Résumés
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has forced universities to conduct online learning, requiring lecturers to create innovative e-learning methods and students to be ready to adapt and show high interest in learning. This study aimed to examine the effect of an integrative e-learning method on students’ readiness and interest in learning at Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia. This research was experimental, designed with one group pretest and posttest, and no control group. As many as 190 students participated, selected using clustered random sampling. Two measurement scales were used: the readiness for change scale and the interest in learning scale. The statistical analysis technique used was a paired sample t-test. The results of paired sample t-test analysis on readiness for change (p = 0.000; p < 0.05) and interest in learning (p = 0.000; p < 0.05) showed significant differences between the pretest and posttest data. The findings indicated that students who participate in integrative e-learning show significant change in the level of readiness and interest in learning.
Keywords:
- integrative e-learning,
- change readiness,
- interest in learning,
- university student
Veuillez télécharger l’article en PDF pour le lire.
Télécharger
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Abrantes, J. L., Seabra, C., & Lages, L. F. (2007). Pedagogical affect, student interest, and learning performance. Journal of Business Research, 60(9), 960-964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.10.026
- Ainley, M., Hillman, K., & Hidi, S. (2002). Gender and interest processes in response to literary texts: Situational and individual interest. Learning and Instruction, 12(4), 411-428. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00008-1
- Alqahtani, M., & Mohammad, H. (2015). Mobile applications’ impact on student performance and satisfaction. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14(4), 102-112. http://www.tojet.net/articles/v14i4/14410.pdf
- Arbaugh, J. B. (2005). Is there an optimal design for online MBA courses. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 4(2), 135-149. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2005.17268561
- Aydin, C. H., & Tasci, D. (2005). Measuring readiness for e-learning: Reflections from an emerging country. Educational Technology and Society, 8(4), 244-257. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.8.4.244
- Babiker, M. E. (2015). For effective use of multimedia in education, teachers must develop their own educational multimedia applications. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14(4), 62-68. http://www.tojet.net/articles/v14i4/1446.pdf
- Bandura, A. (1997). Self efficacy. W.H. Freeman and Company.
- Bolliger, D. U., & Wasilik, O. (2009). Factors influencing faculty satisfaction with online teaching in higher education. Distance Education, 30(1), 103-116. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910902845949
- Bolton, R. N., & Drew, J. H. (1991). A longitudinal analysis of the impact of service changes on customer attitudes. Journal of Marketing, 55(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.2307/1252199
- Dahiya, S., Jaggi, S., Chaturvedi, K. K., Bhardwaj, A., Goyal, R. C., & Varghese, C. (2016). An e-learning system for agricultural education. Indian Research Journal of Extension Education, 12(3), 132-135.
- Djaali. (2013). Psikologi pendidikan [Educational psychology]. Bumi Aksara.
- Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(5), 319-339. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
- Flew, T. (2008). New media: An introduction. Oxford University Press.
- George, A.S., & George, A.S.H. (2020). Industrial revolution 5.0: the transformation of the modern manufacturing process to enable man and machine to work hand in hand. Journal of Seybold Report, 15(9), 214-234. https://seyboldjournal.com/industrial-revolution-5-0-the-transformation-of-the-modern-manufacturing-process-to-enable-man-and-machine-to-work-hand-in-hand/
- Ghavifekr, S., & Rosdy, W. A. W. (2015). Teaching and learning with technology: Effectiveness of ICT integration in schools. International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), 1(2), 175-191. https://ijres.net/index.php/ijres/article/view/79
- Hamalik, O. (2003). Manajemen belajar di perguruan tinggi [Learning management at higher education]. Sinar Baru Algensindo.
- Hamel, G., & Välikangas. (2003, September). The quest for resilience. Harvard Business Review, 81(9), 52-63. https://hbr.org/2003/09/the-quest-for-resilience
- Hidi, S. (2006). Interest: A unique motivational variable. Educational Research Review, 1(2), 69-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2006.09.001
- Holt, D. T., Armenakis, A. A., Field, H. S., & Harris, S. G. (2007). Readiness for organizational change: The systematic development of a scale. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 43(2), 99-112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886306295295
- Katz, I., Assor, A., Kanat-Maymon, Y., & Bereby-Meyer, Y. (2006). Interest as a motivational resource: Feedback and gender matter, but interest makes the difference. Social Psychology of Education, 9, 27-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-005-2863-7
- Kotera, Y., Green, P., Rhodes, C., Williams, A., Chircop, J., Spink, R., Rawson, R., & Okere, U. (2020). Dealing with isolation using online morning huddles for university lecturers during physical distancing by COVID-19: Field notes. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(4), 238-244. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v21i4.4843
- Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2009). Manajemen pemasaran [Marketing management]. PT Indeks.
- Kotler, P. (2003). Marketing management (11th ed.). Prentice Hall International.
- Krapp, A. (2002). Structural and dynamic aspects of interest development: Theoretical considerations from an ontogenetic perspective. Learning and Instruction, 12(4), 383-409. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00011-1
- Mohammad, H., Fayyoumi, A., & AlShathry, O. (2015). Do we have to prohibit the use of mobile phones in classrooms? International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technology, 9(2), 54-57. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v9i2.4394
- Nemeth, J., & Long, J. G. (2012). Assessing learning outcomes in U.S. planning studio courses. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 32(4), 476-490. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0739456X12453740
- Ozdamar-Keskin, N., Ozata, F. Z., Banar, K., & Royle, K. (2015). Examining digital literacy competences and learning habits of open and distance learners. Contemporary Educational Technology, 6(1), 74-90. http://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/6140
- Rada, R. (2001). Understanding virtual universities. Intellect.
- Rafferty, A. E., Jimmieson, N. L., & Armenakis, A. A. (2013). Change readiness: A multilevel review. Journal of Management, 39(1), 110-135. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312457417
- Serin, H. (2017). The role of passion in learning and teaching. International Journal of Social Sciences and Educational Studies, 4(1), 60-64. https://doi.org/10.23918/ijsses.v4i1p60
- Shopova, T. (2014). Digital literacy of students and its improvement at the University. Journal of Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, 7(2), 26-32. https://doi.org/10.7160/eriesj.2014.070201
- Sardiman. (2009). Interaksi dan motivasi belajar mengajar [Teaching and learning interaction and motivation]. PT Raja Grasindo Persada.
- Van Brakel, P., & Chisenga, J. (2003). Impact of ICT-based distance learning: The African story. The Electronic Library, 21(5), 476-486. https://doi.org/10.1108/02640470310499867
- Wang, Z., & Adesope, O. (2016). Exploring the effects of seductive details with the 4-phase model of interest. Learning and Motivation, 55, 65-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2016.06.003
- Woolfolk, A. (2010). Educational psychology: Active learning edition. Pustaka Pelajar.