The world is currently experiencing a period of significant upheaval, leading to a profound reassessment and a confrontation of international value systems and social structures (Hugon, 2016). Our contemporary society, marked by rapid and numerous technological and social advancements, has exceeded the ecosystem’s carrying capacity and is now facing the limits of its exponential growth (GIEC, 2023; Eberle et al. 2023). Climate change, biodiversity loss, including the extinction of hundreds of animal and plant species, the depletion of natural resources such as water and fossil fuels, soil impoverishment, and ocean acidification, are well-known phenomena supported by numerous scientific studies in various disciplinary fields (MacDougall et al., 2013; Meadows et al., 2004; Murray and King, 2012; Steffen et al., 2015). Environmental, energy, and climate challenges are accompanied by equally critical geopolitical, economic, and social complexities that the international community is striving to address (Eberle et al. 2023). While these challenges are global in nature, our multipolar world is characterized by disparities in wealth and power, along with variations in collective priorities and preferences, making consensus difficult to attain (Hugon, 2016). Heightened economic and social disparities are observable among individuals, social groups, regions, and countries across the globe, resulting in a significant divide between the populations of the Global North and South. This economic and political instability, in turn, perpetuates these disparities, creating a negative cycle interpreted as a vulnerability within our capitalist system (Piketty and Goldhammer, 2014). Hence, the rapid pace embraced by industrialized and emerging nations may contribute to destabilizing and, in some cases, even dismantling the systems that underpin and sustain our civilization. In the last twenty years, the scientific and political communities have begun to address the intricate issues related to the potential collapse of societies (Diamond, 2006; Hawkins and Jones, 2013; Servigne and Stevens, 2021). In the field of entrepreneurship, social and environmental crises have typically been approached from a positive standpoint, highlighting the role entrepreneurs can play in devising and advancing solutions to global challenges. This perspective glorifies “heroic” entrepreneurship (Janssen and Schmitt, 2011) and portrays it as a source of both economic prosperity and social transformation on local, regional, national, and international levels. However, it fails to thoroughly explore entrepreneurship’s potential responsibility in the genesis and aggravation of the problems encountered within the dominant system. Expanding on this observation, this special issue seeks to investigate the links between the field of entrepreneurship and the prospect of a societal collapse. It is a continuation of the 8th edition of the Georges Doriot Days which, in 2021, united the scientific community to collectively contemplate the challenges of entrepreneurship amidst the backdrop of potential societal collapse. This perspective on the roles and responsibilities of entrepreneurs in today’s global society aimed to illuminate an aspect that has been underexplored in academic circles. To start, the entrepreneur’s myth appears to persist without us fully comprehending it, as it blurs the lines between heroism and solitude. Who is truly deceived? as suggested by Paul Veyne. Drawing inspiration from this historian’s work, Olivier Germain’s essay examines the tension between mythification and mystification in the era of revitalized myths, particularly in favor of startups. Does this renewal of the myth contribute to the perpetuation of a flawed world, or does it offer a solution in the face of potential collapse? The essay also delves into the practicality or authenticity of the myth for vulnerable populations and those marginalized in entrepreneurship. It highlights the risks of discussions focused solely on identities, often overlooking the realities of people’s lives. Ultimately, the essay encourages us to explore the possibilities of entrepreneurial activism, which …
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Diamond, J. M. (2006). Collapse : how societies choose to fail or succeed. Penguin Books Canada.
- Eberle, C., O’Connor, J., Narvaez, L., Mena Benavides, M., Sebesvari, Z. (2023). Interconnected disaster risks : Risk tipping points, Bonn : United Nations University – Institute for Environment and Human Security. http://dx.doi.org/10.53324/WTWN2495
- GIEC (2023). 6ème Rapport de synthèse du Groupe d’experts intergouvernemental sur l’évolution du climat, 20 mars 2023, https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/syr/
- Hawkins, E., Jones, P. D. (2013). On increasing global temperatures : 75 years after callendar, Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 139(677), 1961–1963. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2178
- Hugon, P. (2016). Du bilan mitigé des Objectifs du Millénaire pour le développement aux difficultés de mise en oeuvre des Objectifs de développement durable, Mondes en développement, 174(2), 15-32. https://doi.org/10.3917/med.174.0015
- Janssen, F., Schmitt, C. (2011). L’entrepreneur, héros des temps modernes ? Pour une analyse critique de l’entrepreneuriat, dans : Taskin, L., de Nanteuil, M. (dir.), Perspectives critiques en management. Pour une gestion citoyenne, De Boeck, pp. 163-184.
- MacDougall, A., McCann, K., Gellner, G. et al. (2013). Diversity loss with persistent human disturbance increases vulnerability to ecosystem collapse. Nature, 494(7435), 86-89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature11869
- Meadows, D., Randers, J., Meadows, D. (2004). Limits to growth : The 30-year update. Vermont, USA : Chelsea Green Publishing Co. p. xii.
- Murray, J., King, D. (2012). Oil’s tipping point has passed. Nature, 481(7382), 433-435. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/481433a
- Piketty, T., Goldhammer, A. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
- Servigne, P., Stevens R., Cochet, Y. (2021). Comment tout peut s’effondrer : Petit manuel de collapsologie à l’usage des générations présentes, Éditions Points.
- Steffen, W. et al. (2015). Planetary boundaries : Guiding human development on a changing planet, Science, 347(6223), 1259855. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855