Résumés
Abstract
Providing different creative approaches and involving different players, opposite worlds co-exist within a creative industry. Nevertheless, surprising collaborations occur between these worlds. Based on an in-depth exploratory study in the perfume industry, this paper analyzes how designers can create differently in such opposite worlds. In addition to the social and conventional dimensions, we show that these opposite worlds are structured by differences in industry organization, distribution systems and creation processes. We propose the notion of contextual creativity: it means that creators’ creativity is embedded in a specific context. We identify a specific kind of collaboration between opposite worlds: creative symbiosis.
Résumé
Une industrie créative peut abriter des mondes opposés, proposant des produits différents et reposant sur des acteurs différents. Néanmoins, des collaborations se produisent entre ces deux mondes. À partir d’une étude approfondie dans l’industrie du parfum, cet article analyse comment des designers créent différemment dans deux mondes opposés. En plus des dimensions sociales et conventionnelles, nous montrons que ces mondes opposés se structurent autour d’organisations, de systèmes de distribution et de processus de création différents. Nous proposons la notion de créativité contextuelle pour traduire que la créativité des créateurs s’inscrit dans un contexte spécifique. Nous identifions un type spécifique de collaboration entre mondes opposés : la symbiose créative.
Resumen
Una industria creativa puede albergar mundos opuestos, ofrecer productos diferentes y confiar en diferentes actores. Sin embargo, colaboraciones se producen entre estos dos mundos. Basado en un estudio en profundidad en la industria del perfume, este artículo analiza cómo los diseñadores crean de manera diferente en dos mundos opuestos. Además de las dimensiones sociales y convencionales, mostramos que estos mundos opuestos están estructurados por diferencias en la organización de la industria, los sistemas de distribución y los procesos de creación. Proponemos el concepto de creatividad contextual: significa que la creatividad de los creadores está integrada en un contexto específico. Identificamos un tipo específico de colaboración entre mundos opuestos: la simbiosis creativa.
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Abernathy, William J.; Utterback, James M. (1978). “Patterns of Industrial Innovation,” Technology Review, Vol. 64, N° 7, p. 254-228.
- Alvarez, José Luis; Mazza, Carmelo; Strandgaard Pedersen, Jesper; Svejenova, Silviya (2005). “Shielding Idiosyncrasy from Isomorphic Pressures: Towards Optimal Distinctiveness in European Filmmaking,” Organization, Vol. 12, N° 6, p. 863-888.
- Becker, Howard S. (1976). “Art Worlds and Social Types,” American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 19, N° 6, p. 703-718.
- Becker, Howard S. (1982). Art Worlds, Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Bourdieu, Pierre (1993). The Field of Cultural Production, New York: Columbia University Press.
- Brown, Tim (2009). Change by Design, New York: HarperCollins, Harper Business.
- Catmull, Edwin (2008). “How Pixar Fosters Collective Creativity,” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 86, N° 9, p. 64-72.
- Cattani, Gino; Ferriani, Simone (2008). “A Core/Periphery Perspective on Individual Creative Performance: Social Networks and Cinematic Achievements in the Hollywood Film Industry,” Organization Science, Vol. 19, N° 6, p. 824-844.
- Cattani, Gino; Ferriani, Simone; Negro, Giacomo; Perretti, Fabrizio (2008). “The Structure of Consensus: Network Ties, Legitimation, and Exit Rates of U.S. Feature Film Producer Organizations,” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 53, N° 1, p. 145-182.
- Caves, Richard E. (2000). Creative Industries: Contracts between Art and Commerce. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- Chiambaretto, Paul; Massé David, Mirc Nicola (2019). ““All for One and One for All?”-Knowledge broker roles in managing tensions of internal coopetition: The Ubisoft case.” Research Policy, Vol. 48, N° 3, p. 584-600.
- Cohendet, Patrick; Grandadam, David; Simon, Laurent (2010). “The anatomy of the creative city,” Industry and innovation Vol. 17, N° 1, p. 91-111.
- Cohendet, Patrick; Simon, Laurent. (2007). “Playing across the playground: paradoxes of knowledge creation in the videogame firm,” Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 28, N° 5, p. 587-605.
- Cohendet, Patrick; Simon, Laurent (2016). “Always Playable: Recombining Routines for Creative Efficiency at Ubisoft Montreal’s Video Game Studio,” Organization Science, Vol. 27, N° 3, p. 614-632.
- Colbert, François (2003). “Entrepreneurship and Leadership in Marketing the Arts,” International Journal of Arts Management, Vol. 6, N° 1, p. 30-39
- DCMS (2001). Creative Industries Mapping Document. UK Government Department for Culture, Media and Sport.
- De Ferrière le Vayer, Marc (2007). “Des Métiers D’art À L’industrie Du Luxe En France Ou La Victoire Du Marketing Sur La Création,” Entreprises et Histoire, Vol. 46, N° 1, p. 157-176.
- De Vany, Arthur (2004). Hollywood Economics: How Extreme Uncertainty Shapes the Film Industry. London: Routledge.
- DeFillippi, Robert; Grabher, Gernot; Jones, Candace (2007). “Introduction to Paradoxes of Creativity: Managerial and Organizational Challenges in the Cultural Economy,” Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 28, N° 5, p. 511-521.
- Dell’Era, Claudio; Verganti, Roberto (2010). “Collaborative Strategies in Design-Intensive Industries: Knowledge Diversity and Innovation,” Long Range Planning, Vol. 43, N° 1, p. 123-141.
- Dorado, Silvia (2005). “Institutional Entrepreneurship, Partaking, and Convening,” Organization Studies, Vol. 26, N° 3, p. 385-414.
- Dumez, Herve (2016). Comprehensive research: A methodological and epistemological introduction to qualitative research, Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.
- Durand, Rodolphe; Rao, Hayagreeva; Monin, Philippe (2007). “Code and Conduct in French Cuisine: Impact of Code Changes on External Evaluations,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 28, N° 5, p. 455-472.
- Eikhof, Doris Ruth; Haunschild, Axel (2007). “For Art’s Sake! Artistic and Economic Logics in Creative Production,” Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 28, N° 5, p. 523-538.
- Eisenhardt, Kathleen M. (1989). “Building Theories from Case Study Research,” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14, N° 4, p. 532-550.
- Ellena, Jean-Claude (2011). Perfume: The Alchemy of Scent. eBook edition. Arcade Publishing.
- Endrissat, Nada; Islam, Gazi; Noppeney, Claus (2016). “Visual organizing: Balancing coordination and creative freedom via mood boards,” Journal of Business Research Vol. 69, N° 7, p. 2353-2362.
- Gioia, Dennis A.; Corley, Kevin G.; Hamilton, Aimee L. (2013). “Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology,” Organizational Research Methods, Vol. 16, N° 1, p. 15-31.
- Geels, Frank W. (2004). “From Sectoral Systems of Innovation to Socio-Technical Systems: Insights about Dynamics and Change from Sociology and Institutional Theory,” Research Policy, Vol. 33, N° 6, p. 897-920.
- Gibbert, M.; Ruigrok, W. (2010). “The ‘what’ and ‘how’ of Case Study Rigor: Three Strategies Based on Published Research,” Organizational Research Methods, Vol. 13, N° 4, p. 710-737.
- Glaser, Barney G.; Strauss, Anselm L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, Chicago: Aldine Pub. Co.
- Glynn, Mary Ann. (2000). “When Cymbals Become Symbols: Conflict Over Organizational Identity Within a Symphony Orchestra.” Organization Science, Vol. 11, N° 3, p. 285-298.
- Gomez, Marie-Léandre; Bouty, Isabelle (2011). “The Emergence of an Influential Practice: Food for Thought,” Organization Studies, Vol. 32, N° 7, p. 921-940.
- Hesmondhalgh, David; Pratt, Andy C. (2005). “Cultural Industries and Cultural Policy,” International Journal of Cultural Policy, Vol. 11, N° 1, p. 1-13.
- Howkins, John (2002). The Creative Economy: How People Make Money from Ideas, London: Penguin Global.
- Islam, Gazi; Endrissat, Nada; Noppeney, Claus (2016). “Beyond ‘the Eye’ of the Beholder: Scent Innovation through Analogical Reconfiguration,” Organization Studies Vol. 37, N° 6 (June), p. 769-95. doi: 10.1177/0170840615622064.
- Jones, Candace; Livne‐Tarandach, Reut (2008). “Designing a Frame: Rhetorical Strategies of Architects,” Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 29, N° 8, p. 1075-1099.
- Jones, Candace; Svejenova, Silviya; Strandgaard Pedersen, Jesper; Townley, Barbara (2016). “Misfits, Mavericks and Mainstreams: Drivers of Innovation in the Creative Industries,” Organization Studies, Vol. 37, N° 6, p. 751-768.
- Klein, Katherine J.; Steve W. J. “From Micro to Meso: Critical Steps in Conceptualizing and Conducting Multilevel Research,” Organizational Research Methods Vol. 3, N° 3 (July 2000), p. 211-36. doi: 10.1177/109442810033001.
- Krippendorff, Klaus (1989). “On the Essential Contexts of Artifacts or on the Proposition That ‘Design Is Making Sense (Of Things)’,” Design Issues, Vol. 5, N° 2, p. 9-39.
- Kubartz, Bodo (2011). “Sensing Brands, Branding Scents: On Perfume Creation in the Fragrance Industry,” in Andy Pike (Ed), Brands and Branding Geographies, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., p. 125-149.
- Lampel, Joseph; Lant, Theresa; Shamsie, Jamal (2000). “Balancing Act: Learning from Organizing Practices in Cultural Industries,” Organization Science, Vol. 11, N° 3, p. 263-269.
- Langley, Ann; Smallman, Clive; Tsoukas, Haridimos; Van de Ven, Andrew H. (2013). “Process Studies of Change in Organization and Management: Unveiling Temporality, Activity, and Flow,” Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 56, N° 1, p. 1-13.
- Lê, Patrick L.; Massé, David; Paris, Thomas (2013). “Technological Change at the Heart of the Creative Process: Insights From the Videogame Industry,” International Journal of Arts Management, Vol. 15, N° 2, p 45-59.
- Lena, Jennifer C.; Peterson, Richard A. (2008). “Classification as Culture: Types and Trajectories of Music Genres,” American Sociological Review, Vol. 73, N° 5, p. 697-718.
- Massé, David; Paris, Thomas (2013). “Former pour entretenir et développer la créativité de l’entreprise: les leçons du Cirque du Soleil,” Gestion, Vol. 38, N° 3, p. 6-15.
- Miles, Matthew B.; Huberman, A. Michael (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook, Newcastle: Sage.
- Moeran, Brian (2009). “The Organization of Creativity in Japanese Advertising Production,” Human Relations, Vol. 62, N° 7, p. 963-985.
- Norman, D. A.; Verganti, R. (2014). “Incremental and Radical Innovation: Design Research vs. Technology and Meaning Change,” Design issues, Vol. 30, N° 1, p. 78-96.
- Paris, Thomas (2010). Manager la créativité: Innover en s’inspirant de Pixar, Ducasse, les Ateliers Jean Nouvel, Hermès..., Paris: PearsonVillage Mondial.
- Paris, Thomas (2017). “Exploring the specificities of new product development in creative industries,” 24th Innovation and Product Development Management Conference, Reykjavik, Iceland, 11-13 June 2017.
- Patriotta, Gerardo; Hirsch, Paul M. (2016). “Mainstreaming Innovation in Art Worlds: Cooperative Links, Conventions and Amphibious Artists,” Organization Studies, Vol. 37, N° 6, p. 867-887.
- Pisano, Gary P.; Verganti, Roberto (2008). “Which Kind of Collaboration Is Right for You?” Harvard Business Review, Dec. 2008.
- Powell, Walter W.; Sandholtz, Kurt W. (2012). “Amphibious Entrepreneurs and the Emergence of Organizational Forms,” Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, Vol. 6, N° 2, p. 94-115.
- Rao, Hayagreeva; Monin, Philippe; Durand, Rodolphe (2003). “Institutional Change in Toque Ville: Nouvelle Cuisine as an Identity Movement in French Gastronomy,” American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 108, N° 4, p. 795-843.
- Rao, Hayagreeva; Monin, Philippe; Durand, Rodolphe (2005). “Border Crossing: Bricolage and the Erosion of Categorical Boundaries in French Gastronomy,” American Sociological Review, Vol. 70, N° 6, p. 968-991.
- Rosen, Sherwin (1981). “The Economics of Superstars,” The American Economic Review, Vol. 71, N° 5, p. 845-858.
- Sgourev, Stoyan V. (2013). “How Paris Gave Rise to Cubism (and Picasso): Ambiguity and Fragmentation in Radical Innovation,” Organization Science, Vol. 24, N° 6, p. 1601-1617.
- Strauss, Anselm; Corbin, Juliet (1994). “Grounded Theory Methodology,” Handbook of Qualitative Research, London, Thousand Oaks: Sage, p. 273-285.
- Svejenova, Silviya; Mazza, Carmelo; Planellas, Marcel (2007). “Cooking up Change in Haute Cuisine: Ferran Adrià as an Institutional Entrepreneur,” Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 28, N° 5, p. 539-561.
- Svejenova, Silviya; Planellas, Marcel; Vives, Luis (2010). “An Individual Business Model in the Making: A Chef’s Quest for Creative Freedom,” Long Range Planning, Vol. 43, N° 2-3, p. 408-430.
- Tschang, F.T. (2007). “Balancing the Tensions Between Rationalization and Creativity in the Video Games Industry,” Organization Science, Vol. 18, N° 6, p. 989-1005.
- Verganti, Roberto (2003). “Design as Brokering of Languages: Innovation Strategies in Italian Firms,” Design Management Journal, Vol. 14, N° 3, p. 34-42.
- Verganti, Roberto (2008). “Design, Meanings, and Radical Innovation: A Metamodel and a Research Agenda,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 25, N° 5, p. 436-456.
- Verganti, Roberto (2009). Design-Driven Innovation, Cambridge: Harvard Business Press.
- Von Hippel, Eric (1986). “Lead Users: A Source of Novel Product Concepts,” Management Science, Vol. 32, N° 7, p. 791-805.
- Von Hippel, Eric (1998). “Economics of Product Development by Users: The Impact of ‘Sticky’ Local Information,” Management Science, Vol. 44, N° 5, p. 629-644.
- Wijnberg, Nachoem M.; Gemser, Gerda (2000). “Adding Value to Innovation: Impressionism and the Transformation of the Selection System in Visual Arts,” Organization Science, Vol. 11, N° 3, p. 323-329.
- Yin, Robert K. (2012). Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.