Résumés
Abstract
This article focuses on the use of Photographic Participatory Inquiry (PPI) in researching the teaching and learning of photography in the e-learning environment. It is an arts-informed method drawing on digital tools to capture collective information as digital artefacts, which can then be accessed and harnessed to build critical and reflective photographic practices. The multimedia tools employed (for example GoPro video and screen capture) are critically discussed for their potential to contribute understanding of photographic artistic practice and the learning of a digital generation. The article may also provide critical insights and inform more nuanced methods for research and scholarship when wishing to investigate the personalized, participatory, and productive pedagogies of a networked learning society.
Résumé
Cet article porte sur l’utilisation, en contexte d’apprentissage en ligne, de la photographie participative comme méthode de recherche dans le domaine de l’enseignement et de l’apprentissage de la photographie. Cette méthode, fondée sur les arts, s’appuie sur l’utilisation d’outils numériques pour recueillir de l’information sous forme d’artéfacts numériques, artéfacts pouvant ensuite être consultés et exploités pour élaborer des pratiques photographiques critiques et réflectives. Les outils multimédia utilisés (par exemple, des vidéos GoPro et des captures d’écran) et leur potentiel à contribuer à une meilleure compréhension des pratiques de photographie artistique et d’apprentissage de la génération numérique sont examinés sous un angle critique. Cet article peut également fournir des perspectives critiques et engendrer des méthodes de recherche plus nuancées pour ceux désirant enquêter les pédagogies personnalisées, participatives et productives d’une société d’apprentissage en réseau.
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Adams, A. (1934). The new photography. In C. G. Holme (Ed.), Modern photography: The studio annual of camera art 1934-35. London: The Studio.
- Barone, T, & Eisner, E. (Eds.). (2012). Arts based research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Blinn, L., & Harrist, A. (1991). Combining native instant photography and photo-elicitation. Visual Anthropology, 4(2), 175–192.
- Bresler, L. (2006). Toward connectedness: Aesthetically based research. Studies in Art Education, 48(1), 52–69.
- Butler-Kisber, L., & Poldma, T. (2010). The power of visual approaches in qualitative inquiry: The use of collage making and concept mapping in experiential research. Journal of Research Practice, 6(2), Article M18.
- Catterall, J. S. (2005). Conversation and silence: Transfer of learning through the arts. Journal for Learning through the Arts, 1(1), 1-12. Retrieved from http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/6fk8t8xp
- Collier, J., & Collier, M. (1986). Visual Anthropology: Photography as a research method (Revised & enlarged ed.). Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press.
- Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (Eds.). (2000). Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. London, UK: Routledge.
- Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2005). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Drew, V., & Mackie, L. (2011). Extending the constructs of active learning: Implications for teachers’ pedagogy and practice. The Curriculum Journal, 22(4), 451-467. doi: 10.1080/09585176.2011.627204
- Finley, S. (2008). Arts-based research. In G. Knowles & A. Cole (Eds.), Handbook of the arts in qualitative research: Perspectives, methodologies, examples and issues (pp. 72-83). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
- Gallagher, K., & Kim, I. (2008). Moving towards postcolonial, digital methods in qualitative research. In K. Gallagher (Ed.), The methodological dilemma: Creative, critical and collaborative approaches to qualitative research (pp. 103-120). London, UK: Taylor & Francis.
- Garry, M., & Gerrie, M. (2005). When photographs create false memories. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(6), 321–325.
- Grauer, K., & Naths, A. (1998). The visual journal in context. CSEA Journal, 29(1), 14–19.
- Grushka, K. (2008). Tangential visibility: Seeing other, seeing self, becoming other through artmaking. The International Journal of Education Through Art, 4(3), 297-313. doi: 10.1386/eta.4.3.297/1
- Grushka, K. M., McLeod, J. H., & Reynolds, R. M. (2005). Reflecting upon reflection: Theory and practice in one Australian university teacher education program, Reflective Practice, 6, 239-246. doi: 10.1080/14623940500106187
- Harper, D. (2002). Talking about pictures: A case for photo-elicitation. Visual Studies, 17(1), 13–26.
- Harrison, B. (2002). Photographic visions and narrative inquiry. Narrative Inquiry, 12(1), 87–111.
- Hetland, L. (2007). Studio thinking: The real benefits of visual arts education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
- Irwin, R. (2008). Communities of a/r/tographic practice. In S. Springgay, R. Irwin, C. Leggo & P. Gouzouasis (Eds.), Being with a/r/tography (pp. 71-80), Rotterdam, NL: Sense Publishers.
- Irwin, R., & de Cosson, A. (2004). A/r/tography: Rendering self through arts-based living inquiry. Vancouver, BC: Pacific Educational Press.
- Irwin, R., & Springgay, S. (2008). A/r/tography as practice-based research. In M. Cahnmann-Taylor & R. Siegesmund (Eds.), Arts-based research in education (pp. 103-124), New York, NY: Routledge.
- Jevic, L. L., & Springgay, S. (2008). A/r/tography as an ethics of embodiment: Visual journals in preservice education. Qualitative Inquiry, 14(1), 67–89.
- Jones, S. (2010). Common sense assumptions about intentional representation in student artmaking and exhibition in the arts: Initial advice paper. Paddington, AU : Australian Institute of Art Education.
- Kemmis, S. (2001). Educational research and evaluation: Opening communicative space. Australian Educational Researcher, 28(1), 1-30.
- Kemmis, S. (2006). Participatory action research and the public sphere. Educational Action Research, 14(4), 459–476.
- Kemmis, S. (2008). Critical Theory and Participatory Action Research. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), The Sage handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (pp. 121-138). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M. J. (2008). The three p’s of pedagogy for the networked society: Personalization, participation, and productivity. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 20(1), 10–27.
- McTaggart, R. (Ed.). (1997). Participatory action research: International contexts and consequences. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
- Mockler, N. & Sachs, J. (Eds.). (2011). Rethinking educational practice through reflexive inquiry: Essays in honour of Susan Groundwater-Smith. New York, NY: Springer.
- Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Pink, S. (2003). Interdisciplinary agendas in visual research: Re-situating visual anthropology. Visual Studies, 18(2), 179–192.
- Pink, S. (2004). Visual methods. In C. Seale, G. Gobo, & J. Gumbrium (Eds.), Qualitative research practice (pp. 361-378). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Pink, S. (2007). Doing visual ethnography. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Prosser, J. (Ed.). (1998). Image-based research: A sourcebook for qualitative researchers. London, UK: Falmer Press.
- Prosser, J., & Schwartz, D. (1998). Photographs within the sociological research process. In J. Prosser (Ed.), Image-based research: A sourcebook for qualitative researchers (pp. 101-115). London, UK: Falmer Press.
- Rees, J. (2010). Art education in Canada: Reflections from scholars impacting the field. International Journal of Education through Art, 6(1), 25-40.
- Rose, G. (2007). Visual methodologies: An introduction to the interpretation of visual materials (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Stafford, B. M. (2007). Echo objects: The cognitive work of images. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- Sullivan, G. (2005). Art practice as research: Inquiry in visual arts. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Thomson, P. (2008). Doing visual research with children and young people. Hoboken, NJ: Taylor and Francis.
- Uelsmann, J (2002). Maker of photographs: Jerry Uelsmann. Retrieved from http://www.photovisionmagazine.com/articles/uelsmann.html
- Valdivia, A. N. (2002). bell hooks: Ethics from the margins. Qualitative Inquiry, 8(4), 429–447.
- Wright, T. (1998). Systems of representation: Towards the integration of digital photography into the practice of creating visual images. Visual Anthropology, 11(3), 207–220. doi: 10.1080/08949468.1998.9966751
- Xenakis, I., & Arnellos, A. (2013). The relation between interaction aesthetics and affordances. Design Studies, 34(1), 57–73.