Résumés
Résumé
Cet article présente la validation en français d’un instrument permettant d’appréhender le climat social des études, tel que perçu par des étudiants universitaires. Plus spécifiquement, cet outil se focalise sur les dimensions liées au domaine des relations interpersonnelles, telles qu’elles apparaissent dans le College and University Classroom Environment Inventory (CUCEI; Fraser & Treagust, 1986). Dans un premier temps, une analyse factorielle exploratoire permet de mettre en évidence quatre composantes principales. Dans un second temps, une analyse factorielle confirmatoire étaye la présence de cette structure avec les facteurs Personnalisation, Implication, Cohésion et Satisfaction. La version finale comporte 20 items et possède des qualités psychométriques très satisfaisantes.
Mots-clés :
- Climat social,
- instrument de mesure,
- analyse factorielle confirmatoire,
- étudiants universitaires
Abstract
This article presents the validation in French of a scale measuring the social climate of studies as perceived by university students. More specifically, this questionnaire is focused on dimensions concerned with the interpersonal relationships domain as they appear in the College and University Classroom Environment Inventory (CUCEI; Fraser & Treagust, 1986). In a first step, an exploratory factor analysis yields four principal components. In a second step, a confirmatory factor analysis corroborates this structure with the scales Personalization, Involvement, Student Cohesiveness and Satisfaction. The final version consists of 20 items and shows very satisfactory psychometric characteristics.
Keywords:
- Social climate,
- measurement scale,
- confirmatory factor analysis,
- university students
Resumo
Este artigo apresenta a validação em francês de um instrumento que permite apreender o clima social dos estudos, tal como é percepcionado pelos estudantes universitários. Mais especificamente, este utensílio focaliza-se nas dimensões ligadas ao domínio das relações interpessoais, tais como aparecem no College e University Classroom Environment Inventory (CUCEI; Fraser & Treagust, 1986). Num primeiro momento, uma análise factorial exploratória permite evidenciar quatro componentes principais. Num segundo momento, uma análise factorial confirmatória especifica a presença desta estrutura com os factores Personalização, Implicação, Coesão e Satisfação. A versão final comporta 20 itens e possui qualidades psicométricas muito satisfatórias.
Palavras chaves:
- Clima social,
- instrumento de medida,
- análise factorial confirmatória,
- estudantes universitários
Parties annexes
Références
- Aldridge, J.M., Fraser, B.J., & Huang, T.-C. (1999). Investigating classroom environments in Taiwan and Australia with multiple research methods. Journal of Educational Research, 93, 48-62.
- Anderson, G.J., & Walberg, H.J. (1974). Learning environments. In H.J. Walberg (éd.), Evaluating educational performance. A sourcebook of methods, instruments, and examples (pp. 81-98). Berkeley: McCutchan.
- Arbuckle, J.L., & Wothke, W. (1999). Amos 4.0 user’s guide. Chicago: Smallwaters Corporation.
- Aviv, A.L., Zelenski, J.M., Rallo, L., & Larsen, R.J. (2002). Who comes when: personality differences in early and later participation in a university subject pool. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 487-496.
- Bennacer, H. (2005). L’échelle de l’environnement social de la résidence universitaire (EESRU): Adaptation française de University Residence Environment Scale (URES). Orientation Scolaire et Professionnelle, 34, 191-215.
- Bollen, K.A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
- Borich, G., & Klinzing, G. (1984). Some assumptions in the observation of classroom process with suggestions for improving low inference measurement. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 20, 36-44.
- Braskamp, L.A., Caulley, D., & Costin, F. (1979). Student ratings and instructor self-ratings and their relationship to student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 16, 295-306.
- Brekelmans, M., Van den Eeden, P., Terwel, J., & Wubbels, T. (1997). Student characteristics and learning environment interactions in mathematics and physics education: a resource perspective. International Journal of Educational Research, 27, 283-292.
- Byrne, B.M. (1998). Structural Equation Modeling wiht Lisrel, Prelis, and Simplis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Byrne, D.B., Hattie, J.A., & Fraser, B.J. (1986). Student perceptions of preferred classroom learning environment. Journal of Educational Research, 80, 10-18.
- Cheng, Y.C. (1994). Classroom environment and student affective performance: an effective profile. Journal of Experimental Education, 62, 221-239.
- Clark, B.M., & Creswell, J.L. (1979). Participants’ versus nonparticipants’ perception of teacher nonverbal behavior. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 14, 28-36.
- Clarke, J.A. (1990). The reliability of the College and University Classroom Environment Inventory: some Australian data. Psychological Reports, 66, 1339-1342.
- Cohen, P.A. (1981). Student ratings of instruction and student achievement: A metaanalysis of multisection validity studies. Review of Educational Research, 51, 281309.
- Coll, R.K., Taylor, N., & Fisher, D.L. (2002). An Application of the Questionnaire on Teacher Interaction and College and University Classroom Environment Inventory in a multicultural tertiary context. Research in Science and Technological Education, 20, 165-183.
- De Jong, R., & Westerhof, K.J. (2001). The quality of student ratings of teacher behaviour. Learning Environments Research, 4, 51-85.
- Doyle, W. (1977). Paradigms for research on teacher effectiveness. Review of Research in Education, 5, 163-198.
- Eccles, J.S., & Midgley, C. (1989). Stage-environment fit: developmentally appropriate classrooms for young adolescents. In C. Ames & R. Ames (éds), Research on motivation in education: Goals and cognition (vol. 3, pp. 139-186). San Diego: Academic Press.
- Fraser, B.J. (1994). Research on classroom and school climate. In D.L. Gabel (éd.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 493-541). New York: Macmillan.
- Fraser, B.J. (1995). Classroom environments. In L.W. Anderson (éd.), International Encyclopedia of Teaching and Teacher Education (2e éd., pp. 344-348). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
- Fraser, B.J. (1998a). Classroom environment instruments: Development, validity and applications. Learning Environments Research, 1, 7-33.
- Fraser, B.J. (1998b). The birth of a new journal: Editor’s instruction. Learning Environments Research, 1, 1-5.
- Fraser, B.J., & Fisher, D.L. (1982). Predicting students’ outcomes from their perceptions of classroom psychosocial environment. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 498-518.
- Fraser, B.J., Giddings, G.J., & McRobbie, C.J. (1995). Evolution and validation of a personal form of an instrument for assessing science laboratory classroom environments. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 399-422.
- Fraser, B.J., & Treagust, D. (1986). Validity and use of an instrument for assessing classroom psychosocial environment in higher education. Higher Education, 15, 37-57.
- Genoud, P.A. (2006, septembre). Influence of perceived social climate on the motivation of university students. Poster présenté à l’European Conference on Educational Research (ECER), Genève.
- Helmke, A., Schneider, W., & Weinert, F.E. (1986). Quality of instruction and classroom learning outcomes: The German contribution to the IEA classroom environment study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2, 1-18.
- Hu, L., & Bentler, P.M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424-453.
- Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R.T. (1983). Social interdependence and perceived academic and personal support in the classroom. Journal of Social Psychology, 120, 77-82.
- Kline, R.B. (1998). Principles and practice of Structural Equation Modeling. New York: The Guilford Press.
- Levy, J., Den Brok, P., Wubbels, T., & Brekelmans, M. (2003). Students’ perception of interpersonal aspects of the learning environment. Learning Environments Research, 6, 5-36.
- Logan, K.A., Crump, B.J., & Rennie, L.J. (2006). Measuring the computer classroom environment: lessons learned from using a new instrument. Learning Environments Research, 9, 67-93.
- MacCallum, R.C., Browne, M.W., & Sugawara, H.M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130-149.
- Madonna, S., Bailey, G.K., & Wesley, A.L. (1990). Classroom environment and locus of control in identifying high and low self-concept in fourth- and fith-graders. Psychological Reports, 66, 1152-1154.
- Moos, R.H. (1973). Conceptualizations of human environments. American Psychologist, 28, 652-665.
- Moos, R.H., & Trickett, E.J. (1974). Classroom environment scale manual. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.
- Olsson, U.H., Foss, T., Troye, S.V., & Howell, R.D. (2000). The performance of ML, GLS, and WLS estimation in Structural Equation Modeling under conditions of misspecification and nonnormality. Structural Equation Modeling, 7, 557-595.
- Randhawa, B.S., & Michayluk, J.O. (1975). Learning environment in rural and urban classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 12, 265-285.
- Schuh, K.L. (1996). The lecture classroom environment and its effects on change in computer anxiety of students taking computer proficiency classes. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 15, 241-259.
- Schunk, D.H., & Meece, J.L. (1992). Student perceptions in the classroom. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Schwarz, N., Knâuper, B., Hippler, H.-J., Noelle-Neumann, E., & Clark, L. (1991). Rating Scales: Numeric values may change the meaning of scale labels. Public Opinion Quarterly, 55, 570-582.
- Sharma, S., Mukherjee, S., Kumar, A., & Dillon, W.R. (2005). A simulation study to investigate the use of cutoff values for assessing model fit in covariance structure models. Journal of Business Research, 58, 935-943.
- Sinclair, B.B., & Fraser, B.J. (2002). Changing classroom environments in urban middle schools. Learning Environments Research, 5, 301-328.
- Teh, G.P., & Fraser, B.J. (1995). Development and validation of an instrument for assessing the psychosocial environment of computer-assisted learning classrooms. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12, 177-193.
- Walberg, H.J., & Ahlgren, A. (1970). Predictors of the social environment of learning. American Educational Research Journal, 7, 153-167.
- Walker, S.L., & Fraser, B.J. (2005). Development and validation of an instrument for assessing distance education learning environments in higher education: The Distance Education Learning Environments Survey (DELES). Learning Environments Research, 8, 289-308.
- Waxman, H.C. (1991). Investigating classroom and school learning environments: A review of recent research and developments in the field. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 26, 1-4.
- Wong, A.F., Young, D.J., & Fraser, B.J. (1997). A multilevel analysis of learning environments and student attitudes. Educational Psychology, 17, 449-468.
- Wong, N.Y., & Watkins, D. (1996). Self-monitoring as a mediator of person-environment fit: an investigation of Hong Kong mathematics classroom environments. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 223-229.
- Wright, S., & Cowen, E.L. (1982). Student perception of school environment and its relationship to mood, achievement, popularity, and adjustment. American Journal of Community Psychology, 10, 687-703.
- Yarrow, A., & Millwater, J. (1995). Smile: Student modification in learning environments establishing congruence between actual and preferred classroom learning environment. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 30, 11-15.