Résumés
Abstract
This paper investigates the effect of board and audit committee independence on firm market performance. Using a sample of French listed firms, we find a negative and significant relation between board independence and equity returns. This suggests that appointing more independent directors fails in enhancing firm stock returns. Furthermore, we show that firms with independent audit committees exhibit higher equity returns. We analyze three portfolios sorted by the percentage of independent directors on boards and audit committees using Carhart’s model and find that the portfolio of firms with low board independence and high audit committee independence exhibits the highest abnormal returns.
JEL Classification: G34, G11
Keywords:
- Corporate governance,
- Board independence,
- Audit committee,
- Carhart’s (1997) four-factor model,
- Equity prices
Résumé
Cet article étudie l’effet de l’indépendance du conseil d’administration et du comité d’audit sur la performance de marché des entreprises. A partir d’un échantillon d’entreprises françaises cotées, notre étude montre une relation négative et significative entre l’indépendance du conseil d’administration et le rendement des actions. De plus, les enterprises à comité d’audit indépendant affichent des rendements plus élevés. Nous analysons trois portefeuilles triés par le pourcentage d’administrateurs indépendants dans le conseil et le comité d’audit en utilisant le modèle de Carhart. Il ressort que le portefeuille d’entreprises à faible indépendance du conseil et à forte indépendance du comité d’audit affiche les rendements anormaux les plus élevés.
Classification JEL : G34, G11
Mots-clés :
- Gouvernance d’entreprise,
- Indépendance du conseil d’administration,
- Comité d’audit,
- Modèle à 4 facteur de Carhart’s (1997),
- Prix des actions
Resumen
En este artículo se analiza el efecto de la independencia del consejo de administración y del comité de auditoría en el rendimiento de la empresa. A partir de una muestra de empresas francesas cotizadas, nuestro estudio muestra, por una parte, una relación negativa y significativa entre la independencia del consejo de administración y el rendimiento de las acciones. Por otra parte, ponemos de relieve que, las empresas cuyo comité de auditoría es independiente tienen rendimientos más elevados. Hemos analizado tres portafolios según el porcentaje de administradores independientes en el consejo de administración y en el comité de auditoría utilizando el modelo de Carhart. De ello se deduce que, el portafolio de empresas cuya independencia del consejo de administración es débil, y cuya independencia del comité de auditoría es fuerte, muestra los rendimientos anormales más altos.
Clasificación JEL: G34, G11
Palabras clave:
- Gobierno corporativo,
- Independencia del Consejo de Administración,
- Comité de Auditoría,
- Modelo 4 factores de Carhart (1997),
- precios de las acciones
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Agrawal, Agrawal; Knoeber, Charles R. (1996). “Firm Performance and Mechanisms to Control Agency Problems between Managers and Shareholders”, The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol.31, N° 3, p. 377-397.
- Aldamen, Husam; Duncan, Keith; Kelly Simone; Mcnamara, Ray; Nagel Stephan (2012). “Audit committee characteristics and firm performance during the global financial crisis”, Accounting and Finance, Vol. 52, N°4, p. 971-1000.
- Aman, Hiroyuki; Nguyen, Pascal (2008). “Do stock prices reflect the corporate governance quality of Japanese firms?”, Journal of theJapanese andInternational Economies, Vol. 22, N°4, p. 647-662.
- Ammann, Manuel; Oesch, David; Shmid, Markus M. (2011). “Corporate governance and firm value: International evidence”, Journal of Empirical Finance, Vol. 18, N°1, p. 36-55.
- Avramov, Doron; Chordia, Tarun (2006). “Asset pricing models and financial market anomalies”, Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 19, N°3, p. 1001-1040.
- Bai, Chong-En; Liu, Qiao; Lu, Joe; Song, Frank M.; Zhang, Junxi (2003). “Corporate governance and markets valuation in china”, Journal of Comparative Economics, Vol. 32, N°4, p.599-825.
- Bauer, Rob; Guenster, Nadja; Otten, Rogér (2004). “Empirical evidence on corporate governance in Europe: the effect on stock returns, firm value and performance”, Journal of asset management, Vol. 5, N° 2, p.91-104.
- Bebchuk, Lucian; Cohen, Alma; Ferrell, Allen (2009). “What Matters in Corporate Governance?”, Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 22, N° 2, p. 783-827.
- Ben-Nasr, Hamdi; Boubaker, Sabri; Rouatbi, Wael (2015). “Ownership Structure, Control Contestability and Debt Maturity Structure”, Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol.35, p.265-285.
- Beiner, Stefan; Drobetz, Wolfgang; Schmid, Markus M.; Zimmermann, Heinz (2006). “An integrated framework of corporate governance and firm valuation”, European Financial Management, Vol. 12, N° 2, p. 249-283.
- Bhagat, Sanjai; Black, Bernard S. (2002). “The non-correlation between board independence and long-term firm performance”, Journal of Corporation Law, Vol. 27, N°23, p. 231-273.
- Black, Bernard S.; Jang, Hasung; Kim, Woochan (2006). “Does Corporate Governance Predict Firms’ Market Values? Evidence from Korea”, Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, Vol. 22, N°2, p.366-413.
- Boubaker, Sabri; Labegorre, Florence (2008). “Ownership structure, corporate governance and analyst following: A study of French listed firms”, Journal of Banking & Finance, Vol. 32, N°6, p.961-976.
- Bouton, Daniel (2002). “Pour une meilleure gouvernance des entreprises cotées”, Rapport Bouton, MEDEF & AFEP-AGREF.
- Breeden, Richard C. (2003). “Restoring Trust - The Breeden Report on Corporate Governance for the future of MCI, Inc”, The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.
- Bronson, Scott N.; Carcello, Joseph V.; Hollingsworth, Carl W.; Neal, Terry L. (2009). “Are fully independent audit committees really necessary?”, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Vol. 28, N°4, p.265-280.
- Brown, Lawrence D.; Caylor, Marcus L. (2006). “Corporate governance and firm valuation”, Journal of accounting and public policy, Vol. 25, N°4, p. 409-434.
- Bruno, Valentina; Claessens, Stijn (2010). “Corporate governance and regulation: can there be too much of a good thing?”, Journal of Financial Intermediation, Vol. 19, N°4, p.461-482.
- Carcello, Joseph V.; Neal, Terry L. (2003). “Audit committee characteristics and auditor dismissals following “new” going-concern reports”, The Accounting Review, Vol. 78, N°1, p. 95-117.
- Carhart, Mark M. (1997). “On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance”, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 52, N°1, p. 57-82.
- Cai Charlie X.; Hillier, David; Tian, Gaoling; Wu, Qinghua (2015). “Do audit committees reduce the agency costs of ownership structure?”, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Vol. 13, p. 225-240.
- Chan, Kam C.; Li Joanne (2008). “Audit committee and firm value: Evidence on outside top executives as expert-independent directors”, Corporate Governance: An International Review, Vol. 16, N°1, p.16-31.
- Choi, Yoon K.; Han, Seung Hung; Lee, Sangwon (2014). “Audit Committees, Corporate Governance, and Shareholder Wealth: Evidence from Korea”, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Vol. 33, N°5, p. 470-489.
- Coles, Jeffrey L., Lemmon, Michael L.; Wang, Yan (2008). “The Joint Determinants of Managerial Ownership, Board Independence, and Firm Performance”, Second Singapore International Conference on Finance.
- Core, John E.; Guay, Wayne R.; Rusticus, Tjomme O. (2006). “Does Weak Governance Cause Weak Stock Returns? An Examination of Firm Operating Performance and Investors’ Expectations”, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 61, N°2, p.655-687.
- Cremers, Martijn K.J.; Nair, Vinay B. (2005). “Governance Mechanisms and Equity Prices”, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 60, N°6, p. 2859-2894.
- Defond, Mark L.; Hann, Rebecca N.; Hu Xuesong (2005). “Does the market value financial expertise on audit committees of boards of directors?”, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 43, N°2, p. 153-193.
- Doukas, John A.; Mcknight, Phillip J. (2005). “European momentum strategies, information diffusion, and investor conservatism”, European Financial Management, Vol. 11, N°3, p. 313-338.
- Drobetz Wolfgang; Schillhofer, Andreas; Zimmermann Heinz (2004). “Corporate governance and expected stock returns: Evidence from Germany”, European Financial Management, Vol. 10, N°2, p. 267-293.
- Durnev, Art; Kim, Han E. (2005). “To steal or not to steal: Firm attributes, legal environment, and valuation”, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 60, N°3, p. 1461-1493.
- Eisenberg, Theodore; Sundgren, Stefan; Wells, Martin T. (1998). “Larger board size and decreasing firm value in small firms”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 48, N°1, p. 35-54.
- Faccio, Mara; Lang, Larry H.P. (2002). “The Ultimate Ownership of Western European Corporations”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 65, N°3, p. 365-395.
- FAMA, Eugene F.; French, Kenneth R. (1993). “Common risk factors in the returns on bonds and stocks”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 33, N°1, p. 3-53.
- Fama Eugene F.; French, Kenneth R. (2008). “Dissecting anomalies”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 63, N°4, p. 1653-1678.
- Fama, Eugene F.; Jensen, Michael C. (1983). “Separation of Ownership and Control”, Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 26, N°2, p. 301-325.
- Giroud, Xavier; Mueller, Holger M. (2011). “Corporate governance, product market competition, and equity prices”, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 66, N°2, p. 563-600.
- Gompers, Paul; Ishii, Joy; Metrick, Andrew. (2003). “Corporate Governance and Equity Prices”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 118, N°1, p. 107-155.
- Hermalin, Benjamin E.; Weisbach, Michael S. (1991). “The Effects of Board Composition and Direct Incentives on Firm Performance”, Financial Management, Vol. 20, N°4, p. 101-112.
- Jegadeesh, Narasimhan; Titman, Sheridan. (1993). “Returns to buying winners and selling losers: Implications for stock market efficiency”, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 48, N°1, Vol. 65-92.
- Jensen, Michael C. (1993). “The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit and the Failure of Internal Control Systems”, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 48, N°3, p. 831-880.
- Johnson, Shane A.; Moorman, Theodore C.; Sorescu, Sorin. (2009). “A Reexamination of Corporate Governance and Equity Prices”, Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 22, N°11, p. 4753-4786.
- Klein, April (2002). “Audit committee, board of director characteristics, and earnings management”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 33, N°3, p.375-400.
- Lahaije Marieke (2010). “Factors influencing audit committee reporting in France and the UK”, Maastricht University, SBE.
- Maraghni, Ines; Nekhili, Mehdi (2014). “Audit committee diligence in French companies: a question of independence or competence?”, Comptabilité–Contrôle–Audit, Vol. 20, N°2, p. 99-128.
- Nguyen, Bang Dang; Nielsen, Kasper M. (2010). “The value of independent directors: Evidence from sudden deaths”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 98, N°3, p. 550-567.
- O’connell, Vincent; Cramer, Nicole. (2010). “The relationship between firm performance and board structure in Ireland”, European Management Journal, Vol. 28, N°5, p.387-399.
- Piot, Charles (2004). “The existence and independence of audit committees in France”, Accounting and Business Research, Vol. 34, N°3, p. 223-246.
- Piot, Charles; Janin, Rémi (2007). “External Auditors, Audit Committees and Earnings Management in France”, European Accounting Review, Vol. 16, N°2, p. 429-454.
- Rosenstein, Stuart; Wyatt, Jeffrey G. (1990). “Outside directors, board independence and shareholder wealth”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 26, N°2, p. 175-191
- Shleifer, Andrei; Vishny, Robert W. (1997). “A Survey of Corporate Governance”, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 52, N°2, p. 737-783.
- Viénot, Marc (1999). “Recommendations of the Committee on corporate governance (Viénot II)”, The French Association of Private Enterprises (AFEP).
- Yeh, Yin-Hua; Chung, Huimin; Liu Chih-Liang (2011). “Committee independence and financial institution performance during the 2007-08 credit crunch: Evidence from a multi-country study”, Corporate Governance: An International Review, Vol. 19, N°5, p. 437-458.
- Zhang, Frank X. (2006). “Information uncertainty and stock returns”, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 61, N°1, p. 105-136.