; 44(4), 505–515.

10.1016/j.cnur.2009.07.005 Google Scholar

34. Ernecoff N C, Curlin F A, Buddadhumaruk P et White D B. Health care professionals’ responses to religious or spiritual statements by surrogate decision makers during goals-of-care discussions. JAMA internal medicine, 175(10). 2015; 1662–1669.

10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.4124 Google Scholar

35. Bibler T M, Shinall Jr M C, et Stahl D. Responding to those who hope for a miracle: Practices for clinical bioethicists. The American Journal of Bioethics. 2018; 18(5), 40-51.

Google Scholar

36. Daaleman T P et VandeCreek L. Placing religion and spirituality in end-of-life care. Jama. 2000; 284(19), 2514–2517.

10.1001/jama.284.19.2514 Google Scholar

37. Shinall Jr M C, Stahl D, et Bibler T M. Addressing a Patient’s Hope for a Miracle. Journal of pain and symptom management. 2018; 55(2), 535–539.

Google Scholar

38. Rosoff P M. When Religion and Medicine Clash: Non-beneficial Treatments and Hope for a Miracle. HEC Forum, Springer Netherlands. 2018; 1-21.

10.1007/s10730-018-9352-9 Google Scholar

39. Schwartz D B, Barrocas A, Wesley J R, Kliger G, Pontes-Arruda A, Márquez H A, James R L, Monturo C, Lysen L K, et DiTucci A. Gastrostomy tube placement in patients with advanced dementia or near end of life. Nutrition in Clinical Practice. 2014; 29(6), 829–840.

Google Scholar

40. Pomey M P, Flora L, Karazivan P, Dumez V, Lebel P, Vanier M C, Débarges B, Clavel N, et Jouet E. Le « Montreal model » : enjeux du partenariat relationnel entre patients et professionnels de la santé. Santé publique. 2015; 1(HS), 41-50.

Google Scholar

Parties annexes

Bibliographie

Outils de citation

Citer cet article

Exporter la notice de cet article