Résumés
Résumé
Le succès académique antérieur s’avère le meilleur prédicteur du succès académique en médecine, mais cet indicateur n’informe en rien quant aux habiletés non cognitives des candidats. Le Mini Entrevues Multiples (MEM), une mesure d’habiletés non cognitives, démontre une bonne fidélité et validité prédictive. L’objectif de la présente étude était de mesurer la fidélité du MEM UdeS élaboré et administré dans le cadre du processus de sélection au doctorat en médecine de l’Université de Sherbrooke. Les résultats observés démontrent la fidélité de l’outil, et ce, dans un contexte d’administration différent des études précédentes.
Mots-clés :
- Admission,
- évaluation,
- habiletés non cognitives,
- médecine
Abstract
Previous academic success is the best predictor for success in medical schools; however that indicator cannot be used to assess candidates’ non cognitive abilities. The Multiple Mini Interview, a tool to assess non cognitive abilities, has demonstrated good reliability and predictive validity. The purpose of this study was to study the MMI’s reliability when used to select students for the MD program at Université de Sherbrooke. The results suggest that the tool is reliable, even when used in a different context.
Keywords:
- Admission,
- evaluation,
- non-cognitive abilities,
- medicine
Resumo
O sucesso académico anterior é o melhor preditor do sucesso académico em medicina, mas este indicador nada informa quanto às habilidades não-cognitivas dos candidatos. O Mini Entrevistas Múltiplas (MEM), uma medida das habilidades não-cognitivas, demonstra uma boa fidelidade e validade preditiva. O objectivo do presente estudo era medir a fidelidade do MEM no quadro de um processo de selecção de estudanters para o doutoramento em medicina da Université de Sherbrooke. Os resultados observados demonstram a fidelidade do instrumento mesmo quando usado num contexto de administração diferente dos estudos anteriores.
Palavras chaves:
- Admissão,
- avaliação,
- habilidades não-cognitivas,
- medicina
Parties annexes
Références
- AERA, APA, & NCME (American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education) Joint Committee on Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: AERA.
- Albanese, M.A., Snow, M.H., Skochelak, S.E., Huggett, K.M., & Farrell, P.M. (2003). Assessing personal qualities in medical school admissions. Academic Medicine, 78, 313-321.
- Brennan, R.L. (2001a). Manual for urGenova. Iowa City, Iowa: Testing Programs, University of Iowa. Disponible sur le site: [http://www. education.uiowa.edu/casma/ GenovaPrograms.htm], consulté le 12 avril 2009.
- Brennan, R.L. (2001b). Generalizability theory. New York: Springer-Verlag.
- Eva, K.W., Reiter, H.I., Rosenfeld, J., & Norman, G.R. (2004a). The relationship between interviewers’ characteristics and ratings assigned during a Multiple Mini-Interview. Academic Medicine, 79, 602-609.
- Eva, K.W., Reiter, H.I., Rosenfeld, J., & Norman, G.R. (2004b). The ability of the Multiple Mini-Interview to predict preclerckship performance in medical school. Academic Medicine, 79, S40-S42.
- Eva, K.W., Reiter, H.I., Rosenfeld, J., & Norman, G.R. (2008). An update on the validity evidence pertaining to the Multiple Mini-Interview as a candidate selection strategy. Paper presented at the Canadian Medical Education Conference, Montréal, Québec.
- Eva, K.W., Rosenfeld, J., Reiter, H.I., & Norman, G.R. (2004). An admissions OSCE: The Multiple Mini-Interview. Medical Education, 38, 314-326.
- Frank, J.R. (2005). Le Cadre de compétences CanMEDS 2005 pour les médecins. L'excellence des normes, des médecins et des soins. Ottawa: Le Collège royal des médecins et chirurgiens du Canada. Disponible sur le site [http://crmcc.medical.ore/canmeds/CanMEDS2005/CanMEDS2005_f.pdf]. consulté le 12 avril 2009.
- Grand’Maison, P., Brailovsky, C.A., & Lescop, J. (1996). Content validity of the Quebec licensing examination (OSCE) assessed by practising physicians. Canadian Family Physician, 42, 254-259.
- Grand’Maison, P., Lescop, J., Rainsberry, P., & Brailovsky, C.A. (1992). Large-scale use of an objective, structured clinical examination for licensing family physicians. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 146, 1735-1740.
- Kreiter, C.D., Yin, P., Solow, C., & Brennan, R.L. (2004). Investigating the reliability of the medical school admissions interview. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 9, 147-159.
- Kulatunga-Moruzi, C., & Norman, G.R. (2002). Validity of admissions measures in predicting performance outcomes: The contribution of cognitive and non cognitive dimensions. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 14, 34-42.
- Mann, W.C. (1979). Interviewer scoring differences in student selection interviews. American Journal of Occupation Therapy, 33, 235-239.
- Moreau, K., Reiter, H.I., & Eva, K.W. (2006). Comparison of aboriginal and nonaboriginal applicants for admissions on the Multiple Mini-Interviews using aboriginal and nonaboriginal interviewers. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 18, 58-61.
- Norman, G. (2004). Editorial - The morality of medical school admission. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 9, 79-82.
- Reiter, H.I., Eva, K.W., Rosenfeld, J., & Norman, G.R. (2007). Multiple Mini-Interviews predict clerkship and licensing examination performance. Medical Education, 41, 378-384.
- Roberts, C., Walton, M., Rothnie, I., Crossley, J., Lyon, P., Kumar, K., & Tiller, D. (2008). Factors affecting the utility of the Multiple Mini-Interview in selecting candidates for graduate-entry medical school. Medical Education, 42, 396-404.
- Salvatori, P. (2001). Reliability and validity of admissions tools used to select students for the health professions. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 6, 159-175.
- Smee, S.M., Dauphinee, D.W., Blackmore, D.E., Rothman, A.I., Reznick, R.K., & Des Marchais, J. (2003). A sequenced OSCE for licensure: Administrative issues, results and myths. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 8, 223-236.
- Tamblyn, R., Abrahamowicz, M., Dauphinee, D., Wenghofer, E., Jacques, A., Klass, D., et al. (2007). Physician scores on a national clinical skills examination as predictors of complaints to medical regulatory authorities. Journal of the American Medical Association, 208, 993-1001.