Résumés
Abstract
The release of ChatGPT has marked the dawn of a new information revolution that will transform how people communicate and make meaning. However, to date, little is known about the implications of ChatGPT for L2 composition instruction. To address this gap, the present study uses a systematic review design to synthesize available research on the educational potentials of ChatGPT as an instructional assistant, outline the implications of these potentials for L2 writing instruction, and discuss their practical applications. The findings, based on a meta-analysis of 42 research articles, demonstrate that ChatGPT can enhance L2 writing instruction by boosting learners’ motivation, automating instructional tasks, and offering instantaneous, personalized feedback to learners. These findings have important implications for harnessing the instructional potential of generative AI in L2 writing classes.
Keywords:
- artificial intelligence,
- artificial neural network,
- L2 writing,
- AI applications,
- chatbots
Veuillez télécharger l’article en PDF pour le lire.
Télécharger
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Ali, J. K. M., Shamsan, M. A. A., Hezam, T. A., & Mohammed, A. A. (2023). Impact of ChatGPT on learning motivation: Teachers and students’ voices. Journal of English Studies in Arabia Felix, 2(1), 41–49. https://doi.org/10.56540/jesaf.v2i1.51
- Altamimi, A. B. (2023, August). Effectiveness of ChatGPT in essay autograding. In 2023 International Conference on Computing, Electronics & Communications Engineering (iCCECE) (pp. 102–106). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/iCCECE59400.2023.10238541
- Athanassopoulos, S., Manoli, P., Gouvi, M., Lavidas, K., & Komis, V. (2023). The use of ChatGPT as a learning tool to improve foreign language writing in a multilingual and multicultural classroom. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 3(2), 818–824. https://doi.org/10.25082/AMLER.2023.02.009
- Ibrahim. K (2023). Using AI-based classifiers to detect AI-generated texts in ESL composition. Language Testing in Asia,13, 46. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-023-00260-2
- Baidoo-anu, D., & Ansah, L. O. (2023). Education in the era of generative artificial intelligence (AI): Understanding the potential benefits of ChatGPT in promoting teaching and learning. Journal of AI, 7(1), 52–62. https://doi.org/10.61969/jai.1337500n
- Barrot, J. S. (2023). Using ChatGPT for second language writing: Pitfalls and potentials. Assessing Writing, 57, 100745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100745
- Baskara, R., & Mukarto, M. (2023). Exploring the implications of ChatGPT for language learning in higher education. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 343–358. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1391490.pdf
- Bonner, E., Lege, R., & Frazier, E. (2023). Large language model-based artificial intelligence in the language classroom: Practical ideas for teaching. Journal of Teaching English with Technology, 23(1), 23–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.56297/BKAM1691/WIEO1749
- Brown, T., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J. D., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam P., Henighan, T., Child, R., Ramesh, A., Ziegler, D. M., Wu, J., Winter, C., Hesse, C., Chen, M., Sigler, E., Litwin, M., Gray, S., … & Amodei, D. (2020). Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33, 1877-1901. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2005.14165
- Christiano, P. F., Leike, J., Brown, T. B., Martic, M., Legg, S., & Amodei, D. (2017). Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences. In I. Guyon, U. Von Luxburg, S. Bengio, H. Wallach, R. Fergus, S. Vishwanathan, and R. Garnett (Eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems: Vol. 30 (pp. 4299–4307). https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2017/file/d5e2c0adad503c91f91df240d0cd4e49-Paper.pdf
- Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2024). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2), 228–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148
- Dai, W., Lin, J., Jin, H., Li, T., Tsai, Y.-S., Gašević, D., & Chen, G. (2023, July). Can large language models provide feedback to students? A case study on ChatGPT. In 2023 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT) (pp. 323–325). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT58122.2023.00100
- Darvishi, A., Khosravi, H., Abdi, S., Sadiq, S., & Gašević, D. (2022, June). Incorporating training, self-monitoring and AI-assistance to improve peer feedback quality. In Proceedings of the ninth ACM conference on learning@ scale (pp. 35-47). https://doi.org/10.1145/3491140.3528265
- Francke, E., & Alexander, B. (2019). The potential influence of artificial intelligence on plagiarism a higher education perspective. In Proceedings of the European Conference on the Impact of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics (pp. 131–140). EM Normandie Business School, Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-023-00260-2
- Fuchs, K. (2023). Exploring the opportunities and challenges of NLP models in higher education: Is ChatGPT a blessing or a curse? Frontiers in Education, 8, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1166682
- Gao, C. A., Howard, F. M., Markov, N. S., Dyer, E. C., Ramesh, S., Luo, Y., & Pearson, A. T. (2023). Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to real abstracts with detectors and blinded human reviewers. NPJ Digital Medicine, 6, article 75. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-023-00819-6
- Han, J., Yoo, H., Myung, J., Kim, M., Lee, T. Y., Ahn, S.-Y., & Oh, A. (2023). Exploring student-ChatGPT dialogue in EFL writing education. In Thirty-Seventh Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. Neural Information Processing Systems Foundation. https://gaied.org/neurips2023/files/19/19_paper.pdf
- Haque, M. U., Dharmadasa, I., Sworna, Z. T., Rajapakse, R. N., & Ahmad, H. (2022). “I think this is the most disruptive technology”: Exploring sentiments of ChatGPT early adopters using Twitter data. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2212.05856
- Hawanti, S., & Zubaydulloevna, K. M. (2023). AI chatbot-based learning: Alleviating students’ anxiety in English writing classroom. Bulletin of Social Informatics Theory and Application, 7(2), 182–192. https://doi.org/10.31763/businta.v7i2.659
- Hirunyasiri, D., Thomas, D. R., Lin, J., Koedinger, K. R., & Aleven, V. (2023). Comparative analysis of GPT-4 and human graders in evaluating praise given to students in synthetic dialogues. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2307.02018
- Hong, W. C. H. (2023). The impact of ChatGPT on foreign language teaching and learning: Opportunities in education and research. Journal of Educational Technology and Innovation, 5(1). https://jeti.thewsu.org/index.php/cieti/article/view/103
- Hu, K. (2023, February 2). ChatGPT sets record for fastest-growing user base: Analyst note. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/technology/chatgpt-sets-record-fastest-growing-user-base-analyst-note-2023-02-01/
- Huang, J., & Li, S. (2023). Opportunities and challenges in the application of ChatGPT in foreign language teaching. International Journal of Education and Social Science Research, 6(4), 75–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.37500/IJESSR.2023.6406
- Imran, M., & Almusharraf, N. (2023). Analyzing the role of ChatGPT as a writing assistant at higher education level: A systematic review of the literature. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(4), ep464. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13605
- Jia, Q., Young, M., Xiao, Y., Cui, J., Liu, C., Rashid, P., & Gehringer, E. (2022). Insta-reviewer: A data-driven approach for generating instant feedback on students’ project reports. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Educational Data Mining (pp. 5–16). International Educational Data Mining Society. https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.6853098
- Kasneci, E., Seßler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., ... & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education [Position paper]. Department of Educational Sciences, Technische Universität München. https://www.edu.sot.tum.de/fileadmin/w00bed/hctl/_my_direct_uploads/ChatGPT_for_Good_.pdf
- Khalil, M., & Er, E. (2023). Will ChatGPT get you caught? Rethinking of plagiarism detection. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.04335
- Koltovskaia, S. (2020). Student engagement with automated written corrective feedback (AWCF) provided by Grammarly: A multiple case study. Assessing Writing, 44, 100450.
- King, M. R., & ChatGPT. (2023). Editorial: A conversation on artificial intelligence, chatbots, and plagiarism in higher education. Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering, 16, 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12195-022-00754-8
- Kınık, B., & Çetin, H. (2024). Human vs. AI: The use of ChatGPT in writing assessment. In Z. Çetin Köroğlu & A. Çakır (Eds.), Fostering foreign language teaching and learning environments with contemporary technologies (pp. 194–215). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-0353-5.ch009
- Kohnke, L., Moorhouse, B. L., & Zou, D. (2023). ChatGPT for language teaching and learning. RELC Journal, 54(2), 537–550. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231162868
- Kortemeyer, G. (2023). Performance of the pre-trained large language model GPT-4 on automated short answer grading. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2309.09338
- Lage, M. J., Platt, G. J., & Treglia, M. (2000). Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 30–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220480009596759
- Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355
- Ljujić, B., Miljković, J., & Grozdić, V. (2023). ChatGPT and academic writing in higher education. In M. Radulović & M. Trajković, Towards a more equitable education: From research to change (pp. 104–109). Institute for Educational Research. https://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/5759
- Loem, M., Kaneko, M., Takase, S., & Okazaki, N. (2023). Exploring effectiveness of GPT-3 in grammatical error correction: A study on performance and controllability in prompt-based methods. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.18156
- Lund, B. D., & Wang, T. (2023). Chatting about ChatGPT: How may AI and GPT impact academia and libraries? Library Hi Tech News. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4333415
- MacNeil, S., Tran, A., Mogil, D., Bernstein, S., Ross, E., & Huang, Z. (2022, August). Generating diverse code explanations using the GPT-3 large language model. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research, 2, 37–39. https://doi.org/10.1145/3501709.3544280
- Marzuki, Widiati, U., Rusdin, D., Darwin, & Indrawati, I. (2023). The impact of AI writing tools on the content and organization of students’ writing: EFL teachers’ perspective. Cogent Education, 10(2), 2236469. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2236469
- Mhlanga, D. (2023). OpenAI in education, the responsible and ethical use of ChatGPT towards lifelong learning. SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4354422
- OpenAI. (n.d.-b). Overview. Retrieved January 5, 2024, from https://openai.com/chatgpt
- Pardos, Z. A., & Bhandari, S. (2023). Learning gain differences between ChatGPT and human tutor generated algebra hints. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.06871
- Qadir, J. (2022). Engineering education in the era of ChatGPT: Promise and pitfalls of generative AI for education. TechRxiv. https://doi.org/10.36227/techrxiv.21789434.v1
- Radford, A., Narasimhan, K., Salimans, T., & Sutskever, I. (2018). Improving language understanding by generative pre-training. Retrieved June 30, 2023, from https://www.mikecaptain.com/resources/pdf/GPT-1.pdf
- Radford, A., Wu, J., Child, R., Luan, D., Amodei, D., & Sutskever, I. (2019). Language models are unsupervised multitask learners. OpenAI Blog, 1(8), 9. https://insightcivic.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/language-models.pdf
- Rahman, M. M., & Watanobe, Y. (2023). ChatGPT for education and research: Opportunities, threats, and strategies. Applied Sciences, 13(9), 5783 https://doi.org/10.3390/app13095783
- Rakhmonov, I. U., & Kurbonova, R. S. (2023). The pedagogical principles and effectiveness of utilizing ChatGPT for language learning. Research and Education, 2(9), 226–243. https://researchedu.org/index.php/re/article/view/4899
- Rudolph, J., Tan, S., & Tan, S. (2023). ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education? Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 342–363. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9
- Shaikh, S., Yayilgan, S. Y., Klimova, B., & Pikhart, M. (2023). Assessing the usability of ChatGPT for formal English language learning. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology, and Education, 13(9), 1937–1960. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe13090140
- Solaiman, I., Brundage, M., Clark, J., Askell, A., Herbert-Voss, A., Wu, J., Radford, A., Krueger, G., Kim, J. W., Kreps, S., McCain, M., Newhouse, A., Blazakis, J., McGuffie, K., & Wang, J. (2019). Release strategies and the social impacts of language models. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1908.09203
- Sridhar, P., Doyle, A., Agarwal, A., Bogart, C., Savelka, J., & Sakr, M. (2023). Harnessing LLMs in curricular design: Using GPT-4 to support authoring of learning objectives. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2306.17459
- Susnjak, T. (2022). ChatGPT: The end of online exam integrity? arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2212.09292
- Üstünbaş, Ü. (2024). EFL learners’ views about the use of artificial intelligence in giving corrective feedback on writing: A case study. In Z. Çetin Köroğlu & A. Çakır (Eds.), Fostering foreign language teaching and learning environments with contemporary technologies (pp. 115–133). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-0353-5.ch006
- Wambsganss, T., Janson, A., & Leimeister, J. M. (2022). Enhancing argumentative writing with automated feedback and social comparison nudging. Computers & Education, 191, 104644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104644
- Wang, Y., Derakhshan, A., Pan, Z., & Ghiasvand, F. (2023). Chinese EFL teachers’ writing assessment feedback literacy: A scale development and validation study. Assessing Writing, 56, 100726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100726
- Wulandari, F., Astuti, M. T., & Marhamah, M. (2024). Enhancing writing literacy teachers through AI development. Jurnal Onoma: Pendidikan, Bahasa, dan Sastra, 10(1), 246–256. https://doi.org/10.30605/onoma.v10i1.3175
- Yan, D. (2023). Impact of ChatGPT on learners in a L2 writing practicum: An exploratory investigation. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 13943–13967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11742-4
- Yeadon, W., Inyang, O.-O., Mizouri, A., Peach, A., & Testrow, C. (2022). The death of the short-form physics essay in the coming AI revolution. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2212.11661
- Yoon, S.-Y., Miszoglad, E., & Pierce, L. R. (2023). Evaluation of ChatGPT feedback on ELL writers’ coherence and cohesion. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2310.06505
- Young, J. C., & Shishido, M. (2023). Investigating OpenAI’s ChatGPT potentials in generating chatbot’s dialogue for English as a foreign language learning. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 14(6). https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2023.0140607