Résumés
Abstract
This study explored the complex dynamics of student engagement, community of inquiry, and transactional distance in online learning environments. The study analyzed 1,281 participants’ responses to identify the factors contributing to online learning outcomes. The research highlighted the crucial role that transactional distance and community of inquiry play in shaping students’ behavioral engagement and provided insight into their significant impact on participants’ learning experience. Through a stepwise multiple linear regression analysis, the research uncovered the complex relationships among these variables, thereby providing valuable insights for educators and institutions aiming to enhance the online learning experience. The results have significant implications for educational practitioners and policymakers, including practical strategies to increase student engagement and foster a lively community of inquiry in online learning environments. Ultimately, this research is a valuable resource for all those involved in online education, to help them understand the key factors that contribute to successful online learning experiences.
Keywords:
- student engagement,
- transactional distance,
- community of inquiry,
- online learning,
- regression analysis
Veuillez télécharger l’article en PDF pour le lire.
Télécharger
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Alhih, M., Ossiannilsson, E., & Berigel, M. (2017). Levels of interaction provided by online distance education models. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(6), 2733–2748. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01250a
- Arbaugh, J. B., Cleveland-Innes, M., Diaz, S. R., Garrison, D. R., Ice, P., Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. P. (2008). Developing a community of inquiry instrument: Testing a measure of the Community of Inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(3-4), 133–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.06.003
- Baloran, E. T., Hernan, J. T., & Taoy, J. S. (2021). Course satisfaction and student engagement in online learning amid COVID-19 pandemic: A structural equation model. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 22(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.1002721
- Bond, M., & Bergdahl, N. (2022). Student engagement in open, distance, and digital education. In O. Zawacki-Richter & I. Jung (Eds.), Handbook of open, distance and digital education (pp. 1–16). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0351-9_79-1
- Bond, M., Buntins, K., Bedenlier, S., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2020). Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: A systematic evidence map. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0176-8
- Buyarski, C. A., Bloom, J. L., Murray, J. E., & Hutson, B. L. (2011). Engaging families in supporting their students: An appreciative approach. Journal of College Orientation, Transition, and Retention, 19(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.24926/jcotr.v19i1.2779
- Çebi, A. (2023). How e-learning readiness and motivation affect student interactions in distance learning? Education and Information Technologies, 28, 2941–2960. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11312-0
- Chatterjee, S., & Parra, J. (2022). Undergraduate students engagement in formal and informal learning: Applying the community of inquiry framework. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 50(3), 327–355. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395211062552
- Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
- Dewan, M. A. A., Murshed, M., & Lin, F. (2019). Engagement detection in online learning: A review. Smart Learning Environments, 6(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-018-0080-z
- Dharmadjaja, P. N., & Tiatri, S. (2021). The effect of online interaction types and acceptance of technology factors on student satisfaction with online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Proceedings of the International Conference on Economics, Business, Social, and Humanities (pp. 936–942). https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210805.148
- Doo, M. Y., Bonk, C. J., & Heo, H. (2023). Examinations of the relationships between self-efficacy, self-regulation, teaching, cognitive presences, and learning engagement during COVID-19. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(2), 481–504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10187-3
- Doo, M. Y., Bonk, C. J., Shin, C. H., & Woo, B. -D. (2021). Structural relationships among self-regulation, transactional distance, and learning engagement in a large university class using flipped learning. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 41(3), 609–625. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2020.1832020
- Eom, S. B., Wen, H. J., & Ashill, N. (2006). The determinants of students’ perceived learning outcomes and satisfaction in university online education: An empirical investigation. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 4(2), 215–235. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4609.2006.00114.x
- Ergün, E., & Koçak Usluel, Y. (2015). The Turkish adaptation of student’s engagements scale in online learning environment: A study of validity and reliability. Educational Technology Theory and Practice, 5(1), 20–33. https://doi.org/10.17943/etku.64661
- Fabian, K., Smith, S., Taylor-Smith, E., & Meharg, D. (2022). Identifying factors influencing study skills engagement and participation for online learners in higher education during COVID-19. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(6), 1915–1936. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13221
- Febrinzky, I. T. (2020). The influence of student engagement towards learning achievement of School of Communication and Business Telkom University. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Politik Dan Humaniora, 3(1), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.36624/jisora.v3i1.51
- Garrison, D. R. (2007). Online community of inquiry review: Social, cognitive, and teaching presence issues. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11(1), 61–72.
- Hajibayova, L. (2017). Students’ viewpoint: What constitutes presence in an online classroom? Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 55(1), 12–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2016.1241972
- Hambali, N., Zaiton, S. N. ‘Ain H., Sidik, N., Hanib, N. H., Zahid, F. S., & Rahim, N. H. (2022). Exploring online education experience through the teaching, social and cognitive presences. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(10), 1440–1459. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v12-i10/14871
- Harb, J., & Krish, P. (2020). Cognitive presence in a blended learning environment at Jordanian universities. Arab World English Journal, 11(1), 44–51. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no1.4
- Hu, S. (2011). Reconsidering the relationship between student engagement and persistence in college. Innovative Higher Education, 36(2), 97–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-010-9158-4
- Huisman, B., Saab, N., van Driel, J., & van den Broek, P. (2018). Peer feedback on academic writing: Undergraduate students’ peer feedback role, peer feedback perceptions and essay performance. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(6), 955–968. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1424318
- Joksimović, S., Poquet, O., Kovanović, V., Dowell, N., Mills, C., Gašević, D., Dawson, S., Graesser, A. C., & Brooks, C. (2018). How do we model learning at scale? A systematic review of research on MOOCs. Review of Educational Research, 88(1), 43–86. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317740335
- Kang, M., & Im, T. (2013). Factors of learner–instructor interaction which predict perceived learning outcomes in online learning environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(3), 292–301. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12005
- Karaoglan-Yilmaz, F. G., Zhang, K., Ustun, A. B., & Yilmaz, R. (2022). Transactional distance perceptions, student engagement, and course satisfaction in flipped learning: A correlational study. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(2), 447–462. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2091603
- Karasar, N. (2020). Scientific research method: Concepts, principles, techniques. Nobel Publishing.
- Kauffman, H. (2015). A review of predictive factors of student success in and satisfaction with online learning. Research in Learning Technology, 23. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v23.26507
- Klavina, A., & Block, M. E. (2008). The effect of peer tutoring on interaction behaviors in inclusive physical education. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 25(2), 132–158. https://doi.org/10.1123/apaq.25.2.132
- Kucuk, S., & Richardson, J. C. (2019). A structural equation model of predictors of online learners’ engagement and satisfaction. Online Learning, 23(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i2.1455
- Kuo, Y. -C., Walker, A. E., Belland, B. R., & Schroder, K. E. E. (2013). A predictive study of student satisfaction in online education programs. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(1), 16–39. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v14i1.1338
- Lee, Y., & Pillai, V. (2022). The impact of online learning on 7th grade students’ perception of engagement, social presence, and satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Student Research, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v11i3.3685
- Li, L., Zhang, R., & Piper, A. M. (2023). Predictors of student engagement and perceived learning in emergency online education amidst COVID-19: A community of inquiry perspective. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 12, 100326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2023.100326
- Li, Q., Jiang, Q., Liang, J. -C., Pan, X., & Zhao, W. (2022). The influence of teaching motivations on student engagement in an online learning environment in China. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38(6), Article 6. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7280
- Liu, B., Xing, W., Zeng, Y., & Wu, Y. (2022). Linking cognitive processes and learning outcomes: The influence of cognitive presence on learning performance in MOOCs. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(5), 1459–1477. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13193
- Luthfiarini, P., & Susandari. (2022). Pengaruh community of inquiry terhadap student’s satisfaction in online learning di Universitas Islam Bandung. Bandung Conference Series: Psychology Science, 2(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.29313/bcsps.v2i1.1096
- Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learning, 22(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092
- Mayne, L. A., & Wu, Q. (2011). Creating and measuring social presence in online graduate nursing courses. Nursing Education Perspectives, 32(2), 110–114. https://doi.org/10.5480/1536-5026-32.2.110
- McCreery, M. P., Schrader, P. G., Krach, S. K., & Boone, R. (2013). A sense of self: The role of presence in virtual environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1635–1640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.002
- Meyer, K. A. (2014). Student engagement in online learning: What works and why. ASHE Higher Education Report, 40(6), 1–114. https://doi.org/10.1002/aehe.20018
- Mitchell, C., Cours Anderson, K., Laverie, D., & Hass, A. (2021). Distance be damned: The importance of social presence in a pandemic constrained environment. Marketing Education Review, 31(4), 294–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/10528008.2021.1936561
- Moon, J., & Ke, F. (2020). Exploring the relationships among middle school students’ peer interactions, task efficiency, and learning engagement in game-based learning. Simulation & Gaming, 51(3), 310–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878120907940
- Moore, M. G. (1993). Theory of transactional distance. In Keegan, D. (Ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education (pp. 22–38). Routledge.
- Moore, M. G. (2018). The theory of transactional distance. In Moore, M. G. & Diehl, W. C. (Eds.), Handbook of distance education (pp. 32–46). Routledge.
- Muilenburg, L. Y., & Berge, Z. L. (2005). Student barriers to online learning: A factor analytic study. Distance Education, 26(1), 29–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910500081269
- Natarajan, J., & Joseph, M. A. (2022). Impact of emergency remote teaching on nursing students’ engagement, social presence, and satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic. Nursing Forum, 57(1), 42–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12649
- Oyarzun, B., Stefaniak, J., Bol, L., & Morrison, G. R. (2018). Effects of learner-to-learner interactions on social presence, achievement and satisfaction. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30(1), 154–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-017-9157-x
- Öztürk, E. (2012). An adaptation of the community of inquiry index: The study of validity and reliability. Elementary Education Online, 11(2), 408–422.
- Pallant, J. (2001). SPSS survival manual. Maidenhead, PA: Open University.
- Pardales, M. J., & Girod, M. (2006). Community of inquiry: Its past and present future. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 38(3), 299–309. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2006.00196.x
- Picciano, A. G. (2002). Beyond student perceptions: Issues of interaction, presence, and performance in an online course. Online Learning, 6(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v6i1.1870
- Ramadhani, S. A., & Wulandari, L. (2019). The difference of student engagement between Javanese and non-Javanese students who are studying in Malang. Proceedings of the 4th ASEAN Conference on Psychology, Counselling, and Humanities (pp. 288–290). https://doi.org/10.2991/acpch-18.2019.70
- Richardson, J. C., Besser, E., Koehler, A., Lim, J., & Strait, M. (2016). Instructors’ perceptions of instructor presence in online learning environments. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(4). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i4.2330
- Saraç, M., & Doğan, M. (2022). Evaluation of the instructor-student interaction in online classes: Instructors’ perspective. E-International Journal of Educational Research, 13(4), 99–112. https://doi.org/10.19160/e-ijer.1122570
- Setyawati, A., Wijaya, S., & Widjaja, D. C. (2022). The effect of student’s perception of learning innovation on student engagement and student satisfaction. Petra International Journal of Business Studies, 5(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.9744/ijbs.5.2.198-205
- Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2009). Community of inquiry as a theoretical framework to foster “epistemic engagement” and “cognitive presence” in online education. Computers & Education, 52(3), 543–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.10.007
- Shea, P., Hayes, S., & Vickers, J. (2010). Online instructional effort measured through the lens of teaching presence in the community of inquiry framework: A re-examination of measures and approach. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 11(3), 127–154. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v11i3.915
- Starr-Glass, D. (2013). From connectivity to connected learners: Transactional distance and social presence. In C. Wankel & P. Blessinger (Eds.), Increasing student engagement and retention in e-learning environments: Web 2.0 and blended learning technologies (Vol. 6, Part G, pp. 113–143). Emerald Group Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2044-9968(2013)000006G007
- Sun, J. C. -Y., & Rueda, R. (2012). Situational interest, computer self-efficacy and self-regulation: Their impact on student engagement in distance education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43, 191–204. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01157.x
- Sun, Y., Ni, L., Zhao, Y., Shen, X. -L., & Wang, N. (2019). Understanding students’ engagement in MOOCs: An integration of self-determination theory and theory of relationship quality. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(6), e0001. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12724
- Supardi, S., & Ashari, S. (2021). Determinants of vocational student satisfaction levels following online lectures during the COVID-19 pandemic. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 31(3), 677–692. https://doi.org/10.24843/EJA.2021.v31.i03.p12
- Swan, K., Garrison, D. R., & Richardson, J. C. (2009). A constructivist approach to online learning: The community of inquiry framework. In C. Payne (Ed.), Information technology and constructivism in higher education: Progressive learning frameworks (pp. 43–57). IGI Global. https://www.igi-global.com/gateway/chapter/www.igi-global.com/gateway/chapter/23488
- Tadesse, T., & Edo, B. (2020). The relationships between student engagement and learning outcome in the undergraduate sports science program in Ethiopia. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 13(1), 48–62. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-01-2019-0017
- Themeli, C., & Bougia, A. (2016). Tele-proximity: Tele-community of inquiry model. Facial cues for social, cognitive, and teacher presence in distance education. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(6), 145–163. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i6.2453
- van Popta, E., Kral, M., Camp, G., Martens, R. L., & Simons, P. R. -J. (2017). Exploring the value of peer feedback in online learning for the provider. Educational Research Review, 20, 24–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.10.003
- Vaughan, N. D. (2010). A blended community of inquiry approach: Linking student engagement and course redesign. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1), 60–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.007
- Vaughan, N., & Garrison, R. (2006). How blended learning can support a faculty development community of inquiry. Online Learning, 10(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v10i4.1750
- Weidlich, J., & Bastiaens, T. J. (2018). Technology matters: The impact of transactional distance on satisfaction in online distance learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(3). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i3.3417
- Wu, Y. (2016). Factors impacting students’ online learning experience in a learner-centred course. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(5), 416–429. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12142
- Xiao, M., Zhou, J., & Xu, T. (2021). Research on the influence of synchronous interactive class on student online learning engagement. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Education Technology and Computers (pp. 98–104). https://doi.org/10.1145/3436756.3437028
- Xiaoxing, L., & Deris, F. D. (2022). CoI-based teaching practices to promote EFL learners’ online discussion in China’s blended learning context. Asian Journal of University Education, 18(2), 477–488.
- Xue, J., Xu, X., Wu, Y., & Hu, P. (2023). Student perceptions of the community of inquiry framework and satisfaction: Examining the role of academic emotion and self-regulation in a structural model. Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1046737
- Yılmaz, R., & Keser, H. (2015). The adaptation study of transactional distance scale. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 30(4), 91–105.
- Yilmaz, R. (2017). Exploring the role of e-learning readiness on student satisfaction and motivation in flipped classroom. Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 251–260.
- Yu, Z. (2022). Sustaining student roles, digital literacy, learning achievements, and motivation in online learning environments during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 14(8), 4388.
- Zapata-Cuervo, N., Montes-Guerra, M. I., Shin, H. H., Jeong, M., & Cho, M. -H. (2023). Students’ psychological perceptions toward online learning engagement and outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic: A comparative analysis of students in three different countries. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education, 35(2), 108–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/10963758.2021.1907195
- Zhang, A. (2003). Transactional distance in web-based college learning environments: Toward measurement and theory construction [Doctoral dissertation, Virginia Commonwealth University]. LearnTechLib. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/117282
- Zhao, H., & Sullivan, K. P. H. (2017). Teaching presence in computer conferencing learning environments: Effects on interaction, cognition and learning uptake. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 538–551. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12383
- Zilka, G. C., Cohen, R., & Rahimi, I. (2018). Teacher presence and social presence in virtual and blended courses. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 17, 103–126.