Résumés
Abstract
This study aimed to systematically compile the activities and applications to be used by instructors to conduct synchronous virtual classrooms effectively. Using specific keywords in various databases we examined the literature to discover the activities and applications associated with effective synchronous virtual classrooms. A total of 70 studies were included in the study, based upon pre-determined criteria. A total of 53 activities and applications for conducting synchronous virtual classrooms effectively were obtained and classified according to Gagné’s nine events of instruction (GNEI). These activities and applications were sorted within 11 themes dimensions: technical control, environment control, clarity, introductory activities, technological tools, course materials, interaction, feedback, summarizing, time management, and self-assessment. Synchronous virtual classrooms conducted according to this classification will serve as a guide for instructors to conduct synchronous virtual classrooms effectively.
Keywords:
- distance education,
- virtual classroom,
- synchronous virtual classroom,
- synchronous course,
- quality course design,
- videoconferencing
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Acosta-Tello, E. (2015). Enhancing the online class: Effective use of synchronous interactive online instruction. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 17, 1–6. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1102879.pdf
- Akyurek, M. İ. (2020). Uzaktan eğitim: Bir alanyazın taraması [Distance education: A literature review]. Medeniyet Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(1), 1–9. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/1029473
- Alenezi, M. (2023). Digital learning and digital institution in higher education. Education Sciences, 13(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13010088
- AlFuqaha, I. N. (2013). Pedagogy redefined: Frameworks of learning approaches prevalent in the current digital information age. Journal of Educational Technology, 10(1), 36–45. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1101795.pdf
- Aydin, B., & Yuzer, T. V. (2006). Building a synchronous virtual classroom in a distance English language teacher training (DELTT) program in Turkey. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 7(2), 9–20. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/156400
- Basaran, M., Ulger, I. G., Demirtas, M., Elif, K. A. R. A., Geyik, C., & Vural, O. F. (2021). Uzaktan eğitim sürecinde öğretmenlerin teknoloji kullanım durumlarının incelenmesi [Examining the technology usage status of teachers in the distance education process]. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 17(37), 4619–4645. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.903870
- Bickle, J. T., Hirudayaraj, M., & Doyle, A. (2019). Social presence theory: Relevance for HRD/VHRD research and practice. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 21(3), 383–399. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422319851477
- Bigné, E., Badenes, A., Ruiz, C., & Andreu, L. (2018). Virtual classroom: Teacher skills to promote student engagement. Journal of Management and Business Education, 1(2), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.35564/jmbe.2018.0008
- Borel D. (2013). The influence of web conferencing on graduate students’ sense of community in an online classroom (Publication No. 3562263) [Doctoral dissertation, Lamar University]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. https://www.proquest.com/docview/1371140073?pq origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true
- Bouhnik, D., & Carmi, G. (2012). E-learning environments in academy: Technology, pedagogy and thinking dispositions. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 11(1), 201–219. https://doi.org/10.28945/1698
- Bower, M. (2016). Deriving a typology of Web 2.0 learning technologies. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(4), 763–777. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12344
- Brodie, R. J., Ilic, A., Juric, B., & Hollebeek, L. (2013). Consumer engagement in a virtual brand community: An exploratory analysis. Journal of Business Research, 66(1), 105–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.07.029
- Cankaya, S., & Durak, G. (2020). Acil uzaktan eğitimde bütüncül sistemler: Microsoft Teams örneği [Holistic systems in emergency distance education: The case of Microsoft Teams]. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi, 14(2), 889–920. https://doi.org/10.17522/balikesirnef.827595
- Cao, Q., Griffin, T. E., & Bai, X. (2009). The importance of synchronous interaction for student satisfaction with course websites. Journal of Information Systems Education, 20(3), 331–338. https://jise.org/volume20/n3/JISEv20n3p331.html
- Choppin, J., Amador, J., Callard, C., & Carson, C. (2020, October 14). Studying a synchronous online course using a community of inquiry framework. In A. I. Sacristán, J. C. Cortés-Zavala, & P. M. Ruiz-Arias (Eds.), Proceedings of the 42nd Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 1782–1790). https:/doi.org/10.51272/pmena.42.2020
- Chowdhury, F. (2020). Virtual classroom: To create a digital education system in Bangladesh. International Journal of Higher Education, 9(3), 129–138. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v9n3p129
- Christopher, D., & Hyder, K. (2014). The successful virtual classroom: How to design and facilitate interactive and engaging live online learning. Amacom.
- Dahmen, U., Schulze, C., Schindler, C., Wick, K., Schwartze, D., Veit, A., & Smolenski, U. (2016). Recommendations to enhance constructivist-based learning in interprofessional education using video-based self-assessment. GMS Journal for Medical Education, 33(2). https://doi.org/10.3205/zma001032
- Dixon, R. A., Hall, C., & Shawon, F. (2019). Using virtual reality and web conferencing technologies: Exploring alternatives for microteaching in a rural region. Northwest Journal of Teacher Education, 14(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.15760/nwjte.2019.14.1.4
- Dos, I. (2014). Sınıfta zaman yönetimi [Time management in classroom]. In T. Argon & S. Nartgün (Eds.), Sınıf yönetimi (pp. 101–129). Maya Yayıncılık.
- Duraku Z. H., & Hoxha N. (2020). The impact of COVID-19, school closure, and social isolation on gifted students’ wellbeing and attitudes toward remote (online) learning. In S. Meinck, J. Fraillon, R. Strietholt R. (Eds.), Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on education and wellbeing (pp. 130–169). International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. https://l24.im/ph7dw4H
- Fasso, W. (2013). First year distance transition pedagogy: Synchronous online classrooms. International Journal of the First Year in Higher Education, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.5204/intjfyhe.v4i1.141
- Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. (2000). How to design and evaluate research in education (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
- Franklin, J. L. (2017). MVP and instructional systems design in online courses. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2017(152), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.20267
- Gagné, R. M., Briggs, L. J., & Wager, W. W. (1988). Principles of instructional design (3rd ed.). Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
- Green, R., Mazzuchi, T., & Sarkani, S. (2010). Understanding the role of synchronous & asynchronous communication in agile software development and its effects on quality. Journal of Information Technology Management, 21(2), 8–23. https://jitm.ubalt.edu/XXI-2/article2.pdf
- Johnson, H. P., Mejia, M. C., & Cook, K. (2015). Successful online courses in California’s community colleges. Public Policy Institute of California. https://www.ppic.org/wp-content/uploads/content/pubs/report/R_615HJR.pdf
- Kidd, R. S., & Stamatakis, M. K. (2006). Comparison of students’ performance in and satisfaction with a clinical pharmacokinetics course delivered live and by interactive videoconferencing. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 70(1). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1636907/pdf/ajpe10.pdf
- Koppelman, H., & Vranken, H. (2008). Experiences with a synchronous virtual classroom in distance education. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 40(3), 194–198. https://doi.org/10.1145/1597849.1384324
- Kowalczyk, N., & Truluck, C. (2013). Literature reviews and systematic reviews: What is the difference? Radiologic Technology, 85(2), 219–222. http://www.radiologictechnology.org/content/85/2/219.extract
- Kuo, Y. C., Walker, A. E., Belland, B. R., Schroder, K. E., & Kuo, Y. T. (2014). A case study of integrating Interwise: Interaction, Internet self-efficacy, and satisfaction in synchronous online learning environments. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(1), 161–181. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i1.1664
- Lahaie, U. (2007). Web-based instruction: Getting faculty onboard. Journal of Professional Nursing, 23(6), 335–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2007.01.024
- Lee, J. M. (2018). Perspectives of learning in synchronous online education (Publication No. 11016823) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2174324992?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true
- Lee, Y., Yang, H. H., MacLeod, J., & Dai, J. (2019). Developing the rotational synchronous teaching (RST) model: Examination of the connected classroom climate. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(1). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.4010
- LeRoy, L. S., & Kaufmann, R. (2022). Identifying student motivations for web cam use in online courses. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2115516
- Maanvizhi, S., Jaiswal, J. N., Narayanan, R. R., & Jain, R. R. (2020). A review on virtual classroom. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, 54(3), 433–437. https://doi.org/10.5530/ijper.54.3s.141
- Martin, F., Parker, M. A., & Deale, D. F. (2012). Examining interactivity in synchronous virtual classrooms. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(3), 228. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i3.1174
- McBrien, J. L., Cheng, R., & Jones, P. (2009). Virtual spaces: Employing a synchronous online classroom to facilitate student engagement in online learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 10(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v10i3.605
- McNeill, L., & Fitch, D. (2022). Microlearning through the lens of Gagne’s nine events of instruction: A qualitative study. TechTrends, 67, 521–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00805-x.
- Moallem, M. (2015). The impact of synchronous and asynchronous communication tools on learner self-regulation, social presence, immediacy, intimacy and satisfaction in collaborative online learning. The Online Journal of Distance Education and e-Learning, 3(3), 55–77. https://tojdel.net/journals/tojdel/articles/v03i03/v03i03-08.pdf
- Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group. (2010). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. International Journal of Surgery, 8(5), 336–341. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135
- Mueller, D., & Strohmeier, S. (2011). Design characteristics of virtual learning environments: State of research. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2505–2516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.017
- Ng, K. C. (2007). Replacing face-to-face tutorials by synchronous online technologies: Challenges and pedagogical implications. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 8(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v8i1.335
- Northey, G., Bucic, T., Chylinski, M., & Govind, R. (2015). Increasing student engagement using asynchronous learning. Journal of Marketing Education, 37(3), 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475315589814
- Ozkok, G. A., & Bulutlu, Ö. (2020). Examination of intention to use synchronous e-classroom environments of university students in distance education programs. Cukurova University Faculty of Education Journal, 49(2), 895–937. https://doi.org/10.14812/cufej.755147
- Racheva, V. (2018). Social aspects of synchronous virtual learning environments. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2048(1), 0200321–0200329. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5082050
- Richey, R. C. (2000), The legacy of Robert M. Gagné. Syracuse University.
- Romiszowski, A. J. (2004). How’s the e-learning baby? Factors leading to success or failure of an educational technology innovation. Educational Technology, 44(1), 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406414525048
- Rovai, A. P., & Downey, J. R. (2010). Why some distance education programs fail while others succeed in a global environment. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(3), 141–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.07.001
- Sae-Khow, J. (2014). Developing of indicators of an e-learning benchmarking model for higher education institutions. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 13(2), 35–43. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1022884.pdf
- Setiawan, F., & Fauzi, A. Z. (2022). Why do not students turn on their cameras during online classes. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute Journal, 5(1), 4529–4539. https://bircu-journal.com/index.php/birci/article/view/4162/pdf
- Simonson, M. (1999). Equivalency theory and distance education. TechTrends, 43(5), 5. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02818157
- Simonson, M., Schlosser, C., & Hanson, D. (1999). Theory and distance education: A new discussion. American Journal of Distance Education, 13(1), 60–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923649909527014
- Stewart, A. R., Harlow, D. B., & DeBacco, K. (2011). Students’ experience of synchronous learning in distributed environments. Distance Education, 32(3), 357–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2011.610289
- Szeto, E. (2015). Community of inquiry as an instructional approach: What effects of teaching, social and cognitive presences are there in blended synchronous learning and teaching? Computers & Education, 81, 191–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.015
- Tipton, P. H., Pulliam, M., Allen, S. H., & Sherwood, C. (2011). Lessons learned: Pointers for successfully teaching via videoconferencing. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 6(1), 27–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2010.07.001
- Tyrväinen, H., Uotinen, S., & Valkonen, L. (2021). Instructor presence in a virtual classroom. Open Education Studies, 3(1), 132–146. https://doi.org/10.1515/edu-2020-0146
- Viera, A. J., & Garrett, J. M. (2005). Understanding interobserver agreement: The kappa statistic. Family Medicine, 37(5), 360–363. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:38150955
- Wang, C. H. (2005). Questioning skills facilitate online synchronous discussions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(4), 303–313. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00138.x
- Watts, L. (2016). Synchronous and asynchronous communication in distance learning: A review of the literature. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 17(1), 23–32. https://www.infoagepub.com/qrde-issue.html?i=p5760190b408a2
- White, E. (2019). Teacher self-assessment of feedback practices in an EFL academic writing class: A reflective case study. In Learning and performance assessment: Concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications. (pp. 1200–1224). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-0420-8.ch057
- Yilmaz, O. (2015). The effects of “live virtual classroom” on students’ achievement and students’ opinions about “live virtual classroom” at distance education. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14(1), 108–115. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fullt xt/EJ1057348.pdf