Résumés
Abstract
In previous publications, gamelan culture has often been associated with heterophonic characteristics. In this paper, I want to show its greater diversity through the analysis of several examples that represent the diversity of music and ensembles in Bali. I also want to demonstrate that the distinction between heterophonic and polyphonic has nothing to do with the melodic characteristics and melodic innovation of Balinese gamelan. In fact, much Balinese music displays polyphonic characteristics. I argue that Balinese music evades general categorization because it often occupies a liminal space between these two textural categories of heterophony and polyphony. In Balinese music, we are faced with a rich and diverse musical culture, which cannot be boxed into a single category.
Keywords:
- elaboration,
- layers,
- payasan,
- Balinese music
Résumé
Dans les publications précédentes, la culture du gamelan a souvent été associée à des caractéristiques hétérophoniques. Dans cet article, je souhaite montrer sa plus grande diversité à travers l’analyse de plusieurs exemples qui représentent la diversité de la musique et des ensembles à Bali. Je souhaite également démontrer que la distinction entre hétérophonie et polyphonie n’a rien à voir avec les caractéristiques mélodiques et l’innovation mélodique du gamelan balinais. En fait, une grande partie de la musique balinaise présente des caractéristiques polyphoniques. Je soutiens que la musique balinaise échappe à toute catégorisation générale parce qu’elle occupe souvent un espace liminaire entre ces deux catégories textuelles que sont l’hétérophonie et la polyphonie. Dans la musique balinaise, nous sommes confrontés à une culture musicale riche et diversifiée, qui ne peut être enfermée dans une seule catégorie.
Mots-clés :
- élaboration,
- couches,
- payasan,
- musique balinaise
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Adler, Christopher. 1998. “Cross-Cultural Hybridity in Music Composition”. Unpublished. https://christopheradler.com/hybridity98.pdf.
- Brady, Samuel and Mark Gotham. 2021. “Texture”, in Open Music Theory. eBook, https://viva.pressbooks.pub/openmusictheory/chapter/texture/.
- Brinner, Benjamin. 1995. Knowing Music, Making Music: Javanese gamelan and the theory of musical competence and interaction. University of Chicago Press.
- Frobenius, Wolf, Peter Cooke, Caroline Bithell, and Izaly Zemtsovsky. “Polyphony.” Grove Music Online. 2001; Accessed 11 Oct. 2024. https://www.oxfordmusiconline.com/grovemusic/view/10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.001.0001/omo-9781561592630-e-0000042927.
- Gold, Lisa 2005. Music in Bali: Experiencing Music, Expressing Culture. Oxford University Press.
- Hood, Mantle and Hardja Susilo. 1967. Music of the Venerable Dark Cloud: The Javanese Gamelan Khjai Mendung. UCLA Institute of Ethnomusicology.
- Morton, David, ed.. 1975. Selected Reports in Ethnomusicology. Department of Music University of California Los Angeles.
- Perlman, Marc 2004. Unplayed melodies: Javanese gamelan and the genesis of music theory. University of California Press.
- Rai, I Wayan. 1996. “Balinese Gamelan Semar Pagulingan Saih Pitu: The Model System”. PhD. diss., University of Maryland.
- Rehding, Alexander and Steven Rings. 2015. The Oxford Handbook of Critical Concepts in Music Theory. Oxford University Press.
- Sandino, Joseph P. 2008. “Recent structural developments in Tabuh Kreasi Gong Kebyar.” Master’s thesis, University of British Columbia). https://doi.org/10.14288/1.0070799.
- Steele, Peter Michael. 2007. “Innovative approaches to melodic elaboration in contemporary Tabuh Kreasi Baru.” PhD. diss., University of British Columbia. https://doi.org/10.14288/1.0100968.
- Sudirana, I. Wayan 2013. “Gamelan gong luang: Ritual, time, place, music, and change in a Balinese sacred ensemble.” PhD diss., University of British Columbia.
- Tenzer, Michael 2000. Gamelan Gong Kebyar: The Art of Twentieth-Century Balinese Music. University of Chicago Press.
- Tenzer, Michael 2015. “Polyphony.” In Oxford Handbook of Music Theory. Oxford University Press.