Résumés
Abstract
This paper examines the mechanisms underlying the institutionalization process of soft-regulations in the field of business schools, where international accreditation agencies are perceived as dictating the standards. The study examines the discursive and monitoring mechanisms used by the EFMD to promote EQUIS accreditation since its creation. Combining a critical discourse analysis of accreditation guidebooks and interviews with EQUIS regulators, our findings illustrate and build on the institutionalization curve proposed by Lawrence et al. (2001). Contributing to research about the convergence of business schools’ practices, we offer a perspective into the characteristics of institutional actors’ legitimacy strategies underpinning the institutionalization process.
Keywords:
- Soft-regulations,
- international accreditation,
- institutionalization,
- legitimacy,
- business schools
Résumé
Cet article étudie les mécanismes qui sous-tendent le processus d’institutionnalisation des soft-regulations dans le champ des écoles de commerce où les accréditations internationales sont perçues comme dictant les standards. Notre étude analyse les mécanismes du discours et de contrôle utilisés par EFMD pour promouvoir l’accréditation EQUIS depuis sa création. A l’appui d’une analyse du discours critique approfondie des guides d’accréditation et des entretiens avec les membres institutionnels, notre étude complète les travaux de Lawrence et al. (2001), fournit une perspective détaillée des stratégies de légitimité des acteurs institutionnels et nuance le rôle des organismes d’accréditation dans le processus d’institutionnalisation.
Mots-clés :
- Soft-regulations,
- accréditations internationales,
- institutionnalisation,
- légitimité,
- écoles de commerce
Resumen
Este artículo investiga los mecanismos subyacentes al proceso de institucionalización de soft-regulations en las escuelas de negocios donde se considera que las acreditaciones internacionales dictan las normas. El estudio analiza los mecanismos discursivos y de control utilizados por EFMD para promover la acreditación EQUIS desde sus inicios. Combinando un análisis crítico profundo del discurso de las guías de acreditación y entrevistas con miembros institucionales, nuestro estudio complementa el trabajo de Lawrence et al. (2001), ofrece una perspectiva detallada de las estrategias de legitimidad de los actores institucionales y matiza el papel de los organismos de acreditación en el proceso de institucionalización.
Palabras clave:
- Soft-regulations,
- acreditaciones internacionales,
- institucionalización,
- legitimación,
- escuela de negocio
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Altbach, P. G. & Wit, H. (2018). Too Much Academic Research Is Being Published. International Higher Education, 96, 2-3. https://doi.org/10.6017/ihe.2019.96.10767
- Altbach, P. G. & Yudkevich, M. (2017). Twenty-First Century Mobility: The Role of International Faculty. International Higher Education, 90, 8–10. https://doi.org/10.6017/ihe.2017.90.9995
- Baly, O., Kletz, F., & Sardas, J.-C. (2018). Harder Times, Softer Regulation: Exploring the Governmentality of Austerity. LAEMOS, Sub-Theme 03, Exploring Resilience: Lessons from the Public Sector
- Baudry, B. & Chassagnon V. (2012). Inter-Firm Social Responsibility and the Coordination and Regulation of Multinational Network Firms: An Economic Analysis. Revue d’Economie Industrielle, 137(1), 43–64. https://doi.org/10.4000/rei.5286
- Bell, E. & Taylor S. (2005). Joining the Club: The Ideology of Quality and Business School Badging. Studies in Higher Education, 30(3), 239–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070500095671
- Bres, L. & Gond, J.-P. (2014). The visible hand of consultants in the construction of the markets for virtue: Translating issues, negotiating boundaries and enacting responsive regulations. Human Relations, 67(11), 1347–1382. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726713519278
- Buchanan, A. & Keohane, R. O. (2006). The Legitimacy of Global Governance Institutions. Ethics & International Affairs, 20(4), 405–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7093.2006.00043.x.
- Charlier, J.-E. & Croche, S. (2003). Le processus de Bologne, ses acteurs et leurs complices. Éducation et sociétés, 12(2), 13–34. https://doi.org/10.3917/es.012.0013
- Cornelissen, J. P., Durant, R., Fiss, P. C., Lammers, J. C., & Vaara, E. (2015). Putting Communication Front and Center in Institutional Theory and Analysis. Academy of Management Review, 40(1), 10–27. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0381.
- Cornelissen, J. P., Hollerer, M. A., & Seidi, D. (2021). What Theory Is and Can Be: Forms of Theorizing in Organizational Scholarship. Organization Theory, 2, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/26317877211020328
- Djelic, M.-L. & Hond, F. (2014). Introduction: Multiplicity and Plurality in the World of Standards: Symposium on Multiplicity and Plurality in the World of Standards, Business and Politics, 16(1), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1515/bap-2013-0034
- Djelic, M.-L. & Sahlin-Andersson, K. (2006). Transnational Governance: Institutional Dynamics of Regulation, (Eds). Cambridge University Press
- Finch, D., Deephouse, D. L., O’Reilly, N., Massie, T., & Hillenbrand, C. (2016). Follow the Leaders? An Analysis of Convergence and Innovation of Faculty Recruiting Practices in US Business Schools. Higher Education, 71(5), 699–717. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9931-5
- Fransen, L. (2012) Multi-Stakeholder Governance and Voluntary Programme Interactions: Legitimation Politics in the Institutional Design of Corporate Social Responsibility. Socio-Economic Review, 10(1), 163–192. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwr029
- Greenwood, R., Olivier, C., Lawrence, T. B., & Meyer, R. E. (2017). The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, SAGE.
- Guillotin, B. & Mangematin, V. (2015). Internationalization Strategies of Business Schools: How Flat Is the World? Thunderbird International Business Review, 57(5), 343–357. https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.21705
- Hedmo, T., Sahlin-Andersson, K., & Wedlin, L. (2006). The Emergence of a European Regulatory Field of Management Education, Transnational Governance: Institutional Dynamics of Regulation, Cambridge University Press, 308-328. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511488665.016
- Hou, A. YC., Morse, R., Ince, M., Chen, HJ., Chiang, CL., & Chan, Y. C. (2015). Is the Asian Quality Assurance System for Higher Education Going Glonacal? Assessing the Impact of Three Types of Program Accreditation on Taiwanese Universities. Studies in Higher Education, 40(1), 83–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.818638
- Jacobsson, K. (2004). Soft Regulation and the Subtle Transformation of States: The Case of EU Employment Policy, Journal of European Social Policy, 14(4), 355–370. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928704046878
- Julian, S. D. & Ofori-Dankwa, J. C. (2006). Is Accreditation Good for the Strategic Decision Making of Traditional Business Schools? Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5(2), 225–33. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2006.21253788
- Lamicq, H. & Jensen, H. T. (2003). On Accreditation Schemes for Higher Education in Europe, European Education, 35(2), 16–41. https://doi.org/10.2753/EUE1056-4934350216.
- Laurent, A., Garaudel, P., Schmidt, G., & Eynaud, P. (2020). Civil society meta-organizations and legitimating processes: The case of the addiction field in France, Voluntas, 31(1), 19–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-019-00094-8
- Lawrence, T. B., Winn, M. I., & Jennings, P. D. (2001). The Temporal Dynamics of Institutionalization, The Academy of Management Review, 26(4), 624-644. https://doi.org/10.2307/3560245
- Leeuwen, V. T. & Wodak, R. (1999). Legitimizing Immigration Control: A Discourse-Historical Analysis, Discourse Studies, 1(1), 83–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445699001001005
- Lejeune, C., Schultz, M., & Vas, A. (2015). How Does Accreditation Influence the Dynamics of Organizational Identity for Business Schools?”, Management international / International Management /Gestiòn Internacional, 19(3), 83–97. https://doi.org/10.7202/1043004ar
- Lincoln, Y. S. (1995). Emerging Criteria for Quality in Qualitative and Interpretive Research, Qualitative Inquiry, 1(3), 275–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780049500100301
- Lightbody, M. (2010). Exacerbating Staff Shortages and Student Dissatisfaction? The Impact of AACSB Accreditation on Faculty Recruitment in Australia, Business and Finance Journal, 4(2), 1–18.
- Mahon, R. (2009). The OECD’s Discourse on the Reconciliation of Work and Family Life, Global Social Policy: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Public Policy and Social Development, 9(2), 183–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468018109104625
- Miles, M. P., Grimmer, M., & Franklin, G. MC. (2016). How Well Do AACSB, AMBA and EQUIS Manage Their Brands? Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 34(1), 99–116. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-06-2014-0100
- Nigsch, S. & Schenker-Wicki, A. (2013). Shaping Performance: Do International Accreditations and Quality Management Really Help? Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 35(6), 668–681. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2013.844669
- Peters, K., Smith, R. R., & Thomas, H. (2018). Rethinking the Business Models of Business Schools: A Critical Review and Change Agenda for the Future, Emerald Group Publishing.
- Pettigrew, A. M., Cornuel, E., & Hommel, U. (2014). The institutional development of business schools, Oxford University Press.
- Phillips, N., Lawrence, T. B., & Hardy, C. (2004). Discourse and Institutions, Academy of Management Review, 29(4), 635–652. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2004.14497617
- Quack, S. (2010). Law, Expertise and Legitimacy in Transnational Economic Governance: An Introduction, Socio-Economic Review, 8(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwp029
- Rasche, A. & Dirk U. G. (2015). Decoupling Responsible Management Education: Why Business Schools May Not Walk Their Talk, 24(3), 239-252. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492614567315
- Romero, Eric J. (2008). AACSB Accreditation: Addressing Faculty Concerns, Academy of Management Learning & Education, 7(2), 245-255. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40214540.
- Saldaña, J. (2015). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers, SAGE.
- Schleifer, P. (2019). Varieties of Multi-Stakeholder Governance: Selecting Legitimation Strategies in Transnational Sustainability Politics, Globalizations, 16 (1), 50–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2018.1518863
- Svensson, J. (2009). The Regulation of Rule-Following: Imitation and Soft Regulation in the European Union. PhD dissertation, School of Business, Stockholm University.
- Teixeira, G. C. S. & Maccari, E. A. (2018). The Institutional Role of Business School Accreditation Agencies: A Systematic Literature Review, Revista de Gestão, 25(3), 274–290. https://doi.org/10.1108/REGE-04-2018-035
- Thomas, H. & Cornuel, E. (2012). Business schools in transition? Issues of impact, legitimacy, capabilities and re-invention. Journal of Management Development, 31(4), 329–335. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621711211219095
- Thomas, H., Thomas, L., & Wilson, A. (2013). The Unfulfilled Promise of Management Education (ME): The Role, Value and Purposes of ME. Journal of Management Development, 32(5), 460–76. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621711311328255
- Thomas, L., Billsberry, J., Ambrosini, V., & Barton H. B. (2014). Convergence and Divergence Dynamics in British and French Business Schools: How Will the Pressure for Accreditation Influence These Dynamics?: Convergence and Divergence in British and French B-Schools. British Journal of Management, 25(2), 305–319. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12007
- Tulmets, E. (2014). Exporting ‘Soft Norms’ through the European Union’s External Policy, Politique Européenne, 46(4), 34–58. https://doi.org/10.3917/poeu.046.0034
- Urgel, J. (2007). EQUIS Accreditation: Value and Benefits for International Business Schools. Journal of Management Development, 26(1), 73–83. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621710710721698
- Vaara, E. (2015). CDA as methodology in SAP research. In Golsorkh, D., Rouleau, L., Seidl, D., & Vaara, E. (eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice, 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge
- Veldman, J. & Willmott H. (2016). The Cultural Grammar of Governance: The UK Code of Corporate Governance, Reflexivity, and the Limits of ‘Soft’ Regulation. Human Relations, 69(3), 581–603. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726715593160
- Wedlin, L. (2006). Ranking Business Schools: Forming Fields, Identities and Boundaries in International Management Education, Edward Elgar Publishing.
- Welch, C., Piekkari, R., Plakoyiannaki, E., & Paavilainen-Mantymaki, E. (2011). Theorising from Case Studies: Towards a Pluralist Future for International Business Research. Journal of International Business Studies, 42, 740–762. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22113-3_9
- Willmott, H. (2010). Governing Employability: Business School Accreditation as Soft Regulation, in Reassessing the Employment Relationship, edited by Heery, E. & Turnbull, P., Bloomsbury Publishing, 249-270.
- Zammuto, R. F. (2008). Accreditation and the Globalization of Business, Academy of Management Learning & Education, 7(2), 256–268. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2008.32712623
- Zhao, J. & Ferran, C. (2016). Business School Accreditation in the Changing Global Marketplace: A Comparative Study of the Agencies and Their Competitive Strategies. Journal of International Education in Business, 9(1), 52-69. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIEB-02-2016-0001
- Zyzak, B. & Jacobsen, D. I. (2020). External managerial networking in meta-organizations. Evidence from regional councils in Norway. Public Management Review, 22(9), 1347–1367. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1632922