Résumés
Abstract
Drawing on the dynamic capabilities perspective we examine the relationship between top management team’s (TMT’s) involvement in strategic decision-making and family firm growth. Additionally, we posit that this relationship varies by firm’s prioritized growth mode, internal dynamism and environmental dynamism. Data from 357 German family firms suggest that family firms with highly involved TMTs are less likely to grow in contexts of high internal dynamism, whereas growth benefits from highly involved TMTs in context of environmental dynamism.
Keywords:
- Family firms,
- dynamic capabilities,
- top management teams,
- growth,
- internal dynamism,
- environmental dynamism
Résumé
En nous inspirant de la dynamic capabilities perspective, nous examinons la relation entre l’implication de l’équipe de direction dans la prise de décision stratégique et la croissance de l’entreprise familiale. De plus, nous postulons que cette relation varie selon le mode de croissance prioritaire de l’entreprise, le dynamisme interne et le dynamisme environnemental. Les données de 357 entreprises familiales allemandes suggèrent que les entreprises familiales avec des TMT fortement impliquées sont moins susceptibles de se développer dans des contextes de dynamisme interne élevé, alors que la croissance bénéficie de TMT fortement impliquées dans un contexte de dynamisme environnemental.
Mots-clés :
- Entreprises familiales,
- capacités dynamiques,
- top management teams,
- croissance,
- dynamisme interne,
- dynamisme environnemental
Resumen
Basándonos en la perspectiva de las capacidades dinámicas, en este artículo examinamos la relación entre la participación de los equipos de alta dirección en la toma de decisiones y en el crecimiento de las empresas familiares. Además, argumentamos que esta relación varía según el modo de crecimiento priorizado de la empresa, el dinamismo interno y el dinamismo del entorno. Usando datos de 357 empresas familiares alemanas, nuestros resultados sugieren que las empresas familiares con equipos de alta dirección altamente involucrados tienen menos probabilidades de crecer en contextos de alto dinamismo interno, mientras que, en entornos dinámicos, las empresas familiares se benefician de una participación alta de los equipos de alta dirección.
Palabras clave:
- Empresas familiares,
- capacidades dinámicas,
- equipos de alta dirección,
- crecimiento,
- dinamismo interno,
- entorno dinámico
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Adner, Ron, and Constance E. Helfat. 2003. “Corporate effects and dynamic managerial capabilities.” Strategic Management Journal 24 (10): p. 1011-25.
- Aguinis, Herman, Ryan K. Gottfredson, and Thomas A. Wright. 2011. “Best‐practice recommendations for estimating interaction effects using meta‐analysis.” Journal of Organizational behavior 32 (8): p. 1033-43.
- Ambrosini, Véronique, and Cliff Bowman. 2009. “What are dynamic capabilities and are they a useful construct in strategic management?” International journal of management reviews 11 (1): p. 29-49.
- Amit, Raphael, and Paul J. H. Schoemaker. 1993. “Strategic assets and organizational rent.” Strategic Management Journal 14 (1): p. 33-46.
- Aragon-Correa, J. Alberto, and Sanjay Sharma. 2003. “A contingent resource-based view of proactive corporate environmental strategy.” Academy of Management Review 28 (1): p. 71-88.
- Barney, J. 1991. “Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage”. Journal of Management, 17(1): p. 99-120.
- Beck, Joseph B., and Margarethe F. Wiersema. 2013. “Executive decision making: Linking dynamic managerial capabilities to the resource portfolio and strategic outcomes.” Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies 20 (4): p. 408-19.
- Boone, Christophe, and Walter Hendriks. 2009. “Top management team diversity and firm performance: Moderators of functional-background and locus-of-control diversity.” Management science 55 (2): p. 165-80.
- Bromiley, Philip, and Devaki Rau. 2016. “Social, behavioral, and cognitive influences on upper echelons during strategy Process: A literature review.” Journal of Management 42 (1): p. 174-202.
- Cadiou, Christian, Cadiou, Kristen, N’Goma Farrel. 2017. “Performance et défense de l’unité familiale: La valeur du capital émotionnel”. Management International 22(1): p. 87-99.
- Calabrò, Andrea, Giovanna Campopiano, Rodrigo Basco, and Thilo Pukall. 2016. “Governance structure and internationalization of family-controlled firms: The mediating role of international entrepreneurial orientation.” European Management Journal: in press, doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2016.04.007.
- Calabrò, Andrea, Giovanna Campopiano, and Rodrigo Basco. 2017 “Principal-principal conflicts and family firm growth: The moderating role of business family identity.” Journal of Family Business Management 7(3): p. 291-308.
- Calabrò, Andrea, and Donata Mussolino. 2013. “How do boards of directors contribute to family SME export intensity? The role of formal and informal governance mechanisms.” Journal of Management and Governance 7 (2): p. 363-403.
- Calabrò, Andrea, Mariateresa Torchia, Thilo Pukall, and Donata Mussolino. 2013. “The influence of ownership structure and board strategic involvement on international sales: The moderating effect of family involvement.” International Business Review 22 (3): p. 509-23.
- Cameron, Kim S., Myung U. Kim, and David A. Whetten. 1987. “Organizational effects of decline and turbulence.” Administrative Science Quarterly 32 (2): p. 222-40.
- Campopiano, Giovanna, Mara Brumana, Tommaso Minola, and Lucio Cassia. 2019. “Does Growth Represent Chimera or Bellerophon for a Family Business? The Role of Entrepreneurial Orientation and Family Influence Nuances.” European Management Review. In press
- Carpenter, Mason A., Marta A. Geletkanycz, and Wm Gerard Sanders. 2004. “Upper echelons research revisited: Antecedents, elements, and consequences of top management team composition.” Journal of Management 30 (6): p. 749-78.
- Casillas, Jose C., Ana M. Moreno, and Jose L. Barbero. 2010. “A configurational approach of the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and growth of family firms.” Family Business Review 23 (1): p. 27-44.
- Chatterjee, Debabroto, Rajdeep Grewal, and Vallabh Sambamurthy. 2002. “Shaping up for e-commerce: Institutional enablers of the organizational assimilation of web technologies.” Mis Quarterly 26 (2): p. 65-89.
- Chirico, Francesco, and Massimo Bau. 2014. “Is the family an “asset” or “liability” for firm performance? The moderating role of environmental dynamism.” Journal of Small Business Management 52 (2): p. 210-25.
- Chirico, Francesco, and Mattias Nordqvist. 2010. “Dynamic capabilities and trans-generational value creation in family firms: The role of organizational culture.” International Small Business Journal 28 (5): p. 487-504.
- Chirico, Francesco, and Carlo Salvato. 2008. “Knowledge integration and dynamic organizational adaptation in family firms.” Family Business Review 21 (2): p. 169-81.
- Clark, Kevin D., and Patrick G. Maggitti. 2012. “TMT potency and strategic decision‐making in high technology firms.” Journal of Management studies 49 (7): p. 1168-93.
- Cyert, Richard M., and James G. March. 1963 “A behavioral theory of the firm.” Englewood Cliffs, 2: 4: p. 169-187.
- Coad, Alex, and Christina Guenther. 2014. “Processes of firm growth and diversification: Theory and evidence.” Small Business Economics 43 (4): p. 857-71.
- Colombo, Massimo G., Alfredo DeMassis, Evila Piva, Cristina Rossi‐Lamastra, and Mike Wright. 2014. “Sales and employment changes in entrepreneurial ventures with family ownership: Empirical evidence from high‐tech industries.” Journal of Small Business Management 52 (2): p. 226-45.
- Delmar, Frédéric, Per Davidsson, and William B. Gartner. 2003. “Arriving at the high-growth firm.” Journal of business venturing 18 (2): p. 189-216.
- Dess, Gregory G., and Richard B. Robinson. 1984. “Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures: The case of the privately‐held firm and conglomerate business unit.” Strategic Management Journal 5 (3): p. 265-73.
- Drnevich, Paul L., and Aldas P. Kriauciunas. 2011. “Clarifying the conditions and limits of the contributions of ordinary and dynamic capabilities to relative firm performance.” Strategic Management Journal 32 (3): p. 254-79.
- Dyer, W. Gibb, and David A. Whetten. 2006. “Family firms and social responsibility: Preliminary evidence from the S&P 500.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 30 (6): p. 785-802.
- Eddleston, Kimberly A., Franz W. Kellermanns, Steven W. Floyd, Victoria L. Crittenden, and William F. Crittenden. 2013. “Planning for growth: Life stage differences in family firms.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 37 (5): p. 1177-202.
- Eisenhardt, Kathleen M. 1989. “Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments.” Academy of Management Journal 32 (3): p. 543-76.
- Eisenhardt, Kathleen M., and L. Jay Bourgeois. 1988. “Politics of strategic decision making in high-velocity environments: Toward a midrange theory.” Academy of Management Journal 31 (4): p. 737-70.
- Eisenhardt, Kathleen M., and Jeffrey A. Martin. 2000. “Dynamic capabilities: What are they?” Strategic Management Journal 21 (10-11): p. 1105-21.
- Ensley, Michael D., and Allison W. Pearson. 2005. “An exploratory comparison of the behavioral dynamics of top management teams in family and nonfamily new ventures: Cohesion, conflict, potency, and consensus.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 29 (3): p. 267-84.
- Gomez-Mejia, Luis R., Pankaj C. Patel, and Thomas M. Zellweger. 2015. “In the horns of the dilemma socioemotional wealth, financial wealth, and acquisitions in family firms.” Journal of Management: doi: 10.1177/0149206315614375.
- Habbershon, Timothy G., and Mary L. Williams. 1999. “A resource-based framework for assessing the strategic advantages of family firms.” Family Business Review 12(1): p. 1-25.
- Halevi, Meyrav Yitzhack, Abraham Carmeli, and Nir N. Brueller. 2015. “Ambidexterity in SBUs: TMT behavioral integration and environmental dynamism.” Human Resource Management 54 (S1): p. s223-s38.
- Hambrick, Donald C. 2007. “Upper Echelons Theory: An Update.” Academy of Management Review 32 (2): p. 334-43. doi: 10.5465/amr.2007.24345254.
- Hambrick, Donald C., and Phyllis A. Mason. 1984. “Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers.” Academy of Management Review 9 (2): p. 193-206. doi: 10.5465/amr.1984.4277628.
- Harrison, David A., and Katherine J. Klein (2007) “What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations.” Academy of management review 32(4): p. 1199-1228.
- Helfat, Constance E, and Jeffrey A Martin. 2015. “Dynamic managerial capabilities: Review and assessment of managerial impact on strategic change.” Journal of Management 41 (5): p. 1281-312.
- Helfat, Constance E, and Margaret A Peteraf. 2003. “The dynamic resource‐based view: Capability lifecycles.” Strategic Management Journal 24 (10): p. 997-1010.
- Henderson, Rebecca. 1994. “Managing innovation in the information age.” Harvard Business Review 72 (1): p. 100-5.
- Hinsz, Verlin B., R. Scott Tindale, and David A. Vollrath. 1997. “The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors.” Psychological bulletin 121 (1): p. 43-64.
- Hmieleski, Keith M., and Michael D. Ensley. 2007. “A contextual examination of new venture performance: Entrepreneur leadership behavior, top management team heterogeneity, and environmental dynamism.” Journal of Organizational behavior 28 (7): p. 865-89.
- Hough, Jill R., and Margaret A. White. 2003. “Environmental dynamism and strategic decision‐making rationality: An examination at the decision level.” Strategic Management Journal 24 (5): p. 481-9.
- Houssam Bouzgarrou and Patrick Navatte. 2014. “Family Firms and the Choice of Payment Method in
- Domestic and International Acquisitions”. Management International. 18(4): p. 107-124.
- Judge, William Q., and Carl P. Zeithaml. 1992. “Institutional and strategic choice perspectives on board involvement in the strategic decision process.” Academy of Management Journal 35 (4): p. 766-94.
- Kale, Prashant, and Harbir Singh. 2007. “Building firm capabilities through learning: The role of the alliance learning process in alliance capability and firm‐level alliance success.” Strategic Management Journal 28 (10): p. 981-1000.
- Kellermanns, Franz W., Kimberly A. Eddleston, Ravi Sarathy, and Fran Murphy. 2012. “Innovativeness in family firms: A family influence perspective.” Small Business Economics 38 (1): p. 85-101.
- Kellermanns, Franz W., Jorge Walter, Steven W. Floyd, Christoph Lechner, and John C. Shaw. 2011. “To agree or not to agree? A meta-analytical review of strategic consensus and organizational performance.” Journal of Business research 64 (2): p. 126-33.
- Kiefer, Tina. 2005. “Feeling bad: Antecedents and consequences of negative emotions in ongoing change.” Journal of Organizational behavior 26 (8): p. 875-97.
- König, Andreas, Nadine Kammerlander, and Albrecht Enders. 2013. “The family innovator’s dilemma: How family influence affects the adoption of discontinuous technologies by incumbent firms.” Academy of Management Review 38 (3): p. 418-41.
- Kor, Yasemin Y., and Andrea Mesko. 2013. “Dynamic managerial capabilities: Configuration and orchestration of top executives’ capabilities and the firm’s dominant logic.” Strategic Management Journal 34 (2): p. 233-44.
- Kraiczy, Nils D., Andreas Hack, and Franz W. Kellermanns. 2015. “The relationship between top management team innovation orientation and firm growth: The mediating role of firm innovativeness.” International Journal of Innovation Management 19 (1): p. 1-24.
- Kumar, Nirmalya, Louis W. Stern, and James C. Anderson. 1993. “Conducting interorganizational research using key informants.” Academy of Management Journal 36 (6): p. 1633-51.
- Kuvaas, Bård. 2002. “An exploration of two competing perspectives on informational contexts in top management strategic issue interpretation.” Journal of Management studies 39 (7): p. 977-1001.
- Le Breton-Miller, Isabelle, Danny Miller, and Richard H. Lester. 2011. “Stewardship or agency? A social embeddedness reconciliation of conduct and performance in public family businesses.” Organization Science 22 (3): p. 704-21.
- LeBreton‐Miller, Isabelle, and Danny Miller. 2015. “The arts and family business: Linking family business resources and performance to industry characteristics.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 39 (6): p. 1349-70.
- Leal-Rodriguez, Antonio, Peris-Ortiz, Marta, and Leal-Millan, Antonio. 2017. “Fostering Entrepreneurship by Linking Organizational Unlearning and Innovation: The Moderating Role of Family Business”. Management International. 21 (2): p. 86-94.
- Ling, Yan, and Franz W. Kellermanns. 2010. “The Effects of Family Firm Specific Sources of TMT Diversity: The Moderating Role of Information Exchange Frequency.” Journal of Management Studies 47 (2): p. 322-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00893.x.
- Lockett, Andy, Johan Wiklund, Per Davidsson, and Sourafel Girma. 2011. “Organic and acquisitive growth: Re‐examining, testing and extending Penrose’s growth theory.” Journal of Management studies 48 (1): p. 48-74.
- MacLean, Donald, Robert MacIntosh, and David Seidl. 2015. “Rethinking dynamic capabilities from a creative action perspective.” Strategic Organization 13 (4): p. 340-52.
- Maltz, Elliot, William E. Souder, and AjithKumar. 2001. “Influencing R&D/marketing integration and the use of market information by R&D managers: Intended and unintended effects of managerial actions.” Journal of Business research 52 (1): p. 69-82.
- March, James G. 1991. “Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning.” Organization Science 2 (1): p. 71-87.
- Martin, Jeffrey A. 2011. “Dynamic managerial capabilities and the multibusiness team: The role of episodic teams in executive leadership groups.” Organization Science 22 (1): p. 118-40.
- McKelvie, Alexander, and Johan Wiklund. 2010. “Advancing firm growth research: A focus on growth mode instead of growth rate.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 34 (2): p. 261-88.
- Melin, Leif, and Mattias Nordqvist. 2007. “The reflexive dynamics of institutionalization: The case of the family business.” Strategic Organization 5 (3): p. 321-33.
- Miller, Danny, and Peter H. Friesen. 1983. “Strategy‐making and environment: The third link.” Strategic Management Journal 4 (3): p. 221-35.
- Miller, Danny, and Isabelle LeBreton-Miller. 2003. “Challenge versus advantage in family business.” Strategic Organization 1 (1): p. 127-34.
- Miller, Danny, and Isabelle LeBreton-Miller. 2006. “Priorities, practices and strategies in successful and failing family businesses: An elaboration and test of the configuration perspective.” Strategic Organization 4 (4): p. 379-407.
- Miller, Danny, Isabelle Le Breton‐Miller, and Richard H. Lester. 2010. “Family ownership and acquisition behavior in publicly‐traded companies.” Strategic Management Journal 31 (2): p. 201-23.
- Milliken, Frances J. 1987. “Three types of perceived uncertainty about the environment: State, effect, and response uncertainty.” Academy of Management Review 12 (1): p. 133-43.
- Minichilli, Alessandro, Guido Corbetta, and Ian C. MacMillan. 2010. “Top management teams in family‐controlled companies: ‘Familiness’, ‘faultlines’, and their impact on financial performance.” Journal of Management studies 47 (2): p. 205-22.
- Moreno, Ana M, and José C Casillas. 2007. “High-growth SMEs versus non-high-growth SMEs: a discriminant analysis.” Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 19 (1): p. 69-88.
- Nielsen, Sabina. 2009. “Why do top management teams look the way they do? A multilevel exploration of the antecedents of TMT heterogeneity.” Strategic Organization 7 (3): p. 277-305.
- O’Boyle, Ernest H., Jeffrey M. Pollack, and Matthew W. Rutherford. 2012. “Exploring the relation between family involvement and firms’ financial performance: A meta-analysis of main and moderator effects.” Journal of business venturing 27 (1): p. 1-18.
- O’Reilly, Charles A., and Michael L. Tushman. 2008. “Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator’s dilemma.” Research in organizational behavior 28: p. 185-206.
- Patel, Pankaj C., and Danielle Cooper. 2014. “Structural Power Equality between Family and Non-Family TMT Members and the Performance of Family Firms.” Academy of Management Journal 57 (6): p. 1624-49. doi: 10.5465/amj.2012.0681.
- Penrose, Edith Tilton. 1959. The theory of the growth of the firm. Oxford: Blackwell.
- Podsakoff, Philip M., Scott B. MacKenzie, Jeong-Yeon Lee, and Nathan P. Podsakoff. 2003. “Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.” Journal of Applied psychology 88 (5): p. 879-903.
- Reilly, Anne H., Jeanne M. Brett, and Linda K. Stroh. 1993. “The impact of corporate turbulence on: Managers’ attitudes.” Strategic Management Journal 14 (S1): p. 167-79.
- Salvato, Carlo. 2004. “Predictors of entrepreneurship in family firms.” Journal of Private Equity 7 (3): p. 68-76.
- Salvato, Carlo, Ugo Lassin, and Johan Wiklund. 2007. “Dynamics of external growth in SMEs: A process model of acquisition capabilities emergence.” Schmalenbach Business Review 59 (3): p. 282-305.
- Salvato, Carlo, and Leif Melin. 2008. “Creating value across generations in family‐controlled businesses: The role of family social capital.” Family Business Review 21 (3): p. 259-76.
- Samba, Codou, Daan VanKnippenberg, and C. Chet Miller. 2018 “The impact of strategic dissent on organizational outcomes: A meta‐analytic integration.” Strategic Management Journal 39(2): p. 379-402.
- Santulli, R., Torchia, M., Calabrò, A., and Gallucci, C. (2019). “Family ownership concentration and firm internationalization: p. integrating principal-principal and socioemotional wealth perspectives”. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 17(2), 220-248.
- Schäffer, Utz, and Bianca Willauer. 2003. “Strategic planning as a learning process.” Schmalenbach Business Review 55 (2): 86-107.
- Sciascia, Salvatore, Pietro Mazzola, and Francesco Chirico. 2013. “Generational involvement in the top management team of family firms: p. Exploring nonlinear effects on entrepreneurial orientation.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 37 (1): p. 69-85.
- Sharma, Sanjay. 2000. “Managerial interpretations and organizational context as predictors of corporate choice of environmental strategy.” Academy of Management Journal 43 (4): p. 681-97.
- Siemsen, Enno, Aleda Roth, and Pedro Oliveira. 2010. “Common method bias in regression models with linear, quadratic, and interaction effects.” Organizational research methods 13 (3): p. 456-76.
- Sirmon, David G., and Michael A. Hitt. 2009. “Contingencies within dynamic managerial capabilities: Interdependent effects of resource investment and deployment on firm performance.” Strategic Management Journal 30 (13): p. 1375-94.
- Teece, David J. 2007. “Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance.” Strategic Management Journal 28 (13): p. 1319-50.
- Teece, David J., Gary Pisano, and Amy Shuen. 1997. “Dynamic capabilities and strategic management.” Strategic Management Journal 18 (7): p. 509-33.
- Tushman, Michael L., and Lori Rosenkopf. 1996. “Executive succession, strategic reorientation and performance growth: A longitudinal study in the US cement industry.” Management science 42 (7): p. 939-53.
- Upton, Nancy, Elizabeth J. Teal, and Joe T. Felan. 2001. “Strategic and business planning practices of fast growth family firms.” Journal of Small Business Management 39 (1): p. 60-72.
- Van Gils, Anita, Wim Voordeckers, and Jeroen vandenHeuvel. 2004. “Environmental uncertainty and strategic behavior in Belgian family firms.” European Management Journal 22 (5): p. 588-95.
- Vermeulen, Freek, and Harry Barkema. 2001. “Learning through acquisitions.” Academy of Management Journal 44 (3): p. 457-76.
- Versailles, David W. and Foss, Nicolai J. 2019. “Unpacking the Constituents of Dynamic Capabilities: A Microfoundations Perspective”. Management International, 23(4): p. 18-20.
- Weinzimmer, Laurence G. 1997. “Top management team correlates of organizational growth in a small business context: A comparative study.” Journal of Small Business Management 35 (3): p. 1-9.
- Westhead, Paul, and Carole Howorth. 2007. “‘Types’ of private family firms: an exploratory conceptual and empirical analysis.” Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 19 (5): p. 405-31.
- Wiklund, Johan. 2007. “Small firm growth strategies.” In Entrepreneurship and growth: The engine of growth, edited by A. Zackarakis and S. Spinelli, 135-54. Westport: Praeger.
- Yamak, Sibel, Sabina Nielsen, and Alejandro Escribá-Esteve. 2014. “The role of external environment in upper echelons theory: A review of existing literature and future research directions.” Group & Organization Management 39 (1): p. 69-109.
- Zaheer, Akbar, Xavier Castañer, and David Souder. 2013. “Synergy sources, target autonomy, and integration in acquisitions.” Journal of Management 39 (3): p. 604-32.
- Zahra, Shaker A. 2005. “Entrepreneurial Risk Taking in Family Firms.” Family Business Review 18 (1): p. 23-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2005.00028.x.
- Zahra, Shaker A. 2010. “Harvesting family firms’ organizational social capital: A relational perspective.” Journal of Management studies 47 (2): p. 345-66.
- Zahra, Shaker A., Donald O. Neubaum, and Bárbara Larrañeta. 2007. “Knowledge sharing and technological capabilities: The moderating role of family involvement.” Journal of Business research 60 (10): p. 1070-9.
- Zellweger, Thomas M., Franz W. Kellermanns, James J. Chrisman, and Jess H. Chua. 2012. “Family control and family firm valuation by family CEOs: The importance of intentions for transgenerational control.” Organization Science 23 (3): p. 851-68.
10.7202/1053690ar