Résumés
Abstract
In this paper I question the primacy of argumentation relying solely on logic by showing how the body and mind are deeply connected and as a result how communication and argumentation are a product of this mind/body connection. In particular, I explore the physicality of argumentation through the research and writings on gestures and the embodied mind. Michael Gilbert’s theory of multi-modal argumentation provides the general approach for this elaboration.
Keywords:
- argument1,
- argument2,
- embodied mind,
- emotional mode,
- gesture,
- gesture-speech unity,
- information packaging hypothesis,
- kisceral mode,
- logical mode,
- multi-modal argumentation,
- physical or visceral mode,
- spacio-motoric thinking
Résumé
Dans cet article, je questionne la primauté de l'argumentation qui repose uniquement sur la logique en montrant comment le corps et l'esprit sont profondément connectés et par conséquent comment la communication et l'argumentation sont le produit de cette connexion esprit/corps. En particulier, j'explore la physicalité de l'argumentation à travers la recherche et les écrits sur les gestes et l'esprit incarné. La théorie de l'argumentation multimodale de Michael Gilbert fournit l'approche générale de cette élaboration.
Veuillez télécharger l’article en PDF pour le lire.
Télécharger
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Britzman, Deborah P. 2021. Anticipating education. Gorham, Maine. Myers Education Press.
- Church, R. Breckenridge, Martha W. Alibali, Spencer D. Kelly (Eds.). 2017. Why gesture? How the hands function in speaking, thinking and communicating. Amsterdam, NL. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
- De Freitas, Elizabeth and Sinclair, Nathalie. 2014. Mathematics and the body. Cambridge, UK. Cambridge University Press.
- Dodds, E.R. 1959. Plato Gorgias. Oxford, UK. Clarendon Press.
- Duran, C. and Hamamé, E. 2022. Diversity in argumentation theory. In Proceedings of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation Conference, Vol. 12. Ed. Julie Cook. URL: <https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/ossaarchive/OSSA12/Thursday/19/>
- Ferrara, F. and Nemirovsky, R. 2005. Connecting talk, gesture, and eye motion for the microanalysis of mathematics learning. In Proceedings of the 29th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vol. 1. Eds. H. L. Chick and J. L. Vincent, 138-142. Melbourne PME.
- Gilbert, Michael A. 1997. Coalescent argumentation. Mahwah, US. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Taylor & Francis Inc.
- Ginsburg, Carl. 2016. Body-image, movement and consciousness: Examples from somatic practice in the Feldenkrais method. In The view from within. Eds. Varela, Francisco and Jonathan Shear, 79-91. Bowling Green, OH. Imprint Academic.
- O’Keefe, D.J.O. 1977. Two concepts of argument. Journal of the American Forensic Association 13: 121-128.
- Phillips, Adam. 1999. The beast in the nursery: On curiosity and other appetites. New York, NY. Pantheon Books.
- Rotman, Brian. 1993. The ghost in Turing’s machine. Taking god out of mathematics and putting the body back in. Stanford University Press.
- Thompson, Evans. 2007. Mind in Life. Cambridge, MA. The Belknap Press, Harvard University Press.
- Varela, Francisco and Shear, Jonathan (editors). (1999). The view from within. Exeter, UK. Imprint Academic.
- Varela, Francisco, Thompson, Evans and Rosch, Eleanor. 2016. The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Revised edition. Cambridge, MA. The MIT Press.