Résumés
Résumé
Notre étude cherche à évaluer, dans un cadre théorique articulant le champ politique de la RSE et l’analyse institutionnelle comparée, la performance sociétale des entreprises dans différents modèles de capitalisme. Elle vise à interroger l’hypothèse très discutée de la convergence des différents modèles vers un type libéral anglo-saxon, dans un contexte de globalisation économique et financière. Nos résultats montrent que les modèles de capitalisme libéral, européen continental et social-démocrate demeurent soumis à des pressions institutionnelles qui impactent de manière différenciée la performance sociétale des entreprises nationales, remettant en cause l’hypothèse d’une convergence des pratiques sociétales entre économies de marché libéral et coordonnée.
Mots-clés :
- Performance sociétale des entreprises,
- modèles de capitalisme,
- champ politique de la RSE,
- analyse institutionnelle comparée
Abstract
Our study evaluates, in a theoretical framework articulating the political field of CSR and comparative institutional analysis, the corporate social performance in different type of capitalism. It aims to question the highly discussed hypothesis of the convergence of different models towards a liberal Anglo-Saxon type, in a context of economic and financial globalization. Our results show that liberal models, continental European and social-democratic capitalism remain subject to institutional pressures that impact in a different way the societal performance of national companies, questioning the hypothesis of a convergence of societal practices between liberal and coordinated market.
Keywords:
- Corporate social performance,
- models of capitalism,
- Political CSR,
- comparative institutional analysis
Resumen
Nuestro estudio consiste a evaluar, en un marco teórico que articula el campo político de la RSE y el análisis institucional comparativo, el desempeño social de las empresas en diferentes modelos de capitalismo. Su objetivo es el de cuestionar la muy discutida hipótesis de la convergencia de diferentes modelos hacia un tipo liberal anglosajón, en un contexto de globalización económica y financiera. Nuestros resultados muestran que los modelos de capitalismo liberal, europeo continental y socialdemócrata siguen sujetos a presiones institucionales que impactan de manera diferenciada el desempeño social de las empresas nacionales, cuestionando la hipótesis de una convergencia de prácticas sociales entre mercado liberal y coordinado.
Palabras clave:
- Desempeño social de las empresas,
- modelos de capitalismo,
- campo de políticas de RSE,
- análisis institucional comparada
Parties annexes
Bibliographie
- Acedo, F.J.; Barroso, C.; Galan, J.L. (2006). “The resource-based theory: dissemination and main trends”, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 27, p. 621-636.
- Adungo, B.I. (2012). “Are Corporate Governance Systems Converging Towards a Model Based on Shareholder Primacy and Dispersed Ownership Structure?”, The IUP Journal of Corporate Governance, Vol. 11, n° 4, 2012
- Allen, F.; Gale, D. (2001). Comparing Financial Systems, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
- Aguilera, R.V.; Cuervo-Cazurra, A. (2004). “Codes of good governance worldwide: what is the trigger?”, Organization Studies, vol. 25, p. 415-443.
- Aguilera, R.V.; Rupp, D.E.; Williams C.A. et Ganapathi J. (2007). “Putting the s back in Corporate Social Responsibility : A Multilevel Theory of Social Change in Organizations”, Academy of Management Review, vol.32, n° 3, p. 836-863.
- Amable, B. (2009). « Capitalisme et mondialisation : une convergence des modèles ? » Cahiers français n° 349 - Mars-avril 2009
- Amable, B.; Demmou, L. et Gatti, D. (2007). « Institutions, chômage et inactivité dans les pays de l’OCDE », Revue économique, numéro spécial Congrès AFSE.
- Amable, B. (2005). Les cinq capitalismes. Diversité des systèmes économiques et sociaux dans la mondialisation, Seuil, Paris.
- Amable, B.; Paillard, S. (2002). Intégration européenne et systèmes financiers : y a-t-il convergence vers le modèle anglo-saxon ? in Intégration européenne et institutions économiques, S. Ngo-Maï, D.Torre et E.Tosi (eds.), Bruxelles, de Boeck.
- Amaeshi, K.; Amao, O. O. (2009). “Corporate Social Responsibility in Transnational Spaces: Exploring Influences of Varieties of Capitalism on Expressions of Corporate Codes of Conduct in Nigeria”, Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 86, p. 225-239.
- Bartley, T. (2007). “Institutional emergence in an era of globalization: the rise of transnational private regulation of labor and environmental conditions”, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 113, p. 297-351.
- Bergsteiner, H., & Avery, G. (2012). “When Ethics are Compromised by Ideology : The Global Competitiveness Report”. Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 109, n°4, pp. 391-410.
- Boncori, A.-L. (2015). « Les dimensions de l’américanisation en question : modalités d’adoption de l’idéologie de la valeur actionnariale dans les rapports annuels d’entreprises du CaC 40 (1998-2012) ». Management international, vol 19, n°2, p. 203-225.
- Bory, A.; Lochard, Y. (2008). « La RSE, entre relations publiques et outil politique », La Revue de l’IRES, n° 57, p. 3-21.
- BrohierMeuter, J.; d’Humières, P. (2011). « L’état des politiques publiques de RSE dans le monde : panorama et tendances de l’incitation publique à la RSE », Les études de veille de l’IRSE, n° 2, septembre.
- Brown, D.L.; Higgins, H.N. (2001). “Managing earnings surprises in the US versus 12 other countries”, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, vol. 20, n° 4-5, p. 373-398.
- Caby, J. (2003). « La convergence internationale des systèmes de gouvernance des entreprises : faits et débats », Cahiers de recherche - GREGOR, 2003-07-07
- Campbell, J. L. (2007). “Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility”, Academy of Management Review, vol. 32, n° 3.
- Carroll, A. (1979). « A Three-Dimensional Model of Corporate Performance », Academy of Management Review, vol. 4, n° 4, p. 497-505.
- Chapple, W.; Moon, J. (2005). “Corporate social responsibility (CSR) in Asia: A seven-country study of CSR web site reporting”, Business & society, vol. 44, n° 4, p. 415-441.
- Chatterjee, S. R.; Pearson, C. A. L. (2003). “Ethical perceptions of Asian managers: evidence of trends in six divergent national contexts”, Business Ethics: A European Review, vol. 12, n° 2, p. 203-211.
- Chen, C-M.; Delmas, M. (2011). “Measuring corporate social performance: an efficiency perspective, Production and operations Management”, vol. 20, n° 6, November-December, p. 789-804.
- Chih, LH.; Chih, HH. et Chen, TY. (2010), “On the Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility: international Evidence on the Financial Industry”, Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 93, n° 1, p. 115-135
- Child, J.; Tsai, T. (2005). “The dynamic between firms’ environmental strategies and institutional constraints in emerging economies: evidence from China and Taiwan”, Journal of Management Studies, vol. 42, p. 95-125.
- Clarkson, M. E. (1995). “A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance”, Academy of management review, vol. 20, n° 1, p. 92-117.
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
- Cournac, A. (2013), La responsabilité sociale de l’entreprise multinationale à l’égard de ses territoires d’implantation, Thèse de doctorat en sciences de gestion, sous la direction du Pr. Jaussaud, Université de Pau et des Pays de l’Adour.
- Crouch, C. (2005), Capitalist Diversity and Change : Recombinant Governance and Institutional Entrepreneurs, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
- Deeg, R.; Jackson, G. (2007). “Towards a More Dynamic Theory of Capitalist Variety”, Socio-Economic Review, vol. 5, n° 1, p. 149-180.
- DenHond, F., Rehbein, K.A., de Bakker, F.G.A. et Lankveld, H.K. (2014). “Playing on two chessboards : reputation effects between Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Corporate Political Activity (CPA)”, Journal of Management Studies, vol. 51, p. 790-813.
- Dhanesh, G. S. (2015). “Why Corporate Social Responsibility ? An Analysis of Drivers of CSR in India”, Management Communication Quarterly, vol. 29, n° 1, p. 114-129.
- DiMaggio P.J.; Powell W.W. (1983), “The Iron Cage Revisited : Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields”, American Sociological Review, vol. 48, p. 147-160.
- Djelic, M.-L.; Etchanchu, H. (2015). “Contextualizing corporate political responsibilities : Neoliberal CSR in historical perspective”, Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 142, n° 4 p. 6411-661.
- Doh, J.P., Guay, T.R. (2006). “Corporate Social Responsibility, Public Policy, and NGO Activism in Europe and the United States: An Institutional-Stakeholder Perspective”, Journal of Management Studies, vol. 43, n° 1, p. 47-73.
- Dolvik, J-E. (2016). « Le modèle nordique en période de crise : est-il toujours capable de s’adapter ? », Revue Française des Affaires Sociales, n° 1, p. 111-140.
- Eurofound. (2017). Income inequalities and employment patterns in Europe before and after the Great Recession, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
- Franks, J.; Mayer, C. et Rossi, S. (2002).“The origination and evolution of ownership and control of the corporation”, Working Paper, London Business School.
- Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management : A stakeholder theory approach, Boston, MA: Pitman.
- Frynas, JG., Stephens, S. (2015). “Political Corporate Social Responsibility: Reviewing Theories and Setting New AgendasInternational”, Journal of Management Reviews, vol. 17, p. 483-509
- Greening, D. W.; Gray, B. (1994), “Testing a Model of Organizational Response to Social and Political Issues”, Academy of Management journal, vol. 37, n° 3, p. 467-98.
- Hah, K.; Freeman, S. (2014). “Multinational Enterprise Subsidiaries and their CSR : A Conceptual Framework of the Management of CSR in Smaller Emerging Economies”, Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 122, n° 1, p. 125-136.
- Hall P., Soskice D. (2001). Varieties of capitalism : the institutional foundations of comparative advantage, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
- Hall, P.; Gingerich, D.W. (2004), “Varieties of Capitalism and Institutional complementarities in the macroeconomy, an empirical analysis”, MPifG Discussion Paper 04/5 www.mpifg.de.
- Hansmann, H., Kramann, R. (2001). “The End of History for Corporate Law”, Georgetown Law Journal, Vol. 89, p. 439-468.
- Hartmann, M. (2011). “Corporate Social Responsibility in the Food Sector”, European Review of Agricultural Economics, vol. 38, n° 3, p. 297-324.
- Hassel, A. (2016). « Le modèle allemand en transition », La documentation française, vol. 1, p. 141-161.
- Hill, R. P.; Ainscough, T.; Shank, T.; Manullang, D. (2007). “Corporate social responsibility and socially responsible investing : A global perspective”, Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 70, n° 2, p. 165-174.
- Hirigoyen, G.; Poulain – Rehm, T. (2017). « Approche comparative des modèles de gouvernance », Revue Française de Gestion, vol. 4, n° 265, p. 107-130
- Ho, F. N.; Wang, H.-M.; et Vitell, S. J. (2012), “A global analysis of corporate social performance : The effects of cultural and geographic environments”, Journal of Business Ethics, 107 (4) : p. 423-433.
- Hofman, P. S.; Moon, J.; Wu, B. (2017). “Corporate Social Responsibility Under Authoritarian Capitalism: Dynamics and Prospects of State-Led and Society-Driven CSR”, Business & Society, vol. 56, n° 5, p. 651-671.
- Igalens J.; Déjean, F.; El Akremi, A. (2008), « L’influence des systèmes économiques sur la notation sociétale », Revue Française de Gestion, n° 183, p. 135-155.
- Ioannou, I.; Serafeim, G. (2012). “What drives corporate social performance? The role of nation-level institutions”, Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 43, n° 9, p. 834-864.
- Jackson, G.; Apostolakou A. (2010). “Corporate Social Responsibility in Western Europe: An Institutional Mirror or Substitute?”, Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 94, p. 371-394
- Jackson, G.; Deeg, R. (2008). “Comparing capitalisms: Understanding institutional diversity and its implications for international business”, Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 39, n° 4, p. 540-561.
- Jochem, S. (2011). “Nordic Employment Policies – Change and Continuity Before and During the Financial Crisis”, Social Policy&Administration, vol. 45, n° 2,April, p. 131-145
- Khanna, T.; Palepu, K. (2004).“Globalization and convergence in corporate governance :
- Evidence from Infosys and the Indian software industry”, Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 35, p. 484-507.
- LaPorta, R.; Lopez-de-Silanes, F.; Shleifer, A. (1999), “Corporate Ownership Around the World”, Journal of Finance, vol. 54, n° 2, p. 471-517.
- Levy, D.L.; Kolk, A. (2002). “Strategic responses to global climate change: conflicting pressures on multinationals in the oil industry”, Business and Politics, vol. 4, n° 3, p. 275-300.
- Magnin, E. (2013). “Diversity of capitalism and sustainable development: institutional complementarity dynamics or radical change in the hierarchy of institutions”, Colloque Ecological Economics and Institutional Dynamics, ESEE & RIODD, Université Lille 1, Lille, 17-21 Juin.
- Mäkinen, J.; Kourula, A. (2012). “Pluralism in political corporate social responsibility”, Business Ethics Quarterly, vol. 22, n° 4, p. 649-678.
- Maignan, I.; Ferrell, O. C. (2003). « Nature of corporate responsibilities perspectives from American, French, and German consumers”, Journal of Business Research, vol. 56, p. 55-67.
- Matten, D.; Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit and explicit CSR: a conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility”, Academy of Management Review, vol. 33, p. 404-424.
- Meyer, J.W.; Rowan B. (1977). “Institutionalized organizations : formal structure as myth and ceremony”, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 83, n° 2, p. 340-363
- McWilliams, A.; Siegel, D. (2000). “Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: correlation or misspecification?”, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 21, n° 5, p. 603-609.
- Morgan, G. (2007). “National business systems research: Progress and prospects”, Scandinavian Journal of Management, vol. 23, n° 2, p. 127-145.
- Newbert, S.L. (2007). “Empirical research on the resource based view of the firm: an assessment and suggestions for future research”, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 28, p. 121-147.
- Orlitzky, M.; Louche, C.; Gond, J-P.; Chapple, W. (2015). “Unpacking the Drivers of Corporate Social Performance: A Multilevel, Multistakeholder, and Multimethod Analysis”, Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 144, n°1, p. 21-40
- Palepu, K.; Khanna, T.; Kogan, J. (2002), “Globalization and Similarities in Corporate Governance: A Cross-Country Analysis”, Working Paper, Harvard University.
- Pasquero, J. (2008). « Entreprise, Développement durable et théorie des parties prenantes : esquisse d’un arrimage socio-constructionniste », Management international, vol. 12, n° 2, p. 27-47.
- Rodriguez, P.; Siegel, D.S.; Hillman, A.; Eden, L. (2006). “Three lenses on the multinational enterprise: politics, corruption, and corporate social responsibility”, Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 37, p. 733-746.
- Rubinstein, M. (2006). « Le développement de la responsabilité sociale de l’entreprise », Revue d’économie industrielle, vol. 113, p. 83-105.
- Scherer, A.G.; Palazzo, G. (2007). “Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective”, Academy of Management Review, vol. 32, p. 1096-1120.
- Scherer, A.G.; Palazzo, G. (2011). “The new political role of business in a globalized world: a review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance and democracy”, Journal of Management Studies, vol. 48, p. 899-931.
- Scruggs, L. (2006). The generosity of social insurance, 1971-2002. Oxford review of economic policy, vol. 22, n° 3, p. 349-364.
- Shinn, J. (2001), Private Profit or Public Purpose? Shallow Convergence on the Shareholder Model, Princeton University.
- Slager, R.; Gond, J.-P.; Moon, J. (2012). “Standardization as institutional work: the regulatory power of a responsible investment standard”, Organization Studies, vol. 33, p. 763-790.
- Solomon, J. (2007), Corporate Governance and Accountability, 2nd Edition, John Wiley, Chichester.
- Tempel, A.; Walgenbach, P. (2007). “Global standardization of organizational forms and management practices? What new institutionalism and the business-systems approach can learn from each other”, Journal of Management Studies, vol. 44, n° 1, p. 1-24.
- Waddock, SA.; Graves, SB. (1997). “The corporate social performance–financial performance link”, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 18, n° 4, p. 303-317.
- Whitley, R. (1999). Divergent Capitalisms : The Social Structuring of Business Systems. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1999.
- Wood, D. J. (1991). “Corporate social performance revisited”, Academy of management Review, vol. 16, n° 4, p. 691-718.
- Wood, D. J. (2010). “Measuring Corporate Social Performance : A Review”, International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), p. 50-84.