Résumés
Abstract
My essay, “Multi-modal argumentation” was published in the journal, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, in 1994. This information appeared again in my book, Coalescent argumentation in 1997. In the ensuing twenty years, there have been many changes in argumentation theory, and I would like to take this opportunity to examine my now middle-aged theory in light of the developments in our discipline. I will begin by relating how a once keen intended lawyer and then formal logician ended up in argumentation theory. (If you do not care to read this bit of autobiography, skip to Section 2).
Keywords:
- context,
- emotion,
- multi-modal argumentation,
- kisceral,
- logical,
- visceral
Résumé
Mon essai « Multi-Modal Argumentation » a été publié dans la revue savante Philosophy of the Social Sciences en 1994. Cette information est réapparue dans mon livre, Coalescent Argumentation en 1997. Au cours des 20 années qui ont suivi, il y a eu de nombreux changements dans la théorie de l'argumentation, et j'aimerais profiter de cette occasion pour examiner ma théorie maintenant d'âge moyen à la lumière des développements dans notre discipline. Je commencerai par raconter comment un juriste passionné, puis logicien formel, s'est retrouvé dans la théorie de l'argumentation. (Si cette information autobiographique ne vous intéresse pas, passez à la section 2).
Veuillez télécharger l’article en PDF pour le lire.
Télécharger
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Ben-Ze'ev, A. 1995. Emotions and argumentation. Informal Logic 17(2): 189-200.
- Burleson, Brant B., and Sally Planalp. 2000. Producing emotion(al) messages. Communication Theory 10(2): 221-250.
- Carozza, Linda. 2007. Dissent in the midst of emotional territory. Informal Logic 27(2).
- Damasio, Antonio R. 1994. Descartes' error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: G.P. Putnam.
- DePaul, Michael R., and William Ramsey. 1997. Rethinking intuition: The psychology of intuition and its role in philosophical inquiry. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
- Duran, Claudio. 2006. Analysis of arguments in political propaganda: The case of the Chilean press 1970-1973. ISSA: Proceedings of the Sixth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation 14: 359-366.
- Edelsky, C., and Deborah Tannen. 1993. Who's got the floor? In Gender and conversational interaction 327. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Fricker, Miranda. 1995. Intuition and reason. Philosophical Quarterly 45(179): 181-189.
- Gilbert, Michael A. 1994a. Feminism, argumentation and coalescence. Informal Logic 16(2): 95-113.
- Gilbert, Michael A. 1994b. Multi-modal argumentation. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 24(2): 159-177.
- Gilbert, Michael A. 1995. What is an emotional argument, or, why do argumentation theorists argue with their mates?" Proceedings of the Third Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation, Amsterdam, NL, 1995.
- Gilbert, Michael A. 1997. Coalescent argumentation. Mahwah, N.J.: Routledge.
- Gilbert, Michael A. 2002a. Effing the ineffable: The logocentric fallacy in argumentation. Argumentation 16(1): 21-32.
- Gilbert, Michael A. 2002b. Let's talk: Emotion and the pragma-dialectic model." Proceedings of the Third Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation, Amsterdam, NL, 2003.
- Gilbert, Michael A. 2004. Emotion, argumentation and informal logic." Informal Logic 24(3): 245-264.
- Gilbert, Michael A. 2005. Let's talk: Emotion and the pragma-dialectic model. In Argumentation in Practice, eds. F. H. v Eemeren and P. Houtlosser, 43-52. Holland: John Benjamins.
- Gilbert, Michael A. 2010. Reason and intuition: The kisceral mode of communication. Seventh Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation 2010, at Amsterdam., Amsterdam, June 2010.
- Gilbert, Michael A. 2017. Argumentando se entiende la gente. Trans. Fernando Leal Carretero. 1st ed. Guadalajara: Editorial Universitaria: Universidad de Guadalajara. Original edition, Arguing with people, Broadview Press, 2014.
- Godden, David M. 2003. Arguing at cross-purposes: Discharging the dialectical obligations of the coalescent model of argumentation. Argumentation 17(2): 219-243.
- O'Keefe, Barbara. 1988. The logic of message design: Individual differences in reasoning about communication. Communication Monographs 55: 80-103.
- O'Keefe, Daniel J. 1977. Two concepts of argument. JAFA: Journal of the American Forensic Association 13(3): 121-128.
- Perelman, Chaim and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca. 1969. The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation. Trans. John Wilkinson and Purcell Weaver. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
- Plantin, Christian. 1999. Arguing emotions. Proceedings of the Fourth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation, Amsterdam, NL, 1999.
- Rooney, Phyllis. 2010. Philosophy, adversarial argumentation, and embattled reason. Informal Logic 30(3): 203-234.
- Sosa, David. 2006. Scepticism about intuition. Philosophy: The Journal of the Royal Institute of Philosophy 81 (318): 633-647.
- Tindale, Christopher W. 2015. The philosophy of argument and audience reception. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- van Eemeren, F., and R. Grootendorst. 1987. Fallacies In pragma-dialetic perspective. Argumentation 1(3): 283-302.
- Walton, Douglas. 1992. The place of emotion in argument. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
- Willard, Charles A. 1989. A theory of argumentation. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
- Wohlrapp, Harald. 2006. Who is afraid of emotion in argument? ISSA: Proceedings of the Sixth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation 2: 673-678.