The Social Nature of Argumentative Practices: The Philosophy of Argument and Audience Reception

Olmos, Paula

doi:https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v38i1.5071

Feilke, H. (1996). “From Syntactical to Texual Strategies of Argumentation. Syntactical Development in Written Argumentative Texts by Students Aged 10 to 22”, Argumentation 10(2): 197-212.

10.1007/bf00180725 Google Scholar

Hamblin, C.L. (1970). Fallacies. London, Methuen and Co.

Google Scholar

Mercier, H. & D. Sperber (2011). “Why Do Humans Reason? Arguments for an Argumentative Theory”, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34(2): 57-74.

10.1017/s0140525x10000968 Google Scholar

Mercier, H. & D. Sperber (2017). The Enigma of Reason. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

Google Scholar

Olmos, P. (2007). “Making it public: Testimony and socially sanctioned common grounds”. Informal Logic 27(2): 211-227.

10.22329/il.v27i2.476 Google Scholar

Olmos, P. (2008). “Situated practices of testimony. A rhetorical approach”. Theoria 23(1): 57-68.

Google Scholar

Olmos, P. (2015). “De entimemas, epiqueremas y esquemas”. En. H. Marraud y P. Olmos (eds.) De la demostración a la argumentación. Ensayos en honor de Luis Vega (pp. 197-215). Madrid: Publicaciones UAM.

10.15366/demost.argum2015.013 Google Scholar

Tindale, C.W. (1999). Acts of Arguing: A Rhetorical Model of Argument. Albany, NY SUNY Press

Google Scholar

Tindale, C.W. (2017). “Narratives and the Concept of Argument”. In P. Olmos, ed., Narration as Argument, pp. 11-30. Amsterdam, Springer.

Google Scholar

The Social Nature of Argumentative Practices: The Philosophy of Argument and Audience Reception[Notice]

Bibliography

Parties annexes

Bibliography

Outils de citation

Citer cet article

Exporter la notice de cet article