Résumés
Abstract
In this qualitative study, we analyzed the processes of a collaborative online international learning (COIL) collaboration between two higher education institutions in Japan and the United States from the perspective of the technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge (TPACK) framework. The research question this study aimed to address was: What is the utility of the TPACK framework, as a lens of analysis, for this online cultural exchange? To address this question, we conducted semi-structured interviews with student participants and examined their written works. From the student participants’ learning experiences, we identified evidence of cultural exchange as well as evidence of missed opportunities for cultural exchange arising from the limited knowledge of technology, pedagogy, content, and culture. COIL and TPACK both share a common goal of increasing students’ access to multiple knowledge systems using educational technology. As a result, COIL conceptually aligns well with the TPACK framework. This collaboration showed an ongoing need for the centering of cultural knowledge and cultural exchange in both COIL and TPACK. We, accordingly, outline potential for a TPACCK, a modified TPACK framework to center cultural knowledge in both with the hope of taking steps towards a more culturally sustaining framework of international collaboration.
Keywords:
- collaborative online international learning (COIL),
- technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK),
- culturally sustaining pedagogy,
- online education,
- college teaching
Veuillez télécharger l’article en PDF pour le lire.
Télécharger
Parties annexes
Biographical notes
Sohyeon Bae is a researcher and educator in higher education administration. She completed her Ph.D. in higher, adult, and lifelong education at Michigan State University. Her research interests include international higher education, global rankings, institutional research, teaching and learning, and diversity at higher education institutions. With years of professional experience in various universities worldwide, she tries to better understand how universities work in different local, national, and global contexts and make the voices in the higher education field heard by broader audiences either in the policy or public areas.
Kyle L. Chong (張陳創庭) (he.him.his) is a Ph.D. Candidate of Curriculum, Instruction & Teacher Education at Michigan State University. Kyle is a transnational adoptee born in Taipei, Taiwan raised by Chinese American parents in San Francisco, CA. His teaching and research both sit at the intersections of global, urban, and ethnic studies education. Kyle’s research uses Asian Critical Race Theory and decolonial theory to study the multiple curricular and educational spaces through which young people move and how curriculum can forge stronger coalitional resistance possibilities across educational contexts. Kyle’s dissertation shows how global movements of state discourses of Chinese identities impact the curricular representations and relationalities of Asian diasporic communities. Kyle is a 2023 Curriculum Inquiry Writing Fellow, Residential College of Arts and Humanities Undergraduate Teaching and Learning Fellow, and an Inaugural Asian Pacific American Studies Fellow at Michigan State. Kyle holds Graduate Certificates in Qualitative Research Methods, Urban Education, and Online College Teaching, and a B.A. in Political Theory from the University of Puget Sound where he was a Trimble Distinguished Asia Scholar.
Bibliography
- Appiah-Kubi, P., & Annan, E. (2020). A review of a collaborative online international learning. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 10(1), 109–124. https://ecommons.udayton.edu/enm_fac_pub/2
- Benton-Borghi, B. H. (2013). A universally designed for learning (UDL) infused technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) practitioners’ model essential for teacher preparation in the 21st century. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 48(2), 245–265. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.48.2.g
- Benton-Borghi, B. H. (2016). Universal design for learning (UDL) infused technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) model prepares efficacious 21st-century teachers. In M. C. Herring, M. J. Koehler, & P. Mishra (Eds.), Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) for educators (pp. 143–165). Routledge.
- Carter Andrews, D. J. (2021). Preparing teachers to be culturally multidimensional: Designing and implementing teacher preparation programs for pedagogical relevance, responsiveness, and sustenance. The Educational Forum, 85(4), 416–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131725.2021.1957638
- Dalal, M., Archambault, L., & Shelton, C. (2021). Fostering the growth of TPACK among international teachers of developing nations through a cultural exchange program. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 37(1), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.5964
- Dirkx, J. M. (1998). Transformative learning theory in the practice of adult education: An overview. PAACE Journal of Lifelong Learning, 7, 1–14. https://www.iup.edu/pse/files/programs/graduate_programs_r/instructional_design_and_technology_ma/paace_journal_of_lifelong_learning/volume_7,_1998/dirkx1998.pdf
- Hackett, S., Janssen, J., Beach, P., Perreault, M., Beelen, J., & van Tartwijk, J. (2023). The effectiveness of Collaborative Online International Learning (COIL) on intercultural competence development in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, Article 5. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41239-022-00373-3
- Harro, B. (2000). The cycle of socialization. In M. Adams, W. Blumenfeld, R. Castaneda, H. Hackman, M. Peters. & X. Zuniga (Eds.), Readings for diversity and social justice (pp. 16-21). Routledge.
- Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020, March 27). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. EDUCAUSE Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning#fn6
- Keeler, C. G. (2008). When curriculum and technology meet: Technology integration in methods courses. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education 25(1), 23–30. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10402454.2008.10784605
- Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education Journal, 9(1), 60–70. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/29544/
- Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Cain, W. (2013). What is Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK)? Journal of Education, 193(3), 13-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741319300303
- Laal, M., & Ghodsi, S. M. (2012). Benefits of collaborative learning. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 486–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.091
- MacKinnon, G. R. (2017). Highlighting the importance of context in the TPACK model: Three cases of non-traditional settings. Issues and Trends in Educational Technology, 5(1), 4–16. https://doi.org/10.2458/azu_itet_v5i1_mackinnon
- OECD. (2020). Education at a glance 2020. https://doi.org/10.1787/69096873-en
- Paris, D., & Alim, H. S. (2014). What are we seeking to sustain through culturally sustaining pedagogy? A loving critique forward. Harvard Educational Review, 84(1), 85–100. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.84.1.982l873k2ht16m77
- Porras-Hernández, L. H., & Salinas-Amescua, B. (2013). Strengthening TPACK: A broader notion of context and the use of teacher’s narratives to reveal knowledge construction. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 48(2), 223–244. http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/EC.48.2.f
- Shahjahan, R. A., & Kezar, A. J. (2013). Beyond the “national container” addressing methodological nationalism in higher education research. Educational Researcher, 42(1), 20–29. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12463050
- SUNY COIL Center. (2018). Faculty guide for Collaborative Online International Learning course development (Version 1.4). http://www.ufic.ufl.edu/uap/forms/coil_guide.pdf
- Suter, W. N. (2011). Introduction to educational research: A critical thinking approach. Sage.
- Swallow, M. J. C., & Olofson, M. W. (2017). Contextual understandings in the TPACK framework. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 49(3–4), 228–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2017.1347537
- Tatum, B. D. (2000). The complexity of identity: “Who am I?.” In M. Adams, W.J. Blumenfeld, H.W. Hackman, X. Zuniga, & M.L. Peters (Eds.), Readings for diversity and social justice: An anthology on racism, sexism, anti-semitism, heterosexism, classism and ableism (pp. 9-14). Routledge.
- Tanhueco-Nepomuceno, L. (2019). Internationalization among selected HEIs in the ASEAN region: Basis for a proposed framework for an internationalized campus. International Journal of Educational Development, 65, 152–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2018.07.003
- Vahed, A., & Rodriguez, K. (2021). Enriching students’ engaged learning experiences through the collaborative online international learning project. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 58(5), 596–605. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2020.1792331
- Williams, M., & Moser, T. (2019). The art of coding and thematic exploration in qualitative research. International Management Review, 15(1), 45–72. https://doi.org/info:doi/